Now THAT Was A Bike - 1991 Alpinestars Ti Mega

Oct 9, 2014 at 15:40
by Mike Kazimer  



Nearly 30 years after it was first welded up to form a mountain bike, titanium remains a coveted material for frame building, and while carbon fiber and aluminum may rule the roost when it comes to full-suspension frames, there's still something about a ti hardtail that gets the heart beating a little quicker. Alpinestars' Ti Mega, with its eye-catching elevated chainstay design, garnered a good deal of press when it was released in 1991, even snagging a spot on the cover of Mountain Bike Action magazine. The 3AL-2.5V titanium frame was welded in the USA by Litespeed, one of the leading titanium frame builders at the time.

The elevated chainstay design that gives the Mega its distinctive look reached its peak in the early '90s, and according to the Alpinestars original ad copy, building a bike this way created the “ultimate combination of power climbing, traction, and ground clearance.” Those are some bold claims, and eventually the extra weight, as well as the flex that occurred around the bottom bracket area during hard pedaling caused this frame style to be passed by in favor of the double diamond configuration that most hardtails use to this day.

Alpinestars Ti Mega. Photos courtesy of The Pro s Closet.
  A top of the line Shimano XT gruppo along with a health dose of titanium, including the frame, seatpost, and stem, were enough to land the Ti Mega a magazine cover shot.


This Ti Mega is part of The Pro's Closet's growing vintage bike collection, and was built from the frame up with period correct components. The era's most lust-inducing brands are well represented, with Ringlé, Onza, and Cook Brothers Racing all finding their place on the bike. Ringlé takes care of the seatpost and wheel quick releases, although they're not the bright anodized colors that the New Jersey based company became best known for. Onza's Racing Porcs were a popular tire at the time, but now their round knobs cause them to more closely resemble a mud spike rather than anything you'd want to roll up to a cross-country race on.

Alpinestars Ti Mega. Photos courtesy of The Pro s Closet.
  Thumb shifters, a 48 tooth big ring, and a 130mm quill stem. Oh, how things have changed.


The gearing on the bike is quite tall compared to today's mountain bikes, but the Ti Mega's 24 x 34 x 48t triple ring set up is actually slightly lower gearing than the 28 x 38 x 48t configuration that prevailed at the time. The chainrings are bolted to a set of Cook Brothers Racing cranks and paired with a 7 speed 13-30t Hyperglide cassette in the back. Shifting and braking duties are taken care of by Shimano's XT gruppo (XTR would make waves when it hit the market later in 1991). The frame isn't the only bit of titanium on this vintage ride – the 130mm stem was also made by Litespeed, and the Syncros manufactured the titanium seatpost. Those Ringlé skewers are ti as well, along with the Cook Brothers crankarm bolts. And what about the rigid aluminum fork? Well, front suspension still had yet to gain widespread acceptance, although RockShox's RS-1 was generating a healthy buzz, one that would turn into a roar by the middle of the decade as lighter, more reliable options became available. Until then, a ride like the Ti Mega was near the top of the heap when it came to exotic mountain bikes.



Alpinestars Ti Mega

Fork: Alpinestar Aluminum Blade 1 1/4″
Stem: Litespeed Titanium 1 1/4″ 130mm
Handlebar: Alpinestars Mega Lite 7005
Grips: ODI Attack
Seatpost: Syncros Ti
Brakes: Shimano XT BR-M734
Brake Levers: Shimano SLR BL-M733
Shifters: Shimano Deore XT SIS 7s thumb
Front Derailleur: Shimano Deore XT
Rear Derailleur: Shimano Deore XT
Cassette: Shimano HG90 7 speed
Chain: Shimano CN-91
Crankset: Cook Bros. Racing 172.5″ BCD 110 /74
Chainrings: SR 48 / Onza Buzz Saw 34 / Onza Buzz Saw 24
Pedals: Shimano Deore XT PD-M737 (Shimano's first SPD model for MTBs)
Quick releases: Ringle Ti Holey Cams
Headset: Tange Aluminum 1 1/4″ Stock Alpinestars
Hubsl: Shimano XT HB-M730
Tires: Onza Racing Porcs II
Saddle: Perforated Flite Red Label Dated 1991


Special thanks to The Pro's Closet for once again allowing us access to their treasure trove of historic bikes.

