Pivot Firebird 275 - 160 Millimeter All-Mountain Shredder

Apr 21, 2013
by Richard Cunningham  
Pivot Firebird side shot

Pivot Firebird 725 is the first mid-sized-wheel design to arrive from the Arizona bike maker. The 167-millimeter-travel all-mountain chassis is a good match for 650B wheels.



Pivot's Firebird is a sharp-pedaling all-mountain design that has been in its lineup for a number of years and it has earned the respect of many for its remarkable versatility. Pivot designer and founder Chris Cocalis is infamous for his unyielding attention to detail, so we expected to hear a litany of physical and numerical descriptions when we asked him about the new bike. Chris, however, admitted that he didn't need to make many alterations to the 26-inch-wheel Firebird in order to produce the 650B version. Firebird 275s have 167 millimeters of rear-wheel travel and are designed around 160-millimeter forks. Complete bikes are sold for $5599, based upon Shimano XT components and for $6199, decked out in SRAM X0. Frame sizes are small, medium and large, and Pivot offers a frame kit that includes a special angle-cup headset (more about that later), and a Fox Float CTD shock and 34 CTD 160 fork.

Pivot Firebird details

A lot of design went into the Firebird to keep the chainstays short, and still allow for ample tire clearance around the dual-link suspension. That homework paid off, because the original swingarm later provided ample room for the larger wheel size.



The swingarm of the Firebird is unchanged, because there is enough room for 2.5-inch 650B tires. Bottom bracket height is 14 inches, the same as the 26er, and the dw-link suspension is also unchanged. To keep the ride-height correct, the head tube was shortened about a fourth of an inch and the head angle is slacked out by Pivot-designed headset cups that create a perfect-for-650B, 66-degree head angle and is one degree slacker than the original 26-inch Firebird. The system is not adjustable like Cane Creek's AngleSet. Instead, it is a pair of fixed cups that alter the head angle by one degree. Three sets of cups are used, one for each head tube length to keeps the change to one degree for each frame size. Without the need for the domed bearings or cups of an adjustable headset design, Pivot's option promises to remain squeak free, which is great news for all of us who have suffered that malady. Sadly, however, Pivot says that the cups will not be available for aftermarket sales.

Pivot Firebird 275 geometry

When asked why he broke tradition and chose not to design the mid-sized-wheel Firebird from a clean sheet of paper, Cocalis says that he originally adapted the bike for testing 650B, and discovered afterwards that the chassis was a sweet performer in stock form. Longer travel designs benefit most from the mid-sized wheel, so the Firebird is the right platform from which to launch the first 650B bike from Pivot, and it was sort of a gift that the chassis required minimal modification to bring it on line. That said, Cocalis indicated that there will be a number of clean-sheet 650B bikes arriving in the near future



Pivot M4X Freestyle Bike

Pivot M4X side shot

Pivot's M4X is a dual-slalom/freestyle design that offers exceptional pedaling action.



Looking sharp in black with lime green graphics, the four-inch-travel M4X is Pivot Cycle's take on the perfect dual-slalom/freestyle bike. Designed around dw-link suspension, the M4X is arguably one of the best pedaling rear-suspension designs in the genre, so it would be a good choice for a rider who grew up on a hardtail and is in the market for rear suspension. Sizes are small and large, with the main difference being top tube length (22.3 inches or 23.5 inches).

Pivot M4X details

Pivot's M4X has compact suspension and a low-profile front section. Two top tube lengths are offered.



Pivot M4X geometry

More from Pivot Cycles

Author Info:
RichardCunningham avatar

Member since Mar 23, 2011
974 articles

72 Comments
  • 22 4
 So current owners of the firebird can theoretically upgrade their bikes to 650b?
  • 34 5
 "UPgrade" ? ^^
  • 8 7
 But the geo is made for 650b, and geo can be all the differance between an awful bike and otherwise
  • 15 1
 Ok, retrofit.... Does that terminology please you more. Not the point of the question anyway.
  • 4 0
 My conversation with Pivot..Interestingly the information I read on their press-release said they had made adjustments to the rear triangle.

"So you know this question is going to be asked again and again.... Am I going to be able to convert my firebird to a 27.5 beast by getting the updated rear from you guys? Thanks!"

Pivot Cycles Oli - We are not offering updated rear triangles but the current Firebird already fits a fairly wide variety of 27.5 tires. If you get a Cane Creek Angleset and slacken the head angle by 1.5 degrees and use a proper 27.5 (650) X 160mm travel fork, you will be in a close proximity to the set up of the new bike. Chris Cocalis was testing with this set up in public for the better part of a year and it gets you 95% of the way there. Good Luck!

