Can someone help me figure out how the DW6 suspension design works? Looks like a Horst link but obv there's something extra going on near the BB/lower shock pivot.
Can someone help me figure out how the DW6 suspension design works? Looks like a Horst link but obv there's something extra going on near the BB/lower shock pivot.
Looks like there's just a secondary pivot at the bb so there's two compact links there. Guessing extra stiffness and maybe axle path control vs a single pivot or link there. Looks like some needless extra complication vs standard dw.
Some people say anything more than a single pivot is needless complication. Six-bar systems give additional control over the kinematics, albeit with diminishing returns. There's a reason most suspension designs are four-bar.
For a given weight and general layout, more pivots will reduce stiffness. The extra mass of bearings, axles, and frame profiles could've been used to make a huge, single pivot at that location (i.e. a four-bar with a huge main pivot) that would be stiffer than a forest of small, closely spaced pivots.
Every bike's chainstay lengthens as it compresses. That's the nature of anti-squat, without getting too detailed about it (designs with an idler are a whole different conversation). That doesn't necessarily mean the rear wheel is moving rearward, mind you, it's just transitioning to a larger radius than would be the case if the pivot was concentric with the BB - i.e. rearward relative to a constant arc.
The moving location of the virtual pivots does not necessarily imply additional lengthening. We're just talking about the point of rotation moving, not the rear wheel.
Every bike's chainstay lengthens as it compresses. That's the nature of anti-squat (designs with an idler are a whole different conversation). That doesn't necessarily mean the rear wheel is moving rearward, mind you, just transitioning to a larger radius than would be the case if the pivot was concentric with the BB.
The moving location of the virtual pivots does not necessarily imply additional lengthening. We're just talking about the point of rotation moving, not the rear wheel.
I'm gonna need a diagram. Someone do it. It will be wrong if I try.
Below is a hasty sketch of how the the virtual chainstay pivot moves throughout the travel. The virtual pivot of the chainstay is found by drawing lines through the pivots and finding the intersections. Starts with the green lines (instant centre of rotation, or "vitual pivot point", circled) and ends with the blue (instant centre circled again).
Note this is the instant centre of the chainstay. The instant centre of the whole linkage would be found by repeating this process of drawing lines through the pivots using the other physical links and this instant centre in place of the usually static chainstay pivot.
Every bike's chainstay lengthens as it compresses. That's the nature of anti-squat (designs with an idler are a whole different conversation). That doesn't necessarily mean the rear wheel is moving rearward, mind you, just transitioning to a larger radius than would be the case if the pivot was concentric with the BB.
The moving location of the virtual pivots does not necessarily imply additional lengthening. We're just talking about the point of rotation moving, not the rear wheel.
I'm gonna need a diagram. Someone do it. It will be wrong if I try.
There's a video in the review showing it in action.
I was at a motocross track the other day and saw someone setting tire pressure with one of those digital shock pumps that RS and fox sell, I felt dumb for never thinking about that before. Now I just need tubeless valves that come in schrader.
Shock pumps have a range up to 300-350psi. They're not going to be as accurate in the range of 15-35psi as an analog gauge that operates only in that range, even if it's a digital readout.