Santa Cruz previewed its 2012/'13 29er lineup this week in Sedona, Arizona, and two of its most surprising developments are made from aluminum, not carbon. Those who fell in love with the iconic Santa Cruz Superlight XC/trail bike will revel in the fact that its single-pivot triangulated swingarm and simple-is-best profile has been reincarnated as a sweet 100-millimeter-travel 29er. Price is set at only $1850 for the complete bike in Santa Cruz's D/XC build. Want a simpler 29er? How about the Highball-a, an aluminum-framed version of the recently released carbon 29er hardtail by the same name. The aluminim Highball features single-speed-convertible dropouts, progressive geometry and a tantalizing MSRP that begins at $1499 with the geared D/XC complete build. First-production bikes should hit the bike shops in April or May this year.
Santa Cruz created an all-new frame, geometry and a different suspension rate to make its Superlight 29, but the family resemblance to its 26er sibling is unmistakable.
Superlight 29The single-pivot aluminum framed Superlight is now a 29er, and for good reason. The triangulated swingarm and its mid-height pivot location is perfect for a 100-millimeter suspension - and that seems about perfect for a 29er in the XC/trail category. The easy-to-make frameset has been tweaked to emulate the performance of its VPP sister-ship, the Tallboy, which has been said by many test riders to be one of the best handling big-wheel suspension bikes to date. Why reincarnate the single-pivot Superlight instead of making a less-expensive aluminum Tallboy? Price is the answer. The Superlight 29 costs only $1850 0r $2350 depending upon your choice of Shimano components. And its suspension is tops too, with a RockShox RL100 fork and Float RL shock. The up-charge for the Tallboy's VPP suspension would force Santa Cruz to drastically compromise its components to approach the Superlight's MSRP. The other reason is that Santa Cruz knows that many new riders will be buying a 29er as their first bike, and they wanted to place the best possible machine underneath them to maximize their experience (scroll down to view the Superlight's build options). After putting some miles on the new Super on the red soil and sandstone around Sedona, I think Santa Cruz hit the mark.
(Clockwise) The Superlight's top tube bows heavily downward to maximize stand-over clearance. The shock length is shorter and the swingarm's leverage ratio is increased on medium and small-sized frames to boost sensitivity. The forward-of-the seat tube seatstay junction gives the Superlight's swingarm plenty of tire clearance.
Superlight Frame NotesLike the original 26-inch-wheel version, the Superlight 29 frame is about as simple as a dual-suspension frame gets, but its design incorporates the sum total of knowledge that Santa Cruz compiled over the years. Elements like forged dropouts tube-junctions, and the addition of the collet-type 15-millimeter adjustable pivot mech developed for the VPP linkage. Hydroformed tubes and a tapered steerer keep the frame tight and flex free, while its Tallboy geometry ensures that the new chassis will be as fun to descend upon as it is efficient on the climbs. Santa Cruz chose a threaded bottom bracket shell instead of the now-popular PressFit type in order ensure that the bike can be serviced with off-the-shelf parts at the bike shop for years to come.
Suspension choice: The elephant in the room during the Superlight 29 presentation was, "why use the old-school Superlight's single-pivot suspension instead of a less-expensive version of the dual-link VP design?" The answer is that, a single-pivot.placed correctly provides a beautiful shock rate for a moderate-travel 100-millimeter suspension. Extending the new Super's travel far beyond that would require the more expensive and complicated VPP or APP linkage to produce the perfect shock rate - and Santa Cruz will not take the cheap route on either design simply to make price point.
Superlight 29 GeometrySmall means Small: Small riders can rejoice that the 'small' frame is claimed to have the lowest stand-over height in the 29er class (27.5") and a top tube length that actually fits small-framed folks. Better still, the shock stroke is shorter and leverage rate higher on the small and medium frames to soften the suspension and boost the effectiveness of the shock's damping adjustments for lighter-weight riders. While the travel remains at 100-millimeters on all sizes, using two different shocks and leverage rates will make the smaller Supers' ride as smoothly as the large and XL models. Just to review, sizes offered will be Sm, Med, Lg and XL. Colors are orange or black.