Oli Kasicki Thanks, I'll give it a go when I find some funds, looks like it would really help with efficiency for enduro, but does having the bigger wheels take much of the playfulness of the 'bird away?

Pivot Cycles MORE FUN!
  • 1 27
flag rifrafi (Apr 21, 2013 at 15:40) (Below Threshold)
 looks like a trek
  • 6 0
 I run my firechicken with 650b wheels and they clear. It's about damn time Pivot caught on. The rear triangle has about 1/4in clearance and my Fox 160mm fork clears it as well. I find it made the bike a lot less squirrely and much more DH capable.
  • 2 1
 Yes an original firebird will clear 650b wheels front (long as its a fox fork) and rear ( no shimming required). There is a thread about this on MTBR
  • 3 12
flag A-Smalls (Apr 21, 2013 at 19:04) (Below Threshold)
 @ rifrafi come on if your gunna do it do it right ...... looks like a Trek Session
  • 3 0
 X-fusion forks will fit too
  • 7 1
 Lovely bike but it's hilarious how they have banged on about the angle headset being something new and that it's a shame it's not available separately - works components have only been selling the exact same thing for 4 years now! www.workscomponents.co.uk He'll I bought one off ridemonkey yeeeears ago. Funny world the bike industry, whoever is reporting for pinkbike should surely be aware of other brands product too....
  • 2 1
 You need an angleset to run the bike at its intended geometry? Am I the only one who thinks this is pathetic? What if you want to go slacker than stock geo, oh wait you can't unless you run a longer fork which will only raise the BB more...
  • 1 0
 It's not an angle-adjustable HS. Just cups that permanently set the angle slacker - kind of like offset shock bushings.
  • 2 1
 Yes... I dont think anyone was confused about that. What I am confused about is why didnt they actually change the angle of the head tube? Seems lazy to me. I would never buy a frame that requires a set of angled cups to slacken the bike to intended geo. Again, what if you want to go even slacker? An angled headset isnt an option since you are already running one...
  • 1 0
 The guts of the bike is getting a bit old now. Props to pivot for *almost futureproofing a bike made about 4 years ago. In that time head angles have got slacker. I would like to see pivot rock a whole new firebird. I love mine, it's a lot more dh than a lot of current AM bikes, but I still get to the top. Maybe not the best move to spec a 34 with all the issues. Just wondering who makes a 135mm hub spaced 650b wheelset.
  • 5 0
 Respect to manufacturers who still produce 100mm 4x bikes especially like this one and Tazer VP with efficient pedaling designs, be it VPP or DW. Very nice geometry on the firebird too and I would ask for the DHX air option on the frameset.
  • 5 0
 I demo'd this bike yesterday along with several other 275 trail bikes. I liked the bike but it felt a little tall and old school. Later I found that the BB hight is almost an inch higher than the best competition. Still a sick ride though.
  • 1 0
 Talking about the firebird.
  • 1 0
 The standard firebird bb is .2 inches lower. Checked the site. Does that mean all firebirds are super high? Norco range killer is 13.5 so there is a significant difference there. Maybe that explains why these bikes are so squirley according to some riders?
  • 5 1
 Firebird - Not impressed by the fact that they are just recycling the same frame to market a "new" 650B model. The end result it basically the same bike with a higher bottom bracket. This is moving in the wrong direction IMO, especially considering that DW-Link bikes are known to ride higher in their travel.

I really dig Pivots bikes. The 5.7 is something I'm looking at for an AM bike. No need for a 650B version for me. I don't care for longer chainstays.

Sorry Pivot. Competing must bring tough decisions.
  • 3 0
 GET IT!!!!! I just bought a 2013 alloy 5.7 and hand on heart it is the best bike i have ever ridden. Took me ages to save for it but im sooo glad i bought it now.
  • 2 0
 The bottom bracket height is the same. They shortened the head tube to do it. Read the article.
  • 1 0
 Chainstays are also the same, they used the existing rear triangle.
  • 1 0
 1. If I had the money, I'd put on my Sundays' best and head to my local dealer right now. But I'm actually considering two other DW bikes. Some time in the future. Owned a DW in the past and demoed the 5.7C. They are dialed.

