Pinkbike.com
Powered by Outside
brunoschull
- Member since Jun 29, 2014
- Male / 53
-
Basel , Switzerland - 0 Followers
- 0 Trailforks Points
Recent
brunoschull mikekazimer's article
Sep 17, 2023 at 2:53
Sep 17, 2023
Bike Check: Gee Atherton's AM.170
Just want to say that I think Atherton bikes are rad. Nice, clean, simple, functional, interesting.
brunoschull rossbellphoto's article
Aug 7, 2022 at 2:59
Aug 7, 2022
XCC Photo Epic: Mont-Sainte-Anne World Cup 2022
The women's XCC was one of the mosty exciting bits of racing, of any kind, that I've seen in a couple of decades. Cross country mountain bike racing has really evolved into a great form, with terrific courses, easy access for fans, absolute world class athletes, intense racing, intriguing storylines, all wraped up in a package that is somehow professional and amazing but also fun and friendly. Great stuff!
brunoschull brianpark's article
Jul 14, 2021 at 16:26
Jul 14, 2021
Letter from the Editor: Pinkbike’s Next Chapter with Outside
Goddamn it! This just happened with Climbing and Rock and Ice. They were bought/combined under the Outside umbrella...terrible! Much of the previously available free content is protected by a paywall, email boxes are flooded with new advertising, logging into your "Outside online" or Outside +" account presents a dizzying array of difficult to navigate options and suggestions...I'm out. I'm canceling my Outside online subscription. Not worth the hassle. As others have said, why the need to constantly grow, grow, grow? Obviously, it's not sustainable, nor does it produce quality. If individuals wanted to sell their product to make a profit, fair enough, but let's not pretend the change will lead to "an improved user experience." Pinkbike was fun when it was a bunch of scrappy folks doing what they love and having fun. Now...it will just be mainstream media content. The only positive side is wondering what small, creative outlet will take it's place.
Selling
Nov 8, 2020 at 0:14
Nov 8, 2020Nearly-new custom Falconer hardtail 27.5/700cc
$1500 USDHi Folks,
I am selling my custom Falconer hardtail. It’s a beautiful bicycle, in nearly-new condition, ridden perhaps 15-20 times. Why am I selling it? About two years ago, I injured my knee skiing, and I have not been able to ride since then. I don’t know when/if I will be able to ride again, and I can’t justify keeping this beauty in the garage.
This is a special bike, and it has a few unique features, so please study this carefully.
Frame
This bike is appropriate for riders in the L/XL range. It is built around what I would call classic or conservative geometry. Relative to modern standards, it has a relatively relaxed seat tube angle (72 degrees), a relatively steep head tube angle (69 degrees) and relatively long chainstays (445 mm). This creates a smooth, comfortable ride, ideal for rolling singletrack, gravel roads, and so on. The only geometry feature of the geometry that somewhat pushes the envelope is the reach (471 mm). That’s not extremely long, but it’s on the “longish” side for a bike like this. If you ride with a stem in the 100-120 mm range this will provide a nice, stretched-out position. If you ride with a stem in the 60-100 mm range, you will have a more modern/aggressive mountain bike position.
Another interesting feature of this frame is the “blind” built; that means that there are no holes in the frame for water to enter. All of the vent holes are strategically placed during the build so that they are invisible; this is really cool and practical for an all-weather bike!
Other relevant details about the frame: 27.2 seat post diameter, 68 mm threaded bottom bracket shell, 135 mm quick release dropouts, and 74 mm disc brake mounts.
Wheels
This bike is build around 27.5 wheels. It does have a great deal of tire clearance, including a very clean build with no chainstay bridge. The pictures show 27.5 X 2.25 wheels, but you could easily fit 2.25 or slightly larger tires. You could also switch to 700cc wheels and medium-width tires, and turn it into a more gravel-oriented machine. I estimate the circumference of the 27.5 X 2.25 wheels to be about 2194 mm. A 700cc X 38 mm wheel has a circumference of about 2192 mm. So if you switched to 700cc wheels the circumference would be essentially identical, and geometry would not be affected. Lots of options!
Fork
This bike is built with a straight head tube for a straight 1.125 OD fork. I choose a straight head tube and fork because I love the simple and clean look, especially with the integrated Chris King headset. However, potential buyers should understand that most current high-end suspension forks with tapered steerer tubes will not fit on this bicycle. To make this work with the 120 mm travel RockShox Reba fork (a great fork) I bought a replacement steerer tube/crown assembly, and had it switched. I have the original tapered steerer tube/crown, that I will include with the purchase.
Depending on what you want to do with this bike, you have some different options. First, you could ride it as is, with a 120 mm suspension form and 27.5 wheels. Second, you could replace the fork with a carbon or steel fork with a straight steerer tube, and turn it into a rigid ride. You can definitely find rigid carbon forks with straight steerer tubes. Then you could then re-sell the Reba with the original tapered steer/crown, to make back some money. Again, lots of options.
Components
The components on this bike should be clear in the pictures. Some highlights: Chris King integrated headset and threaded bottom bracket. Synchros seatpost, stem, and handlebar. Deore XT brakes, drivetrain, and hubs. DT aluminum rims and butted spokes. Schwalbe Kevlar bead tires. And a cool retro seat that I found!
