Block user

Recent

HuntBikeWheels HuntBikeWheels's article
May 10, 2018 at 19:34
May 10, 2018
Hunt Launches Range Of MTB Wheelsets
@vinay: Just to further this with some more information from John (Peter and my Father and our Chartered Materials Engineer here at HUNT. The Fatigue life of 6069 is also significantly superior to 6061 at approx +60%. Research Gate has some excellent information if you want to search it but the link and charts may not work on here, I'll try the link anyway. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250335394_The_new_aluminum_alloy_AA_6069 "The yield strength of 6069 T6 is 490 MPa as opposed to 6061 T6 at 290 MPa. It still has an elongation (a measure of ductility) of 10-22% depending on the extrusion process. This is similar to 6061 T6. Anything over 10% is pretty ductile. The link above is a chart showing the fatigue cycles to failure of 6069 and 6061, both in the T6 condition. It is in a weak salt solution, so probably quite good for winter riding. It shows that 6069 is almost twice as good as 6061. Your correspondent is right in most of what he says and it is true that some yielding will blunt the crack tip and reduce stress and hence crack growth. This is why you do not want materials with very low ductility, they just crack really quickly, however 6069 does not suffer low ductility and as Pete says the higher Ultimate Tensile Strength actually reduces this issue too in other ways." I hope this helps Vinay and I hope this helps, please do let us know as these discussions opens our understanding further too which is really cool, Tom Marchment HUNT | TheRiderFirm
HuntBikeWheels HuntBikeWheels's article
May 9, 2018 at 22:34
May 9, 2018
Hunt Launches Range Of MTB Wheelsets
@vinay: You raise some really great questions, so we reached out to Hunt co-founder Pete to see what he said. Here is a short summary of what he said to your response: The ovalizing at the crack tip is a very good point, and that is why higher ductility (which normally means lower UTS) materials will have better fatigue resistance relative to their strength. However, having a higher overall strength helps vs fatigue in two other ways: At the tip of the crack itself, the material is still stronger, so the benefits of ovalizing the crack tip are somewhat offset by the higher yield strength of the material itself. If you are using the same shape, thickness and extrusion dimension, you will get less overall deflection under stress, (because stiffness is usually higher in materials with higher UTS and lower ductility) and that means less local stress at the point of the crack. So if you are an aircraft engineer trying to achieve your design spec strength at minimum weight gain in a stiff material like 70xx series then you will have problems with fatigue that you need to solve. But if you are designing for fatigue resistance you can achieve better performance with slightly over-engineered shape and a high strength alloy at the same weight as 6061. This actually is very good for MTB because you then also have a very high UTS on top of that for protection against really big hits. Lastly, it is worth mentioning that the drop off in fatigue life for 6061 to 6069 is much less of an issue than it is going from a 60xx to a 70xx series alloy. Thank you again and I hope this helps.
HuntBikeWheels HuntBikeWheels's article
May 8, 2018 at 21:12
May 8, 2018
Hunt Launches Range Of MTB Wheelsets
accidental reply, soz.
HuntBikeWheels HuntBikeWheels's article
May 8, 2018 at 21:12
May 8, 2018
Hunt Launches Range Of MTB Wheelsets
@vinay: Hi Vinay, You know your stuff and yield strength is key. I have discussed this in depth with my father John (Chartered Materials Engineer and works here at HUNT | TheRiderFirm) when selecting the materials. UTS (Ultimate Tensile Strength) and yield strength are closely related in alloys and if I recall the details correctly when failure on bending occurs it is the extension side of the material that is passing it’s upper yield limit and so is under tension hence UTS is the figure we used but as you say we could change this out for yield strength, and the numbers/%ages would compare higher for 6069 in the same way to approximately the same % as well. However I have to admit this is reaching the edge of my knowledge, but please do come back to me with any further questions and I can refer my father and brother Pete (also co-founder her at HUNT and materials science graduate from Cambridge University) with some more details on the material differences. Thanks again as feedback, questions and understanding from riders is key to us to a better job, Cheers, Tom Marchment HUNT | TheRiderFirm.
HuntBikeWheels HuntBikeWheels's article
May 8, 2018 at 21:11
May 8, 2018
Hunt Launches Range Of MTB Wheelsets
Hi Core559, we really appreciate any questions or feedback so thank you. You’re absolutely right several companies do indeed use 6069 (490MPa UTS Ultimate Tensile Strength) including Stan’s for their high end rims, in their S1 rims they use 6061 (290MPa UTS). I think Race Face use 6061 for most of their alloy rims but I could well be wrong. 6061 is a great material that is regularly used in very high end aerospace applications, however it’s lower UTS and yield strengths do mean you need to use greater mass to achieve the same comparative strength, and this is fine and we actually use 6061 in our 4Season Road and Gravel rims where ultimate performance is not as important as the balance of competitive pricing for a wheel used primarily as winter/training wheelset and often replaced with carbon wheels when summer comes round. Whereas for MTB we felt that, as MTBers ourselves, we never change our wheels from one season to the next and so wanted the highest spec/strength/weight combination to give us the best performance year round if that makes sense? So we specced thick sidewalls (not the thickest but close) but we did spec the highest strength material in 6069 and this equals one of, if not the, strongest Enduro specific rims available (as far as our material strength:wall thickness calculations and checking/measurements of other rims goes). Thank you again and I hope this helps. Enjoy the trails, Tom Marchment HUNT | TheRiderFirm
HuntBikeWheels HuntBikeWheels's article
May 8, 2018 at 21:09
May 8, 2018
Hunt Launches Range Of MTB Wheelsets
Hi Crimedog, thank you ever so much for this feedback. You are right, we are aware that some companies have had issues with previous versions of a similar drive mechanism on slightly different hub models. As I’m sure you know freehub systems are under incredible forces and can take some time to run through testing/dev. However, there have been several updates to the design and it has been tested extensively since and they offer excellent pickup, strength and durability. Of course, we are always welcoming of any extra information and will keep listening to riders like yourself as we know many riders have extensive experience and learning from that is invaluable for us. We would also like to say that we have an ‘above and beyond approach to helping customers’, we work incredibly hard to make sure riders are happy with any experience they have with our wheels or ourselves as a company as we know that growing a long term satisfied rider base is key to being able to serve riders with the best product long into the future, which as self-professed bike geeks is all we aim to do. Thank you again for the feedback and please do let us know if there is any extra info on this matter or anything that might help us make better wheels. We are always keen to speak on the phone +44 1273 931 428 or email thechase@huntbikewheels.com. Cheers again, Tom Marchment HUNT | TheRiderFirm
Added 1 photo to MTB-Wheels
May 6, 2018 at 16:55
May 6, 2018
0 comments – Add comment
Added 2 photos to MTB-Wheels
May 2, 2018 at 2:11
May 2, 2018
Added 6 photos to MTB-Wheels
Apr 29, 2018 at 5:31
Apr 29, 2018
Added 1 photo to MTB-Wheels
Apr 29, 2018 at 3:51
Apr 29, 2018
0 comments – Add comment
Load more...
You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Copyright © 2000 - 2018. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.055628
Mobile Version of Website