Help Save Trails in Montana

Apr 24, 2015 at 8:23
by Anders Broste  
The Ten Lakes Scenic Area East of Eureka provides some of the best true backcountry alpine riding in the state. This type of trail access is becoming increasingly endangered with recent closures in Montana and Idaho. The Ten Lakes Travel Management Proposed Action recommends reducing trails open to mountain biking from 85.9 miles to 16.4 miles.

Mountain bikes are already an established use in the Ten Lakes area and should continue to be allowed. Banning them disenfranchises a significant user group creating conflict among users that are otherwise very supportive of preserving natural spaces and enjoying the outdoors in a non-motorized environment.

Mountain biking is growing and has a positive impact on local Montana economies without major impact on natural resources. We also encourage more research on the impact of mountain bikes in the Ten Lakes area in relation to other user groups before banning them.



The Forest Service is accepting comments on the plan until May 14th. Please take the time to comment on the plan before then to preserve mountain biking in this unique part of our state.

Send all comments to:
comments-northern-kootenai-fortine@fs.fed.us - Please include "Ten Lakes Travel Management" in the subject line.

More Information:
www.fs.usda.gov

Author Info:
mtnman4life avatar

Member since May 29, 2008
2 articles
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

17 Comments
  • 11 0
 You can read the Forest Service's proposal and see maps of the area here: www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=46784

A quick pic from the area - there's precious few areas in the U.S. where bikes are still allowed in areas like this: tinyurl.com/odap2bp

And it's not just the Ten Lakes area - the Bitterroot, south of Missoula, stands to lose a ton of trails to biking in the near future. The Bitterroot Backcountry Cyclists (www.bitterrootbackcountrycyclists.org/home) have been maintaining the trails in that area for years, and now they're about to get shut out of the very trails that they were upkeeping.

And in the Flathead National Forest, a proposed management plan is adding around 100,000 acres of recommended wilderness where bikes are likely to be banned. This is in a forest where almost 50% of it is already closed to bikes due to designated Wilderness.

Conflicts on these trails are rarely an issue. This being western Montana, there just aren't that many people. It's rare to see another person on these trails, and it's even more rare that trail users don't get along. There's hundreds of miles of trail on the forest that are disappearing because there's simply not enough people using them and maintaining them. The Forest Service needs more users on these trails, not less.

Flathead Fat Tires (www.flatheadfattires.com) is the local bike group that's doing its best to deal with the Ten Lakes issue, but they're a small club and they don't have a ton of members. Going up against some of the nationally supported wilderness groups is a tall order, so any support and comments that you can send along to the Forest Service will be a huuuge help.
  • 5 0
 Oh crap! How does the environmental impact have anything to do with the closures? The USFS knows by now that horses have a greater impact on lands than mountain bikes. So, I wonder who is lobbying this wilderness designation?
  • 2 0
 According to Forest Supervisor King in her ROD for the Bitterroot Travel Plan: "allowing uses that do not conform to wilderness character creates a constituency that will have a strong propensity to oppose recommendation and any subsequent designation legislation. Management actions that create this operating environment will complicate the decision process for Forest Service managers and members of Congress. It is important that when the wilderness recommendations are made to Congress that they be unencumbered with issues that are exclusive to the wilderness allocation decision." They are basing their decisions on fear of another lawsuit like the one brought by the Montana Wilderness Association, Greater Yellowstone Coalition, and the WIlderness Society when the Forest Service made a decision that these groups didn't like because it continued to allow biking in the Hyalite-Porcupine-Buffalo Horn WSA. The Forest Service is probably still trying to pay for that lawsuit
  • 1 0
 Interesting, Thanks much for the info. I'm all for wilderness designations for land preservation, however, like other bikers the definition of "wilderness" needs to be modified. Groups like the Sierra Club and others have strong special interest and until the gov modifies the definitions of "wilderness" and either allow mountain biking or ban horses in wilderness I find the whole thing hypocritical. Anyway, thanks again for the insight.
  • 2 0
 We are facing the loss of some of the best singletrack back country alpine riding areas with these travel plans from the Forest Service. The Bitterroot Backcountry Cyclists put together a petition that is making the rounds. Please sign it and pass it around. We need all the help we can get out here!
petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/allow-mountain-bikes-wilderness-study-areas-and-recommended-wilderness-areas
  • 2 0
 Lost the Beaverhead 5 years ago, Gallatin Crest about the same time. Almost lost the Stateline trail until a snowmobile lawsuit saved our butts temporarily. 180 miles about to be lost in the Bitterroot. (Too late to comment there) Now the Ten Lakes. Once Lolo and Flathead finish their plans probably around 1,000 miles of single track will be lost.