Superlight 29: First RideAnyone who has the opportunity to throw a leg over the big-wheel Super will discover another chapter of Santa Cruz's signature handling and easy pedaling action. Back in the day, when the 26er version was one of the top performing trailbikes, I gravitated towards the Superlight when I had no idea what a particular ride had in store - up and down, the Super could handle it. The same holds true for the Super' 29. Its moderately-slack-for-29er, 71-degree head angle felt steady while plying the stepped drops and shifting rocks that pepper the trails of Sedona, and its tight-tracking rear end made for a lively bike in the turns, which is refreshing for a 29er in any form. Its numbers are the same as the carbon fiber Tallboy, and you'll be happy to know that the Superlight 29 is a spitting image on trail - versatile, predictable and energetic.
Suspension travel is limited to 100 millimeters, which at one point was considered cushy for any 29er dualie, but after plying the bumps for a year or so on 150 mm-plus bikes, I used up every millimeter of the Superlight in the first kilometer on the trail. In XC fashion, most of the big hits and short drops I launched on the Super' required damping and spring assistance from my arms and legs. Once the bike and I came to an agreement over which bumps were the domain of the suspension and which were to be shared events, the ride became quite seamless. Better still, the moderate travel front and rear provided enough pedaling firmess to allow me to ignore the blue platform features on the fork and shock.Sweet! The bonus effect of pounding over relatively technical terrain on a minimal-travel machine is that the fore/aft balance is rarely upset, so the rider and bike are in good position to handle any surprises.
Component choice on the Superlight 29 I rode was the predominately Shimano Deore XT RXC 29 ensemble that puts the retail price near $2350 USD. The highlights were its Ice-Tech rotors and Deore XT brakes, Fox shock and RockShox Reba fork. Wheels were Mavic TN179 rims converted to tubeless and spinning on Deore XT hubs. The 30-speed DynaSys drivetrain was a Deore item. The Superlight 29 shifts and stops like a much more expensive machine.
The Superlight 29's good fore/aft balance and moderately slack head angle made poking around on Sedona's slick rock quite fun. Ron Kratch photo
Pinkbike First Impressions: | If the Superlight was your first introduction to mountain biking in general, you would be hooked. If the Superlight 29 was your first-ever dual-suspension big-wheel bike, you would probably fall in love with it in one ride. Its affordable price belies its enthusiast-worthy do-anything performance and its trustworthy handling is the reason that Santa Cruz riders are an unusually loyal group. Is it perfect? No value-priced bike is. The Superlight 29 could use a through-axle in the rear, a longer-stroke fork and some may wish for a fashionably slacker head angle, but two of those additions would short circuit its purpose - to be the most versatile, easy-to-ride XC/trail 29er in the entry-level dual-suspension 29er market. I've ridden a lot of 29ers in the 100mm category and I felt right at home on the Superlight 29. A warm welcome to an old friend.. - RC |
Santa Cruz launches are casual affairs packed with good food and plenty of saddle time. Much of the technical discussions were tossed around over the evening campfire, with formal breakfast seminars hosted by Santa Cruz Don Mike Ferrentino.
Highball AluminumSurprised by the brisk sales of its carbon fiber Highball hardtail, Santa Cruz realized that the basic design that founded the big-wheel movement was still thriving in the hearts and minds of enthusiast-level riders. The Highball aluminum shares the same geometry and features of its far more expensive sibling and can be purchased for the wallet-friendly price of $1499, ready to roll. Care was taken to keep the HighBall aluminum's stiffness high and weight low, so that its rider will get a chance to ride the real thing - not a dull-handling lookalike of a great performing pro-level machine. Highball aluminum hardtails will initially sell as complete bike packages for $1395 with predominantly Shimano Deore drivetrain parts, or for $2350 outfitted in Deore XT. Frame sales are scheduled for Fall 2012. Color options are white or blue with special colors available for an upcharge.
