At 730mm, Thomson's Carbon All-Mountain handlebar will be too narrow for some riders, but for those who prefer that width, it should be a good investment.
It is so nice to have a product that fits like a glove right out of the box and doesn't need any time to get use to. This is what the Thomson All-Mountain bar feels like. I've tried several widths from 700mm to 780mm, the former being too narrow for anything and the latter being way too big. At 730mm, this handlebar may not be the liking of many all-mountain trail riders, especially when wider is trending at the moment. But, if you don't have the broad shoulders and long arms, this handlebar is perfect. The subtle graphics on a glossy carbon finish are also a plus and give it a classier look. All in all, this is an awesome set of bars for women or smaller riders: they are light, reliable, strong but not overly stiff. The price tag may scare some, but for a premium carbon bar with a two-year warranty, Thomson's Carbon All-Mountain is a solid investment. - Mary Moncorge |
About Us
Contacts FAQ Terms of Use Privacy Policy Sign Up! SitemapAdvertise
AdvertisingCool Features
Submit a Story Product Photos Videos Privacy RequestRSS
Pinkbike RSS Pinkbike Twitter Pinkbike Facebook Pinkbike Youtube Pinkbike Instagram
Integrity, where have thou fled.
I don't mean this as a personal jab at PB, it's just how they operate, but let's not pretend any of these reviews are anything but slick advertising. Ever considered why they don't compare products directly, ie. these forks are clearly better than those forks? Wouldn't do to put paying advertisers off side, would it? I mean, why do you think some bikes, components, and accessories get reviewed, while others don't? Ever seen a review on Chris King hubs, or their ubiquitous headsets? Every (decent) mtb bike I've ever owned had a Chris King headset, everyone knows they're bloody good, they don't need to pay for some BS 'review' as advertising.
I agree with ride360 - if the reviewer as a financial interest in the product, then I think there should be a disclaimer or the review should not be presented in a way where it seems impartial.
Mongy, a review where the product is paid for/supplied by the manufacturer is TOTALLY different from a review where the manufacturer pays the reviewer (as is the case here).
Dude, PB reviews products supplied them by the manufacturer, but make no mistake, PB are also paid (advertising fee) to write and present the review by the SAME manufacturer. There is no difference between this 'review', or any other on PB, they're ALL paid for. Again, let me re-iterate that you need to be aware PB is a business run for profit, like any other. Therefore, I don't see a conflict of interest. The real problem is that it seems like a lot of the naive PB readership aren't aware of this.
I believe the bar width and all the angles are as personal as picking up your favourite saddle.
Tried 5 and 12deg backsweep sticks and settled with 9 on both, xc & am mtbks.
On my DH bike i run 780mm where i dont ride such tight lines.
So I guess it is up to personal preferences and the trails you ride.
Review retracted here??
What does a gay carbon bar look like?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6J-MO5OhINI
Turn it left... And it turns left
Turn it right... And it turns right
Pull it up... And braaap
Simples
www.lhthomson.com
While there is nothing wrong with 730mm bars, the average bar width for all mountain riding (which admittedly may differ depending on who you listen to) is above 730mm.
I myself am not a big fan of companies labelling products "All Mountain" or "Enduro" just to get a review and some sales.
I run 730mm... on my XC race bike.