And the DW-Link goes to...Turner Bikes!

Sep 4, 2008

After years of collaboration and months of anticipation and secrecy, it has finally become official that the next company to use DW-Link and build the next DW-Link downhill bike is Turner Bikes.

Check out their 2009 line up:

Here are DW's own words where he explains how the DHR, and other new Turner bikes have improved and his reasons for moving to Turner:

Everyone who has spent time on the interwebs and cycling forums knows that the Turner homers are some of the most passionate and opinionated riders to ever ride and scrutinize a bicycle. As someone who thrives on riding and scrutinizing bicycles, I am thrilled to join your family.

Thanks to all of you who have sent kind words of support, encouragement, and excitement about the dw-link / Turner partnership. I’m as excited as you are. Many of you who know me, either in person or through years of talking on forums, know that Turner has been one of the brands that I’ve really looked up to since I first got into mountain bikes in the late ‘90s. I’ve always been a big fan of the Turner hallmarks of quality, straightforward design, and customer service. I think that this new dw-linked line really will help keep that tradition going. As a rider, I can say that the Turner dw-links are each as individually unique as the dw-link designs used by Ibis and Pivot. I urge you to test the bikes, whatever opinion you hold from a picture or prior experience will be backed up with real, live experience. I am looking forward to hearing all of the homer feedback. To that end, I’ll be available at the Turner, IBIS, and Pivot booths at Interbike and Dirt Demo for Q&A, general grilling, and hopefully a lot more talk about great rides than the finer points of rear suspension..

I’ve briefly scanned the hundreds and hundreds of posts / questions that have popped up since yesterday on the multitude of boards. I will try to answer some of the more commonly occurring questions that I saw.

- Can you switch links back and forth between different dw-link Turner models?

A: Nope, dw-link is a lot more reliant on specific pivot location and kinematic layout than FSR or TNT. The ability to tune and characterize dw-link’s comparatively complex anti-squat and wheel rate curves comes through closely calibrated suspension geometry. Even very small changes, less than 2mm, can have major and unplanned effects on performance.

- Will the Turner dw-links ride like other dw-link bikes that I have ridden?

A: The development of a new dw-link bike is a collaborative affair. For the Turner bikes, the process starts with frame geometry developed by DT himself. This is the first part that gives each bike a unique Turner personality. All dw-link bikes ever made share one common factor. I was responsible for the development of the suspension kinematics for each of these bikes. Whether it’s an Iron Horse, Ibis, Pivot, Turner, or IF, the how’s and why’s of the dw-link suspension begin and end here. So from one standpoint, the bikes are going to ride similarly in some respects, but for the most part they are all very different.

The heart of the dw-link system is its position sensitive anti-squat, and this is shared by all dw-link platforms. There is a very wide range of variability in wheel rate possible within the dw-link system, and I use this to help create each unique suspension bike’s personality. I work hand in hand with each manufacturer to help them realize their idea of what the ultimate suspension bike feels like on the trail. Based on the feedback that I gathered from talking with and riding with Dave Turner and his trusted advisors, I developed wheel rates and ultimately leverage rates to give us the “feel” that we were looking for.

The realization of these ideas on “feel” are what makes each bike special. For example, an Ibis Mojo was engineered to have a coil-like feel using a lightweight air shock, a Pivot Mach 4 was made to have a racy XC feel with very neutral braking, and a Turner 5-Spot was designed to eat small bumps and still take the big hit.

- I think that the bikes look sweet, ugly, like IH bikes, like a Turner, etc

A: I think that this is another area that really lets a company like Turner showcase their abilities. If you put these bikes in a lineup of 100 frames, I could pick them out as Turners instantly. Round downtubes, CNC pivot blocks, bushing pivots, square chainstays and seatstays? I can think of only one manufacturer that combines these elements. The bikes are uniquely Turner, and in a world of swoops and forming I think that they are refreshing.

Someone commented that this is what the dw-link Iron Horse line would have looked like moving forward. To all of the you who commented really like the look of the Iron Horse dw-link bikes, thanks for the nice complement, these were my babies, and I developed every inch of them from the ground up. They were my first (and for now I am content to say last) attempt at styling a whole line. For sure there are things that I would have liked to do differently, but the situation at IH did not allow that. Either way, I am proud of those bikes and it was a great experience for me. If I had decided to allow IH to continue building dw-link bikes, they would have been much different looking than the Turner bikes. Aside from the general dw-link layout the similarities would have ended there.