Author Info:
mikekazimer avatar

Member since Feb 1, 2009
1,737 articles

95 Comments
  • 106 2
 More of these retro articles PB please! Smile
  • 14 2
 Agree! LOVE these articles! RC - Let's see one on the Nishiki Alien! It's got ur signature on it!!
  • 3 1
 this is mike kloser/grundig wc time warp!
  • 5 1
 The people at Pro's Closet are awesome! I went there to pick up a handlebar I bought and they invited me in to check out their inner workings... They showed be all their cool old bikes! Love those guys!
  • 4 1
 Damn .. i remember it ... mike kloser on it ... first year i was racing as a junior ... now racing masterclass ... Damn ....
  • 3 0
 Geometry! I want to see old school geo numbers just for grins.
  • 1 0
 I remember seeing a lot of 70/71 back then
  • 1 0
 Oh boy that brings back memories!! I miss my Dean Ti
  • 2 1
 Thats one method of birth control.
  • 1 0
 I'd love to see my old 2001 rm9 reviewed like this...
  • 14 1
 Owned one of these. Loved it. I was light and still am so never had an issue with flex. Really compliant rear end meant it went downhill like a rocket. Was a lot of fun. Did the transalp on mine. Had it built with some RS Mag 20, cooks cranks, control tech stem, Answer Hperlite bars, Nuke proof hubs, Mavic 231 ceramic rims, etc... Lots of top end period stuff. Sold it in 93 and the guy who bought it broke the frame. Remember seeing mags with Mike Kloser and Tim Davies riding for the team. Those were the days.
  • 8 0
 looks great. What about a feature on a Mountain Cycle San Andreas?
  • 4 1
 Awesome bike. That was the year I started reading MBUK as a schoolboy. I loved the brighter colours of the Al Mega bikes, but the Yeti arc was top of the wish list.

Elevated chainstays came about to evade chain suck didn't they?

Even though it's so old, the Flite saddle wouldn't look out of place today.

How long were those stems..130 would have been merely average at that time too, coupled with a 21" handlebar. Sketchy stuff!
  • 2 1
 I ran that flight saddle on my DH bike up until about 2007
  • 2 1
 I was going to say, that Flite saddle hasn't changed in 23 years!
  • 7 6
 there is no way that stem is only a 130mm, looks more like a 150mm
  • 3 1
 I still run my 93' Flite Ti genuine gel saddle on my Cotic BFe. It hasn't broke or worn out, so I haven't had to replace it. Landed on it so many time, it's shocking it's still around. Actually feels more comfortable then when it was new.
  • 4 4
 As someone who owns 150mm stems still... that's definitely a 130mm.
  • 5 0
 as someone that raced on both a 150mm and a 135mm stems for years i will again stake my amp fork on that being a 150mm not a 130mm stem, i can send you a picture of a 150 if you need, byrt there is already a 150 mm stem on this page up above if you want to see what 1 looks like
  • 3 0
 if that stem is a 130mm , then those cranks are 155mm and that is a 4" seat post height and 24' wheels
  • 5 1
 Anyone remember these little badboys? I knew 3 guys who had them and snapped them clean in half! It's one reason why they stopped making bikes imo...
www.pinkbike.com/photo/11612674
  • 1 0
 oldmandan: I remember finding one of those in a Pawnshop here in Edmonton in about '94 or so, asked my LBS what he knew about them, he said don't do it!! Probably good advice, but at the time I was pretty disappointed, cuzz it's a cool looking frame, but then again cool isn;t always robustSmile
  • 1 0
 I owned the cro mo version, which was a great ride in it's time, knew the alloys were bound to fail....
  • 1 0
 they should make one like that n call it the cross.
  • 1 0
 I remember that bike. Always seemed unbalanced to me. I had the Manitou 2 fork on my 1993 Canondale M1000. The Ali Pepperoni fork it came with was too harsh.
  • 3 1
 A stunner back in the days of simple bikes. As well as being heavy and flexy, I don't think it was the most reliable design either. Would be great if Apibestars ever made a comeback, maybe even make some more wild mtb shoes.
  • 5 3
 Flexy? No...not hardly, not unless you cracked the thing, hell even with a cracked chainstay I didn't notice any flex until it the crack had ground around nearly 90% of the circumfrence of the tube and then it just felt like my QR was loose. The stays were all one inch in diameter (including the cross-brace between the seat stays above the brake studs) at a time when many ti frames were using 3/4" diameter stays, the main tubes were all 1 1/4" diameter or larger. The frame was not "light" by any stretch of the imagination for titanium. My 20.5" weighed 4.25 Ibs for the frame. In comparison my Titan Titanium Compe frame, same nominal size is half a pound lighter INCLUDING the press-fit cartridge bearing titanium bottom bracket.

