gondezee

you can say fuck *apparently you can't

quicker to get out on my gravel rig than it is to get out on my full squish. Also, trails can be pretty tame for a 130 bike, riding underbiked is way more smiles per gallon.

My gravel rig has a 31.6 seat tube, cuz mountain bike. I of course put in a 100mm dropper, cuz mountain bike.

@just6979: Should Santa Cruz change their name?

@taprider: You realize your front ring (those 30's) are irrelevant here? They completely cancel out. So it's really 50/10 and 52/10.

This is only your RF/CPU component. The rest is analog front end for the strain gauge itself.

Meh, you're hating unnecessarily. The HF stuff is under an EMI shield on a sub-board which is already FCC certified with modular approval. Dollars to donuts your CPU is also on this sub board. Otherwise I think there's an instrumentation amplifier to precisely deal with the signal from the strain gauge input from the connector at left (could be dc input, though /shrug, and some minor dc/dc circuits (more than likely linear regs). Nothing here needs RF stitching on the primary assembly. There's one trace I don't like at the top edge on the underside of the board, but I have a feeling we're looking at a 2 layer dude anyways. I'd add some stitching vias and move that one trace if possible, otherwise it's fine. Tear drops look cool but aren't necessary.

@justincs: Desiccants won't hurt you. They're labeled "not food: do not eat" because they aren't food.

it's pretty good, got mine yesterday (not custom painted, tho)