nice 09 bike
You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
nice 09 bike
247 Comments
  • 79 1
 Holy shit 3 disc breaks and 2 rear shocks are you kidding me! thats insane!!
  • 138 4
 it is so you can fly off your bike twice as fast
  • 40 69
flag bikemaniac1993 (Nov 8, 2008 at 15:39) (Below Threshold)
 looks like somones going over the bars!!!
  • 84 6
 Only if you don't know how to brake efficiently.
  • 157 5
 i love headWink
  • 20 66
flag sam-davies (Feb 1, 2009 at 14:10) (Below Threshold)
 How the hell has this had 226 faves?
  • 27 13
 cuz its a nice bike
  • 11 2
 O KURWA 2 dampers nice Big Grin i dreaming about some like that
  • 35 3
 war. huh. yeah.

wha is it good for - absolooly nothinnĀ“

sayyid aggain Big Grin
  • 19 3
 wa'. huh, yeah.

wha is it good for - absolooly nothinnĀ“
  • 43 13
 THIS BIKE IS ONLY GOOD FOR; A FOUR HUNDRED POUND FAT CHICK WHO THINKS AIR IS LIGHTER THAN COIL, IS WORRIED ABOUT GROUNG CLEARANCE AND LIKES TO USE HER BRAKES ALOT............
  • 28 3
 Or big dudes who ride fast and attended physics lessons?
  • 52 2
 It's human nature to fear what we do not understand.
  • 29 4
 I'm not being rude, but swap those forks for fox 40s and lose a front brake and most of the teenage boys on here would be pulling themselves around their bedrooms.

But yeah, I'm sure you're right, the manufacturers probably did just spend millions on the research, development and manufacture of prototypes so fashionista scenesters without the first ****ing clue about physics or engineering could have a good ol' laugh at them.

