JeffDJ

Now I need a conversion kit for car when the motor goes out

@MT36: No! Utah is also terrible. Please keep biking in Colorado.

You're not paying for the CAD file. You're paying for the product

0.5 psi recision?? that's mazing!!

The real lesson here is to learn programming if you want to make a decent salary.

You're surprised that a republican is in favor of less federal government control?

This test could go from pseudoscience to real science quite easily. The test set up it pretty good, but the execution of how you're collecting and analyzing data can make the difference. I don't know enough about the Garmin Vector power pedals, but if they give you data of instantaneous power output as a function of time, then you can integrate the area under the curve, and that will be the energy required for each bike to make the climb. The theoretical minimum energy required to make the climb will be the full weight of the rider and the bike (in kg), multiplied by the vertical climb in meters, multiplied by the gravity constant 9.81 m/s^2. Divide the theoretical minimum by the actual energy required for each bike and you will get a percentage that is the true efficiency of each bike on the climb.

8.22%. What's this 7% nonsense?