Powered by Outside

2010 Fox Shox - 32 Talas RLC and Float RP23 - Reviewed

Dec 18, 2009
by Jordan Holmes  
2010 marks a big step for Fox Racing Shox. Not only will they be further expanding their 15mm QR system that they worked on, in conjunction with Shimano to create, but the all new FIT (Fox Isolated Technology) damper is now lighter, and more functional. A lot of thought has gone into Fox's 2010 fork line up, and it's showing through on the final product. Not only is the new 32 Talas fork amazing, but the all new Float RP23 with BoostValve is a piece of work as well.

photo

photo

Let's look at the 32 Talas RLC fork. Starting at the visuals, Fox has continued to coat their forks in Fox Titanium. This color has proven to be flashy, and specific enough to distinguish it against other greys, and to be durable enough to take a beating and still look good. Fox has also re-designed all the adjustments to be ergonomic to your fingers, and easy to work with. Well labeled, color coordinated, and a logical design make this fork easy to work with.

photo

Fox Racing Shox has recently come out with a new standard for securing your wheel in your fork. The 15mm QR system that was designed in conjunction with Shimano is not only a Thru Axle design, but it features a couple small tid bits of technology that make it unique. The new 15QR system is lighter than a 20mm system and has greater stiffness over the standard 9mm open dropouts. One of the nicest touches on the 15QR system however is the clock-able thread. What is this? Fox has developed a system that allows users to pick which direction their axle release lever faces when it's tight. Obviously you wouldn't want your QR facing forward, because it could get caught by a branch or a plant, and potentially open it and release your wheel. On the same token you don't want it facing directly backwards, because then you could squash your fingers between the fork leg and the QR. Fox's 15QR system allows you to select where the QR lever will be located when snugged down.

photo

The Talas 32 RLC features Talas travel adjust, which is a travel adjustment from 110mm to 130mm to 150mm. These three settings of travel should cover all your riding needs when out on your local loop, or peeling off shuttles like banana skins.

photo

Views: 13,426    Faves: 7    Comments: 3

The Talas 32 RLC also features Fox's FIT system, which is Fox's answer to a high end damper system. FIT was originally designed for downhill racing applications, however Fox has adapted it into some of their single crown forks for 2010. Some of the changes Fox made to the FIT system include making it lighter, an even wider low speed compression range, and a finely tuned high speed compression damping circuit designed to provide superior traction. More traction generally means more control, and better performance as well. Fox has relocated the rebound adjustment to the bottom of the FIT cartridge to make space for the Talas travel adjustment, and the lock out/compression adjustments which are now found on the top of the right leg crown. Fox has also re-designed the bladder system in the FIT cartridge, providing the lowest friction rating for sealed dampers. Our fork was also labeled with RLC - Rebound, Lockout and Compression. The black knob in the middle is referred to as lockout threshold - this is an internal adjustment that Fox designed that allows you to tune the lock out pressure on your fork. Meaning you can now finely tune how "locked out" your fork feels when the adjustment is set up. There is also an RL model and RL stands for Rebound and lockout.

photo

Fox constructs the 32 Talas RLC with both a 1 1/8" steer tube, and in a 1.5" taper steer tube option. Our fork tipped the scales at 3.96 pounds, which is an extremely acceptable weight. That being said, the tapered steer tube option is slightly lighter 3.94 pounds (claimed). External adjustments include rebound, lockout, compression (RLC), Talas travel adjust and air spring pressure. The Talas 32 RLC features post style disc mounts, and an included cable guide on the arch.

Riding characteristics of the 32 Talas were that it was very reliable, and supple, yet stiff when it came to steering and flex. Offered in either standard or tapered steer tube, I am sure that the increased contact area of a tapered steer tube's 1.5" base would greatly increase stiffness even further for this fork. The adjustments made to the FIT damper allowed it to absorb minor bumps as well as large impacts such as rocks and logs with ease.

photo
Lost the cable anchor, so back to zip ties.

photo

The travel adjustment on the 32 Talas RLC is one thing that I want to touch on for a moment. We have seen travel adjustment in the past, however, the adjustment system that Fox is using is very reliable, and precise. Not once has the fork had any issues with the new FIT damper or the Talas travel adjustment. As well, having a travel adjustable fork allows you as the rider to cover more terrain more comfortably. Whether you're climbing with it lowered, or descending at full travel, the 32 Talas is a great fork that continues to perform at an above par level.

photo
Lots of mud and junk on the fork, but clean stanctions tell us that the seals are doing their job.

photo

I'd also like to note some small things about the new RP23 with BoostValve technology. BoostValve is a position sensitive compression damping circuit that Fox has been using from the beginning on the DHX air and coil shocks. Fox has equip the new RP23 shock with BoostValve for 2010, and it's proving to be a very smart move.

photo

photo

The RP23 features the same structural design as the RP2, however it features more advanced internals. Not only does the RP23 shock have ProPedal lock out, but it also features 3 levels of ProPedal adjustment which adjusts the threshold in where ProPedal is effecting the bike. I found myself riding in setting 2 most of the time, with the ProPedal lever open.

