take a look at the hight from where the picture is taken. The camera person must be what less say 5.6 to be conservative. That would make the top from where the camera is at least 6-7 feet then take in to account the angle of the ground, and the fact that

 unless the photographer wasnt standing straight up which rairly they do when there taking a picture of a drop by the looks of the grass right in front of him it looks like hes crouching or laying so your logic is bad but his speed does make the drop bigge

 Indeed it's a good 10 foot by the time you land. Talking to one of the blokes involved in Chicksands construction, a range of drops, including a larger one may be on the way in the not too distant future.

 Danijel must be a bit thick - seems pretty obvious you can drop 10 foot off that once you've used a bit of speed to land out of shot......

 WHAT KIND OF A FUCKIN HOMO WOULD SAY THAT'S 10 FEET!!! THAT THING IS 5 TO 5.5 AT BEST. I SHIT BIGGER DROPS THAN THAT!!! THAT GUY IS A HOMO!

 That was an easy 50 bucks! He lands quite a bit past me, in case you hadn't guessed...

 yeah 10ft if you one of those peoplewho only knows how to bomb at a drop and hope for the best

 classic chicksands drop! that slope drops away rite out of sight of that pic trust its a gd 10ft! 50bucks plz

 yh its 10 foot, i seen people land it over 12 foot, on a proper big bike of course, u land in the flat at 12!

 nice drop man,have u ever tried a 20 b4?

 Nah, working up. Maybe next week in Morzine!!

 that drop is so much more fun on a hardtail

 If you knew the trail you'd know it's 10ft - minimum. Fair play

 yup. been there 10 foot easy. 50 bucks please