2. It says nothing of the BB height in the article. Check the numbers on their site. The 275 is higher. In fact, IMO, the lowering of the front end is what made the seat tube steeper. I wonder how sensitive Dave Weagles' tune is to the suspension being slightly rotated forward. Probably not a big deal.

3. As far as chainstays go, I was referring to a 650B model of the 5.7. It's currently nice and short at 16.85"(428mm). I doubt they can duplicate that with bigger wheels.
  • 1 0
 "3. As far as chainstays go, I was referring to a 650B model of the 5.7. It's currently nice and short at 16.85"(428mm). I doubt they can duplicate that with bigger wheels."

There shouldn't be a reason they couldn't hit 428mm on a 650 Mach 5.7/Mach 6. The Norco Range Killer B and Rocky Altitude are at 427/428 mm with 650b. Heck, Specialized hit 430 mm on the Enduro 29er. Just a matter of the what the design engineers are trying to achieve with the bike - bigger wheels don't necessarily mean CS has to be longer.
  • 1 0
 Well, you are comparing different suspension designs. If you look at other virtual pivot designs with one piece rear triangles and lower links, you'll find that minimum chainstay lengths tend to be longer than comparable bikes with four bar or single pivot setups. Looking at Pivots' funky seat tube should give you an idea of what it takes to make things fit.
  • 1 0
 I hear you and am aware I'm comparing different designs, but I believe you're missing my point. CS is a reflection of the design goals, which includes suspension. Wheel size in not necessarily a limitation. Saying a COMPLETLY redesigned Mach "something or another" for 650b can't hit a CS of 16.8 ish because of wheel size simply discounts all engineering principles. Chris C. has said all the follow on 650 models are going to be ground up designs, so I don't expect to see a current 5.7 retrofitted to 650b like the firebird released by them. (It can be done with current 5.7's but rear clearance blows, which includes your point re the seat tube.)

As an example of 650b not being a limitation, the 26 inch Norco Range from 2012 had a CS of 437 mm while the new Range Killer B is 427 mm. Through good design and engineering, Norco increased the wheel size yet REDUCED the CS by 10mm. Pivot can do the same with a new 650b design IF the design goal is to have the shorter CS. They're pretty anal retentive when it comes to design and engineering and won't release something unless it meets their criteria/goals.

That said, I'd rather have a fun riding bike with great engineering design with a longer CS (e.g. Bronson @ 17.3) than poorly designed bike with a short CS ( too many to list).
  • 1 0
 Word. I don't envy these guys gambling resources to figure it all out.
  • 1 0
 @sOOper-nOOb, which other dw link bikes were u looking at?
  • 1 0
 Turner 5 Spot and Ibis HD 140. Tough choices considering the numbers for all three bikes are all pretty close. These two bikes' low BB's are more appealing to me. Head angles aren't important, as they are adjustable with headsets. I'll have to get some laps on these two bikes to make a decision. The 5.7c I demoed was fun. The stock build was on the XC side of the trail bike spectrum regarding the cockpit, fork and wheels. The stem felt flexy. The fork could have been stiffer as well. The frame is solid though. It has lots of potential. I stiffer fork, wider handlebar and shorter stem combo would really bring the bike to life and make it a whole lot more versatile. Even switching out just bars and stem would make the bike more fun than it already is. It looks like they may have already changed the spec on their site, so I'll have get in on the next demo day. The graphics don't do the the bike any favors though.
  • 1 0
 They are all sweet bikes. From my experience the turner makes u feel like ur riding a bike with more than 5 inches of travel, whereas because the pivots dont really sit in their sag, they pedal like an xc bike, but feel like they have heaps of travel when u need it. Havent ridden an ibis but i would certainly like to. Just my 2 cents worth.
  • 2 0
 Thanks scblurnz. It's actually on the top of my list. Trouble is I haven't demoed one yet. Gotta try before I buy (when I finally get the funds together). Going off all of the praise for it on the interwebs, it pretty much seems to fit my needs. A plus is that I'm no more than an hour from Turner's headquarters. The carbon frames from the other two sure are nice though.
  • 1 0
 Algood mate. Doesnt really matter what bike u get, they are all sweet bikes, i suppose im just a bit biased to pivot because i own one and continue to be blown away by it. Each time i ride it the more i enjoy it. However this is just my opinion and im sure u will choose the bike that suites ur riding style the most.
  • 5 3
 I had some dramatic time when servicing Mondraker's suspension with similar in appearance ultra-compact design. My bet is that this FIrebird, no matter how efficient in ride it is, will provide the same to anyone who's gonna approach it with wrench.
  • 4 0
 sounds like to get a slacker, lower BB firebird, buy the 27.5 version then stick 26in wheels on it! should be .75" lower BB.
  • 3 0
 Good point. Could be a good mini DH build. The longish chainstays wouldn't be a bad thing in this case.
  • 2 0
 Just a note about BB height on Pivots - they generally are higher because the bikes are designed to ride with 30% sag with DW-Link, which drops you roughly 1.8 to 2 inches. So, per a couple of comments below, starting at 13.25 -13.5 will have you striking pretty much everything while pedaling. Same is true with Ibis (13.8 on 26 inch HD). I have a Talas 34 at 150 mm (replaced the shaft) on my 5.7c, so my BB is higher than the standard 13.72 and it rides nice and low and compresses great in corners. Absolutely no issues.
  • 1 0
 That's good info on the 5.7c. Thanks.