- Is the DHR a new Sunday etc

Back in 2000 and 2001, when I really was heavily into developing dw-link, I spent more time than I should have posting on the MTBR forums about the finer points of suspension design. During that time, the number one downhill bike that I recommended to riders was the DHR. I knew when I designed the Sunday that this was the benchmark. Since then it seems like the Sunday has become the new downhill benchmark, but I still thought that I could improve upon it based on my experience on the World Cup circuit and feedback from many talented riders. Think of the new DHR as an evolution of the ideas that made both the DHR and Sunday successful.

The things that I specifically put attention into with the new DHR include:

- a pretty nifty dual progressive leverage rate curve that is supple in the early travel, with the end travel ramp that the Sunday lacked.
- modified spring rates, so that a 155 lb rider will now use a 350lb spring rather than a 300lb spring. This will give lighter riders more tuning options.
- lighter weight layout. The Sunday was impressively light, but this bike’s frame takes it to a new level in my opinion. Alone it weighs in the 7’s, and in the low 8’s with shock. Its light and strong at the same time.

Dave



I'm sure everybody wants to see the bikes now:
DHR


DHR Geo


RFX


RFX Geo


5 Spot


5 Spot Geo


Sultan 29


Sultan 29 Geo


Flux


Flux Geo


The Highline is missing from the lineup, maybe in the future we will see whether there are any plans for it.

The 2009 Turner website is up as well.