You might not like it but if it came with Nicolai stickers on...again...most of you guys who are slagging it off would be pulling yourselves arou...
  • 8 1
 For all the noise people make on here, I don't think that many are ''in the know''.
  • 5 24
flag tyrel27 (Mar 1, 2009 at 2:35) (Below Threshold)
 DINK BOY YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF... DONT YOU KNOW SHE'S UNDERAGE! MAN WHEN YOU RIDE HER YOU KNOW WERE "IN THE KNOW"! WHAT A JOKE! YOU MAKE ME LAUGH!
  • 2 2
 ahhh that thing kina scared me
  • 25 5
 if my calculations are correct, 1mm of downward pressure on the front brake lever will sent your hurtling 100m over your bars
  • 18 0
 nice tennis racket
  • 2 20
flag viatch (Apr 10, 2009 at 8:12) (Below Threshold)
 wtf is HEAD doing in mountainbikes, stick with tennis and dont ruin your reputation by building something so ignorant.
  • 7 0
 2 front breaks has its advantages such as less twisting preasure on the fork which at a guess would help it preform somewhat better under breaking. As for the 2 rear shocks i somewhat struggle to see how it could be an advantage.
  • 2 2
 dang. that's a huck bike if i've ever seen one.
  • 2 0
 raveglia, never truer words spoken...
  • 7 0
 I WANT HEAD!!!!
  • 7 3
 call up Bender, he'll be all over this
  • 1 2
 another bike paris hilton might buy - even though she doesnt need it. (You'll get it if you've seen that photo around PB!)
  • 1 0
 997 favs for this? holy f*ck Lool.
  • 2 0
 bender's new bike ! Big Grin jsut need a super monster fork and he would love it ^^ well you guys are little stupid.. the rear shocks are probably made so that you can set 50-50 on em ? dont you think ? like weighting 80 kg then its 40 kg on each shock ? (:
  • 4 0
 whats the weight on that?
  • 5 2
 7 Quadrillion tons.....and a half.
  • 1 2
 its actually so u can fly off you bike and break twice as much
  • 4 0
 ^^Chuck Norris's DH bike!
  • 5 0
 Yo mama so fat, she needed two sho..nvm
  • 1 0
 If theres two front breaks and only one front lever, then how do both breaks break evenly?
  • 3 0
 First of all, they don't "break", they "brake". Secondly I'm sure there is a hydraulic splitter or something that pushes brake fluid through evenly to both calipers from a single lever.
  • 1 0
 itll be along the lines of how bmxers do it when they have a giro
  • 22 2
 hahaha well the germans have always known to build tankes
  • 20 8
 I'm sorry what? Isn't that front brake mount in danger of being plowed by the upper legs?
And three brakes, two shocks, internal gearbox, and 2.7 tires....looks like a Bender bike to me.
  • 23 34
flag hashmire (Nov 5, 2008 at 21:13) (Below Threshold)
 looks pretty fuckin gay to me.
  • 24 4
 p.s. is that a grip shift? EW
  • 7 5
 same. i dont like it
  • 11 0
 the brake mount wont tounch the fork. Look at the risse bigfoot or any of their others, they have the same set up. fork bottoms out before it his the mount.
  • 9 2
 It's not Grip Shift, it's the Rohloff twist shifter. There's only one shifter for the Rohloff hubs, so they had no choice in th matter.
  • 16 0
 im sorry let me rephrase...is it a shifter on the grip that you twist to shift? EWWW!!!
  • 4 1
 Oh it's a rohloff...its OK then. Those gearboxes are awesome.
  • 2 22
flag biker00029 (Nov 7, 2008 at 20:15) (Below Threshold)
 Why would u even need two rotors on the front wheel? Plus, even if it wouldnt hit the brake mount, the cable would still be damaged cuz its zap strapped to the fork and there would be some serious bending and snapping there. All together i dont think this bike would work out in the long run
  • 10 1
 Actually hydraulic brakes are controlled by hoses, not cables, and they don't bend or snap, despite your ridiculous claims. I'm sure the bike works fine, so what if it's a little bit over the top? A lot of bikes look different.
  • 4 0
 I used to own a risse bigfoot. (in the back of one of my albums) and I had the cable ziptied to the fork leg the same way. Believe me it works fine, the bike wont just stop working because of it..
  • 2 9
flag biker00029 (Nov 8, 2008 at 10:34) (Below Threshold)
 okay well whatever, i guess its all about personal preference
  • 18 0
 no grip shift. thats a freakin throttle.
  • 2 19
flag seraph (Nov 9, 2008 at 0:09) (Below Threshold)
 I believe you are mistaken. Why have an engine when you have cranks?
  • 7 2
 Of course he's kidding dumbass.
  • 10 6
 No need for harsh language. How am I supposed to tell when someone is kidding? Not like you can detect tone of voice over the internet.
  • 4 3
 k sry
  • 1 0
 ..still.. im with g-man27
  • 2 11
flag whiteboy250 (Mar 12, 2009 at 21:06) (Below Threshold)
 i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it i wont it
  • 1 1
 hey sam its had WAY more and i just faved it because i hate it so much that it makes me laugh!
  • 1 0
 It's called a G-Boxx. You can change gear without pedalling.
  • 12 3
 erm.... do you not remember when we invented the tank, then the germans tried to copy it, and failed miserably. it wasnt till ww2 that the germans had better tanks
  • 6 14
flag stinkybigd (Nov 6, 2008 at 6:44) (Below Threshold)
 i dont think they will ever make better bikes than us though.
  • 14 0
 there are some sick german bikes! look at those nicolai or alutech, they are nice bikes, especially cause they are handmade in germany(its the true there are pics on the web where you can see them working), no made in taiwan!

