update on the info at nikons Lens this is the small selection in Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada - photo by darkalleydownhill

311

pdurand (Jan 28, 2009 at 19:15)

HOLY SHIT thats alot of len'szzzzzz

422

Xtreem (Jan 29, 2009 at 1:39)

58, to be more precise.

491

nouser (Jan 29, 2009 at 14:51)

i want that fucking big fish eye in the bottom right

66

r-gibson (Jan 29, 2009 at 17:51)

same here

51

jeff-hurd (Jan 31, 2009 at 16:18)

holy shiit, thats heaven right there
now if only they had a photo of ALL the nikon Bodies AND ALL then nikkor lenses together :O

472

lepattyoh (Jan 31, 2009 at 18:59)

you ca probably zoom to heaven with that huble attachment in bottom left haha

350

nouser (Feb 2, 2009 at 16:09)

Hell you can probably see jesus pickin his nose with that thing. Im a Canon boi but...*drool*

33

bbakus (Feb 4, 2009 at 14:08)

i cant see my nikkor 12-24 maybe those are older lenses

72

RobbyBriers (Feb 4, 2009 at 14:16)

keep in mind that the white "huble attachement", as you call it, is a telelens working with mirrors to shorten the length of it and that causes a very bad picture quality. So don't use one if you want to make POD haha.

I myself work with Canon, and I'm satisfied. I guess that if I bought a Nikon, I would be as satisfied. It was just a choice I made.

And to be honest, a telelens is just good if you're standing at a few dozen of meters from your object. I always try to get as close as possible, which delivers best pictures!

41

darkalleydownhill (Feb 4, 2009 at 15:32)

crazy man I have never seen one of these lens; I thought it would give you a very far away pic. but I argeee I would love to try it out.I think it would prduce some crazy diffent shots. I also want to try and get a tilt shift lens for making photos

38

nouser (Feb 26, 2009 at 11:44) (Below Threshold)

shit like 99999999999999999999999999999 dolars there lol

41

sam-d (Mar 10, 2009 at 12:11)

Whats the Massive white one for?

271

nouser (Mar 11, 2009 at 15:06)

Taking pictures of space aliens picking their noses.

414

nouser (Mar 11, 2009 at 17:23) (Below Threshold)

or not

40

nouser (Mar 11, 2009 at 18:22)

haha i was totally like jk...no
I'm pretty sure its a telescope mount right?

20

katinasd (Apr 15, 2009 at 13:25)

I came undone like.....now, that's sick ass. Send it to me.

21

shredbag (Apr 20, 2009 at 18:21)

whats with the giant teliscope

22

repa224 (Jul 5, 2009 at 16:24)

how the hell would you hold the one top left corner.. youd need and assistant lmao

90

ericpalmer (Jul 20, 2009 at 9:36)

that would be called a tripod

31

zachyoungberg (Oct 20, 2009 at 15:17)

too bad they're not canon lenses....

10

brodoyouevenbike (Nov 4, 2009 at 4:43)

wow that first one can be used to find lost galaxies

26

pumpkintaco (Dec 11, 2009 at 18:39) (Below Threshold)

i think i just pooped a little

14

cools20 (Dec 30, 2009 at 18:52)

sick ass squid eye lens at the bottom

10

MikeStreet (Jan 5, 2011 at 4:33)

from the thumb, i tought these were bombs lol

40

chrisri0 (Nov 25, 2009 at 16:17)

This photo is at least 20 years old, but might even be 30 or 40 years old. Most of those lenses (all of the ones with silver rings) are Manual focus lenses. I wouldn't pay much for that glass now. Heck, they don't even have the old 80-200 2.8. Most of the zooms in the photo are Push-Pull zooms. (really old style). I like my NEW Nikon 14-24mm 2.8G, 24-70mm 2.8G, 70-200mm 2.8G VR, 50mm 1.4G, 85mm 1.4D, 35mm 2.0D just fine. Cool pic though!