-runner.pinkbike.com
Share on Twitter, Facebook, Email

| More

Link to News Story
Must Read This Week

91 Comments

  • + 16
flag lcstay10 (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:02)
sooo sick. thats gunna be a nice ride. hope to see one soon
  • + 2
flag giant0rider (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:05)
will also be going to pivot bikes
  • + 5
flag graf4life (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:05)
WOW i thought giant bought it but this is sick Smile
  • + 5
flag feds (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:29)
Giant made a bike with hints from it but did not actually buy it from Dave Weagle.
  • + 0
flag dirtbiker327 (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:33)
The glory is similar but its pretty different, same concept though. The new Turners bikes are sexy cant wait to ride one.
  • - 22
flag dustyrider (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:46) (Below Threshold) show comment
WHATS IRON HORSE BIKES GONNA LOOK LIKE for 09 ???
  • - 14
flag dbrfreerider16 (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:50) (Below Threshold) show comment
iron horse is going to be selling only mass production bikes after 2008 or 2009. cant remember which one
  • - 13
flag odin333 (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:12) (Below Threshold) show comment
sooo nice. anyone know though if Sam Hills going over to turner now or is he going to stick with iron horse? hopefully they don't make all there full suspension frames with DW super expensive.
  • + 4
flag fr112358 (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:19)
ya know i hadnt thought about giving TURNER the DW of all people. But really, there is no one more suited for it. And IH will be going with there own version of ABP next year BTW.
  • - 6
flag cools320 (Sep 4, 2008 at 19:04) (Below Threshold) show comment
THE DHR LOOKS SO AWESOME EERRRGGGAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • + 1
flag HARDCOREy (Sep 4, 2008 at 19:19)
Giant has the maestro setup which is damn near the same thing as the DW setup. If they release a Highline with the DW then youll find my 07 in the classified section right after. On the DHR, at 8 pounds you could throw a dual chainring on that thing and ride like a billygoat.
  • - 2
flag global747 (Sep 4, 2008 at 19:20)
if you guys want to see a pic of the new ironhorse sunday check out my profile - got a pic from a friend
  • + 5
flag ericpeterson (Sep 4, 2008 at 20:28)
I like it, but I think their is too much hype over it already. Everyone thinks it's the sickest thing right now. But tomorrow they'll see another new bike and it'll be the sickest thing. It's just kind of dumb in my mind to get all hyped up over something that 90% of the "sickest ever" croud will actually buy. So calm down, their will be some super sweet bike just around the corner from another company, and all of the sudden all the attention will focus on it.
  • + 2
flag ericpeterson (Sep 4, 2008 at 20:28)
and by 90 % will buy I mean 10% of those people will buy...
  • - 9
flag bikerdude012 (Sep 4, 2008 at 20:36) (Below Threshold) show comment
Tyler Morland is gonna kill it on those bike
  • + 2
flag wellsy (Sep 5, 2008 at 8:00)
Ironhorse will be using ICT suspension after 2009 from what I hear (Ellseworth suspension). Those turners in turn will be insane expensive I'd say!
  • + 2
flag huckoveraduck (Sep 5, 2008 at 9:49)
hahahah ironhorse are going to be boned!
  • + 3
flag nico100 (Sep 5, 2008 at 17:38)
Naw, IH have always fielded great DH teams, no matter what frame options they have had. Fact is even a single pivot can compete with a virtual one on the DH circuit. I own a sunday and love it but Sam Hill will always be Sam Hill. Whoever gets the top guys is going to kick ass, whatever linkage Smile Just look at how well comencal are doing.
  • + 0
flag banshee-ripper (Sep 7, 2008 at 13:18)
WOW, I can't believe turner is finally moving on from the walking'beam style suspension! (now if only kona would follw suit)
  • + 0
flag madmax412 (Sep 8, 2008 at 20:43)
this turner is waaay sicker than any glory. i wish i would have wited for this dhr instead of buying an 08
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag sexley (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:05)
Which bike shops sell Turner in Alberta?
  • + 0
flag dracones (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:39)
Mountain Bike City on 17th Ave.
  • + 0
flag maestroforlife (Sep 5, 2008 at 5:04)
AND COULIOUR IN CANMORE!!!!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag jeannfm (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:06)
nice
clean Big Grin
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag MajesticMOOSE (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:06)
An already sick bike just got a whole lot better! Congratulations Turner
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag bikeronbowen (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:07)
soooooooooooooooo sick!!!!!!
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag shortbusrdrmoses (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:08)
man i wish i knew how much this was going to cost
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag wtt-tmr (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:09)
Turner where already sexy now, there are super sexy!!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag bikerboywill (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:09)
i want that dhr its sooo sexy!
[Reply]
  • - 14
flag freeridebigisland (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:09) (Below Threshold) show comment
wow. that's big. i was just criticizing turner the other night with some friends cause they don't have any original or exciting looking suspensions, just the four bar. but now, this is dope.
  • + 5
flag bomberdave (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:11)
you sir have never ridden a dhr before.... if you call the dhr suspention boring... well....damn
  • - 6
flag freeridebigisland (Sep 4, 2008 at 22:13) (Below Threshold) show comment
piss off kid. what's a dhr made of? single pivot. nothing new. read between the lines before judging.
  • + 2
flag wellsy (Sep 5, 2008 at 8:03)
The DHR was always "dope". Along with many other single pivot bikes.
[Reply]
  • - 12
flag smarties (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:23) (Below Threshold) show comment
Now whats going to happen to Ironhorse now?
  • + 1
flag Matt-W (Sep 5, 2008 at 7:55)
if sam hill leaves, they are finished.

i heard he was joining Trek.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag shortbusrdrmoses (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:25)
and at only around 8lbs with shock thats madd lighttt
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag altrugon (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:33)
where the hell can I get one of those frames? Big Grin

I already have checked the Turner website and prices are TBD Frown
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag Pitcrew (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:35)
Dam that thing is sharp looking. Cant wait to see it in production.
[Reply]
  • - 5
flag Jojojof (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:37) (Below Threshold) show comment
will someone explain to me what the DW Link is?

but anywho the Bikes are Sick (but for some reason on they're site there's only frames)
  • - 2
flag runner (Sep 4, 2008 at 16:45)
Turner doesn't sell complete bikes, frame and shock only.

http://www.dw-link.com/home.html
[Reply]
  • - 4
flag danthepirate (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:01) (Below Threshold) show comment
Wow!!! That frame just made my jaw drop to the ground. One of the cleanest and sickest frame designs I have ever seen to date. I am currently riding the 2006 DHR and love it, but want something new and different...well, the new 2009 DHR will be it!
[Reply]
  • - 4
flag pushingbroom (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:02) (Below Threshold) show comment
(Turner invented the 4 bar linkage.. but specialized patented it..) So the story goes.
  • - 4
flag RecklessInsanity (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:32) (Below Threshold) show comment
Specialized patented the FSR link
  • + 11
flag foesrider (Sep 4, 2008 at 22:06)
Actually, Horst Leitner invented AND patented the FSR link back when he was with a company called AMP Research (which I believe he started) in Irvine, CA. It was originally called the "Horst Link", and he eventually sold the patent to Specialized Bikes. Specialized then named it the "FSR link" for their use.

