Video Interview: GT Factory Racing and the New Fury

 she likes it long and dirty too....sorry i just kept staring at her second toe. she is still a hotty with dirty feet

 @ Aibek... she's a five foot woman, not surprising that big wheels are too much for her to handle. What's your excuse?

 Having the 29-Inch question in downhill seems more to promote thoughtful discussion rather than rigidly setting body-proportions to that and this wheel. Any wheel will roll - I believe the majority Makers were satisfied stopping tests upon a new DH bike w/ 29" wheels. The one race there, on a Specialized... more amusing than a true forging-ahead of progression away from Trail Bikes of the past 25 Years.
I believe that 27.5" wheel'd bikes will be awful common and an option for nearly any discipline. Not so much due to sheer rider size, but that the mechanical advantages of how the square of all things reacts upon it invites an altered skill set. One persons 'easier' can still be the other's 'lazy'... it's all good though. I'm looking for a Peace 9'R to build for trailwork/coffee runs, 27.5" may also do it though, w/o a poke to 29ers being poorly implemented.

 @DrthVadr... No it's actually no just a "f*cking wheel sz" actually. That was the approach companies took in the early days of 29'er and it produce bikes that suck. Since then, companies have gone back to the drawing board and modified their frame designs, geometry, and suspension platforms and layouts to maximize the advantages of bigger wheels while mitigating their drawbacks. The result is an evolution in technology because previous technology was not able to produce capable and playful big wheeled bikes until that technology EVOLVED. You also seem to be missing that bigger wheels has led to new approaches to wheel designs in trying to control the flex of the larger hoops... whether it's different flange designs like SRAM are employing or massively extended hub flanges like eThirteen are employing, technology is evolving because of the bigger wheels.

Also, just FYI... a chameleon does not "conform to the surface it's traveling" and it most definitely cannot walk up a sheer face wall.

PS- Spell check dude... spell check. You're making public schools look bad.

 Are you f*cking retarded? Companies modified their frame & suspension designs to work with 29'ers before 29'ers? You apparently don't understand what "evolution" actually means... it doesn't matter if "everyone knew" what something did, no one was doing it stupid.

No... spelling doesn't mean anything about seeing forests, it means something about your intelligence. You come up with some ignorant assumption based post on your imaginary definition of 'evolution' and try to sound like you have a clue but don't even know how to spell, use grammar, or what the f*ck evolution even means apparently... So you can sit back with your stupidity and try to pump yourself up with jackass phrases, which you've also misused by the way, when the reality is you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.