Clean and simple lines, backed up by a stiff frame and trustworthy handling make the aluminum version of the Santa Cruz Highball a must ride for entry-level trail riders - and budget-minded enthusiasts as well.
Frame detailsWith its swooping double-bend rear triangle, Santa Cruz's Highball pays a little homage to the Yeti Arc - the seminal aluminum XC hardtail. The Highball one ups the Arc, however, with bolt-on dropouts that allow purists to easily convert the Highball into a single-speed. Add a forged bottom bracket journal, hydroformed top and down tunes, a tapered head tube, and one realizes that the Highball is very up-to-date. Its geometry is exactly the same as the carbon fiber version, which is a good thing. Small frames feature a 28.5 inch stand-over height and a 22.5 inch top tube length - both are welcome and uncommon among 29ers. Santa Cruz offers the Highball aluminum in small, medium. large and XL sizes.
(Clockwise) We appreciated the upgrade to the Fox Kashima-coated Float RLC fork, but probably would opt for a longer-stroke 120-millimeter slider in place of the fancy coating. Standard Superlight 29s come with Avid Elixir 5 brakes, but we'd spring for the XT Ice-Tech stoppers after riding them on the red rock.
Highball Aluminum: First RideI would be foolish not to point out that the Highball that Santa Cruz gave me to ride was upgraded to its third-tier SPX XC 29 kit, which includes a Kashima coated Fox Float RLC fork and Shimano Deore XT Ice Tech brakes. The upgrades add considerably to the Highball's price, bumping it to $3593. The slick fork stanchion only makes a big difference once the fork breaks in and the factory lubrication begins to disappear, but the brakes, they stop with a better feel and more authority than the standard-offering Avid Elixir 5s.
Although I don't ride too many hardtails these days, I was right at home on the Highball. Its steering feels more accurate than the average 29er and it remains tractable while descending some pretty step stuff. With only 100 millimeters of cushion up front and narrow Maxxis Ardent tires, the rough-angled stones and pocked slick rock that punctuate Sedona's trail system could all be felt to some degree. The larger wheels do roll noticeably faster over most chatter and the slackish (for a 29er) 71-degree head angle seems to calm the steering when cornering over uneven steps and imbedded rocks. Unless your hindquarters are hewn from stone or steel, convert your tires to tubeless (the Highball's Mavic TN 719 rims come pre-assembled with Stan's tape and tubeless valve stems are included with each bike) and you will roll faster and smoother over the chatter. Ours were converted - thanks Santa Cruz.
Highball Aluminum Geometry While the Highball's skinny tires and rigid rear end had me wishing for rear suspension while I was banging up stepped climbs and over square-edged rocks, it manages to maintain momentum quite well. There is a positive connection between rider and rear tire that helped me to claw my way up and over a few climbs that I did not make earlier in the week. As hardtails go, this one is among the more pleasant rides I can remember. Its weight balance is on the money, with little tendency to skid the rear tire into tight corners and not much lift on the front wheel when climbing or turning up steep grades. Both are positive 29er benefits, but the Highball manages to steer without the lagging, heavy feel that normally comes with big-wheel stability and rough-surface performance.
The Highball Aluminum's big wheels and stable handling made easy work of the area's many drops and short, steep descents. Ron Kratch photo
Pinkbike First Impressions: | IIf you truly want a 29er hardtail, there are many good ones to choose from. The Highball is one of the better handling 29ers I have ridden in a while, and it transcends the old-school twitchy racer-boy feel without sacrificing the efficient feel that most people buy hardtails to revel about. Many will maintain that aluminum frames feel harsh, but this one seems to have circumvented that prejudice with big wheels and a centered rider position. It rails corners, doesn't push the front tire, accelerates well and handles technical downhills (technical within reason) with conviction. Best of all, you can get a sweet performing 29er hardtail, from a brand that knows what a real mountain bike is, for only $1500. - RC |
Santa Cruz Complete Build Options for 29ersSanta Cruz will initially only sell complete bikes outfitted with the D XC29 or R XC29 kits. Customers will still be able to upgrade for an up-charge to any of its four component levels - or mix and match. As Santa Cruz catches up with deliveries early this Summer, it will begin selling frames.
