pjf78

Well look at that, the EU posters posted examples that they had access to that were: smaller than 6 bike capacity, and presented on smaller vehicles, vehicles that are smaller than the NA counterparts, and thus the racks are scaled appropriately. It validated my point. Down vote away.

@lkubica: If it were cargo rated and able to resist the leverage of a few hundred lbs torquing the rear suspension I could see that.

You could, but most of you think "no one needs" a big stupid "pedestrian smashing" vehicle that is big enough to effectively and safely use it. Looks like these were all mounted to full size trucks, one even had fender flairs, the audacity.......

I see what pinkbike did here today. They pulled the SRAM UDH. Starts out with an introduction (the simplicity of the UDH/ the narrative post of you will get hurt accept it) so that later you will gladly buy more stuff (better equipment that needs UDH/ more expensive helmets). Psychology, well done pinkbike.

No one needs a 10k hardtail. What about the safety of the kids? Those welds are amazing.

came to say the same: the "improved" version seen here: https://nsmb.com/articles/5165-first-date-crank-brothers-kronolog

@suspended-flesh: Yep, probably one of the reasons the data isn't that granular, my Tundra is really a Sequoia, or is it? I'll be revving for ya......haha

@barp: Is that really all you have left? Name calling and insults? Because I called out your lie? The distinction between a truck, and SUV, and a van, all large vehicles IS critical. Especially if you are trying to make an argument about NUMBERS about trucks. No one took issue with SUVs, they were big mad about TRUCKS. The critical competency here is understanding the nuance between the two, in this specific case, sorry you were not able to. In addition, you are making a post hoc fallacy with assumptions. And now a red herring fallacy, I do have to say, I think you've managed to commit all of the major logic fallacies in only a couple of comments. Impressive. I'll commit to being your "better" if you just try a tinny tiny bit harder. Deal? Stick around, it might help you because apparently I teach logic in the pink bike comments section.

@barp: Aww you mad that no one is giving you the attention that you deserve? Yeah you link points to SUVs being the danger? The vehicle was an SUV. an SUV is not a truck. Did you not understand your own link? You are making my argument for me thank you. So about that reading comprehension..... And finally, sorry about your assumptions and your straw man. Better luck next time.

@barp: Aww you mad that no one is giving you the attention that you deserve? Yeah you link points to SUVs being the danger? The vehicle was an SUV. an SUV is not a truck. Did you not understand your own link? You are making my argument for me thank you. So about that reading comprehension..... And finally, sorry about your assumptions and your straw man. Better luck next time.