Pinkbike readers recently voted Life Cycles as their favourite bike movie of all time and it brought back memories of my first time seeing the film and the impact its had on the mountain bike world in the past year.
It was 7:06pm on Tuesday, August 10, 2010, about a mile from the Boneyard as I strolled awkwardly around the theatre lobby, waiting. Looping by the makeshift bar I was startled out of my impatient reverie. ‘’I love mountain bikers,’’ the bartender said to me with a grin. ‘’You guys know how to party!’’ Clearly, he’d worked Crankworx before.
Just a few big names in attendance
My Life Cycles pilgrimage began with the typical summer morning routine: check Pinkbike, check Facebook, and check Gmail. What’s that? My inbox had an unread message from Derek Frankowski. That was cause for curiosity in itself but then I read the tagline - LIFE CYCLES industry premier RSVP – my heart started thumping like a dubstep bass line. I’ll admit, I’m a movie geek and I’d been anticipating this one since I first read about it in the Splatter section of Bike Mag in 2008. Stance Films had been setting internet forums ablaze for months after
lifecyclesfilm.com dropped and I was skeptical about it living up to the hype. I opened the email, ‘’Hope you can make it, I’m sure you'll like what you see!’’ There was no question about it; I was already there.
Getting the email to attend
As guests started rolling in to Whistler’s Millennium Place, a who’s who of industry heavy-hitters, riders and assorted friends and family passed by. Excited chatter was punctuated by guffaws and the occasional expletive as industry buffs rubbed shoulders, united by a desire to see the much-ballyhooed project. Shortly after 8:00pm the doors opened, and a wave of anticipation swept through those assembled. Frankowski and co-creator Ryan Gibb introduced their work, the lights dimmed and then that distinctive narration began. It was a testament to the quality of the film that not a single cell phone or crying baby was heard from, throughout the duration. It was, in fact, the quietest movie showing I’ve ever witnessed except for the periodic OOOOOOOO’s after certain standout moves. The mountain bike intelligentsia is a jaded group and there have been no shortage of big budget, big name releases debuted over the past few years. Some, to be fair, have been quite excellent but they tend to blend into a homogeneous testosterone-fuelled blur.
The boys introducing their work. From left to right: Assistant creator Andre Nutini, Co-creators Ryan Gibb, and Derek Frankowski
The reception from the heavies in attendance must have been the ultimate pat on the back for Stance Films. The looks of incredulity from Clay Porter, Dylan Dunkerton, and Aaron Larocque, not to mention the thunderous standing ovation from the crowd, were instant validation for them. Brandon Semenuk, professional rider and one of the stars of the show, may have said it best when he Tweeted, ‘’Life Cycles was rad! It’s like Planet Earth had sex with your favorite bike movie.’’ Mountain biking has never had its Field of Dreams, its Raging Bull or even a Cool Runnings; there’s never been a film that defines our sport to those outside of it.
Five years in the making, the brainchild of Ryan Gibb and Derek Frankowski is more than the ubiquitous ‘bike porn’ typically associated with mtb cinema. Said Gibb, ‘’Instead of just getting someone “pumped to ride”, hopefully it gets someone pumped to build a trail or go on a road trip or become an activist in saving their local trails.’’ Life Cycles isn’t about the newest most progressive tricks or the biggest most technical terrain. One of the goals for Stance Films was to appeal to the general public (as well as core riders) and Gibb sees it as a potential tipping point, ‘’Since the 1990s mountain biking has been trying to shed this image of spandex nerdy enthusiast and it’s only a matter of time until it receives proper recognition. We wanted to make a movie that could help someone who didn’t mountain bike understand why people like us are so passionate about mountain biking and at the same time stoke out those of us who are riders.’’ Winning Best Cinematography, Best Director and Best Film at the 2011 X-Dance Film Festival shows that mountain biking is intriguing and accessible to even those unfamiliar with the sport. They created the quintessential bike movie.
Cinematography ruled
Life Cycles has polarized opinion like nothing before it. The wait (and hype) made it the most anticipated film since The Collective debuted in 2004. Internet forums ran wild for months preceding it and many people were critical after its release. Did people build it up to be more than what it is? Publicity is often a double-edged sword, too little and no one will know about it, too much and the project can be crushed by outsized expectations. Mountain biking at its core is an unpretentious blue-collar sport and art is a subjective experience. One man’s Picasso is another’s kindergarten doodle. In our instant gratification culture, Life Cycles is in some ways a throwback; it doesn’t use rapid editing, explosions or loud music to keep the viewer enthralled -- the focus is on story. By now you’ve probably seen Life Cycles and have some form of opinion, good or bad. Did it change your life? Probably not, it’s only a movie after all. It needs to be appreciated for what it is -- and isn’t. It’s a work of art and the ultimate ode to our favorite vehicle, it’s proof of how unique and mesmerizing cycling is, and the fulfillment of a five-year odyssey for two men. Most of all, it’s a time capsule of what it is to ride mountain bikes right now. You may never meet the filmmakers personally, but watching the movie gives you a feeling for the passion and love they have for the sport and their art. Like Ride to the Hills a decade before it, Life Cycles is a quantum leap forward for mountain biking and the true impact of it won’t show up right away. It will leach in slowly, inspiring the next generation of young riders and filmmakers and forcing the current group to up the ante… it may have taken a while to get here, but like the sport itself, some things gets better with age.
