CT-2

dave-m is that really all you gathered from this video? How in the world was this a biased test, or an advertisement? They mentioned it was at Easton Bell sports, once, at the very beginning. Also they didn't even mention the other certified helmet being tested was a Bell helmet at all, and in fact I hadn't even realized that until reading these comments. What is pretty clear is the difference between a certified, and non certified helmet (regardless of brand, or how many they tested). THAT was the point of this video. To get some awareness out there and to help people, who might not otherwise know this, and might feel their uncertified helmet is safe enough (which it clearly is not). What other conclusion you could possibly come to, I do not know... more comprehensive testing? non biased facility? I'm honestly unsure if you were just trolling, or you totally missed the point here (along with so many other users who posted below; getting into arguments over moto vs dh, wearing a crappy helmet vs no helmet at all, etc.).