Spot, the Colorado-based brand formerly best known for their belt-driven singlespeeds, turned heads at last year's Sea Otter with the introduction of their 140mm, 27.5”
Rollik, and this year they're at it again with the debut of the Mayhem. The Mayhem can be set up with either 29” or 27.5+ wheels, and has 130mm of rear travel that's delivered via Spot's unique 'Living Link' suspension design.
Like the Rollik, the Mayhem is a full carbon affair, constructed using a fabric called TexTreme that's said to reduce the amount of epoxy necessary during layup, which helps to reduce the overall frame weight. There's internal routing for the derailleur and dropper post housing, with the brake line run externally for ease of maintenance.
Spot Mayhem Details• Wheel size: 29" / 27.5+
• Full carbon frame
• 130mm travel
• 66.7° head angle
• Living Link suspension design
• Colors: Matte Hot Tomato, Matte Black
• Sizes: S, M, L, XL
• MSRP: $3199 USD (frame only), $6000 - $8700 complete
•
www.spotbrand.com Suspension DesignWhat sets the Mayhem apart the rest of the dual-link full suspension bikes on the market is the use of a carbon fiber plate to join the swingarm to the seat tube. According to Spot, in addition to being very resistant to lateral flex, the plate acts like a leaf spring, providing extra mid-stroke support, and making it possible to run the rear shock wide open at all times, rather than reaching for the compression lever before long climbs.
The carbon plate is also said to be extremely durable, and Spot's tests have shown that it can withstand three million cycles without failure, which equates to somewhere around 12 years of daily riding.
Geometry and Frame DetailsWhen it comes to geometry, the Mayhem's numbers are thoroughly modern, with a low standover height, a 66.7° head tube angle, and a 75.7° seat tube angle. There's room to mount a water bottle, a threaded bottom bracket, and ISCG 05 tabs for mounting a chain guide, a trifecta of welcome features. The bike comes spec'd with a 130mm Fox 34, but one of Spot's employees had their personal bike on display with a 140mm Fox 36 that looked even more appealing.
So theoritically you get 2 springs :
- with different (average) spring rates and, above all, very different curves
- one curve is set and the other is user defined by pressure, volume reducers, etc...
- only the shock is in charge of suspension duties (compression, rebound) which are only related to the shock shaft speed and position,
- but the shock hydraulics must take into account and be tuned for both springs...
Sorry but I find difficult to believe that all this added complexity is better than only one spring with dedicated hydraulics...
I bet everyone would be complaining if all of the coverage was of bikes with low end component specs, alloy production material, dated geometry, and needed 3k in upgrades just to be "rideable" by all the price snivelers.
You want to see the good stuff or gear from the bargain bin you'd turn your nose up at? The complaints are confusing the people reporting this stuff.
It is supposed to use less resin for the same weight, so overall you have a better fiber to resin ratio. That means either increased strength at the same weight, or the same strength at a lower weight (compared to a normal carbon lay up)
www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=367035
can i add caltracs bars for less wheel hop?
and will it run 10s if i put radials on it...
Yeah except that technology has been done before by other brands. And I'm not talking about the fiberglass link used on Slingshots. Manufacturers have been using carbon fiber leaf springs in actual full suspension linkage bikes for a LONG time...go thru MBAs from the early 90s from issues where they attended the taipei and euro bike shows and you'll find a lot of them.
Some people land chest high drops to flat with way more abuse than Semenuk lands 30 footers at rampage so...
Maybe that's not super relevant.
Do you launch chest high drops to flat just for fun?
Is this missselling?
Or just plain wrong?
Either way it's ugly.