Block user

Recent

Cirest axel-vertman's article
Dec 29, 2021 at 12:50
Dec 29, 2021
Added 1 photo to bikes
Dec 11, 2021 at 0:47
Dec 11, 2021
0 comments – Add comment
Cirest henryquinney's article
Dec 11, 2021 at 0:39
Dec 11, 2021
Video: Top Fuel vs Element vs Jet9 vs Trance 29 vs Blur TR vs Lux Trail - Field Test Roundtable
I.Can there be such a thing like "objective ride characteristic testing" when biking has a phenomenological aspect and do we want it? When reading such tests I myself am not only interested in comparing objective physical data like geometry, weight or KOMs but I am interested in the very subjective experience testers have while riding. There is a phenomenological aspect to riding bikes which numbers can’t display; it is a highly subjective experience which has to be communicated in exactly such tests, in exactly the way they did. II.How could we know that one of the testers is cognitive biased (evidence)? III.Speaking of Kahneman and Tverskys - Could it be that your hermeneutics of suspicion are the result of the bad lux review (it cannot be what may not be)? IV.It would be a good thing to increase consumer maturity, maybe pb could to a podcast on that topic (manipulative marketing, biases,…)
Cirest mikelevy's article
Dec 9, 2021 at 7:11
Dec 9, 2021
The Pinkbike Podcast: Episode 95 - Field Test Down-Country Bike Debrief
@BikesNRussets To me the problem is geometry: Geometries nowadays are the spawn a downhillish speed cult, sacrificing their false gods of speed all the lovable traditional characteristics of former sub 150mm bikes (f.e. snappiness, playfulness, agility)? To my mind dc bike counter that trend.
Cirest henryquinney's article
Dec 7, 2021 at 10:01
Dec 7, 2021
Field Test: 2022 Santa Cruz Blur TR - The Cruz Missile
@jng7000: Thanks. I am mainly riding long distances, and on the downs slow tech stuff, with thight switchbacks.
Cirest henryquinney's article
Dec 6, 2021 at 9:54
Dec 6, 2021
Field Test: 2022 Santa Cruz Blur TR - The Cruz Missile
I've been riding a stanton sherpa hardtail for three years. I am now looking for a more comfortable alternative. The blur looks like a fun mile munching generalist which fits this bill. Thanks for the review.
Cirest seb-stott's article
Oct 20, 2021 at 4:33
Oct 20, 2021
Nerding Out: Why You Shouldn't Worry Too Much About Weight
What about the phenomenological aspect of added weight? ^^ There are some aspects of reality one cannot translate into physics.
Cirest mikelevy's article
Jul 2, 2020 at 8:32
Jul 2, 2020
The Pinkbike Podcast: Episode 13 - Are Bikes Too Regular Now?
Don’t mind my spelling… I was seriously thinking of buying a new trail/am frame for my trailriding in the alps, which means most of the time balancing, trackstands and lifting the back wheel around tight switchbacks at slow speed. For this kind of riding the current "regular" geometries are unsuitable unless I am willing to buy a small frame at 5’11, or spending money on a custom built frame. I have been wondering a lot lately – Can It be, that I am the only one, who thinks, that modern geometries are the spawn a downhillish speed cult, sacrificing their false gods all the lovable traditional characteristics of sub 150mm bikes (f.e. snappiness, playfulness, agility)?
Cirest jamessmurthwaite's article
Mar 18, 2020 at 16:04
Mar 18, 2020
Interview: Fabio Wibmer on Joining Canyon, Hitting the Lyon 25 and Competing in Rampage
Alles Gute Fabio....und nicht zu viel airtime. Schau dass'd geerdet bleibst! #kapelle
Cirest edspratt's article
Dec 3, 2019 at 15:40
Dec 3, 2019
Load more...
You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Copyright © 2000 - 2022. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.020536
Mobile Version of Website