This is the happiest day of my life!!!!!!!
:disbelief:
Exactly what everyone said about the first 26" DJ'ers!!!
26" has been the "mtb satandard" ATLEAST since Specialized introduced the Stumpjumper in 1981... 26" DJ'ers were certainly not around way back then! Hell, I had a '98 Fisher X-Caliper, with the first 4" S-C from Rock-Shox(the Judy 100), and people thought I was crazy using a mtb for jumping in '99!
Get your facts straight!
all this, and they still need to use a rock to prop them up? unbef*ckinleivable.
On the other hand there has been a "You're a thing of the past if you still ride 26" and you can't recognize "better" even when it's shoved in your face. Your heroes jumped on the 29er bandwagon so quit being retarded and do it already" vibe to the 29er marketing by some people and it pissed off a few riders.
Not sure how the reaction is on other websites but it seems like the more active riders of pinkbike are downhillers/freeriders and dirt jumpers for the most part, the types of riding where 29ers won't do much for you.
And it is THE FASTEST GROWING segment, not "THE best selling segment". And on which market? Overall, all mountain bikes in the world incl ATBs or "Nerd like me" market? However it is, it is what it is because they invested so much in pumping it into people and people bought into it like a marihuana smoker into chocolade - just as with anything they say is "groundbraking" and affordable by the way. They manufactured demand, there was nearly no demand. If there was, the "Niner" would be the biggest bike company in the world.
I have nothing against a 29er as a physical entity with all it's properties in comparison to a 26" bike. I have a lot against how the business is done, and I'm bummed that people buy into it so easily. Dance puppets dance!
Once other companies start producing them, there's competition in the market for your business and they all have to be more mindful of what they're producing and the price point they're hitting. If not for competition in the marketplace, all 29'ers would still be short travel or hardtail XC bikes. Thanks to the addition of companies who weren't thinking along the same lines as Niner, we now have a whole array of 29'ers with varying head angles and travel to suit just about any type of riding... and at some amazing price points. Without people just blindly hating on 29'ers, maybe they wouldn't have to push so hard to overcome the ignorance being thrown around. 29'ers are great bikes for a huge variety of trails, not all trails, but many of the trails that most riders ride... if you disagree, it's only because you've either never spent significant time riding one or you're stuck too deeply in a specific genre like DJ or DH where they're not as advantageous. For things like XC, they're awesome.. I don't watch much XC racing but I'd be willing to bet that at least 2 of every 3 podium spots (if not more) are occupied by someone riding a 29'er at this point, they're just that much faster.
THIS.
you guys neg propping the only two pb members with some ability of critical thought are such a bunch of sheeple, i bet you all got iphones. but that guy mentioning a 29" dj bike wins this by far, he thinks 29" wheels are so awesome that all bikes should have them (he also deserves a white (!) iphone unlike the rest of you failed zealots). maybe what you want next is a 29" bmx bike.
hmmm, 29 + bmx, damn i'm off to start a bike company.
29" bikes have their place - on the road and as xc/trail bikes, maybe even dh bikes that might give some unfair advantage to very tall people.
now if i need to mention how pissed i am because of all the marketing bs that people obviously easily swallow, further discussion is pointless.
And I agree with you that competition is good for the "customer". But we should be people, not some not giving a sht I-phone zombies. In fact there is only one perfectly greedy organism not giving a sht at all (often called: "homo economicus") : the corporation. As soon as your company grows big enough. So such competition as developing more of MOAR is good for the idealistic consumer but terrible for environemnt and system of values of a human being.
And trust me LeRoy, if you think you gain something as a small puppet in the game, they gain much more by you dancing to their tone. It's not for you, it's for them.
Miltons stuff is very attractive but as soon as you start to read Noam Chomsky things stop being so bright. I read a few leftists like Naomi Klein or Raj Patel, but they sort of analyze capitalism and whine too much for my likes. It is great to read them understand neoliberalism but I am more into Paul Hawken sustainability thing. And if you think that is a bullcrap read Ray Anderson - "Confessions of a radical industrialist" Ultimately i believe the guys that got it right were Jesus and Buddha, haven't read much about Mahomet. Gandhi's book is the next on my list.