and n o, im not a patriotist and i dont really care about countries
  • 3 1
 the ignorance...pshh...
  • 0 3
 Those examples of German bikes you gave are bent ass huck bikes...You could have gave an example like "Solid?"
  • 4 0
 nicolai and alutech make some sick dh race and even dirt jump bikes. sure, nicolai did some crazy tanks, but there new bikes are nice. nicolai and alutech are simply the manufactures i like best, i could give lots of other examples.
  • 7 0
 I'd love to demo this for a few days. Highly adjustable suspension, lower air pressures because of the two shocks, Inverted Fork with offset crowns putting the stanctions further in front of the bike and increasing the forks turning radius, truly effortless 1-finger braking with two front brake calipers, not to mentioned decreased braking temperatures brake fade, and also what appears to be a Floating Brake at the rear end to keep the rear suspension alive during breaking, crazy gearbox system with no rear derailure to damage. This bike is a crazy cool concept.
  • 11 1
 ha ha, Propedal: ON
  • 6 0
 clipless??? Idk bout u guys but I, for one, would NOT wunna be clipped into THAT on ANY occasion!
  • 8 2
 Whats this weigh? 100 pounds?
  • 0 1
 probably =S
  • 2 1
 100 lbs frame only maybe
  • 2 0
 and i thaught the preveios proto type was gnar
  • 7 0
 mmmm nice XC bike Big Grin
  • 1 0
 Can someone please tell me what is the point of two parallel rear shocks? It won't alter the bottom out / progression from having just one... seems pointless.
I have seen two rear shocks set up in succession, and that kind of makes sense - when one bottoms the second begins to compress, but this looks useless.
  • 14 0
 In basic speak; Placing a 150-PSI shock close to the swing arm's pivot point provides more arm travel, but won't support quite as much weight, where as a shock placed further away supports more, but has less travel for a given piston stroke. Toss in another 150 PSI shock, and you retain lots of arm travel AND suport in a "compact" setup. The "adjustment" possibilities are mind boggling. :-)
  • 6 3
 Watch out for this guy, next thing he'll be telling you is that this bike needs slicks and a headlight. Sketchy fellow, this one.
  • 6 0
 Ohhh, that's gonna cost you! Stop broadcasting my secret "signature" traits! :-)
  • 3 0
 if you're willing to buy something like this you should just look a a v-10 or something with a good set of brake and it will do the job
  • 5 2
 Yes you are poosticks. No body should be worried about who makes it, because there is absolutely no reason to purchase this tank of a bike.
  • 1 0
 must weight tons!

fork looks heavy, gearbox IS heavy, 2 front brakes - what for? 2 dampers - what for? i mean, it's not a 2 stage system, both dampers work equal to the other one... frontend comes way too high.

might be fun riding it once though.
  • 3 0
 o my golly gosh... theres no need to have 2 air shocks but it looks freakin kooooool!!!!!!!!!
  • 0 1
 yeah
  • 4 1
 I wonder how far you can pedal it. probably not far enough to get to the drop you want to do.
  • 0 0
 Although some people seem to think that disliking this bike is some sort of fashion thing, the truth is that people were experimenting with twin shocks and dual disc brakes at least ten years ago so this is nothing anywhere near being a new or original idea. What is worse than this is the clearly terrible geometry, making this a truly terrible bike on any trail that has corners on it.....
  • 2 0
 every ones looking at it wrong. Think how well it would Pedal with two lots of propeadel. its basicly a xc bike that you can jump out of a plane on. id be well up 4 that.
  • 2 0
 people are retarded two shocks are better less wear on them and they can take more abuse without blowing, people that hate this bike go ride a kona
  • 5 1
 its a gearbox man..
  • 0 0
 G-BOXX to rephase that Smile
  • 3 0
 new toy for Josh Bender. Drool
  • 3 0
 Its a man powered motorcycle.
  • 1 0
 Had no clue that head made bikes, personally not a fan of there skies (WC race at least) find the lack power vs, Ficher, Atomic, Rossignol and this bike is just to much haha
  • 2 0
 Benders Karpiel have 2 shocks to.
  • 5 0
 Yeah but they're in the same line of travel, not side-by-side.
  • 3 1
 burn that bike it has clipless pedals
  • 2 0
 That thing is so beastly. probally handles anything you throw at it
  • 1 2
 I'm quite amused at the token efforts to lower the overall weight, by using air shocks and a carbon handlebar. Why bother. Just scrap it, that would be the best way tho make it lighter.
  • 2 0
 wow imagine service the brakes,and shocks
  • 0 0
 what is that bike called????
Ive seen it in lots of pics,
but i have no clue what its called.
So if someone could tell me that would be great thanks.
  • 1 1
 Its called the Head Pentagon or Head Richi Pentagon. Says it on the toptube if you look real close. Can't find much info on it really. A german company called Brunn makes the forks used on this bike.

I love how they used Easton carbonfiber bars, like they're trying to save weight! LOL!
  • 1 0
 Holy shiit!!!! I WANT THAT BIKE SOO BAD! and it even got a gearbox. Even better

Possible to buy? They mass produce?
  • 1 0
 Like your talk stever.

