It just makes you want to ride.
Furious Race 650B 2017 (Red)
Frame
2017 Furious 650B, 200mm travel
Shock
Fox Factory Float X2, 241x76, Adjustments High / Low Speed Compression, High / Low Speed Rebound
Fork
Fox Factory 40 Float, Adjustments High / Low Speed Compression, Rebound
Brakes
SRAM Guide RE, 200 mm / 200 mm
Rear Mech
SRAM GX DH 7speed
Cranks
e*thirteen LG1, 36 T, 165 mm
Cassette
SRAM GX DH 7speed
Rims
Spank Spike Race 33, 32 holes, tubeless ready, 28.5mm inner
Weight
16,78 kg
Sizes
S/M/L/XL
Price
3,999€ / US $3,999 / CAD $5,399
In all seriousness, it looks sick and really fun to ride.
That is still up in the air i guess. I can see quite a few manufacturers being reluctant to making the jump and fully commit to 29er downhill/freeride bikes. Namely those who do not only cater to a racing crowd but also make most of their sales with beginner/entrance level bikes.
The thing is, IF teams do wanna race 29" on the worldcup, the manufacturers will NEED to start selling 29ers because otherwise the teams would not be allowed to race on the frames (they need to hit production within 12 months).
The one possible solution i see for manufacturers to circumvent this whole situation without fully comitting to 29er only is doing limited numbers of 29er frames. Kinda like Trek did with the Session Park, just a "exclusive 29er race series".
But it´s gonna be interesting for sure and imho a lot of industry people seemed rather unpleasently surprised by the Syndicate bruteforcing the whole worldcup circuit onto the 29er idea.
From a business standpoint i can totally understand why some manufacturers really aren´t happy with this development.
I recon trek will be next onto the 29" at fort William (apparently they have been working on them for 5 years which I somehow doubt) and mabie GT as their frames would be easier to incorporate the wheels into.
Yeah, Syndicate says 9 month, the manuscript i saw said 12 months. I dunno which is more recent info though. Maybe Santa Cruz meant they got 9 months left to hit the market? Idk.
Whatever it is, this UCI rule will eventually be the thing that dictates the shift for consumer bikes to 29" if manufacturers do not want to go with two production wheel sizes :-/
And it´ll suck big time if that happens...
Yeah, i´m not sure of it either. Was just saying it has the potential, since people always claim it was only down to the consumer which way this goes. But there are so many more variables at play and this UCI rule is one of them.
And it´ll be interesting for sure how things end up. For example the Session Park isn´t even in production anymore as far as i know. Seems like it was more of an effort to keep 26" alive for the freeride team and grab some sympathy points from the 26" crowd on the way. So i´m mostly interested in whether the 29ers will become the new Session Park or rather the 27,5" frames.
Yeah, they sure will. They are however one of the few that actually still have a "freeride" bike in their lineup and no carbon fiber frames. So i´m not worried about them really. The Furious will sell well.
This was all more in reference to companys like giant, Specialized and so on, that utilize their race frames as a platform for all the gravity oriented bikes because the carbon molds are such a huge investment.
I recall reading the other day on a road site that teams are allowed limited race usage of the new product in that nine month window as well.
Furios: chain stay 44 cm wheel base 121,4 cm in size M
supreme: chain stay 42,5 cm wheel base 119 cm in size M
Ok, the head angle is a bit less on the supreme. But why..related to geometry should the furious be the more playful ride?
On paper the supreme looks at least as playful as the furios. I dont get the difference, can somebody find it?
Basically at SAG point the Supreme will be longer than the Furious and the difference will grow even more from there.
Also I would assume the more complex setup on the V4 is more expensive but am too lazy to check the prices.
thanks
You claimed single pivot=shit design. Which simply isn't true. And whether some specific bikes are better than this one in specific characteristics of their suspension design also wasn't part of your argumentation.
You were asking why people downvoted your comment and i told you why. Because it was an uneducated and ignorant statement.
I do not need to go into a debate with an armchair engineer on whether you know your stuff or not. You asked and got your answer.