Views: 7,851    Faves: 3    Comments: 0

The new Boost Valve Technology from Fox is a very nice addition to the RP23. By adding the Boost Valve Technology to the shock, Fox has made it a position sensitive shock, meaning it now features a progressive compression curve. On rapid impacts, or repetitive impacts the RP23's boost valve will kick in, giving you progressive compression damping all the way through the stroke. On smaller bumps the Boost Valve will not open, meaning you will not have to overcome an increased amount of compression for the suspension to become active.

photo

I found that this new system works extremely well. On large bumps such as climbs over stumps or rocks, the Boost Valve kicks in and gives me a progressive rear feel, and while out on leisurely pedal rides where I am not encountering larger bumps, I do not feel any increases in compression at all. For 2010 Boost Valve Technology is going to be available in the RP23 and RP2 shocks.

Sizing options are as follows:
-5.5 x 1.0
-6.0 x 1.25
-6.5 x 1.5
-7.5 x 2.0
-7.875 x 2.0
-7.875 x 2.25
-and 8.5 x 2.5

I would highly suggest either of these two products to anyone in the market for new suspension for their All Mountain or aggressive trail bike. They are both very light, strong, and functional. For the 2010, 32 Talas RLC in 150mm travel you can expect a US MSRP price of $775 and a weight of 3.96 pounds. The RP23 with Boost Valve will run you $395 US, and for the 6.5 x 1.5" shock it weighs in at 0.46 pounds. For more information on these, and all the other products by Fox check out their site.

Report
Must Read This Week

47 Comments
  • 60
 Boost valve in the RP23 is gonna be super useful for SS/jump/fr applications... I'm thinking specifically on bikes like the Double, Pink, and Killswitch where you tend to blow through travel quite fast due to the the (lack of)(lol) suspension linkage!
  • 30
 same idea as specialized enduro from 2007 with the boost valve.
  • 10
 the guy at my local shop said its not going to effect it that much and if you already ahve a rp23 dont bother getting the new one unkess your are enduro,cross country, this will not effect slopstyle, or jump in any way cause of impact.the shock is soo small it just doesnt make a difference
  • 11
 Anyway did any one sign up/ send in resume for they're grassroots program thing?
  • 50
 the bike you used to test the rear shock was designed to be run without an RP23 with boost valve. It's not necessary with the 5Spot. A single pivot or VPP bike would be a better testing platform. And by running the shock with pro-pedal turned off it doesn't matter pro-pedal # you have it set too...the shock is fully open regardless!
  • 20
 True, true, true and true.
  • 20
 I'm glad someone else interprets it that way, I was scratching my head:

"I found myself riding in setting 2 most of the time, with the ProPedal lever open."
  • 30
 fox seals have a 90 day warranty. period. they make some great stuff but sometimes fox does not think their sh!t stinks. I ride some of their forks, but in innovation I think rock shox has done a better job in the longer travel forks. The damper on the lyrik, totem, and boxxer is leaps above the fox. They also have very good warranty. Fox makes great forks, but if it does not fit your riding application, they are horrible. it is night and day between a lyrik and 36rc2 if you really push the fork and weigh over 180lbs. 9mm skewers came from road bikes. the system is that old. the BS that 15mm is lighter etc is just smoke. they have to make it sound good. Remember Shimano was taken a beatdown in shifting and is always late to do improvements, but now they have the shadow design. the fact the fox joined is the deciding factor. My I9 run all 3, 9mm, 15mm, 20mm. same bearing, just different caps. changing die hard xc peeps is like trying to change die hard roadies.
  • 20
 Bigger bearings in front hubs, noticed how 20mm hubs go shitty fairly quick?