Did you know that you dont have to pedal while gearing with these kinda gearboxes?

well its true.
  • 1 0
 idk what everyone is complaining and bitching about. this bike is freakin sick!
  • 1 0
 hahaha omg i want this so bad and yea i agree that 2 shocks are sort of pointless, but overall this a badass bike!
  • 2 0
 They should have put two gustavs in the front.
  • 2 0
 BBBBRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!
  • 1 0
 O______________________________________________________________________________________________________O
  • 1 0
 two shocks two discs and a gear box at first wtf then this is awsome!! I want one
  • 1 0
 i thot my asshole dad had a redneck truch this probley haul twice as much and x4 horsepower
  • 3 2
 i think it's not necessary two dis brakes and two rear shoks...
  • 4 3
 Of course it's not neccessary, but it's frikkin' cool.
  • 3 0
 I agree it's not neccessary, but a pretty strategic engineering choice to maximize swing-arm travel/leverage.
  • 4 3
 sickest bike i haveEVERseen
  • 3 2
 this must be for jumping out of planes right? straight down everest.
  • 1 0
 For heck's sake it is not a hucking bike, its a DH bike.
  • 1 0
 relax guy
  • 2 1
 if the terminator had a ride, that would be it
  • 2 1
 Sorry, what's the point in this bike?
  • 1 0
 I actually like it, looks cool. Wonder what kinda coin that'll run ya?
  • 1 0
 come on, dont talk unless you ride the bike, could be sick as hell
  • 2 0
 wtf :O:O
  • 1 0
 It can be a great bike, but I think its heavy...
  • 1 0
 710 faves. and its understandable.
  • 2 0
 eeeeewwwww gator brakes.
  • 1 0
 Sweet! Motor Cycle Callipers In The Front. That's Sooooo Bad. Razz
  • 1 0
 the front are
  • 1 0
 thats something what i'm talking about, thats damn awesome Big Grin
  • 1 0
 It would be a shame to get that bike stolen ;p
  • 1 2
 im sry but whoever says this bike is nice must be FUCKIN blind no offence. it is the defernition of rank who the hell would ride that and think its nice
  • 1 0
 i think this is the bike i will skydive with without a parachute
  • 1 0
 how the hell does that crank work???
  • 1 0
 Gearbox
  • 1 0
 This will probapably be Benders new wip for 2010
  • 2 0
 Why...
  • 1 0
 throttle on the right grip?
  • 1 0
 I bet Bender has already placed his order eh?
  • 1 0
 man idk if you have enough stopping power in the front
  • 1 0
 imagine conering with two shocks?
  • 1 0
 Is there a video of this bike?
  • 1 0
 it could be a nice bike, but what is it's weight? 30 kilo?
  • 1 0
 u have to admit that bike would be pretty fun
  • 1 0
 Why waste your cash? Buy a road bike instead Wink
  • 1 0
 karpiel apacolypse is better
  • 1 0
 nice ;P
  • 1 1
 what type of bike is it???
  • 1 0
 how much travel
  • 1 1
 HELLYEAH! WHAT a Hellbike!
  • 2 2
 put a new fork on and im game. and loose the extra brake
  • 1 1
 jusd need a engine and clutch
  • 2 2
 and some more gears, and a license to ride.
  • 1 1
 Blates made for riding to the shops Big Grin
  • 0 0
 what is the name on the toptube. Is that Rich Houseman?
  • 1 1
 time for bender to get a new bike
  • 0 0
 nice bike these bikes shure have came along way ahaha
  • 0 0
 i bet that bike weighs so much
  • 0 0
 60 something pounds
  • 0 0
 is this benders new ride?
  • 0 0
 this baby is josh bender approved Wink
  • 0 0
 that thing looks like its 60lbs at least!
  • 0 0
 no biggie, there plenty of rides that are 60 plus pounds.
  • 0 1
 negatative prop me if you will...but i dont like it. more things to break. 2 shocks would be annoying as hell.
  • 0 0
 Nice. Not cool, not 'in', not fast, not pimp, just nice. Big bikes rule.
  • 0 0
 Can I have one for Christmas?
  • 0 0
 2 rear shocks and 2 front disc brakes? Eek
  • 0 0
 that's a huge sick downhill monster
it's real?
