Stumpjumper FSR Expert EVOWith bike categories seemingly springing up every month, it's easy to get confused when it comes to where certain models fit in. While this situation can quickly jade even the most enthusiastic of riders, looking at it another way reveals a brighter picture: never before have we, the riders, been able to pick from such a large number of bikes, some of which seem to be built exactly to our needs. Take the Stumpjumper FSR Expert EVO tested here for example. With just 5mm more travel and some tweaked geometry when compared to its more sedate relative, the standard Stumpjumper, the EVO manages to retain its trail oriented manners while appealing to a more aggressive audience. Thankfully, Specialized wisely chose a component spec that lets the EVO be its own bike, as opposed to bolting on parts that wouldn't suit its intentions. The EVO looks great on paper, with its dialed geometry and sensible weight, but how does it perform in the dirt?
When dissecting the EVO it is important to talk about how the black bike is different from the conventional Stumpjumper, and while they both may look very similar at first glance, a closer look reveals some glaring contrasts between the two. Starting up front, the EVO's head angle sits at 67 degrees, a full 1.5 degrees slacker than the standard Stumpjumper, enough to fully alter the bike's personality. Bottom bracket height is raised ever so slightly, sitting at 13.3", or just 3mm taller than its more docile brother, likely done because of the EVO's 5mm of extra rear wheel travel that gives it 145mm in total. But that extra 5mm of travel pales in significance compared to Specialized's choice to forgo using an inertia valve equipped Fox Brain rear shock in lieu of a more conventional, but still custom tuned, RP23 damper. The Brain shock is a clever bit of kit that no doubt has its place, but an EVO rider is likely to be looking for a more active ride that responds to the terrain, and in my opinion, gives the rider more traction. The EVO's Fox shock features a ProPedal lever like you'd expect, but it actually works opposite to the way that we've become accustomed to: instead of using the tuning range knob to select one of three levels of compression when the ProPedal is engaged, the rider chooses which level of low speed compression damping, 1 -light, 2 -medium, 3 -firm, he or she would like while set to the open position. Going to be shredding some smooth, fast trails and looking to pump some backsides? Set it to the firmest compression setting to get the most out of the terrain. Wet and slippery day on some rooty singletrack? You'd be best to open it up to the lightest setting in order to eke out what traction is available from the ground. Because the open position now uses the ProPedal's three damping options, the climbing mode has a single fixed firm setting. You'll certainly have to know exactly what you want out of your bike to get the most from the special shock tuning, but it's great to see Specialized thinking out of the box.
The EVO comes stock with a lightweight Gamut Shift Guide, a smart decision given the bike's intentions, that attaches to the frame via its ISCG 05 chain guide tabs - you won't find those on the standard Stumpy either. This means that a rider is able to bolt up a proper single ring guide if he or she is strong enough to push a 1 x 10 setup, or even a HammerSchmidt if they desired (
the low pivot position would be ideal for a 'Schmidt conversion).
Specialized has wisely chosen to spec a Fox RP23 out back instead of their more XC orientated inertia valve equipped model that is used on standard Stumpjumpers, presumably for maximum bump compliance and traction. There is still some trickery to be found within the diminutive Fox damper in that its ProPedal lever actually controls the amount of low-speed compression damping in the open position, giving you three settings to choose from. Turn it to the climbing mode and you have a predetermined climbing function that stiffens the rear end up for long, smooth climbs.
The frame itself features some swoopy lines that could easily be mistaken for carbon at first glance, especially with the bike's stealth matte finish. The top tube slopes down drastically as it works its way back from the tapered head tube, giving the rider a generous amount of stand over clearance at its lowest point. Cable routing for the Specialized Command Post that comes stock on the bike is run cleanly under the top tube as well, making it nearly invisible until it exits at the far end. Shift and rear brake lines are routed on the underside of the down tube using Specialized's clean cable guides - it makes for a streamlined look, but its a point to keep in mind if you make a habit of hanging your bike over a truck's tailgate.
Predictably, the EVO uses their FSR suspension design to control the bike's 145mm of rear wheel travel. It can sometimes feel like companies are switching up suspension platforms every other year, but Specialized has long used this design, refining the system as time goes by. The result is a tidy package that may not have all of the flash and dazzle of this week's latest hot design, but it is no doubt proven itself year after year. Aluminum hardware holds everything together.