yoda.densan.ca/kmr/bikes/timegacrack2.jpg


As to Alpinestars making a comeback...they were and still are one of the largest clothing makers in the motorcycle world.
  • 4 2
 atleast its not a demo, eh protour?
  • 2 1
 I bought a red CroMega DX (same frame design, but in Cro Moly) and bent the dropout simply by pedaling hard. It pulled forward towards the bottom bracket. Shop replaced it with the AlMega DX (dark blue - aluminum) and I rode that one for about 6 years. 15.75" chainstays if I recall. Proprietary stem/handlebar interface too, if memory serves. I loved the bike because it was unique and handled well with my Rock Shox Mag 20.
  • 2 1
 All my buddies with Al-Mega bikes cracked their frames very quickly, and the warranty replacement frames...so on.

Really cool looking bike and with the crazy 1.5" (?) stem / steerer design, but an unreliable design for sure!
  • 2 1
 1 1/4, which is oddly enough back... Giant's Overdrive 2 taper standard is 1.5 to 1.25.
  • 2 0
 I sold those at my shop when they first came out. I owned the cro-mo (tru temper) model which was red, mad front travel with a girvin flex stem....it went to the very first day ever of lift access riding at Mt. snow in VT. Trying to manage the mountain with that, it was like your head was in a paint can shaker over 15 mph... Things sure have come a long way since those days.
  • 2 0
 GT Zaskar LE, purple ano accessories in 1993 and blue ano accessories in 1994. Used to wish that I was fast enough that GT would give me the Xizang to ride on. Remember getting my first RS Mag 21 (for racing) and Quadra (for training). Ah bikes seem so simple compared to today but if I had them they would be framed on a wall as today's bikes ride so much better. I recall that one of my frames was re-purposed into a two level coffee table! Which I did not keep when I moved unfortunately.
  • 1 0
 I ride a GT zaskar LE the Chrome with Judy SL , XT and LX mix on XT hubs and Mavic 571 rims . I ride it up Bike park Wales in the UK . Light as a fart and love it .
  • 2 0
 Those PD-737 pedals were the bomb! So smooth and so well built, almost the gold standard for pedals. I think I ran my set until I sold my hardtail in 1999 and it had had some miles on it. I bet there are some people that still have a set working almost as well as the day they got them. Just moved back to XT Trail pedals from Time ATAC and whilst there is nothing wrong with the Times my muscle memory just loves the feel of the Shimano pedals. It is just a special sounding 'click'.
  • 1 0
 Yup, love the original 'SPuDs'. Overbuilt mechanical marvels. That's what I learned to ride clipless on.
  • 1 0
 Other details left out above, the chainstays were SHORT (15 7/8" effective length) at a time when 17" was about the norm, and the frames were spaced 133 between the dropouts because there was still wishy-washy between dropout standards at the time, 130 or 135 in back for mountain bikes. Has massive mud clearance between the stays.
  • 1 0
 What a cool old bike! my first real MTB was a 1992 Apollo Evolution comp, same frame design but made of alloy with dx groupset. Great bike but had a bald spot on the inside of my calves from rubbing on the elevated chainstays
  • 1 0
 i had a couple elevated chainstay bikes back then-a yeti ultimate, and a nishiki alien. the alien was one of the all aluminum models, not the one with the AL front triangle and bolt on steel rear. neither bike was flexy. in fact the yeti was stiff as a porn star on boner pills. loved the flite saddle-wish selle italia would continue making 'em. seriously, my all time favorite saddle. 130mm stem-yikes, onza porc's-awful. cook bros. crank-back before shimano knew how to make a decent crank, cook bros. and grafton were the best option. syncros seatpost-had one, in black. funny stuff, takes me back. wish i'd held onto those bikes. wonder where they are?
  • 1 0
 I tend to agree with the rest of earth in recognizing that elevated chainstays don't offer much advantage that i can see (at least not any advantage with the trade-off in weight and BB stiffness) but your the second person on this thread saying how stiff these were. Do you mean in the BB? I recall one of these elevated chainstay bikes a friend had back in the day that I could actually make the chain derail at will. MTBs were weird in the 90s. Flex Stem anybody?
  • 1 0
 they were both really stiff, particularly the yeti. they were also ridiculously over built, and quite heavy. the yeti was straight gauge 4130 chro-mo, nearly 7 lbs. for the frame only.
  • 1 0
 I'm trying to find the completed pictures, but here is one I built up in earlier this summer. Fantastic machines to say the least! fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/t31.0-8/10484224_10152654438074204_2343094675204805137_o.jpg
  • 1 0
 That brings back some memories of the early days. I ended up buying a Stumpjumper with DX instead of an Alpine Star. I broke the frame at the down tube within a year and they replaced it and I still have the replacement frame with the original front derailler built up with slicks. I rode that thing till 1999 till I got a Superlight, and replaced everything on it except the front derailler. I bought the first Marzocchi air oil fork, grip shift, Chris king headset, grip shift, XTR rear derailler, XTR 8 speed cassette, v brakes, cook brothers E cranks, Cooks QR's, and Cooks seatpost. I rode with Smokes front and rear. My roommate worked for Cooks and I was able to work at the shop a bit and get some swag. Now I have a real job and cannot ride as much as those old glory days in college.
