Nico Lau's Cube Fritzz - Enduro World Series 1

Apr 16, 2014
by Mike Levy  
Enduro World Series, Chile
Nico Lau's Cube Fritzz



Nico Lau came into the inaugural EWS season as a bit of an unknown last year, something that certainly won't be the case at this year's kickoff in Chile. The Frenchman showed incredible pace aboard his Cube in 2013, coming through technical sections as fast or faster than the series champ Jerome and all around badass Jared Graves, but he's the first to admit that a lack of fitness hurt him in the long run. Regardless, it looked like he was on his way to taking a race win at the final stop in Finale Ligure, Italy, until a time penalty took him out of the running. What did he do after that? Exactly what any serious racer does: address his weakness. He packed up and spent much of the off-season training in the consistently warm weather of the Mediterranean, something that was difficult to get done in his hometown in northern France. The speed is obviously there - we've heard from a source who was present at a FOX suspension test camp that Nico was coming through rough, technical sections faster than Gee Atherton, an easily believable fact if you've seen him ride in person. Our money is on him troubling last year's top contenders on a regular basis if his fitness is on point, and he's looking to do exactly that aboard his Cube Fritzz.


Production Cube Fritzz Frame

Lau's Chilean race machine is assembled around a Cube Fritzz frame with 160mm of rear wheel travel and 650B wheels, and is actually an off the shelf aluminum frame that you can pick up yourself without needing to risk life and limb riding at Nico's pace. Aluminum? Yup, you read that right - he has spent the winter testing on the aluminum version and he'll take the slight weight penalty for what he told us is increased reliability. Remember, these guys are riding trails that have sections that are legitimately rougher and more technical than a lot of what we see during the World Cup downhill season, all on bikes sporting two or three inches less travel.


And it is exactly that sort of speed that sees many enduro racers go with relatively tall bar heights that tower over how the average rider might set up his or her cockpit - Lau runs a stack of spacers and a tall headset cap underneath his stem (pictured at right) that may look a bit odd but gets his handlebar where it needs to be in order for him to feel comfortable at maximum pace. The extra spacers also allow him to keep his bar height consistent when running different length forks, something that he might change out depending on the track and what he feels comfortable with.

The other talking point is the GPS unit mounted above his stem, a tool that he can use to analyze his performance post-race, but also one that allows fans to actually follow him during the event. We'll hopefully see more of this type of stuff in the future - picture watching Lau and Graves' runs side-by-side, noting where one pulls ahead over the other or which one's heart is beating faster.

Nico Lau s Cube Fritzz Photo by Matt Wragg

Suspension

FOX takes care of Nico's suspension, and his bike is equipped with a Factory-level Float X CTD shock and 34 fork combo, both of which get the full Kashima treatment. We were admittedly a bit surprised to see him not running the new FOX 36 in Chile, but he told us that he spent the entire winter testing on the 34 and is both very comfortable with its performance and has his settings dialed, so he's decided to go with what he knows rather than make any major changes. Having said that, we'll likely see him with a 36 on the front of his Fritzz at some point in the near future once he's spent time on it away from a race venue.

Although they do come stock on a surprising number of bikes sold in Europe, remote shock levers aren't something the we see a lot of in North America. They are certainly popping up more frequently on true enduro race bikes, though. And for good reason: being able to quickly firm up the back of your bike for an uphill sprint during a timed stage is near impossible if you were to have to reach down to flip a shock-mounted lever while breathing out your eyeballs on a technical section of trail. Having the ability to control it from your handlebar means that you'll do it more often and save more time. Don't think it's worthwhile? Lau took the win over Clementz by a single second at last year's Trans-Provence, a tiny margin after many days racing that could easily be down to Nico putting his Float X CTD into 'Climb' mode for a section that saw Jerome neglect to firm up his Jekyll's DYAD shock. That single second might have also been gained anywhere on the many miles of timed descents, but Lau and his peers look for every advantage possible, especially on the climbs.

Nico Lau s Cube Fritzz Photo by Matt Wragg
Nico Lau s Cube Fritzz Photo by Matt Wragg

Here's a setup that you don't see everyday: Lau has mounted the lever that controls his FOX D.O.S.S. seat post on the right side of his handlebar, well inboard of his shifter and tilted up so that it doesn't get in the way when changing gears. That means that there is a hell of a lot going on over there - braking, shifting, and adjusting seat height - and although Nico obviously has no issues with it, we suspect that our untrained right hand might struggle. There is no shifter on the left side due to the single 'ring setup, and this is where he has placed the CTD remote that he uses to adjust the amount of compression damping on his Float X shock, a choice that makes it clear that takes advantage of the CTD function quite a bit when the clock is running.