Check out my previous Life Cycles piece ''How the Riders Saw it''
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/Life-Cycles-How-the-Riders-Saw-It-2011.htmlWords by Scott Secco
Photos by Ian Hylands and Derek Frankowski
Support the filmmakers
http://www.lifecyclesfilm.com/
I dont have any issues of "blah, you are going in the woods with your stupid bicycle again" - not any more.
Thank You, Life Cycles.
But the cinematography...they are gods. Literally.
m.pinkbike.com/video/226625
"like mountain biking is awesome like ya dude" ok that may not be exactly what they said but not intelligent non the less. Maybe you should work on your own vids before you go throwing stones?
My opinion: (Sorry if this sounds crude, it's early in the am) The reason a lot of riders don't dig this so much is, it seems that rather than glorify the bicycle to the general public, they feel sorta pimped out - the film doesn't have the feel that it was made by "riders", like the Collective films do. It feels more like outsiders came in with some fancy cameras and talent, then dubbed a guy's voice who doesn't know anything about contemporary riding.
Personally, I do appreciate they tried something conceptually different than just a "stoke" film, but when I hear the narration, its hard for me, as a rider - to take it seriously. I understand why it's sort of corny sounding - because it was intended for a larger audience than just the riders. Nothing wrong with that. I didn't feel like I was the intended viewer when I watched this. But I think when non-riders see this, they won't notice that the dialogue is a bit corny. So I think they achieved their goal. While it's not a movie "for the riders", it's still definitely worth the price of admission, I do think its a work of art.
Now, it somebody could do a concept flick FOR the riders.... (other than Clay Porter, and something deeper than Collective)
Combined with the travel/broken bikes/maintenance/nature/building scenes I think it creates a nice "mood" that swallows you inside their (our) world.
He likes things like Coronation Street, you know the bland English soap opera and other outdated British television shows.
When it was over he got up came into the kitchen and said, "that was really good".
I already knew it was, I've watched it dozens of times, and will dozens more. In fact I'm going to go put it on now.
Cheers!!
The film could have been so much better if they based it on the rider, not on the bike. It would have been a lot more relate-able for your everyday rider.
The cinematography was spot on though, best out of any action sports film I've seen.
They had sections on the different seasons-how the trails change in each. They had sections on trail-building, bike maintainence, riding in mucky conditions - everyone's done it - and also a segment about the death of the bike (or a snapped frame to most riders). I can see every "everyday rider" managing to relate to what was said in the movie in same shape or form. I did.
However, like you, I was bit "ugh" with the narration at first, but then it grew on me.
Your saying that follow me/seasons/kranked/nwd cant show the world why we like the sport? Only life cycles can? Hmm i dont agree with you on that one.
I think life cycle is a better movie to show to people who don't know much about mtb as it's got a lot bigger "oooooo" factor than most other movies. The movie conveys the feeling of riding a bike instead of just a succession of "sick tricks" and "gnar lines" the average joe can't even fathom how hard it actually is... especially in an era where you can view all the coolest shit ever done on a bike by just watching compilations on youtube or that crankworx finals stream on pinkbike. I don't really feel like paying 35$ and wasting an hour to see more of the same.
As for one, I've seen a billion tailwhips, frontflips, backflips, whips, spins and the like and I couldn't give 2 shits about seeing another billion of them but I still enjoyed the DJ parts in life cycles even though a lot of the tricks in there were "basic". Why? Because I could feel how those guys felt when riding those jumps even though it's a discipline I don't enjoy much, as opposed to most other movies where I just skip those parts before I fall asleep. Life cycles makes me remember why I like my bikes so much when a lot of the other movies barely make me want to go ride.
I realize that a lot of people here probably don't feel like I do but I also know that a lot are in the same boat too.
I think if you wanted to encourage other people to mountain bike/understand why people mountain bike, seasons would be the right film to show, not life cycles.
I fully get that it's what the people want and that this is a biking site, not a film-making site. But Life Cycles will always be my 1 top favorite bike video.