Powered by Outside
New bike, 10.85kg, SHE LITE!!!
You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
New bike, 10.85kg, SHE LITE!!!
44 Comments
  • 91
 that is SICK!
  • 111
 Because it has NS frame Big Grin
  • 30
 btw just saying if you were very rich you could save over1kg gram by
eclat seat/post combo saves 150gish
Ns rotary hub on back saves 90g i think
majesty - 300g
Wellgo mg1's with ti spindle saves 70g
aluminium bars 150g ish
brakeless - 700gish?
drill shit 6g
ti everything 10g to 100g saving??
kenda sb8 1.95 saves 200g
lol! Not saying u have to do it but just saying someone could build a strong street mtb at 9 kg lol dont why you would but f*ck ot would be cool
  • 42
 Yeah that's not really that light. My Sub is 11.7 kg with gears...
  • 50
 but why super motos instead of table tops? folded table tops are ca. 100g lighter per tire.
  • 20
 I don't think he was really trying to make a light bike, it just turned out relatively light with the parts that he used.
  • 10
 You can get Super Motos in a folding bead and they're ten grams lighter than table tops. I know since I've got a TT on the front and a Super Moto on the rear.
  • 10
 10.85kg? thats still really light... sweet bike mate
  • 10
 super motos are a way better street/park tyre
  • 10
 probly 10 flat brakeless
  • 54
 and if want a good bike, put some nice forks on it
  • 53
 There already is a nice fork on it...
  • 47
 i mean suspension not rigid, if you wanted rigid, ride a bmx
  • 29
flag dirtparkstreet (Mar 13, 2009 at 18:18) (Below Threshold)
 if you wanted rigid, ride a bmx ... loser.
  • 49
flag travis657 (Mar 13, 2009 at 19:59) (Below Threshold)
 well think about it, mountain bikes without forks are just a big bmx bike
  • 36
 suspension i mean
  • 93
 and the point of suspension at a skatepark is? to huck? Thought so. All you haters can say what you want, if i want rigid i'll ride a rigid mtb if i want a bmx i'll ride a bmx you stupid f*cks. The difference between riding a bmx and a mtb isn't in the forks its in the wheel size, if i threw a set of argyles on a bmx its still a bmx not a "little mtb". travis657 you can f*ck off and enjoy your forks you dirty hack. Dirtparkstreet you usually have something constructive to say to me but today for some reason you decided to be an intolerant, close-minded f*ck. Good day c*nts.
  • 20
 just so you know i wasnt calling you a loser matt.
  • 20
 yeah fuck man sorry after i posted that i realized what you meant. Sorry man!
  • 14
 ur gay, uh dont you think it would be easier to do tricks on a bmx bike, bmx is for pussys who cant go big, like you
  • 21
 haha dude have u hit pubity yet?
pick an e-fight with someone your own age, and talent level.
  • 24
 buddy im not starting a fight cleary you guys did, you called me a loser, so why dont you take your own advice, and stop chirping off someone who is on the oher side of the world where you live
  • 42
 travis657, fuck off. no one thinks you're cool. if he wants to rock out on a rigid mountain bike, then he'll do it. little cuntholes like you who think they're tough on the internet can lick on my rectum. lutton is smooth as fuck over bigger shit than you'll ever hit in your life, he don't need forks. so get some facts before you throw that weak ass bullshit this way. you're really stupid, ignorant, and narrow minded. have fun failing at life.
  • 14
 have fun failing at life.... so you think im going to fail at life because i believe in something different than you, all im trying to say is, the bike would be alot better with suspension, so why dont you stfu because you don know me, im not ignorant i have different beliefs, and lick your rectum, ur fucked in the head, i bet you woul like your boyfriend to do that for you...
  • 40
 "i bet you woul like your boyfriend to do that for you..."

thats how i know your like 12
  • 24
 good one pal, you have some good ways of critizing people.... real mature
  • 20
 yeah. pretty much. i run forks on my suburban, just cos lutton doesn't, that doesn't mean it's a 'big bmx' and that it needs 'better forks' in order to be a good bike. pick your words better then. idiot.
  • 12
 you just dont understand what im tryig to say, im not saying its s shitty bike, im saying it would be better with suspension
  • 00
 i have a bike

haha lol


24 rigid all the way
or its a crusier

nice bikesmicle btw Pimp

how much was your bb, i really need one?
  • 11
 hmm didnt see yours is a 26

but still you get me

love your travel on your forks btw

nearly like mine :O

lol
  • 10
 Super nice! But could be lighter IMO.
  • 20
 Wouldn't want it any lighter, get wind-blown at the trails.
  • 20
 haha yea true. It's already crazy light for a bike.
  • 00
 Awsome bike!
Really like the way you build it! Keep the Blk Mrkt fork, much nicer than suspension Smile
  • 10
 ill buy it off oyu
  • 00
 25-11 hard, easy or medium ratio?
  • 00
 its like medium/hard
1-10 i'd say about 7
  • 00
 Nice.
  • 02
 + take of dust caps and drill 0.1mm in in the valve save 1g? but this is stupid andso is the above
  • 23
 needs more stock metro
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2026. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.013107
Mobile Version of Website