Nico Lau s Cube Fritzz Photo by Matt Wragg

Photos: Matt Wragg

Author Info:
mikelevy avatar

Member since Oct 18, 2005
2,032 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

47 Comments
  • 59 2
 This frame should have good square-edge bump sensitivity cause its a cube right? Wink
  • 9 5
 It has a horst link so yeah, it actually does.
  • 2 1
 Nah man, this frame is probably on the Fritz...
  • 3 0
 I'm Dr. Kind Schultz and this is my horse Fritz.
  • 36 2
 So he's a professional racer, and a fast one at that. And he's running an aluminium frame, aluminium wheels with a hook, and single ring with TWO chain retention devices.

Pretty obviously the industry is fooling us with the carbon hype and the promise of the unbreakable narrowwide. You can race for the top spots with a normal bike, the carbon stuff is just for vanity (to be fair, he is running a carbon handlebar).
  • 13 0
 Agree with you on the carbon comment, but i think the only reason he is not using a narrow wide ring is that he can't because his sponsors dont make one, which means he has to use a regular rign with a full chain device.
  • 1 0
 Well said Kainerm , www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_eBTTnx96Q#t=48 - The chain retention device is always a Quick Risk Prediction . At their level they can't afford to lose time on a race.
  • 1 0
 Ah, I didn't spot that he's not running a narrow-wide chainring. That explains the need for quite a lot of chain retention Wink
  • 2 0
 yeah I run a narrow wide with a top guide on my 160mm trail bike, I have not chucked the chain once, and I have properly thrashed it. That being said I'd still race on a full guide just in case. It's the only way it's impossible to lose your chain.
  • 3 0
 I witnessed a carbon cube stereo's rear linkage explode at the redbull foxhunt last october, t'was in bits.
  • 3 3
 Innovation maybe....but marketing is the evil which brainwash the mind Smile
  • 2 0
 Fairly sure he could rock a Huffy to the podium. all the tech hype is perennially trumped by talent.
  • 1 0
 Haha! Yea wasn't great was it! Good finish
  • 1 1
 Incorrect. Most likely because cubes carbon frames aren't up to snuff yet.
  • 2 0
 Not true darkstar. Ratboy proved that in PMB. Granted most of us don't ride at his speed. Wink
  • 1 0
 Yeah and Iv'e actually done it myself, it comes down to set up. If the chain is close enough to the top guide and the lower pulley is tucked in proper it's very close to impossible.
  • 1 0
 Kainerm, I wish I could give that comment more props.
  • 3 0
 @keadyboy: same thing happened to Nico Lau last year or the year before. He finished a race with seatstays fixed with cable binders if I remember correctly.
  • 11 0
 It's nice to see such a high-profile rider running a suspension remote. I've always liked the principle, and I don't understand why we don't see more of them. I get the appeal of having efficient suspension that doesn't need to be fiddled with on the fly, as well as the appeal of having clean bars. But a remote doesn't weigh that much, and no one's MAKING you push it... Why not have the option at your fingertips? You might be happy that you do someday. If we put right-hand Reverb buttons upside-down on the left side so we don't have to loosen our grip on the bars, why wouldn't we try all the harder to avoid taking a hand COMPLETELY off of the bars to futz around with a tiny switch at knee level?
  • 8 0
 I'm not sure about the Clementz reference, though, although I certainly understand and agree with its meaning. If I recall correctly, he's modified a left-hand Grip Shift to cycle his rear suspension modes, despite the fact that Mike Levy (who, incidentally, wrote both this article and the Trigger review) considered Cannondale's stock remote an ergonomic triumph... Anyway, that modification alone demonstrates Jerome's dedication to efficiency. I doubt he lost the precious second in question into his shock. Smile
  • 7 0
 every remote option makes a lot of sense and has great applications- but I have no clue why Fox has not implemented a "one-remote, 2-3 components" option, depending on which suspension unit(s) you want to run. they all have 3 modes and are all cable actuated. why not? RockShox remotes are so much cleaner (and also hydraulic), the least Fox can do is make one for them all.
  • 2 1
 Fox has, at least as far as the suspension. Their new remote is available with a cable splitter that lets you CTD the fork and shock from one remote. I believe the iCD electronic remote system achieves the same effect. The D.O.S.S hasn't reached a second generation yet, and the new remote isn't backwards compatible - so I'm guessing that cable pull is the limiting factor there. Viability aside, though, would you really want all three on the same control? You could be on a very fast and flowy descent, where the trail is glass-smooth but technical and rolling. In that situation, you'd probably want your seat down and your suspension hard - a one-remote descending mode would probably pair a low seat with fully open suspension.

In addition to that, all modern dropper posts require body weight to go down. If you want to change suspension modes but keep your saddle low, you'd have to sit down on it to keep it from popping up on you.
  • 8 5
 I always liked high-profile minds being able to look at some technology and being able to sort out whether it suits them or not. Especially if they do it basing on their experience. I also like people who looked at some high-rpfile rider using some technology and using him as an authority. It is nice to see that we recognize authorities so that the world is not full of ignorants and not know-all pricks. However I never liked people looking at some technology or idea, and judging others who don't use it as luddites. Then I truly madly deeply do hate people who use that high-profile athlete, the authority, as an argument in stupid, ridiculous, retarded attempt to convert as many "others" to acknowledge the superiority of one technology/ idea. Particularly in a situation where most choices are extremely relative as it happens in mountain biking. For every argument why to use something, one can easily find reason why not to, and he/she should recognize the possibility that others might have different preferences...

