"Throughout the years our M badged bikes have evolved and progressed with the sport of downhill racing. Now we’re into a new evolution with a completely redesigned platform as we bring back the M1. Go behind the scenes to see and hear about the development of the new M1 with the Intense Factory Racing (IFR) team, mechanics and the ‘main man’ himself, Jeff Steber."
@meathooker: Haha, thx! Yeah, 13/14yo me in 95/96 was like “Shaun Palmer isn’t the first dude to ride an M1 in jean shorts, a snowboard (Lib Tech) T-shirt, and full face helmet!” I always refused to wear Spandex from my first NORBA downhill at age 12 (Mt Spokane, 1994). Never understood Spandex =P
@WRCDH: were you racing in 2001-2006? We’re similar ages. I raced a lot during that time but not much in your area. Did hit up a race in mt hood around 2003-2004 though
I wonder, is this the comeback of high-end aluminium bikes? Or Intense will just come up with carbon version in a year? Because this one looks badass, especially in raw. It's hard not to appreciate all the commitment that went in to it, I mean, this is a niche product from a brand which was not doing so great lately, they could have found easier money elsewhere.
Cause guys like Jeff stebber , max commencal and Robb roskop have DH racing in their blood . And keep the sport alive , DH ain’t dead . IMO going back to allot is much cheaper to develop then carbon . And carbon can really only be made in Asia to keep the cost down . Alloy gives the manufacturer the option to make bikes in North America and avoid the ridiculous cost of shipping
@mxmtb: The problem with Alloy is the stress cracks seen on alot of them lately especially on commencal's, We Broke 3 of the new v5 meta, the rear triangle all 3 times.
on the previous gen v4, TR with cracked shock mount & next frame had a big crack under the headtube, Friends one seperated at the headtube and was in a coma for 3 days.
@HeatedRotor: hey never said alloy didn’t break or have issues just. In a conversation with Dave turner few years back he gave me some numbers of what it costs to make carbon molds ….it’s a ton of money for a small brand. Intense made that carbon m29 and it was not a well received bike . So that’s about a million. Bucks down the drain , I’ve also heard of commencals failure .
Such a good looking rig! The lines just make it look fast, like the new bike — both of which have the trademark 1994-2024 Intense “Boomerang” seat-tube-area design feature.
But Intense needs to use that original basic INTENSE logo in chrome, with a base outline layer, on their new M1. As well as the original M1 logo. Both would look stellar on the new bike. I don’t really care for the new Intense & M1 logos they showed in the video...the new logos look too “graphic designer with an Adobe account” fancy to me.
My 98 M1 — a warranty replacement of my 94/95 M1, but inspired a bit by Palmer’s M1 in your pic...along with Tomac’s 97 M1, and Palmer’s orange prototype Manitou X-Vert on his 97 Specialized. www.pinkbike.com/photo/18793220/?s4
Carbon in the future ? front triangle ? chain stays ? seat stays ? Curious if material was part of the testing process. Weight, flex, absorption... etc. The new V10 under jacko stayed carbon. Easier to manufacturer carbon these days potentially ?
I reached out to Intense last week. They said Asia production. They'll offer both completes and frames. Geo chart and pricing will be published after Jan 1.
Video should be called developing a new DH bike for Aaron and Dakota that we are going to sell to the public.
I refuse to believe that this much engineering effort goes into actual development of the platform, versus the endless testing and tuning to suit their preferences. Neko was able to make a fine DH bike in one year, without any access to advanced engineering for stress analysis, it was just some trial and error.
Why would you think the Intense M1 developed by a team of racers and engineers is suited to only fit their preferences, but Neko's bike solely developed by himself would be a bike suited for everyone? Not saying that bias of developing around those who test the bike doesn't exist, but you seem to be applying that bias unequally. I would think it would be a stronger bias in the case of Neko's frame to be a bike suited for his preferences.
Thats a weird way to twist what I said. My implication is that its fairly straightforward to develop a DH platform that is perfectly fine for the mass market.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/20383318/?s6
www.pinkbike.com/photo/20383316/?s4
www.pinkbike.com/photo/20383319/?s6
on the previous gen v4, TR with cracked shock mount & next frame had a big crack under the headtube, Friends one seperated at the headtube and was in a coma for 3 days.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/25872358
But Intense needs to use that original basic INTENSE logo in chrome, with a base outline layer, on their new M1. As well as the original M1 logo. Both would look stellar on the new bike. I don’t really care for the new Intense & M1 logos they showed in the video...the new logos look too “graphic designer with an Adobe account” fancy to me.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/18793220/?s4