A de rigueur tapered head tube (top right) is used up front in conjunction with the Fox 32's tapered steerer tube in an effort to stiffen the front end. Down low on the black bike you'll find a Press Fit 30 bottom bracket shell (bottom right)that is fitted with a custom set of SRAM's XO double ring trail cranks, along with a Gamut Shift Guide bolted to the bike's ISCG 05 tabs. Specialized uses the Horst Link suspension design on all of their performance full suspension bikes and the Stumpy EVO is no different (bottom left). A smart clevis system (top left) eliminates the Fox shock's need for a rear bushing, instead connecting the damper directly to the bike's swing link via sealed bearings. Why? Worn bushings, usually found to be the rearmost bushing, will never pose an issue, and the design may make for a smoother stroke.
Specifications
|
Release Date
|
2011 |
|
Price
|
$4100 |
|
Travel |
145mm |
|
Rear Shock |
Fox RP23-S with Boost Valve |
|
Fork |
Fox F150 RL |
|
Headset |
1-1/8 and 1.5" Threadless, Campy style upper with 1.5" lower, cartridge bearings |
|
Cassette |
Shimano HG81, 10-speed, 11-36t |
|
Crankarms |
Custom SRAM Carbon XO, 10-speed AM double |
|
Chainguide |
Gamut shift guide |
|
Bottom Bracket |
PF30 BB |
|
Rear Derailleur |
SRAM X.0, 10-speed, mid cage |
|
Chain |
KMC X10, 10-speed |
|
Front Derailleur |
SRAM X.7, 10-speed, S1 direct mount |
|
Shifter Pods |
SRAM X.9, 10-speed |
|
Handlebar |
Specialized Enduro low-rise bar, 7050 alloy, 720mm wide, 8 degree backsweep, 6 degree up, 31.8mm |
|
Stem |
Specialized XC |
|
Grips |
Specialized lock-on |
|
Brakes |
Custom Avid Elixir CR SL |
|
Wheelset |
Roval Traverse AL |
|
Hubs |
Roval Traverse AL |
|
Spokes |
DT Swiss Competition 1.8/1.6mm stainless |
|
Rim |
Roval Traverse AL, 26mm, 27/32h |
|
Tires |
S-Works Purgatory |
|
Seat |
Specialized BG Henge Comp |
|
Seatpost |
Specialized Command Post |
|
The EVO's component package errs on the light side of the spectrum for a bike with its angles, which sets it apart from many similar travel machines that are spec'd with burlier parts. A Fox F150 RL 32 (
with a tapered steerer tube and 15mm thru-axle) fork sits up front, as opposed to a bigger legged 20mm thru-axle option. This no doubt sheds weight, but it also clearly puts the EVO in a different category than its bigger travel siblings in the Enduro fold - despite the EVO using a head angle that is an ever-so-close half of a degree steeper. The bike is rolling on a set of Roval Control AL wheels that have been beefed up in the name of lateral stiffness with the addition of some extra spokes over the previous year, although they still weigh in at under 1700 grams. Stopping the bike is a set of custom Avid Elixir CR SL's done up in black and using a 185mm/160mm rotor combination (
large and extra large models get a 203mm/185mm up size for more power)
SRAM has a monopoly on the EVO's drivetrain, kitting the bike out with an XO level 10 speed group that uses a wide range 11-36 tooth cassette out back. This paired with a 24/36 tooth chain ring combo (
that is held together with aluminum c/r bolts) gives the bike a wide enough gearing range to both climb walls and carry speed when the trail opens up, but keep in mind that the low range is slightly higher than what you'd find on a standard triple crankset that is fitted with a 22 tooth granny ring (
1.556m of rollout as opposed to a 22/34's 1.399m) Fitted in the Press Fit bottom bracket is a set of blacked out carbon XO cranks and a minimalist Gamut Shift Guide. Specialized smartly spec'd the EVO with a dropper post as well, choosing to use their own Command Post. I tested last year's version, and while it worked decently, its remote left a lot to be desired and I came away wishing for another inch of drop - both issues that Specialized has addressed for 2011. The completely new remote no longer suffers from excessive play at its pivot and the post now features a full five inches of travel.