I for instance do not like the remotes for suspension, I rarely use lock out. I expect as much reliability from my bike as possible, then I appreciate low maintenance. I have two small kids and I want my bike to be ready for a ride when the time comes. Check the tyre pressure, chain and brakes - and go. I do not expect anyone to like it. If Nico Lau uses it, I do not discuss it, he obviously has plenty of reasons to do it coming from his riding experience, which I have absolutely NOTHING in common with. I wish there were more people thinking this way, but I don't mind the cosiness of minority...
  • 4 0
 Uh... what? Lol.
  • 4 2
 I don't know what I wrote, it was before the coffee kicked in... I meant: It is cool to see what sort of wicked setups the best riders use. It may kick a thought or two. But in case someon uses similar device, then just stay happy with that "coincidence" - do not use it as an argument to convert others to do what you do... but Bluefire hasn't put it that way so I have no bloody idea why I write it... I am confused and I will go now...
  • 3 2
 Ahhh, remember back in the day when the kids used to call it All-Mountain?
  • 3 0
 Yes, it was not racing...
  • 2 0
 I don't love the idea of a remote for a shock, but I get why people like it. But no thanks to any kind of fox remote. Peoples' biggest complaint is keeping the cockpit clean and the fox ones just look like an after thought, they are so bulky and stick up a mile off the bars. The one for the shock if you run it on the same side as a shifter you have to run it or the shifter pretty far in so it doesn't interfere with the shifter and It also looks like it wants to put a large hole in my knee. The sad part is it seems better than that giant doss lever which this guy might have to take his hand off the grip to use.
  • 1 0
 Its all good man, obviously you are a man of words. Lol
  • 5 0
 The problem with comparing Nico's heart rate to Jared Graves is that you would be comparing a human heart to the RPM's pumped out of Jared Grave's massive diesel torque engine, he is not a man, he is a machine!
  • 4 1
 WHAT’S THE DEAL WITH SHORT HEAD TUBE??? (in Seinfeld voice) I am 6.4” and I have realy problem with finding right frame for me. I am running Giant Reign XL 2011 and happily it has 7.50” (19 cm) head tube. And for example new Trance Advance 27,5 XL (successor of Reign, I suppose) have 5,3” (13,5 cm) head tube. I don’t want to run gazilons spacers under my stem, it look hideous and I am not sure about safety. And it's not only about Giant, even pro like Nico have problem with that. This madness has to stop!
  • 1 2
 YOU COULD JUST LEARN TO RIDE A BIT LOWER.
  • 1 0
 Kore make a nice 2" riser bar.
  • 1 0
 "The extra spacers also allow him to keep his bar height consistent when running different length forks".
When someone has the possibility to running different forks, he can also find new spacers.
It's very interesting also, to know more, about handlebar dimensions, stem length, wheels, tire pressure, tubeless or not, crankset length, brake and suspension setup...
  • 1 0
 Also height vs frame size and what shoe & pedal combo used.
  • 10 8
 Surprised no one is bagging on his bike. If it had Ellsworth written on it people would be wondering how he could race on such am outdated design. Cube bikes have the exact same suspension design. Just an observation.
  • 10 1
 Aaron, I'm calling your comment out as bogus. This bike and Ellsworth have nothing in common aside from being 4-bar linkages, and neither is 'outdated'. If you had even bothered to do your research on cube you'd find that they have some sweet looking bikes and probably the lightest carbon 160mm bike out there.
  • 5 4
 I think they are great bikes as well as Ellswoth. The design is excellent. Just referring to the hate thrown at Ellsworth for being outdated. I own two Ellsworth bikes and love them both. The rear suspension on both bikes works better than most of the designs out there IMHO. Thumbs up to both of them.
  • 4 1
 www.ellsworthbikes.com/product-p/0-epi-e.htm

The aesthetic is hideous and 68° HA on a 140 mm bike does not match to well with "The Epiphany Enduro 275 is for those who ride to decend, who want the lightweight of an XC bike, but the handling of a more gravity oriented All Mountain Bike."
  • 1 0
 I think the Ellsworth bashing came about as a result of the owners arrogant behavior in some mtbr thread a while ago, and its reputation never quite recovered.
  • 1 0
 Good article Mike! It's good to see an actual review of the rider setup instead of just the list of parts he is using. Interesting reading.
  • 6 3
 Nice steer tube.
  • 2 0
 Nice bike. Now where's that new Devinci.
  • 2 0
 good lord that paint scheme is ugly.
  • 3 2
 Ellsworth called hey want their bike back.
  • 1 0
 Pic is a bit blurry, but that looks a lot like a n/w saint ring.
  • 2 0
 Geometry looks whack







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.042890
Mobile Version of Website