this berm is 8" radius, when the pumptrack got faster, the berm felt tight. i corrected the situation by adding more height to the berm and more vertical
for this berm i was getting a lot of speed and get taller berm you will keep your speed
this berm is 8" radius, when the pumptrack got faster, the berm felt tight. i corrected the situation by adding more height to the berm and more vertical
that's exactly right.
it's all about getting that berm to have a steep transitioned face in order get sideways.
That's a killer track jimbsport! How much dirt did you have to bring in for that build? I have a near identical plot of land, many trees and rocks, and it's at the far end of my backyard. I can't haul dirt very easily back to the area I want to build. I was going to have 20 yards of soil delivered to my front yard. Of course, the front yard is much lower elevation from where the track would be. So I would have to wheelbarrow uphill, or rent a machine for a day or maybe longer.
It's comes down to the size of the rollers, the speed you'll be going and the size and length of the bikes that'll be on the pumptrack. For relatively small rollers to be ridden at lower speeds you don't need much more than the wheelbase or a bike length between them. As the size and/or speed increases you'll need more spacing to give your body time to deal with the transitions.
If I remember correctly, a space of about 2.5x the intended users bike length is a good starting point (built a pumptrack ~4 years ago succesfully using this measurement)
How do you guys decide how far apart each roller should be?
10 feet peak to peak is a good starting point. Up to 13, maybe even 15 if you’re going faster. (Some DH flow trail lines have high speed big rollers that are around 20-22 feet peak-to-peak). If you’re doing 10 foot spacing, but you want sets you can jump easily, then consider shortening those sets.
dingo-dave wrote:
It's comes down to the size of the rollers, the speed you'll be going and the size and length of the bikes that'll be on the pumptrack. For relatively small rollers to be ridden at lower speeds you don't need much more than the wheelbase or a bike length between them. As the size and/or speed increases you'll need more spacing to give your body time to deal with the transitions.
Yeah I agree. Roller spacing is all about speed. Close together when you’re going slow, and more spaced-apart when you’re going faster. Also for roller height, smaller/shorter rollers can be closer together; larger ones need to be further apart. If rollers are tall/peaky and too close together, they may still be rideable, but it forces people to manual etc. If you mean one wheel base or bike length in the “trough” like this, then I agree. But, one wheelbase peak to peak is way too close together.
If I remember correctly, a space of about 2.5x the intended users bike length is a good starting point (built a pumptrack ~4 years ago succesfully using this measurement)
A bike length is what, like 5 and half feet? So you’re saying 13.75 feet? Yeah, I would agree with that for a medium-fast track.
KingsgateDirtJumper wrote:
In my opinion, the key is to build / ride / build / ride Don't go and make 10 rollers without testing them frequently Same with berms