If I was a US citizen I would vote for Ron Paul But because I do not believe voting is defining democracy I am trying to do good stuff on my own and contribute to the society. Right now I am creeping in it, I don't do more than "trying to save Titanic using teacup to take the water out" but I will try to be better in the future - organize bike camps, repair trails, clean woods. So in my idealistic world if more peopl would do that from their own will without any government - that would make the world as a better place. So i Don't give a sht about political systems and waiting for another messiah - I am trying to be one, everyone should try to see him/herself as one.
www.santacruzbicycles.com/tallboy/pr.html
(that's from March 2011, for those of you keeping score at home)
i believe you cannot get around the maneuverabilty differences between wheel sizes because physics kicks in and at that point it's left up to the rider. yes, aggy could flip whip a 29 but is it easier on a 26? a 24? a 20? we're all tryin to get down the mtn having as much fun as possible so ... whatever..just pm when you guys wanna sell your 26 stuff.
Edit: never mind, I guess I should read the last lines of the articles...
The superlight looks pretty damn sweet for the money, and nice and simple. And the price is right. I'd like a slacker headtube and a thru axle in the back. I'll probably end up with a TRANSITION Trans Am 29er, but this bike has my interest.
65 bikes? Is that all ? Right now, at this moment... I own twenty eight bikes. Over the past 20 plus years ? I'm around a couple hundred. Hell just in the past decade there's been more than another hundred that I can account for visually just from my photo records. And yes, I've seen quite a few pro's riding on 24" wheels. And you know what, when you have SKILL... you really don't need to depend on suspension forks. Perhaps you should develop some.
Cheers!
Richard....some of us cheered, some of us booed when Pinkbike hired you. You have good writing skills and industry contacts, but please STOP trying to make Pinkbike another Mountain Bike Action.
That is all the rant for me...thanks
Kudos to Richard for keeping his fingers on the pulse and adjusting to his new gig. All of us ride and may or may not agree on everything.
Incidently... if this was MBA, they'd not be reviewing SC models at such low price points. They'd be reviewing things that cost more than motorcycles, and that sit around bike store showrooms for many months waiting on the one buyer with more money than need for such a bike. Looking at your recent post history, you seem to really hate 29ers and reviews of them. You even whined because a top pro DH rider with more wins and sponsorship and fans than you'll ever have, has been having fun on a 29er. How dare he... how dare anyone prove you're wrong. The nerve of some people....
Although, I would like to disect your comments to me just a bit: 1. Just because I have been an "official" member for only 2 years, do you think that means I wasn't aware and/or using the site way before then. I never had a subsciption to MBA, however read it for years. 2. If you think DH, All Mountain, Street/DJ, Slalom/4x etc type riders are 1% of 1% of a fringe movement, you need to look around.
Ride on what ever way or bike you ride.
-Bman
there are a few inbetween but 20" & 276" are established "formulars" which I think should be stuck to.
do you realise that the original mountain bikes would have had the larger 29er sized wheels (700c rim with large volume 2"+ tire) except for supply problems in sourcing suitable large volume off-road tires
the originators of the MTB sport including Gary Fisher, Charlie Kelly, Geoff Apps and co, actually preferred the 29er size but could not get adequate stock levels of the Nokian tire they tested, to allow this wheel size to become "commercially" available
26" tires were available, which is why this size was "chosen", nothing to do with performance, just stock levels, and this became what we know today as the "mountain bike"
this is also why Gary Fisher then spent 10+ years pushing the 29er movement through his Gary Fisher Mountain Bike brand, starting with the creation of the WTB 29er tire, the first commercially available off-road 29er tire
this passion is what arguably made his brand lose all their money, as the market was slow to react, until he was absorbed by Trek bicycles who now only have the "Gary Fisher signature" on the Trek 29er models
so 26" was technically inferior in their experienced opinions, but commercially available and supported, so they made the safe choice and went with 26" wheels and tires for mountain bikes (this was early 1980s)
(like just the old home video tape battle between Betamax and VHS tapes where Betamax was technically superior but did not get the support)
As to the first "commercially" available off-road 29er tire... again, that depends on how you define commercially available and what you call a 29er tire. Panaracer and others had some rather large volume knobby 700C tires (the Panaracer Smoke 700C x 1.9 for example) in the early 90s because when "hybrids" were first invented as a market segment, they were meant to be a true hybrid of flat bar mountain bikes and the wheel format of road bikes. Bikes like the DiamondBack Overdrive, Specialized Crossroads, Rocky Mountain Discovery and others had full strength mtb frames, clearance for 700C knobbies, and proper mtb gearing. But ohhh noooo.... they weren't called twenty-niners so they don't count....because Gary Fisher wasn't involved....