  • 1 0
 I'm with bobbytdi, still got my Al Mega DX frame hanging in the garage (still got the crack around the headtube!! ) Reckon I've still got most of the original parts as well, think I only ever sold the bars off it. Paid £750 for it in 1991,my first real mountain bike, absolutely loved it, did me proud for a good few years, I remember my best mate saying I was mad to spend that much on a pushbike, 23 years later he's got a hardtail, full suss trail bike and a D/H rig, ha, these bloody mountain bikes, once your hooked, your hooked.
  • 1 0
 I see bikes like this and it always amazes me how people rode this stuff down the same trails I'm riding my modern full suspension bike down. There wen't any machine built trails or chair lift access during the infancy of mountain biking. Most of them were moto or deer tails at best that mountain bikers just started riding. Just machines like this and the desire to get after it. Rad.
  • 1 0
 I had an almega xt, the aluminium deore xt model, initially a medium, then a large warranty frame. The geometry was all a bit accurate! From memory a somewhat slacker and steeper than standard (71/73 at the time) 70.8 / 74.2, combined to compensate for the 15.75" cs and I think a 23.2" tt. (Medium) maybe 11.75"bb? I ended out with mag 21's on it, awesome, but I was growing at the time and ended out with my seat almost a foot above my handlebars!
The most impressive thing about it was how futuristic it was - it had a clamp on stem, external bb, 31.8mm handlebars all if which have become standard some time later.
  • 2 0
 I managed to scrape enough together to get the Al Mega DX when I was 15, loved that bike and deeply regret selling it for way too little money.
  • 1 1
 oh, deeeight is correct, i had one of those on my AMERICAN M16. the threads on them were easy to strip. i'd probably go through 2-3 of them a year. but they worked on any diameter seat tube, so you didn't need to buy anything specific. the M16 had a U-BRAKE on the chainstays, underneath the bottom bracket. stupidest thing ever.
  • 5 0
 and the MSRP Was?
  • 1 0
 Wasn't RC involved with a few elevated chainstay designed frames? I think one was called "alien" or something like that. It had a bolt on rear triangle and squaretaper tubes in the front? Am I wrong RC?
  • 1 0
 Yeah it was the Nishiki Alien. I've posted this before (and I asked RC to feature it pretty much every time PB posts on of these article.) There's a guy I see from time to time at the grocery store that rides one. RC's signature is on the chainstay.
  • 1 0
 way way way back when, RC was a designer. had a company called mantis.
  • 2 0
 As memory serves, RC used E-stays for mud clearance and to eliminate chainsuck jamming the chain between the inner crank/ring and the chainstay (it wasn't actually to eliminate chain deraillment, just the cursing and swearing that resulted from having to remove your wheel to unjam the chain). RC's also why we ended up with U-brakes under the chainstays... he placed them there because on one particular bike design of his (which had E-stays), the chainstay used larger diameter tubing and so they were stiffer and resisted the flex from the brakes better. Then everyone copied him but put it on regular double-diamond layout frames so they instead served as mud traps as well as a new place to experience chain suck. When he was the editor, MBA once ran an article on "weird / fringe" bike designs and they featured his original mud-bike as one of them.
  • 1 0
 chain suck was a major issue back then... anti-chain suck devises in 1991 were like chain guides today... thats an article worth seeing... a look at all the trick must-have bolt on shit from back then- chainsuck gaurds brake boosters bar-ends canti cable guides hite-rite theres way more...
  • 4 0
 Those Cook Bros. Cranks are still my all-time favorites.
  • 2 0
 I had a Cook Bros BB, it was awesome! I was going through a Shimano cartridge BB every 2 or 3 months. My dad (an engineer) pointed out the bearings were only 1.5 - 2 inches apart and was likely the cause of the premature wear. The Cooks had the bearing on the outside edge of the cups, kind of like today's external BB. Stiffened up the BB so much, no more chain rub from hard pedaling. Ran it till square taper cranks went away, 2 different bikes and about 6,000 miles with no issues or ever replacing bearings.
  • 2 0
 Oh no!!!!
  • 2 0
 Oh yeah!
  • 2 0
 Back when we were 17 and knew it all haha.
  • 2 0
 So we need:
Geometry figures.
Price from that time.
Relative price today taking into account inflation.
Even more retro articles please!
  • 2 0
 That was the very first mountain bike mag I ever bought, and thought my red Jamis Exile I got new for about $300 was so sick!
  • 3 0
 Makes me want a Klunker for some fireroad mayham
  • 1 0
 I remember when these came out, they were something other than girls to lust after...

