2010 Norco Empire 5 SE

by Jordan Holmes
Jul 17, 2009

After a couple days at the 2010 Norco Product launch in Vancouver BC, we had an opportunity to take an up close and personal look at the new bikes. The first bike of course was the Team DH, and second up to bat is the 2010 Norco Empire 5 SE.

Read on for more info on the newly revised slopestyle bike from Norco...

Taking a more visually pleasing approach to their bike line, Norco has designed the Empire 5 SE around a Grey and Orange color scheme, with subtle anodized parts to match. The headset spacers, rocker link, seat post clamp and seat, along with the derailleur hanger, and some other minor parts have all been anodized orange. The decals on the Empire 5 SE also match the Orange color scheme, along with the fork decals, and the head tube badge. Not to much changed on the build kit, however, Norco is providing you with a better bang for your buck in 2010. The rear suspension has stayed the same, however, the front fork has changed to a Marzocchi TST 2 Coil fork, losing the active travel adjust feature from the year prior. As well, Norco opted out of the SRAM x-7 rear mech from 2009, and stepped it up to a SRAM x-9 rear mech. Stronger Avid Elixir 5 brakes, slightly wider rim width, and a refined geometry mark a step in the correct direction for Norco's Empire 5 SE. The Empire 5 will still provide 5 inches of travel via the 1 piece rocker link, and will still utilize the FSR suspension platform.


Suspension Setup

Suspension Setup


FrameEmpire Team frame (131 mm travel)
Rear ShockMarzocchi TST Air with piggyback
ForkMarzocchi 55 TST 2 COIL 160mm
HeadsetFSA Threadless alloy
CrankarmsFSA Gravity Lite
ChainguideE Thirteen LG1
Bottom BracketFSA Gravity Lite
PedalsDMR V 8 pedal ( alloy )
ChainKMC Z-9000 9 speed chain
CassetteSRAM PG 950 11-28T
Rear DerailleurSram X-9 rear derailleur
Shifter PodSram X5 shifter ( 9 speed trigger)
HandlebarFSA Gravity Lite 25 mm rise
StemFSA Gravity Lite
GripsSunline Lock on grips
BrakesAvid Elixir 5 7" rotor
Front WheelJumping Flea front 20 mm
Sun Equilizer 29
Rear WheelJumping Flea front 135 x 12
Sun Equilizer 29
TiresMaxxis Ardent 26x2.4
SaddleNorco Pivotal DJ saddle
SeatpostPivotal (27.2 ) post


For 2010, the Empire 5 SE has a more dialed geometry. The stand over height has been reduced slightly, and the wheelbase slightly decreased. The slightly lower stand over height ensures you can get over the bike when need be, and the slightly tighter wheelbase means better turning, and overall feel of the bike. The bottom bracket height has been slightly decreased as well, lowering the center of gravity on the Empire 5 SE even more, making it corner better, and eat up bumps when need be.










The Empire 5 SE is for sale in short and medium lengths for 2010, and will include ISCG 05 tabs, ensuring you can run whatever chain device you may want.

The Empire 5 SE should weigh in around 33 to 35 pounds for 2010, and still uses the 135 x 12mm maxle axle system.

MSRP for the Empire SE is approx. $4000 CDN, while the standard Empire 5 will be retailing in the $2700 range.

Empire 5 Special Edition

Empire 5 Special Edition


That sums up the changes and alterations on the Empire 5 SE for 2010. Stay tuned at Pinkbike.com, for more information on the all new 2010 Norco Bike's Lineup. Keep it rubber side down!


