not a bike..... but here's my idea for a oleo strut fork.
Theory is oleo strut with floating negative chamber. Allows position sensitive via the central metering pin. Once shaft speeds reach peak for the orifice size it switches to 'deadblow' mode directly engaging the main air spring and the negative seal head moves up as it does. Then as speed slows the negative sealhead returns as it fills, and main air spring returns to normal shaft displacement volume. Rebound is fully controlled via the metering pin orifice size, so is position sensitive too allowing for control of higher air spring pressures when deep in stroke Donor fork will be a manitou mattoc.
First scribbles...
sketch
And first rough schematic diagram..
rough schematics
And got my donor parts stripped down.
parts
Time for some patience to do all the volume and nasty maths n work out the exact piston positions for best operations! It's an orifice damper that goes in series to the air spring as soon as the flow rate restrictions provide enough resistance.
very curious how this will turn out keep us updated. Here is a good read if you havent already https://www.pinkbike.com/news/interview-university-student-designs-oleo-shock-with-titanium-shaft.html
very curious how this will turn out keep us updated. Here is a good read if you havent already https://www.pinkbike.com/news/interview-university-student-designs-oleo-shock-with-titanium-shaft.html
Haha, already been chatting with him. Has had some useful inputs so far. Is definitely going to be a bit of trial n error. Theory is great, but how it works.on practice doesn't always follow those tidy plans!
Have multiple metering pin rods ordered now, so gives me some good baseline options to work out the correct pin configuration.
prototype parts nearly.ready for first assembly. thinking ill go for non-position sensisite for first trial.
The maths for simulating this are damn complicated, so taking some time to work through.
might end up with a bit of trial and error first with my hpx2.5 as the fluid. 3 metering pin base sizes to start from, to give a good idea of relative forces for each once ive sorted the piston mounting interface for them. Then that should allow some reasonable judgements on the base pin size, and tapering profile.
Minor update.... Plans have to pivot. Mattock pro's have tapered stantions I completely missed during measuremens, so has given me a slightly more challenging job!
The whole point was that I could do it with most of my existing parts. Prob have to flip that plan, and see about a mattoc comp CSU and air pistons to bring it back to viable build. I'm not a machinist, and don't have easy access to turn stuff down, custom build pistons so bit of a pain!
I think I've actually managed to source what I need now. Hopefully these are shortly on their way: 1* mattoc comp CSU (non tapered 30mm id stations) 2* mattoc comp air pistons
Minor detour, but getting back on track. Glad I made my modelling formula coding for flexible inputs now!
Flexibility is critical to prototyping - the design process, the manufacturing, the means to achieving the goals, and sometimes even the goals themselves.
Had an attempt to size down one of my existing air pistons. didn't turn out to shabby!
Mattock pro air piston custom turned down to fit the upper stantion diameter. Pain in the backside for xring seal and backup rings. Need to turn down the inner faces too to get the space for the seals/glide ring, or custom make new backup rings for supporting downsized xring profile.
All just adds problems I can sort just using the correct comp model air piston anyways. So will be using those.