you kidding me, you know aboustly nothing about quads

 yea okay bud, and im guessing you know everything about them?

 dude cats are sick, you just never owned one, these bikes got loades of power, the same if not more then the grizzly 700, cat just has a bad rep because of there sleds, but there quads are sooo good, i smoked a grizzly 700 with 28' mud lites through a hole with this thing the grizzly got stuck twice, and i diddent get stuck once.

 i have drove every differnet kind of fourwheeler there is, and i can assure you, cats are the worst bike goin. you think just because a guy on a grizzly got stuck and you didnt means that your bike is better. its not just bike bud, its mostly the driver. for instance. i was out on my YZ125 this weekend with a friend on a kingquad 450. we went through a 3 foot mud hole. he got stuck. i didnt. and i know for a fact that the kingquads are a good bike. but it pretty much all depends on the driver.

 still cats arent a bad bike iv driven every quad from brute force 750, to sportsman 850, and the 700 cat had the smothest ride and was the most reliable, every other bike the belts got wet wayy to east and they lost alot of power, he only bike the i found better was the honda rincon 680, it may not of had a a smother ride but it did have more power and quicker throttle responce, but thats because they dont have a belt, but out of all the belt driven quads, i found the cat to be the most enjoyable best looking, most power, best reliablity, and most confortable.

 arctic cat's merc all other quads

 ouu thats hard thats like the best out there.