Stumpjumper FSR Expert EVO geometry, size medium
Head angle | 67° |
EFF Seat Angle | 74.5° |
Top Tube (actual) | 558mm |
Chainstay | 420mm |
Bottom Bracket Height | 338mm |
Actual Frame Size (seatube length) | 445mm |
Wheelbase | 1137mm |
Riding the Stumpjumper EVOThe Stumpy EVO climbs quite well, enough so that I would guess that the bike was in the 120mm travel category if it had been a blind test, not sporting 145mm. The slack head angle and non-travel adjust fork seriously hurt the bike's technical climbing ability, although flipping the Fox shock's ProPedal lever helped keep the bike from sitting into its sag, and therefore the front end a touch steeper than it would be otherwise.
The Stumpjumper EVO offers a firm
climbing platform, even with the Fox shock's ProPedal set to the open position and the lightest damping level selected. The bike accelerates briskly, whether out of the saddle or seated, and without any of the wallowing that many bikes in this category are prone to. While the EVO doesn't force its rider to sit and spin like so many others, allowing you to throw your weight around if need be without worrying about overwhelming the RP23 damper, the EVO's steep 74.5 degree seat angle is ideal for riders who tend to sit and spin their way up climbs. The efficient suspension and light Roval wheels made for a machine that really took to attacking short steep pitches just as much as long climbs that need that diesel approach to get over. That is a rare attribute for a 145mm travel bike and it's one that I was thankful for when tackling the abrupt and punchy climbs found on the Gooseberry's trail system in Utah. The 2.0" wide Purgatory rear tire is never going to be as forgiving as a higher volume trail bike tire, but it does an admirable job of hooking up when needed. The EVO's 2 x 10 gearing is slightly taller than a traditional 22 tooth ring and 34 tooth cog combo, but I never found myself looking for another gear when the trail gained elevation. I'll once again give props to the bike's light wheels and tires for that manageable feeling - it would have been a different story with heavier hoops and rubber.
While the black bike is an efficient climber, its 67 degree head angle and non-travel adjust Fox fork made the bike a bear when it came to technical pitches. Throw in a bottom bracket height that is half an inch lower than some of its competition and you have yourself a handful when the trail gets steep and tight. I found myself having to time my cranks so as not to catch on rocks and logs much more than on a higher bike, as well as having to attack challenging sections more aggressively in an effort to hold more momentum up and over ledges or through tricky switchbacks. Equipping the EVO with a fork that allows you the option of lowering would improve the technical climbing in some regards, but keep in mind that it would lower an already low bottom bracket. I found that flipping the RP23's ProPedal to climbing mode helped reign in the head angle slightly by holding the bike up in its rear wheel travel, thereby steepening the steering angle by a fraction. Doing this does improve the bike's technical climbing abilities, but it would be nice to take advantage of the extra traction provided by leaving the Fox shock in the fully open mode.
Riders considering the EVO should take into account the terrain that they climb: do most of your climbing on fire roads? Then the slack angles and low B.B. won't be as much of an issue. I can also see some riders looking past the bike's climbing faults, even if they do have to ascend tech trails, simply because the bike rips on the way back down. The same low bottom bracket height that hindered technical climbing is what allows the EVO to absolutely carve the terrain when the trail points the opposite direction. Handling quirks aside, the EVO proved to be a very efficient climber, especially given its 145mm of travel.The black Stumpy EVO loves to be pumped through terrain, making much more of undulations and transitions than a longer travel rig could ever hope. Its angles and relatively low bottom bracket are always egging on its rider to go faster, so much so that the bike's Fox 32 F150 RL fork can be over ridden by an aggressive pilot.
If ever there was one bike designed purely for fun, the EVO could be it.