  • 0 0
 That tank has to have a weigt of 1 t or somthing like that Razz
  • 0 0
 i saw this on internet and it was for sale!!! 14.000 eyro!!!!!!
  • 0 0
 pitty it says head on it Razz lol
  • 1 0
 oh my god. :O
  • 1 0
 fuck ass heavy i bet
  • 1 0
 Haha I was just thinking that.
  • 1 0
 amense
  • 1 0
 fucking insane must cost a fortune
  • 1 1
 it be better if the discs were on the bak
  • 1 2
 HOLY CRAP!! THAT THING IS SICK!! probably will cost ya 10k but only has 1 freakin gear
  • 3 1
 lol you dumbass. it has a gearbox. american idiot, go eat some fastfood!
  • 1 0
 What about vena shnitzel lol
  • 1 0
 80pounds?
  • 1 1
 Useless piace of a metal... =\
  • 1 0
 simply useless....
  • 1 0
 overkill?
  • 1 1
 i want it what is it called
  • 1 0
 Sick bike !!!!
  • 1 0
 dats unbreakable tough!
  • 1 0
 holy s**t
  • 1 1
 3 brakes? kind of overkill
  • 1 0
 How weight?
  • 1 0
 how much?
  • 0 0
 14000 euros Wink
  • 0 1
 fucking shit nice bike... wow
  • 1 2
 am i the only one that is worried bout the fact its made by HEAD!?!?!?!?!?
  • 1 1
 everyone likes a bit of head.
  • 1 0
 the bike is made by a company called richi, all the bikes i have seen that they make are all a bit crazy.
  • 0 0
 this is not 09 bike
  • 0 1
 Amazing! Smile It must be so nice bike Smile
  • 3 4
 think the designers should be sacked from this company
  • 2 0
 You sir are an ignorwamus.
  • 1 1
 amazing!
  • 0 0
 what a pees
  • 0 0
 wots wrong with it?
  • 0 1
 lots lol looks like a tank lmao
  • 0 1
 y the fuck u want to disks at the front
  • 0 0
 Nice ;D xd
  • 0 1
 its a beast is it comeing out
  • 0 2
 looks too heavy and theres too muh useless stuff on it and if it did come out i bet theyd chargea small fortune for it
  • 0 1
 im still struggling to find a purpose for this bike?
  • 0 0
 O kurwaBig Grin
  • 0 0
 oh my good
  • 0 1
 that is a huge waist of time and money right there
  • 0 0
 sweet
  • 0 0
 thats so cool
  • 0 0
 what forks are in it
  • 0 0
 wh the brand
  • 0 1
 man!!! what the fuck is that!!!
  • 1 0
 a bike
  • 0 0
 Great machine:'p
  • 0 0
 Cool but useless.
  • 0 0
 O SHIT !!!
  • 1 2
 that would be good for the jaw drop Razz
  • 0 2
 oh my fuckin god! that bike is amaizing!!!!
  • 0 2
 haha no i don't have a bike right now
  • 0 1
 Head bikes 2008
  • 1 2
 lol singlespeed
  • 4 6
 TOO SHORT REAR TRAVEL
  • 2 0
 I have a feeling that the bike has around 8-9" of travel. Is that too short for you? Remember that travel is measures as in the distance from the start and stop points of the axle, not the stroke or length of the shock.
  • 4 0
 If not more than 8-9 inches of travel. Take a look at the piston "indicator" o-rings, then traject a rough angle from the Swing Arm's pivot point, to where the rear axle would reside at near-full compression. I'm betting MORE, based on the picture alone. I couldn't locate any info of this bike, so it's mere speculation. I don't think the bike looks that bad except for the top-tube shape. JMHO
  • 2 1
 I think it needs a monocoque front end, or maybe hydroformed. Something like the Intense M6 or the older M1. If I'm not mistaken, though, I think the frame on this bike is carbon fiber.
  • 4 0
 Yep, I agree with you front-end sugestions for extra strength. Recognize the fork at all? HUGE inverted uppers! Nice!
  • 2 3
 @ seraph, i hope its not carbon fibre... one sharp rock hits a carbon fibre frame in the wrong way, and the frames strength is in jeopardy. and this looks to be a DH bike, so.. rock to the frame are probably a fairly common occurance
  • 3 5
 this bike is shhit
  • 0 2
 what the f*ck? O.O
  • 0 3
 this is puss compaired to what im making
  • 1 3
 heep of shite
  • 3 6
 ha yes american
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.096270
Mobile Version of Website