its not a 'known' problem - try using a good quality hub from Hope, King or Hadley and you won't be having any issues with 20mm Wink


new 2010 Fox stuff looks dope Smile


I am switching the 2009 DHX 5 Air shock on my Devinci Hectik Ltd. to the new RP23 XV BV in the New Year, after getting over the financial shock of the Christmas vacation.....
  • 20
 I have a 2010 RP23 w/ Boostvalve on a 2010 Transition Covert and it is a big improvement over the previous rp23. The extra cushion on the backend of the stroke allows the shock to be run at a lower pressure and be more supple. I have never felt the shock bottomout though I have pushed the 0-ring off the shaft several time.
  • 20
 i have been running the new 32 Talas on my 09 remedey and with the new trek drcv rear end the bike is so much better then the 09 setup.i opted for the 32 although i had to order a new hub due to the weight and because for AM there is no need for the 36 Talas. and a 4 lbs its amazing, Fox is second to none
  • 10
 I own the Fox Float RL 140mm.. light/strong/stiff as nails regardless of 15qr (which i still run 9mm) It was increased my bikes performance/weight and it looks great to boot. Why roll on anything else? I'm a lifer. Thanks Fox for continuing to push the boundries of lightweight suspension in the world of MTB's.
  • 10
 Me to. Much the same. To the people who where saying fox is overpriced and overrated..Ever actually push down on a fox fork? its orgasmic.
  • 10
 I have this fork on my Blur LT and to say i'm impressed would be an understatement. The travel adjustment is really good. It feels awesome and works great with my dhx air 5 on the rear. Recommended Smile
  • 20
 I see the 15mm as a replacement for the 9mm. It's a good thing so stop complaining
  • 10
 gotta love it. looks clean
  • 199
 omg ... whats up with that 15mm axle ?!?

don´t tell me it has to do with less weight, if you ask me, that´s just a good way to make money in corporation with shimano.

sorry, but this really sucks in my opinion Frown
  • 202
 I dont really find the 32 series aesthetically pleasing Frown
(here come the neg props)
  • 619
flag joedaho (Dec 18, 2009 at 10:01) (Below Threshold)
 Bigger bearings in front hubs, noticed how 20mm hubs go shitty fairly quick?
  • 122
 you do realise its the same bearings no matter what axle you use right?
  • 45
 Looks like most fork companies are moving towards 15mm and away from 20mm.
  • 41
 ya but you can use BIGGER bearings
  • 62
 The 15mm axle is Fox's way of getting around the Rockshox Maxle patent. This way they can (essentially) copy the Maxle and not have to pay for it; you pay for it instead by buying a new hub.
  • 69
 15mm versus 20mm is all about end use. 15mm = XC, AM, trail and possibly DJ, 20mm is DH, FR and DJ.

Companies like DT SWiss made a 20mm through-axle fork for stiffness but people busted them and then cried "No fair - its 20mm, it should be strong enough for hucking cliffs!". So now DT only make 15mm to clarify the fork use to the end user.

Blame stupid mountain bikers for 15mm, not Fox and Shimano.
  • 61
 You seriously believe that?! wow.
  • 43
 15mm will be accepted over time just as any standard in the bike market has. 9mm quick releases have been around for too long for there to be no ways to improve upon it. I won't bug anyone with those details... because they've been stated time and time again. just consider it another way for us bike fanatiks to break away from the casual crowd with something new and special! heck, i don't know if this has ever talked about or covered; the flex that the 15mm gives over the 20mm... most likely the whole fork was built to flex around the strength of the 15mm. if it was using a 20mm, the fork would be over-stressed in other areas, requiring more strength in the fork in other areas to compensate, obviously making it heavier. and there's already the option for lower 1.5. strength wise, that will do many more wonders in terms of stiffness. you can still build up a very strong wheel with any of the optinos availible today. if you're worried about having to make a new wheel because your current one won't adapt... well... you're already spending a lot of money on a fancy dancy fork... if you don't want it to perform at its' best... there are plenty of cheaper options out there for your confusing budget that somehow managed to include such a high performing fork. sorry for the rant... i'm just venting casually
  • 22
 negative-approch - yes I believe that because it comes from the guys at DT.
  • 30
 really don't see why they stick with the boring grey colour.
  • 20
 probably has something to do with the fact that they are worried more about making stuff that performs well rather than looks good. (ie: marzicchi) sure having a shiny fork is cool, but having to rebuild it every month cuz its a peice of shit sucks. performance>pretty
  • 20
 Hey, undercoverfreak! The outer diameter of the cartridge bearing is limmited by the brake rotor mounting holes, therefore by shrinking the axle, and allowing more space between the brake mounts and the axle, there's room for larger balls to be used in the cartridge! Thus leading to longer bearing life and better durrabillity!
  • 20
 yeah fine but i mean a different colour isnt really very much to ask is it now?
  • 10
 RLC and Float Are wicked, only if i had the money to try them out.
  • 21
 Wow! MSRP around 775$ US, so much cheaper than our Canadian MSRP!!
  • 10
 I paid $500 for a brand new 2009 RL. Best deal ever.
  • 21
 Nice spelling error! Boosvalve!
  • 20
 WANT.
  • 11
 omg wish i had those shox
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2026. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.074972
Mobile Version of Website