Nokian actually offered both 650B and 700c knobblies, but neither size was available in any quantity with the 700c even rarer than the 650B
this is from Geoff Apps himself:
“The photo here shows an early prototype Aventura. It has 700C tyres. This was around 1981/2. Nokia (now ‘Nokian’) had this size listed from around 1979/80 but it took ages to get some. I persisted because I knew they would be good. I built only the one 700C machine and sent some of these tyres over to Charlie Kelly and Gary Fisher, who had built a frame in readiness. They loved them and really appreciated the ride they gave, compared to the 26-inch tyres, and also loved the success they had at the races. As far as they were concerned, these 29-inch tyres were the way to go."
“This was the ONLY tyre of this type and size in the world, there was no choice. Unfortunately getting a supply of tyres was almost impossible”. Geoff adds “The 26-inch wheel standard (for mountain bikes) was not absolutely fixed at that time, so, had the supply situation been better, it is quite possible that 700C tyres and wheels would have been the mountain bike standard now."
Coincidentally, in the same issue of Bike Biz, Gary Fisher, speaking about the growing popularity of 29ers, gave his perspective:
“We got some tyres from Geoff Apps really early on and we [Fisher and Kelly] said ‘Holy Toledo!’” But the poor supply situation of the larger diameter tyres meant the fledging MTB industry stuck with the smaller wheel size.”
Fisher was one of a handful of people in the USA (along with Mike Sinyard) who "commercialised" mountain biking
older members of the mountain bike community knows they did not "invent" off-road cycling (there are photos of people "rough riding" on safety bicycles in the late 1800s), but they certainly made it affordable to the masses and promoted its popularity to the public
whereas before you had to have a custom frame made to order, and then track down all the parts (many taken from Cafe Racer motorbikes and road bikes)
Tom Ritchey was one of the early guys who saw what Specialized were doing with the first Stumpjumper and could not believe the low prices compared to the custom built bikes he was offering at the time.
regarding the first commercially available true off-road tire, it was not the Smoke, because when measured this does not have a 29" diameter inflated on the rim (it was 700c x 45)
the whole point of the 29er is to have a full volume knobbly tire in 700c rather than a cyclocross or multi-use hybrid tire (neither of which will handle mountain bike terrain properly)
both the Crossroads and Overdrive bikes were hybrid bikes with extra tire clearance (compared to road going hybrids) but neither had suspension forks nor proper off-road tires, and did not sell in any quantity
the first true off-road tire that was commercially available was the WTB Nanorapter in 1999 (you can thank Gary Fisher for pushing them into that..), with White Bros. releasing the first 29er suspension fork also in 1999
the Nanorapter tire, and WB suspension fork allowed the 29er to become what we know today as it allowed a bike to be built that would handle mountain biking, rather than a beefed up hybrid with tire and fork limitations
Guess i'm moving to bmx again...