View all photos from the 2010 Launch

www.norco.com
Must Read This Week









70 Comments

  • + 16
flag callumbillington (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:00)
 That's a pretty sick little bike! Smile Norco are back on track!
  • - 1
flag sk8biker95 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:43)
 yess! ... it looked blue and orange on the picture tho so i didn't really like the colour scheme .. but now that i see its grey its an sick bike!
  • + 5
flag asteezc1 (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:52)
 its a shame that they have a fixed travel fork, i find that i ride mine at the lowest setting all the time as it rides the nicest, imo i rode it with a argyle and that had my favorite ride characteristics.
  • - 3
flag parkerrider (Jul 16, 2009 at 19:40)
 this years looked much better.
  • - 1
flag erik74 (Jul 16, 2009 at 20:58)
 this is one sick bike.
  • + 3
flag n-bri (Jul 16, 2009 at 21:43)
 sick colors
  • - 1
flag specializer4 (Jul 17, 2009 at 11:08)
 wicked bike!!!!
  • + 4
flag dray (Jul 17, 2009 at 13:06)
 would look way better with a 36 talas rc2 and a rp23
  • + 2
flag erik74 (Jul 17, 2009 at 19:47)
 and cost way too much for a complete...
  • + 1
flag dray (Jul 17, 2009 at 20:51)
 yeah it would be sick tho
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag OlSkoolJake (Jul 16, 2009 at 20:39)
 I've been riding NORCO porducts for 25 years. I love the company and all they stand for. However their pricing on bikes is getting out of control and un-favorable. Being a grassroots rider I have to pay for all my own up-keep etc. etc. With the prices rocketing upwards it's no wonder most of the people riding the newer NORCO'S are litlle kids with rich parents. I just belive a BC product should be cheap to BC peps so we can support our own products. Props to NORCO for another year of wicked bikes. No props for expensive bikes taht die-hard NORCO lovers can't afford!
  • + 1
flag woodygebhardt (Jul 16, 2009 at 21:21)
 you've been riding from 6 years old? beast.
  • + 2
flag brule Mod Plus (Jul 16, 2009 at 22:31)
 Jake,
Norco is aware of the world economy and all their retails have dropped (the spec has too in order to make that happen) to make their bikes more affordable to the end consumer like yourself.
  • + 1
flag bradchills (Jul 17, 2009 at 10:01)
 ok... so Dylan Korba is riding an '09 in an article about the 2010 empire.
  • + 1
flag etownrider (Jul 17, 2009 at 10:03)
 I'm not sure if woody's comment was a dis to jake but I know lots of people that started two wheelin at six including myself,it's not to uncommon.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag vokes (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:52)
 I like the looks ... BUT what is it with Norco when it comes to doing promo pics ??? Once again this bike has different front and back tires. I find it hard to believe that's how it comes?? Surely they could have at least found a set of tires that match instead of the Ardent in the back and the Kenda in the front (in this pic)
  • + 1
flag brule Mod Plus (Jul 16, 2009 at 19:21)
 It comes with Ardents and they had them on the other demo bikes, but at the time that we were able to take pics of the bike that Jordan rode, his had different tires. It's just a picture and the spec is dual Ardents.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag OlSkoolJake (Jul 16, 2009 at 23:32)
 Brule,
Yes you are correct. I too have seen the prices in the bike industry drop over over all. Thanx mostly the popularity of the "green" lifestyle. I just wish the prices would drop quicker. Plus for provincial and fedral goverments to give tax breaks to both businesses and consumer's. Pedal power is slowly winning.
  • + 1
flag valtra (Jul 17, 2009 at 10:02)
 That's kind of a bullshit argument. Mountain biking is not a "green lifestyle" at all. We drive pretty massive distances with our bikes on our vehicles, often large gas-guzzling SUVs or trucks, to go riding. That green lifestyle "pedal power" stuff really only applies to cyclist commuters and kids like me who don't have cars to get around.

But, I guess if it gets us price cuts we win one way at least right.
  • + 1
flag OlSkoolJake (Jul 17, 2009 at 14:18)
 Valtra,
It's not an argument it is a stament of facts. I have the blessing of living in BC where there are trails right out my back door. The MTB community here is probibly much more "green" focused just due to the fact that BC has been on the fore front of the "green" lifestyle for many years already. I & many other people don't own a car because gas just simply sux! I can understand the use of a vehicle if you live in urban sprawl Ontario.
  • + 1
flag valtra (Jul 17, 2009 at 16:03)
 If you live in the urban sprawl? That's where you don't need a vehicle. I live on a farm in rural Ontario and that makes a car an absolute necessity to get around. Anyone who lives in town where the local trails are could make a nice ride out of just getting to the trail head.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag nightmareterror (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:04)
 Now i'm not one to bash bombers, but i could easily see a Fox 36 Float on that, as well as the DHX air. Not that it isn't a good setup, but for the money i'd rather pay for higher end suspension..? Dig the frame, but I also wouldn't mind seeing this in a fewer different color schemes!
  • + 1
flag hondamotox (Jul 17, 2009 at 16:13)
 The bomber 55's are great forks, I personally don't see a need for any better ones.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag badgermeister (Jul 17, 2009 at 0:41)
 i think i'll be waiting out to compare this amongst all the other 2010 rigs before considering buying one of these. this does seem overpriced but i suppose if its quality your after thats the cost.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag lilwalters (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:40)
 can someone please explain to me why this bike is $4000???

-headset
-fork
-shifters
-chain
-pedals
-less than impressive brakes (with a $4000 pricetag)
-saddle/seatpost (norco in-house brand??)
-crappy cassette

Anyone???
  • + 1
flag Atrak (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:49)
 accually the elixers work very well. I love mine.