And no, Turner didn't "invent" the 4-bar linkage. That type of suspension design has been around for years in automobile racing, before mountain bikes even came into the picture. Turner licensed the use of the FSR link from Specialized for a number of years and then eventually dropped it a couple of years ago because the cost of licensing it was too high and Turner found their designs didn't really need it.
[Reply]
  • - 4
flag sebsta (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:04) (Below Threshold) show comment
Look pretty sweet!
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag philipstonier (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:18)
LOVIN THE DHR
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag lucent (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:19)
I love how so many people had the 'inside information' with the DW Link going to Trek/Giant/etc.
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag valtra (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:35)
so is it a full floater design?
  • - 2
flag runner (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:41)
no, none are floaters
  • - 2
flag valtra (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:52)
shows what I know.
thanks
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag sammo (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:36)
wow, didnt see this comming!
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag dhangelofdeath (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:44)
It doesn't matter what bike Sam Hill is going to be riding guys. Seriously, can't you see past it? As long as he is on one of the current dh race bike offerings (many offerings there are), he will be riding the same as ever. It doesnt matter, history has shown this. Think about it. Look into racing history folks..
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag TJ-downhill (Sep 4, 2008 at 17:54)
wow i am utterly surprised about this news. I thought it was going to norco.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag haro357 (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:01)
YES it went to a company that deserves it! thank god it didnt go to norco
  • + 1
flag pimpedaline (Sep 4, 2008 at 19:13)
Funny, you seem to dislike the company that handles Haro. Secondly the 09 Norco stuff has been up for a few weeks now why is everyone so suprised that they aren't runing the DW link. I will say that the DW link rids amazingly well, rode one of the Ibis sl's we got in and I was suprised that I couldn't feel any chain tug at the pedals, unlike the giants and SC, dispite the amount of chain growth that they have
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag g-off7 (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:02)
looks like accesing the shock on the dhr may be a little difficult
  • - 2
flag tyronepottle (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:14)
much easier than a glory haha
[Reply]
  • - 7
flag free629ride (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:08) (Below Threshold) show comment
My buddy who rides for Ironhorse said the guy who invented the DW link left !! guess he went to TURNER SICK BIKE BOYS!!!!
  • - 2
flag bomberdave (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:13)
wow.... alot of people dont read the forums, this was announced MONTHS and MONTHS ago
  • - 2
flag xltrider (Sep 4, 2008 at 20:34)
the guy who invented dw-link doesn't work at iron horse. iron horse bought the license to use dw-link from him. then ibis did. then independent and pivot did. then turner did.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag godfried (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:48)
what about Rotec The RL9 is newest concentric based, floating rear shock design utilizing “Mert Lawwill’s” suspension technology with 9 inches of travel? Which one works more effectly in terms of eating small and big pumps on the trails.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag rush10 (Sep 4, 2008 at 20:02)
I WANT A DHR!!
[Reply]
  • - 19
flag josephkrom (Sep 4, 2008 at 21:12) (Below Threshold) show comment
Wow, I dislike turner even more now than I used to! I mean you know a bike brand is lame when they change their designs all the time! Turner and many other brands need to just pay for the FSR (the most proven and superior design) patent and just be done with it.
  • + 1
flag maglor (Sep 21, 2008 at 13:10)
How do you work out that they change there designs all the time?, the basic DHR suspension design hasn't changed from 2000 when it was first made until now, the frame shape and tubing may of changed twice from the original but it was only to make it lighter and stronger, this is the first major suspension change to the DHR, looks like a good design too, although i still love my 06 DHR
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag Riksa (Sep 4, 2008 at 21:29)