Notes
If you are interested, I have many more pictures and details. Contact me if you are interested at brunoschull @ hotmail . com
brunoschull pinkbikeoriginals's article
Sep 16, 2020 at 11:52
Sep 16, 2020
Video: We Actually Tested Our Bike From The Future - The Grim Donut Part 2
All jokes aside, that bike is surprisingly fast I hope some folks in the industry sit up and take notice. Great content..both substance and entertaining.
brunoschull mikekazimer's article
Jul 11, 2019 at 8:29
Jul 11, 2019
First Ride: The 2020 Scott Gambler DH Bike is Light & Ultra-Adjustable
@MarcusBrody: Oh, I'm thinking much more about aesthetics than actual function! With the flip chip on the linear setting, the long chainstays setting, and air shock, a single crown fork, and regular handlebars/stem, that would be a sweet bike, and probably super-durable. The dropper post might be the killer. I just like the lines and simple look. Totally superficial, and just dreaming/hypothesizing.
brunoschull mikekazimer's article
Jul 11, 2019 at 5:56
Jul 11, 2019
First Ride: The 2020 Scott Gambler DH Bike is Light & Ultra-Adjustable
That's a beautiful bike--easily the cleanest DH bike I've seen yet. How do people think this bike would do as an enduro machine with a single crown fork?
brunoschull mikelevy's article
Jun 18, 2019 at 11:40
Jun 18, 2019
Review: 6 Months on the Trust Message Linkage Fork
Hi--Great review Mike. It really gives me a sense of what this fork is and is not doing. I agree with others that it represents a new direction for future designs. I have one question/observation. You wrote: "Trust claims that the linkage creates more stability, which I take to mean more consistent handling, by increasing the trail number as the fork goes into its travel. Because the axle path isn’t a straight line like it would be on a telescoping fork, the Message's offset changes as it goes into its travel. That means that the trail grows, too, which will kinda feel like your head angle is getting slacker, or at least not getting steeper... And that would obviously make your bike feel less twitchy when you’re doing things like braking hard, landing a jump or drop, or nosing into one of those roll-the-dice kinda chutes." Those words don't make complete sense to me. My understanding of this fork is that it is designed to keep the trail the same, or preserve the trail as much as possible, as the fork compresses, as opposed to a telescoping fork, with which the trail will decrease as the fork compresses, because the head angle will grow steeper (leaving the rear suspension out of the equation for the moment). So, with the Message, as the fork compresses, the head angle grows steeper (again, leaving the rear suspension out of the equation), which would have the effect of decreasing trail, but the offset grows smaller, which in isolation would have the effect of increasing trail, but which, combined with the head angle change, works to preserve the trail of the bike. And that makes the bike more stable and predictable, which sounds like what you felt on the trail. Is that correct? If so, this would indicate that the Message fork might be particularly suited for hard tails, because the rear suspension would not be messing with the kinematics, and trail would be preserved. When you throw the rear suspension into the equation, we'd have to say that sometimes the rear suspension would be compressing at the same time as the front suspension, therefore, the head angle would not grow steeper, and when the fork compressed the reduced offset would lead to increased trail...maybe that's what you were trying to get at in the review? In any case, I think the general point that this fork is designed to preserve or maintain trail through the fork travel could be made somewhat more clear. Thanks again.
brunoschull jamessmurthwaite's article
Jan 4, 2019 at 6:02
Jan 4, 2019
Lawsuit Claims Search & Rescue Delays Contributed to Mountain Biker's Death
Folks with more legal knowledge that I can step in here, but I'm suspicious of the various comments that the Police or SAR folks have "no responsibility" to do their best to find lost and/or injured people. I have held various first aid certifications for decades, and have been involved in numerous medical situations, some very serious, some involving loss of life. One of the things the first aid instructors always talk about is good samaritan laws, roughly, that people are expected to do, and can be held legally responsible for not doing, what somebody with equal training would be expected to do. If those kind of standards, however loose or vague they might be, can be applied to everyday citizens, I would be surprised if there is not a higher standard for an official SAR team, even if made up of volunteers, not least because it appears this SAR team was associated with and possible even partly funded by the Sherrifs office. As for the comments that the Sherrif's office only has a responsibility to solve crimes and not save lives, that may be the precedent that has been established by the courts in soem places at some times, but that seems like an extremely limited vision of what it means to protect public safety. From what I understand, police officers often go out of there way to help people in need, even if no crime has been committed, even at risk of their own lives. Again, I would be surprised if they were not in some way legally obligated to do so. Police officers, fire fighters, SAR teams, and so on, exist to help the public in situations exactly like this--it certainly seems like something failed this time.
Now, it may be true that the Sherrif's office and SAR team did do their best in this situation, and that meant waiting till morning. Maybe that was the right call, for all the reasons mentioned by others (darkness, effecient use of resources, and so on). We only have one limited side of the story, but, based on the information here, there are at least three things that make me think that the public bodies made serious errors and may be legally liable. 1) The possibility that they told the wife that they were starting a search and then cancelled it several hours later, 2) The possibility that they have made those insulting comments, and 3) The internal report which previously found fault with the institutions. I mean, really, we are not talking about a risky backcountry environment here, like the high mountains. How hard could it be to send some folks up the trails, shouting, blowing whistles, and so on. If the rough set of facts presented in this article are true, I think they should be held liable for their failure.
As an aside, yes, we live in a litigious society, but the repeated comments on here that "The bitch is just looking for a paycheck" reveal a deep misogyny and, I would say, a great fear of women. The instinctive hatred is revealing.
Last, for all those who say, "It was his fault, shit happens, he should have been prepared," I would say, be careful of the belief that you have it all under control, that you will always make the right decisions, that if you get in trouble you will be able to extract yourself, or that if you do pay the price, whatever that might be, including death, that you will accept that responsibility with individuality and grace. Pretending that you may never need help, or that you will bravely accept the consequences of your own actions at all times, betrays a lack of experience and self-reflection. Humility and empathy are advised.