Turners' 5 Spot is spec'd at 13.5 and their 650B Burner at 13.25. Haven't ridden either, although I'm itching to. My current rig runs 13.25" stock no problem. I guess all bikes are setup differently.
  • 1 0
 Ya, Weegle works closely with each vender in the design process to dial in the suspension. Turner's design is pretty differrent than Pivot's with the linkage much higher up. Probably doesn't compress as much, but would have to ride one to see.

Also, total typo on my part above - I meant .8 to 1 inches with 30%. Wish I can say I was I high, but just had a brain fart. :^) Design does allow for more use of the travel, though, which is why it compresses nicely turns.
  • 1 0
 Kudos to Chris for designing such a versatile bike. If/when this 650b fad dies, you can convert your 2013 firebird to a 26r.

How about a 26 inch wheel in the back, 275 in the front to make it even slacker! The fun you could have.
  • 1 1
 Two words... Mino Link

My Remedy has a dual personality it can live as a 26er or a 650b and with a flip of a switch "Mino Link" I can adjust the geo on the fly. I disagree with the "sharp-pedaling" description anyone who's owned a Pivot Firebird knows that it is not a joy while climbing a better description would be "clumsy-slow".
  • 3 0
 We want to see new DH bikes, Marzocchi Booth, and DVO booth!
  • 1 1
 725 is hotchpotch to give the frame another life. Maxed out HA, BB wandered up to high, retrothought 650. 67.5 HA is outdated. Even 66 degree with Angleset will feel twitchy. No buy.
  • 2 1
 How do you guys ride these bikes with super low bbs? Do you run 165 cranks, do you ride trails without rocks, or do you just not pedal uphill? I'm constantly hitting rocks with my Giant Reign/175 cranks, which has an averagish bb height.
  • 1 0
 me too. gotta run too much air in shock not to have pedal strike
  • 2 0
 Glad to see that 4x bikes still dominate on 26" wheels
  • 2 0
 I bet that Firebird is scary fast
  • 2 0
 love this time when everybody show the new things,it's interesting
  • 1 0
 It's not new... there was just room for bigger wheels...
  • 1 0
 i didn't mean that,i'm telling you about all sea otter,ofc it's not revolutionary but somethhing is happening and it's cool
  • 1 0
 It seems like the only new bikes at Sea Otter aren't 26". (the M4X is already out)
  • 1 0
 This 650b craze is out of control, 26"wheels still dominating! Skill still more important than wheel size.
  • 1 0
 Trolling. No evidence to back up your claim!!
  • 1 0
 got too be said this is my favourite 650b bike out there atm the frame design is awesome
  • 1 0
 Pedaless bikes are the future ?
  • 1 0
 The graphics on the Firebird remind of the bikes sold in supermarkets.
  • 2 0
 Solid !
  • 2 0
 Firebird's awesome!
  • 1 0
 I like the bird with a 66, this looks more xcish
  • 1 0
 XT cranks are great on my old Prophey for AM. The extra leverege!
  • 1 0
 I don't care how it rides...it is ugly.
  • 1 0
 I agree! With so many great looking bikes out that also ride great, why pick an ugly one?
  • 1 0
 One mans trash....
Maybe the liteville is more to your liking
www.pinkbike.com/news/Liteville-301-MK10-Tested.html
  • 1 0
 Holy 650b's Batman!

Is anyone building anything ELSE anymore???
  • 1 0
 The light/dark knight rises...
  • 1 0
 Looks amazing! Pivot has some really nice bikes
  • 1 0
 ROY (reply of the year)
  • 1 0
 Schwing!
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.036894
Mobile Version of Website