The guy has made the top circle too big. because of the angle the top circle should finish smaller but this dude has extended to the outside of the seatstay which is most probably an inch tick and thus messes up the diagram. and besides that the frame wouldnt just flex it eiter bend and stay bent or just snap...... sorry just thought id point out.
yes, the stays flex... AND A TON of companies have done it before! the idea being to keep things simple in most cases. Hell, even tomac uses flex stays these days. check out the carbide and it flexes
uuurrgh! relying on flex in the ali to make it work! horrid. that would make the shock only react as fast as the frame can flex, completely alter its characteristics.
Uhm . . angles don't change the fact that the paths are circles. Two circles cannot intersect in more than two points, so either the link or the rear triangle has to bend. If you don't understand, I'm sorry.
Yes the paths will always be circles, your not telling me anything new. On an angle though a circle does not look like a circle, it looks like an oval. Also, your insults do nothing to make you look more intelligent, they just add to the immaturity that has driven a lot of people away from this otherwise good site. Have you seen me insult you any even though i don't agree with you?
Of course it's not new, but it seems new to you because you don't seem to understand it. Ok, from an angle, it looks like an oval. Big whoop. The frame isn't built at an angle, this picture is here not to demonstrate the exact paths but to show that they are, in fact, circles.
I'm not insulting you, I'm just saying you don't get it, and believe me - I'm not the demographic that pushes people away.
No, it's a pivot, but those circles show the path of the link and the path of the rear triangle. The paths have to be the same because they both attach to each other, but the paths are different. That means that something has to flex so that they can still be attached.