Descending on the black Stumpjumper will bring a smile to even the most timid of rider's faces. I attribute this to not only the bike's inspiring angles (
the very same that I grumble about above), but also a suspension design that tames the ground while still providing feedback to let you know what is happening under you. There are many bikes out there that can descend competently, but certainly less that manage to do both of those tasks at the same time. No, it doesn't level the terrain like the Enduro does, but what it does do is encourage you to be light on the bike, look for backsides, and manual through even the smallest depressions in the trail. Don't get me wrong, the longer travel Enduro is a great machine, but I found that you have to be riding hard to make the most out of it, whereas the EVO is a much more enjoyable rig when not absolutely attacking the trail or on tamer terrain. Just as I am every time that I test a bike with Fox's RP23 damper, I was surprised at how well the small canned air shock performed. No, it isn't a coil shock and it won't ever be as supple, but it does an admirable job when pushed to its limits. I spent most of my descending time with the shock set to its lightest compression setting, but there was a noticeable amount of firmness added when either of the two stiffer settings were selected. I found that the bike was able to work the terrain so well in the full open position, even on smooth trails like Utah's Jem singletrack, that I rarely felt an advantage by firming the ride up.
As expected, the 67° head angle felt ideal once some speed was built up and the bike was allowed to be steered more by leaning than actually turning the bars. The relatively low 13.3" bottom bracket makes for a rig that doesn't take a lot of effort to corner hard - this bike wants to turn and doesn't feel skittish about doing it while going quickly. The EVO simply felt more planted and with better weight distribution than other bikes that use the same head angle, but sit higher. That feeling encouraged me to attack flatter sections of trail that I may have otherwise let off on simply because it was much more enjoyable to carry speed on the Stumpjumper than to relax and take a breather. As I said earlier, it is like someone penned the EVO purely with fun in mind.
The surefooted nature of the EVO was especially appreciated when the trail conditions got tricky.
While it is easy to rave about how well the bike descended, there were a few points of contention. The bike's Fox fork, with its 32 mm stanchions and 15 mm thru-axle, left a lot to be desired when it came to stiffness. I've ridden 32's before and I know that they perform well, but the EVO is probably capable of more than what the 32 series is really meant for. Riding downhill or technical sections on true cross-country trails at the speed that the EVO can carry resulted in too much flex for my liking, both torsionally and front to back. I also found myself having to run higher air pressure in the fork than I would have preferred in order to keep it from diving unnecessarily. Fox, if you're listening, more low speed compression control please. It would be worth the weight penalty for aggressive riders to equip the EVO with a Fox 36 that is lowered to 150 mm of travel. In the same vein, the bike could be pushed hard enough on cross-country trails to detect a bit too much flex coming from the rear end - a result of the svelte wheels and light frame perhaps. Will we see the EVO using a 142mm rear end for next season?
The EVO loves to go fast and has geometry that encourages its rider to do so. The low and slack stance inspires confidence, and the quality rear wheel travel proves that, in the right hands, a lot can come from a little. While flex up front was a hindrance when riding hard, even on cross-country trails, the bike was still a blast at all times, even when the terrain was less than challenging.Warm Winter day - check. Fun bike - check. Stupid grin - double check. Every ride aboard the EVO was a blast. This is a bike that wants to make you smile, even on the tamest trails.
What about those parts...• The bike's Purgatory tires perform wonderfully. They roll decently fast, especially the thin 2.0" wide rear tire, and offer predictable traction. Great all rounders.
• SRAM's 10 speed XO group has once again impressed me with its shifting precision and speed, even when abused and caked with thick mud. Another knock against those who claim the ten cogs out back will never work as well as nine.
• The one drivetrain part that did let me down were the bearings used for the Press Fit bottom bracket. It was only a few months of riding before they were toast.
• The bike's Gamut Shift Guide works very well at keeping the chain put. I rode the bike sans lower chain guide roller to see how effective it was and quickly learnt that it is far better with it on.
• The Avid Elixir's brake bleed from the factory left a lot to be desired and required some work before they were trail worthy. I mention this for two reasons; one, because it isn't ideal, and two, because Avid just recently put a lot of effort into improving the factory bleeds that come on original equipment brakes. The EVO's stoppers were too early to get the new treatment, but expect good things down the road from bikes equipped with Avid brakes on the showroom floor.
The EVO is a dream come true for a lot of riders. The bike manages to spot that hard to find middle ground where it can make even the most boring trails fun, but without losing its cross-country sensibilities. If you are really looking to define the EVO, even though the bike seems to do everything in its power to resist, you might refer to it as a trail bike with an attitude. It's stoked to climb all day, it's happy to carve turns like others can only dream of, and it will bring its own party to trails that you may otherwise find less than fun.You can check out Specialized's entire lineup on
their website.