headsets rarely get wrecked
pedals get pitched anyways, and whats wrong with v8's.
who sits on seats when freeriding?
the fork is the only thing that accually isn't so hot
  • + 3
flag asteezc1 (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:54)
 i bought the 09 and despite the specs im pretty satisfied with the bike, once u ride it u see that its not overpriced.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nightmareterror (Jul 17, 2009 at 4:44)
 I agree with the brake system, the Elixir CR's or anything above are just over-engineered.. sure they're nice, but can be problematic if you have any luck like I do with them and require ridiculous maintenance. 8-)
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Bobynboy (Jul 17, 2009 at 0:09)
 looks overpriced to me. the normal empire 5 for $2700 doesn't seem to bad, although it does seem like they cheaped out on some of the components.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag bradchills (Jul 16, 2009 at 22:39)
 anybody else notice that the two shots of the guy actually riding it looks like he's on an '09? not a '10.
  • + 1
flag mybicycle (Jul 17, 2009 at 8:34)
 That is Dylan Korba!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag seraph (Jul 17, 2009 at 12:34)
 The E5 SE better be way better than the normal E5 to justify the extra $1300 CAD.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag sharkyboy (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:05)
 I liked the '09 colors better
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag ehrenmcphee (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:24)
 dont like the colours, the 09 was such a better colour combo
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag masterbailer (Jul 17, 2009 at 8:47)
 is the normal empire gonna be almost the same as this year or like the SE except in a different colour?
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag kylechapman (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:16)
 still seems way to overpriced, but it's a pretty good looking bike
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag riskyB1985 (Jul 17, 2009 at 1:49)
 can someone tell me what the difference between a slopestyle and a fr bike is ? is it just that the back end is at a steaper angle with just as much travel ?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag BikeDaug40 (Jul 18, 2009 at 12:05)
 Infinitely better looking than their DH rig.
The seat-post hole still looks like sh*t.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag trainboy17 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:36)
 looks good. where can i buy?
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag norco-gaz (Jul 17, 2009 at 1:17)
 all i know is i want one!! well done to norco for the 2010 line up!
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag KyleG43 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:45)
 yum
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Oregon (Jul 17, 2009 at 8:11)
 What exactly is Avid Elixir 5 brakes?
  • + 1
flag hondamotox (Jul 17, 2009 at 16:18)
 Awesome brakes.
  • + 0
flag Oregon (Jul 17, 2009 at 17:58)
 Yeah I love my Elixir R I have them on my TOP but Elixir 5 must be Canadian
  • + 1
flag brettr (Jul 18, 2009 at 10:26)
 i think its gonna be like the juicys they are gonna have elixir 3 5 and 7 i think
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag norcosavage (Jul 17, 2009 at 4:19)
 i know what im asking santa for chrismas this year!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag fleuris (Jul 17, 2009 at 0:39)
 Ugly and over priced, period.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag h5n1 (Jul 17, 2009 at 3:11)
 first norco I really like
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Ryder27 (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:44)
 nice to see they've really stepped up their 2010 lineup
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag seb-c (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:06)
 That bike is INSANE Love the colours love the look good job Norco!!!!!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag hondarider241 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:06)
 i think im gonna have to get oneSmile but not the SE....tooo much moneyRazz
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag riggadon (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:02)
 the one norco bike i would actually happily ride! but not in orange. looks pretty good though
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag hondamotox (Jul 17, 2009 at 16:20)
 I personally love it all around. The price tag is another story...
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag bhd13 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:16)
 I prefer this look to the 2009 lineup.
Kind of nit-picking, but is there another kind of fork besides the "front fork"? Smile
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag rider280 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:30)
 nice
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Downhiller95 (Jul 17, 2009 at 9:50)
 Very nice but would still prefer a Iron Horse or Santa Cruz
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag northshore749 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:44)
 It is overpriced i agree, tbh $3000 is all its worth i think. nice looking bike though
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag nightmareterror (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:35)
 Looks like a hell of a lot of fun. Reminds me of the 09 Team DH meets the Fluid LT Smile Great combination!!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jimmyeater (Jul 17, 2009 at 13:09)
 Thats Realy Nice wish i had enough money to buy
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag konashreder101 (Jul 18, 2009 at 12:36)
 to much$$
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag hell-no (Aug 9, 2011 at 12:21)
 i got one
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag svenhard Plus (Nov 2, 2010 at 2:29)
 i love my empire!!!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag hotpinkbike (Jul 17, 2009 at 22:54)
 go norco
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag me2menow (Jul 16, 2009 at 23:06)
 elixir 5 brakes?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag creamsoda (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:56)
 "Taking a more visually pleasing approach to their bike line"....
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bennlikesbikes (Jul 17, 2009 at 19:27)
 sick bike i want it
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag handsomedan (Jul 16, 2009 at 19:20)
 150 rear spacing, really? maybe a typo
  • + 1
flag brule Mod Plus (Jul 16, 2009 at 22:30)
 Totally a typo and it actually said 135x12 later on too. Both are fixed and read 135x12 MAXLE.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Robert94pl (Jul 17, 2009 at 2:34)
 this is beautiful
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag biker33 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:02)
 niceSmile
[Reply]

Post a Comment



You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Copyright © 2000 - 2012. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv43 0.055961