10

darkalleydownhill (Nov 25, 2009 at 21:38)

nice man that is sick collection you got there. you did not go with the 50 mm 1.2 eh, no need or you dont like ? do you shoot video with that glass now that nikon got the d3s ? ?? ? I want ds3 like now

40

darkalleydownhill (Jan 28, 2009 at 19:25)

check out that one on the bottom right looks like a ufo; it is the widist lens I have ever seen. the one that I see missing from the photo is the TS 85 mm nikon lens

05

slincoln (Jan 29, 2009 at 14:51) (Below Threshold)

its just a fish eye

10

twowheels4ever (Jan 30, 2009 at 8:57)

I like the old school look of these cameras. Warmer feeling and puts you in the moment.
the new stuff makes me feel like Jeff Goldblum when he is trying to replicate the steak? remember? looks real feels real but lacking in that one imprtant area... TASTE

15

darkalleydownhill (Jan 30, 2009 at 13:29) (Below Threshold)

I agree I love the feel of the older lens they feel like they are made a lot better, and DON'T have any plastic on them. Plus where is the aperture control dial on any new lens, do they think no one wants this ?????

30

ridenwc1 (Oct 10, 2009 at 18:33)

You adjust that on the camera nowadays.

31

transam711 (Oct 13, 2009 at 19:51)

Yeah, you adjust it on the camera nowadays, ya big goof.

30

freeridemtber06 (Jan 28, 2009 at 20:33)

whats that like 200Gs worth the lenses right there? god damn and i thot i was happy with just my fish eye

00

lescart (Apr 30, 2009 at 5:34)

when i worked in photography, we had everything from an 8mm fisheye, i think right up to to the 500mm f4 and lots of zooms too, i remember we were photographing a nuclear fuel store, and my colleuge put our latest nikon f6 with a 15mm lens on his tripod, and came over to me, and we turned to go back and the tripod release plate failed and they dropped to the concrete floor! the camera was 1 day old!!

10

ericpalmer (Jul 20, 2009 at 9:40)

holy shit, I would collapse into tears if that was mine!

haha, not really, but that sux!! That's why I wrap the strap around the tripod head when I have my cam on a tripod

10

darkalleydownhill (Jan 28, 2009 at 20:04)

I would take the 500mm that huge one and the white one; that is a telescope lens. that would look so crazy on the end of a camera

12

codyloveskona (Jul 5, 2009 at 16:19)

nice lens, i still like canons lenses and camaras, nikons are big and bulky, the canon L glass are good size, but the white color stands out to much, they foucus fast, they have a group out or in the making noted or rumored to be better then the L glass

10

nouser (Feb 5, 2011 at 15:23)

Mmmmmmmm third row from the bottom-middle, to the left of the 16mm fisheye.. the 105mm and 135mm telephotos.. rear focus elements with defocus-control. Too sweet for words.

10

xcbbb (Feb 1, 2009 at 11:27)

funny how when i cliked on this, there was add at the top for a nikon D200 body for 799.99 ahah

10

brycepiwek (Mar 14, 2009 at 23:23)

That crazy looking fisheye in the bottom right is the 6mm f2.8, that things got 220 degree field of view

01

nouser (Mar 18, 2009 at 21:40)

how is that possible that means i looks backwards a little

20

brycepiwek (Mar 18, 2009 at 22:02)

www.nikonweb.com/fisheye/fisheye_6mm.jpg

10

nouser (Mar 19, 2009 at 18:06)

damn thats intense

20

Caiokv (Jul 28, 2009 at 9:50)

this is like porn for photographers!

10

konarider92 (Oct 29, 2009 at 19:21)

eh, most of those look like the older models, no DX models that i can see. still loooks sweet though!

10

curtalcorn (Mar 12, 2010 at 15:24)

you could make alot of porno from your neighbors window with that shit hahaha

20

mugredeldiablo (Apr 7, 2010 at 6:58)

some of these can catch on a pic. boogers in the nose of a man on the moon

20

G-Stuttard (Oct 13, 2010 at 10:36)

looks like an assortment of anti-aircraft weapons. sick none the less.

31

gustofwind (Jan 28, 2009 at 19:26)

a billion dollars worth

00

jonlake (Jan 30, 2009 at 11:09)

woot got 5 of em, and its not all of them, theres like 5 versions of the nikkor 105

00

sorris (Feb 4, 2009 at 16:07)

are they yours? if yes, how much did you pay for all of them? must have been a pretty expensive experience haha

10

sorris (Feb 4, 2009 at 16:10)

ow, just read all the other comments...dont need an answer anymore^^ sorry for spam

10

Maksimbike (Nov 15, 2010 at 20:55)

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK.