I'm glad you said this: "While it is easy to rave about how well the bike descended, there were a few points of contention. The bike's Fox fork, with its 32 mm stanchions and 15 mm thru-axle, left a lot to be desired when it came to stiffness. I've ridden 32's before and I know that they perform well, but the EVO is probably capable of more than what the 32 series is really meant for. Riding downhill or technical sections on true cross-country trails at the speed that the EVO can carry resulted in too much flex for my liking, both torsionally and front to back. I also found myself having to run higher air pressure in the fork than I would have preferred in order to keep it from diving unnecessarily. Fox, if you're listening, more low speed compression control please."
------ because we're both about the same weight and riding style (or lack thereof) and I feel the same way about the Fox 32 150. Tough to tune low speed compression and holds back an aggressive descending bike. Perhaps it's a better fork for more mellow terrain but might not be well suited for BC technical trails. Of course this is just a personal opinion and others might, and probably will. agree to disagree
With HA lower than 67 you will flip flop and with such high cockpit (please no jokes here) you will have trouble with getting straight back for seated pedalling. XC/Trail bike even an NUskool one, with such properties like slack HA and short TT is simply not effective even on fire roads. It's super fun when going down the hill, but for such use man created 6" bikes
Personally, I don't think it's been made for large production numbers; rather to test public acceptance of some different ideas with travel and geometry that will work their way in to the Stumpjumper lineup through time.
Great points for sure. I would still like to see it with the same amount of travel, just be stiffer in the front and back.
Surprisingly, I would say that it is next to none. I've got loads of time on the exact same wheelset on my personal bike, as well as last year's version as well. I never found the wheels to be overly flexible.
Yea if you are strong enough to push a 36t all the time then there is defiantly weight to be lost.. I think most could maybe go 34t single with a 36t cassette and still probably be fine.. I know I could (given this is on a 7 inch travel Yeti) and I climb some steep +15% climbs at times.. I'll bet the EVO could be ridden as a 1x10 fairly easily.. you just need a mildly strong motor.. that being said, I will just keep my 24t so I can sit and be a wimp and spin, because there are times I dont want to go full anaerobic when I am climbing my bike.. haha
As for NN, as I said it all depends on location, where you ride. My local trails are too technical to pick up higher speeds and there aren't many really sharp rocks and stones. Schwalbe Evo versions are tubeless ready so you just put a bit more sealant in than you would do with full on UST. You end up more or less 150g per wheel lighter than with UST version. I will run this season toiletpaper thin evo up front, and doubledefense on back with my full on UST rims.
Geometry-wise it's got a 0.6mm higher STATIC bb, 5mm more rear travel, and only weighs 1lb more,
Is there something I'm missing or not getting?
Then they try new things like a diffent hub size or a dual crown trail fork and they get blasted. The job of the engineer is the easy one, the job of the marketing manager in charge of implementing certain ideas and supressing others is the tuff one. Typically if there is a new idea differnet than the standard, it is because an engineer thought of a better way. (Doesn't always work in application, but the idea was meant for good.)
My point, take the bad with the good. I like this bike, and if I bought it, it would be with the intention of leaving it stock, although with this review I question the fork, hopefully a better match will come up next year.
interesting to watch the Enduro, Stumpjumper, Trek Remedy, and others play around with geometries and specs to dial-in the trail / AM offerings.
the Split-Pivot I am riding on my Devinci Dixon is simply amazing!
-because you get the pedalling efficiency of a well-designed single pivot
-but with the active braking of a FSR, plus a great shock tune with minimal LSC (Dave Weagle did great work here for Devinci)
....the Split Pivot is weird to ride because it does not have that over-active "squatty" feel of the FSR and you consider it is not working?? it feels transparent...
until you look down at the rocker / shock and you can see them working, but there is not the power loss feeling of FSR? after a ride you can see the 'o' ring on the shock shaft has moved down, but you don't feel that whilst riding, what you get is great pedalling and great traction
I don't even use Pro-Pedal on my Dixon SP, its simply that efficient
I actualy rode a super old XC bike of my friend lately, with like 130 stem and I could still do steep rockgardens with it and do some drop offs - it's a matter of technique, mianly proper riding stance. What those super short XC and AM bikes do is they they are just easy to ride for everybody, they let people run away with many bad habits, especially being too far back. Let's be honest, the target group is weekend warriors. But nonetheless I don't like the fact that these promote bad habits.
also, there should be a way to favorite articles like you can favorite photos and videos!