Damn how good those new bikes look like!!
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag awais (Sep 4, 2008 at 21:34)
it looked better on the ironhorse... bad sell..
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag monstercruiser (Sep 4, 2008 at 21:43)
I would like to see a picture of the DHR on a scale...8 lbs with a shock for a DH bike(That is still stiff) would be impressive.
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag c-radDH (Sep 4, 2008 at 22:06)
wow the new design looks amazing and the dhr is like ahhh a simplified lighter demo frame
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag spicykai (Sep 4, 2008 at 22:07)
i want one of those os bad it look so pimp christmas PLZ.
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag godfried (Sep 5, 2008 at 5:36)
IT STILL LOOKS LIKE A DEMO 8, 2008 MODELS(THE FRONT TRIANGLE). TURNER IS A COPY CAT.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag dustgry (Sep 5, 2008 at 6:09)
it does look like a demo
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag szfetbb (Sep 5, 2008 at 6:54)
can someone please explain me the technological difference between DW link on RFX frame and Maestro on Gaint Reign?!
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag alfarac (Sep 5, 2008 at 7:34)
I wanted a 2008 DHR as my first DH Rig, now I would have to sell a Kidney to buy the 2009 version as it looks waaaay better. Turner Rocks!!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag csucsnowman (Sep 5, 2008 at 8:39)
dhr looks like crap. blah blah blah, sure it rides fantastic, still don't like it
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag amrskipro (Sep 5, 2008 at 8:58)
I do not know why every one keeps raving about 8lbs - that would be great but the geometry specs page on the Turner site specifically states 9.5lbs, which while not heavy is nothing special. SOCOM FRO is the benchmark for a light strong useable frame at 8.5 lbs.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nfiorito (Sep 5, 2008 at 9:32)
I like how he went on about how Turner bikes are great and traditional with round down-tubes and how they don't need fancy sweeping tubes and hydroforming, and then the first two bikes are swoopy-tubed and hydroformed-looking! Not that I care, they look awesome, but it is rather ironic.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bvfreerider (Sep 5, 2008 at 12:42)
HELL YES....
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag dhrager (Sep 5, 2008 at 13:11)
Sam Hill will either be riding for mongoose or trek in the upcoming season.
  • + 2
flag transitionrider1993 (Sep 5, 2008 at 20:17)
wtf? thats unbeliveable
  • + 1
flag dingus (Sep 7, 2008 at 5:48)
That has not been confirmed
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag zackmorris-1975 (Sep 5, 2008 at 13:27)
website says 9.5 pounds
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag industrymike (Sep 5, 2008 at 21:39)
And will Sam follow?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag elbry (Sep 5, 2008 at 23:17)
no,
but turner sales are going to boom..
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag khslova (Sep 6, 2008 at 14:10)
i like the DHM the most but the rest are cool
  • + 1
flag khslova (Sep 6, 2008 at 14:10)
DHR*** sorry
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag spittingcamel63 (Sep 6, 2008 at 22:35)
Awesome. So now what will Iron horse do?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag kevinthelilbiker (Sep 7, 2008 at 0:09)
why does it say in here low 8's for frame + shock but on the turner website it reads 9.5 does anyone know whats the correct wheight because 9.5 is more average than impressive
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag zmtbiker (Sep 7, 2008 at 7:24)
dbrfreerider16 is right, ironhorse sold the DWlink to turner and they are only going to make mass market bikes along with schwinn and i think mongoose after 2009. For bike shops its to hard to sell bikes that have schwinn, ironhorse, and mongoose on their downtube because the consumers see what they think is the same bike at target, walmart, or cosco for a fraction of the cost. Plus the companies will make much larger margins by selling non-IBD shop quality bikes. Good move for them but unfortunatly not for us. The DHR looks like its going to be a sick bike!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag IgoTheExtraMile1 (Sep 8, 2008 at 17:48)
The rfx looks so sick! Do i spot a rear maxxle on it??
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag codename47 (Oct 13, 2008 at 6:39)
there's the prices in US: http://www.go-ride.com/CategoryProductList.jsp?cat=FOR+THE+BIKE%3AFrames%3ABy+Manufacturer%3ATurner
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag slopestyle123 (Oct 3, 2009 at 15:23)
YEAH TURNER
[Reply]

Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?

1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Bold Italic Link