Almost all trails that no one hikes, no one rides horses on, and mountain bikers maintain. Always tempted to see whatever happened to some trails in the Beaverhead, probably disappeared by now.
  • 2 0
 BTW; if you make a comment during the "comment period", you will have the "right to appeal" the decision if it does not go the way you would like. This is part of the NEPA rules. Just sayin'. Perhaps its time to redefine 'mechanized'.
  • 2 0
 Oh, and to be clear, the comments must be received by the Forest Service manager by the close of the comment period (May 14th). I realize I am just clarifying this from the article above, but I just thought it would be better to not leave questions to the process.
As mentioned above...
Send all comments to:
comments-northern-kootenai-fortine@fs.fed.us - Please include "Ten Lakes Travel Management" in the subject line.
  • 2 0
 I just sent the following. Use any part of it you would like (minus the part in quotes):

I would like to submit my comment for consideration in regard to excluding mountain bikes from the Ten Lakes scenic area in Eureka, MT. As an avid cyclist with a strong knowledge of trail maintenance, etiquette, and the value of human powered exploration and travel, I strongly suggest mountain biking remain open in the Ten Lakes area and be included in the travel management plans without any further restriction. Mountain biking is clean, healthy, and quiet. Mountain biking can be done with minimal impact on trails and without complicating travel management issues.

If traffic conflicts, etiquette, or appropriate conditions of use are the problem, they can be addressed with education, not restriction. Take for example the city of Boise’s Ridge to Rivers program and the voluntary use of the TrailSmart education program. This type of program, if well promoted to trail users, can save maintenance, conflicts, and safeguard other trail users and create a more harmonious trail use environment. Please see the following link for more information. www.trailsmart.org

"If the Forest Service or any land management agency is interested in this program, it can be licensed for free by the agency. I produced the program and gave it to the City of Boise and will do it again with your agency in exchange the travel management plans do not include restrictions on mountain bikes in the Ten Lakes scenic area."

Please keep me informed of this decision on this issue.

Best regards,

Brian Wiley
  • 2 0
 Comment sent. Disgusting to see bikers shut out of the few areas we have left. In my experiences across the nation, biking clubs play the biggest role in maintaining trails of any user group out there, and we're becoming the fastest growing group to get shut out. It happened with dirt bikers a long time ago, and it's happening with bikes now in a lot of places.
  • 2 0
 Done...was sad what they did here in the Beaverhead Nat'l Forest. For future sake guys, I would recommend creating a template and click through link that auto-populates and email for people to send...seems trivial but people simply wont do this otherwise.
  • 1 0
 I live in Montana and have our lands locked up over the years. #1 thing I see is forest service states they are understaffed so they keeps many access points locked so they don't have to patrol those areas. #2 State and Federal lands get sold to big money people for "preservation". At the age of 36 I have seen my access more than cut in half since childhood.
  • 1 0
 I was super stoked when I first moved here seeing all the amazing terrain. Quickly learned how difficult it is to gain access to any of it.
  • 2 0
 Thanks Guys!
  • 2 0
 SAVE THE TRAILS!!!
  • 1 0
 No. Thank You @PeteMarv!!
  • 1 0
 Forest service Extended the comment period until the 29th







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.029909
Mobile Version of Website