I'd agree with the comments on the Fox 32, it can feel overfaced on rougher faster descents and a bit "twangy" on hard impacts and hard braking
I am currently riding a 2011 Devinci Dixon Split-Pivot with 145mm of rear travel and a 150mm (lowered) Fox 36 Float RC2
I've ridden the same bike with Fox 32 Float 150mm and it felt good for lighter trail riding, but a bit out of control on rougher all-mountain trails
the boundaries between trail and all-mountain are blurring, and its interesting how each manufacturer has their own take on this area
Specialized have made a smart move with their "Evo" range, and Devinci have said the Dixon can be run with either the Fox 32 or Fox 36 whilst maintaining the lifetime warranty on the frame
my Dixon is 27.4lb with Fox 36 Float fork, SRAM X-9 (2 x 9 with Blackspire device), SLX crankset, Elixir CR brakes, ZTR Flow / Pro II wheels running Stans with Specialized Control Purgatory and Eskar tires, Easton Haven stem and post, Renthal 750mm bars, as a reference to the weight of the Stumpy Evo
And here is the problem of the bike. It allows it to insanely fast in rough terrain. In such kind of terrain the Fox RP shock heats up in a glimpse of an eye and by that rebound is getting faster. I own a Specialized SX (the 4x version with only 100mm of travel) and the SJ evo. On both bikes it took only 4 (!) riding days to blow up the shock. The big problem is the system integration specialized always uses on his bikes. You are not able to switch to another shock to go riding while your blown up shock is in service or switch to a shock which can take the abuse.
If possible I try to get some custom links to switch to another shock. My experience is sadly that Fox won't last if you ride it hard.
is that not essentially what propedal does anyway?
Evo desends better and climbs better than the trance but with a few points.
Descending you have to keep the pedals level or you be hitting them on every little root - never had this problem on the trance - but once i adapted my foot work it was fine.
Climbing you need to lock out everything, the non-travel adjustable 150mm fork makes the bike want to wheelie on technical climbs, even when sat on the nose of the saddle trying to push the front down. unlocked i reckon the trance is a bettter climber but locked the spesh takes it due to the lower overall weight.
on a little side note my trance has a travel adjustable revelation if i was to take into account this then the trance is a better technical climber with the fork wound down. Why spesh didnt spec some sort of travel adjustment to the fork i dont know - probably cost - but that would have sorted 1 of the only issues this bike has.
overall i reckon on my first ride out i was going as fast on the downhills as my long term bike and generally, as long as it wasn't too technical, faster on the up hills.
for those that know the trails the first ride was on the new red (difficult) trail at Eastridge in shropshire.
But please.., can someone tell me why Im dropping the chain, 4 times now, on really fast rutted downhills?? Never had a bike w/a chain guide. What shld I be looking for? Thanks!
Yep, could be beefier, but then it wouldnt be as nimble. I am a big and I think it's solid enough for me. Yes, the fork dives a bit and it would be great to have adjustable height for climbing occasionally. You do need to time your cranks on technical climbs to avoid strikes and the wide bars occasionally feel clumsy (most the time they are blinding).
There are lots of possible tweaks (tyres,seat, dropper, rubbish grips) but you would change character and style of bike. I live my EVO just the way it is. Pure rock and roll!
Will be avoiding this in teh future and SRAM kit in general. I have more Shimano parts across my 3 bikes and the other 3 family bikes and yet not one problem, wish I could say the same for SRAM.
SRAM?....well my confidence is smashed....X9 "fell apart inside" according to SRAM (warrantied), dropper post had to be rebuilt by a mate with different rings (no units available to swap for 8-12weeks) and now the BB/crank. Am nervous of using SRAM on long all mountain rides.
chrisking.com/tech/int_headsets_explained/int_hds_explain_4
as an owner my comments above are above.
I love it!
Anyone know?