You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
58 Comments
  • 2 1
 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D



Salute
  • 4 0
 Nice color contrast! tup
  • 4 0
 i love rideing in snow hard on air forks tho
  • 6 4
 is this a fisheye lens pic?
  • 9 7
 No it's a telephoto.... Yes it's a wide-angle.
  • 13 1
 a wide angle & fisheye are not the same thing, so before u get all shirty & sarcastic with ur comments get yo shit right! It is a fisheye pic piojoer.
  • 3 14
flag nouser (Oct 12, 2009 at 16:26) (Below Threshold)
 Fish is just a wider wide-angle.
  • 9 0
 um, no... it's not.
  • 3 11
flag nouser (Oct 12, 2009 at 21:39) (Below Threshold)
 When a lens is set to have an extremely wide field of view, distortion becomes apparent, hence the "fish eye" effect.
  • 11 0
 Dude... I'm a professional photographer, I think I know what I'm saying... that is not how it works. hahaha
You get wide angles that are 10mm (aka really wide, but not fisheye) & you get some 15mm (not as wide) fisheye's. How do explain that then?
  • 2 12
flag nouser (Oct 13, 2009 at 15:38) (Below Threshold)
 Different magnifications due to size of the image sensor. Pssh.
  • 7 1
 hahaha, ur a funny guy.
The sensor has nothing to do with a lens being fisheye or not... try again... there is one main difference & you can see it in the shot quite easily.
  • 3 12
flag nouser (Oct 14, 2009 at 15:29) (Below Threshold)
 Distortion? What do you think that's caused by? The smaller chips don't see as much as the projected image from the lens so it appears like a narrower field of view with less distortion. And stop playing with the props.
  • 13 0
 Wrong again...
Ok, I'll put you out of your misery.
A fisheye lens has barrel distortion which curves things, like looking at a reflection on a ball... a wide angle lens tries to correct that curvature & pulls the corners out to straighten the lines which causes another type of distortion completely.
I teach photography, you can take my word for it.
Next time someone asks a question, maybe keep quiet if you don't know the answer & just want them to look stupid. It's no good for anyone.
  • 1 10
flag nouser (Oct 14, 2009 at 17:15) (Below Threshold)
 So you are saying that a "fish" lens does not project a wide angle field of view? I said it was a wide-angle. That's true. Fishes are wides, but wides aren't fishes.
  • 13 1
 fr112358! WTH! eric palmers photography is the shit and i believe him. and hes right!
  • 4 8
flag nouser (Oct 16, 2009 at 21:01) (Below Threshold)
 *and a lone tear rolled down his cheek*
  • 1 5
flag charleyboy14 (Oct 17, 2009 at 14:27) (Below Threshold)
 haha eric i had a little chuckle at this. you must love reading peoples responces?
  • 1 9
flag nouser (Oct 17, 2009 at 15:02) (Below Threshold)
 Responces. wow
  • 8 0
 yeah, everyone thinks they're an expert & just prove their ignorance most of the time... just interesting to see how far some will go.
  • 1 6
flag nouser (Oct 18, 2009 at 10:09) (Below Threshold)
 You seem to have decided to ignore my perfectly true statement that fish eye lenses provide a wide angle field of view.
  • 6 0
 I have not ignored that. Piojoer asked what made a lens fisheye & you didn't know... it's not just coz it's wide & you went on about crop factor on sensors & all sorts of completely irrelevant stuff to try & explain it instead of just ask or use google or something. You, knowing this little tried to make someone look stupid for asking a question you didn't know the answer to...
  • 1 7
flag nouser (Oct 18, 2009 at 10:55) (Below Threshold)
 Umm, actually I was just saying that the picture was, ah forget it. I have work to do.
  • 5 0
 we all know what you were saying... you said it. We've all moved on now
  • 1 7
flag nouser (Oct 18, 2009 at 18:52) (Below Threshold)
 What a satiating conclusion to an arduous battle.
  • 8 0
 why was it a battle? I asked a question you couldn't answer... that's it. I wasn't fighting you.
  • 3 0
 and even if eric was, you got OWNED. cheers eric, its good to see dumbasses shown up, and now i know how a fisheye works!
  • 1 0
 eric you legend hahaa. great shot though
  • 2 0
 yeaaaaa....nice pic. POD Smile
  • 2 0
 Obviously POD material. It has everything you need, plus it is unique!
  • 2 0
 POD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • 2 0
 nice pic and BIIIIIIIG TYRES Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin
  • 2 1
 whitch tires do u ride ?
awsom pic ! POD for shure
  • 2 1
 Wooo! great shot! POD!
  • 2 0
 awsome pic!! POD!
  • 2 0
 Great shot!
  • 2 0
 impressive , yo !
  • 2 0
 niesamowite ujÄ™cie,
  • 2 1
 Awsome pic:P
  • 2 1
 sick pic
  • 1 0
 That colours are awsome!
  • 2 1
 awsam shot man pod!
  • 2 1
 ---pod---
  • 2 1
 wonderful pic..POD!!
  • 2 1
 that's mint! POD
  • 1 0
 you don't even know what POD means.. just one moving with the crowd.
  • 1 2
 bottomed out fork lol
  • 2 1
 hmmm not really.
  • 3 1
 ohh jeaah ! POD !!
  • 3 1
 POD:X:X:X:XX:X:
  • 3 1
 POD x 100
  • 2 1
 lush
  • 2 0
 PODD love the colours and angle
  • 3 1
 POD THIS UP!!! Really nice pic!
  • 1 7
flag dirtjumper1997 (Oct 7, 2009 at 16:35) (Below Threshold)
 NO its not gunna be pod
  • 2 1
 i say pod! but lets wait till winter
  • 2 1
 that will be POD sometime but i agree sometime closer to winter
  • 2 0
 nice pic! Smile

i think it could be POD tup







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.040296
Mobile Version of Website