And i don't like them...
looking at the way the market is moving, 29ers will actually become the standard wheel size for the off-road mountain bike segment
26" wheels will become more niche and typically defined as being suitable for 150mm+ bikes (all-mtn, FR and DH)
which is reflected in current sales figures of 150mm+ 26" wheel bikes (low sales)
compared to shorter travel (i.e. 100mm-140mm) 26" wheel XC orientated bikes (medium sales)
the shorter travel 29" XC orientated bikes (very high sales)
on PB we sometimes forget that PB members are the "niche" in that we tend to be interested and active in the much smaller selling niche areas of mountain biking
whereas the "mass market" will find a 29" wheel much more suitable for off-road riding, especially for the "road rider" crossover market
if you look at sales of MTB in general they are declining year on year, whilst sales of Road Bikes and hybrids are growing year on year
Given that many Street, 4X, DS, and DJ riders still prefer 24" wheels, I don't think you can say that 26" is the ideal format for them. For FR and DH, I can see 650Bs being adopted much sooner than 29ers being and the same goes for AM. For longer travel applications, you'll see 650B but for mid range stuff up to 140mm, there's definitely a strong trend going in REAL bike stores and REAL bike sales that 29ers are here to stay.
I think you're mistaken if you think that many street/4x/dj/ds riders use 24" wheels.I have yet to see a pro rider on a 24" bike for 4X and DS. Look at the bikes here on PB in the "Dirt/Street" section of the gallery. You'll find that most of the bikes are using the 26" wheel. 24" is a good size for street or DJ if you are a shorter rider or want a little bit more whippable ride, but if 24" was the future of street/dirt don't you think that more companies would offer 24" suspension forks?
Face it buddy you're out of your element here. I hope I'm not as crotchety when I get to be your age.
anything with 26" wheels and below is ok for me but those damn ugly big wheels i don't like..
So 20" 22" 24" 26" OK!
29" NOK!
the point I was making is that 29er presents a great opportunity to attract more riders to mountain biking, as they provide a smoother and more secure ride without the great expense of full suspension, and riders seem to be agreeing when you look at actual sales figures from the past 2 seasons
in the bike biz:
road bike sales are huge compared to mountain bike sales
within mountain biking:
XC and trail mountain bike sales are huge compared to DJ / DH / FR / ALL-MTN sales
these are niche categories, if you speak to the big brands who sells 10000s of units every year
the trail scene is huge, because its accessible to many
whereas the more gravity orientated parts of mountain biking are less accessible in terms of terrain, development of your skill set, equipment availability and the high risks you undertake - which many salaried professionals will not risk when they have a lifestyle that required them to be in work and not in hospital!
"Given that many Street, 4X, DS, and DJ riders still prefer 24" wheels"
the problem with 24" wheels is that they don't do anything very well - I found this out after owning 4 different 24" wheel bikes from DMR and Identiti and then going back to BMX 20" and MTB 26" wheels
here in the UK the street riders ride BMX (20" wheels)
4X and Dual Slalom are not worth mentioning, its so niche (especially with UCI cancelling 4X). but if you want to talk about these guys they are on 26" wheels, at least the professionals racing in the UK, Europe and N America
in the UK we have a very healthy DJ scene, one of the best in the World according to those in the know..
some DJ riders in the UK use 24" wheels but not many, many DJ riders will use BMX (20" wheels) as the bigger 24" and 26" wheels are not welcome at many trails which are developed by BMX riders
26" wheels tend to be used by riders who only have 1 bike which is used for DJ, skatepark and trips to bike park to ride DH / FR
so, 29 gives you that boost cuz well, it's 3 more isn't it?
be a real man & ride a rigid
I love Pinkbike's reporting, and thought this article and the Santa Cruz testing article were well written. They always are.
But really... the things people say in the comments section are ridiculous. No one's forcing 29ers on you... relax! And it seems like people are forgetting the useful adage "Don't Knock it Before you Rock it!" It's cool if you don't like 29ers. I don't like your broness and your choice of socks. But just tell us why in a constructive manner. "Turns like shit"... that does nothing for me.... and apparently for a lot of other people
PS I am not canadian... but loving that my computer thinks I am!
If you want a real challenge try cutting your arms and legs off and the joints and dragging you self up a mountain with your tongue! (the real challenge comes with trying to work out how to cut off that last limb)