10

Vulpine (Jul 1, 2011 at 17:03)

WTFF!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!! I'm having 10 orgasms per second!

10

dnlparr (Jul 6, 2011 at 21:15)

i dont know any thing about these! i dont take pics. i way prefer riding

10

mex-rider (Oct 20, 2011 at 21:38)

Now I got it why here on pinlbike are so amazing shots!

10

BehindTheLens (Nov 20, 2013 at 13:30)

i dont think you have enough lenses

00

dishboy14 (Jan 28, 2009 at 21:37)

That image is old, you are missing about 20-30 lenses

20

darkalleydownhill (Jan 28, 2009 at 21:39)

nice; really I was wondering; it pic looks old. I just got it off the net cus some one was askin me what kind lens are available. this is the best I could find. Do you have a pic of them all ???

03

twowheels4ever (Jan 29, 2009 at 8:03)

looks like an air-raid - - attack formation
do you try and see how fats you are exchanging lenses? like the military, tear your gun down and you have 1 minute to put it back together and fire! lol

12

twowheels4ever (Jan 29, 2009 at 8:04)

i said fats-i meant fast

00

gcaprider (Jan 29, 2009 at 14:50)

I was slow at lens changes when uhh, I only had one.. Now that i've got another, I've been getting faster at it. I wish I had a arsenal like this one!!

00

nouser (Jan 29, 2009 at 14:49)

These are from the days before digital, I have a couple of these lenses.

00

hypo1 (Feb 23, 2009 at 9:53)

holy...amount to whow many NICOlAI？

00

azzazz7 (Mar 29, 2009 at 7:45)

holy shit man, that top left on is so big its got its own handle lol

00

bikedisk (Apr 21, 2009 at 9:27)

interesting with which eye-ball photographed this picture...;]

00

andrew22 (Apr 25, 2009 at 11:58)

thats a lot of money there!!!!!!!

11

Biker012 (Jul 28, 2009 at 9:53)

U have so much of them....Y don't give the biggest one ???

10

ma11 (Apr 29, 2010 at 15:17)

i want

10

Maksimbike (Jul 5, 2010 at 21:56)

O_O

10

speconapetar (Oct 20, 2011 at 21:27)

HOLY FUCK

00

blackdragon092 (Jan 28, 2009 at 19:16)

ya it is

01

theohhhhorizon (Jan 28, 2009 at 20:01)

i wish i just had 2 of those lens. ohhhhh

01

huckoveraduck (Jan 29, 2009 at 4:55)

how much does the telescope retail at!?

00

cokie (Feb 4, 2009 at 14:10)

holy shit

00

nouser (Feb 18, 2009 at 9:06)

o my lanta

00

freerideordiehard (Feb 26, 2009 at 11:44)

thats crazy...

11

mtbKELSEY (Mar 20, 2009 at 20:24)

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

01

dh-kevin-dh (Mar 28, 2009 at 22:29)

i used to have 8 of those

00

gomess (Mar 29, 2009 at 7:40)

f*ckEN

00

ninerider1 (Apr 17, 2009 at 13:58)

omg!!

00

ninerider1 (Apr 17, 2009 at 13:59)

now thats what i call a lends

00

jacekslonik (Apr 19, 2009 at 15:13)

nice collection

00

sxsxsx (Apr 21, 2009 at 17:34)

all them macros :O

02

NorCalNomad (Apr 23, 2009 at 0:02)

PSSHHHHHH it's all about Canon. There is a reason their lenses dominate any big sporting event

10

ericpalmer (Jan 5, 2011 at 4:40)

coz they're cheaper?

10

NorCalNomad (Jan 5, 2011 at 15:06)

00

diogodavinha (Apr 27, 2009 at 11:49)

amazing!

00

mattsp (Jun 9, 2009 at 8:14)

HOOLLLY BUMBERCLOT!!

01

jonass (Jan 28, 2009 at 19:28)

i wish