Just one thing....

Since when has 23 years old been 'almost 30'??
  • 1 0
 The opening sentence isn't referring to this bike. He is saying the first time titanium was used for a mountain bike frame. It would have provided more clarity to include the first titanium mountain bike frame or at least the year.
  • 2 0
 my favorite bike l ever owned was a bridgestone MB zip. lets see a review of that one!
  • 1 0
 If you want to keep doing articles on these classic bikes, you should check out the collection at VeloCult in Portland.
velocult.com/museum
  • 1 0
 I am riding this frame right now. I outfitted it with 29ers, front shock, and everything else. Always a great conversation on the trail. Still a great bike.
  • 1 0
 How things have changed.. today a sub 1000 aluminium bike could probably beat it in trails
  • 2 0
 I had this bike back in the days !!! STIFF bike.
  • 1 0
 I'm stiff just lookin at it!
  • 1 0
 Oh these and park pre were at the top of my wish list as a spotty 13 year old!! Still looks killer
  • 1 0
 fanny! with a contemporary "Enduro" bike with 1x11 you will never reach this babe with 48/38/28!
  • 1 0
 I wonder how much does it weigh?
  • 4 0
 4 1/4 pounds for a 20" frame, mine hangs over my flatscreen in the living room.
  • 5 0
 Photo please?!?!
  • 1 0
 do i see a direct mount front mech there?
  • 2 0
 Essentially, it was a mount for a shimano clamp-band type front derailleur, minus the replaceable band. Another example of what's old is new again.
  • 1 1
 Essentially, it was a mount for a shimano clamp-band type front derailleur, minus the replaceable band. Another example of what's old is new again.
  • 2 1
 Still got a al mega dx frame and loads of bits for it in my garage..
  • 1 0
 Nice bike would be better with a rockshox & a sealed drive though?
  • 1 0
 Any chance of geometry figures?
  • 1 0
 Nice bike. Like the old stuff.
  • 1 0
 Love old bike articles, still got my 94 Zaskar
  • 1 0
 what a gem
  • 1 0
 Good times!!!
  • 1 0
 looks sick!
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.034670
Mobile Version of Website