Reynolds MTN AM Carbon Wheels Review

Dec 5, 2012
by Mike Kazimer  
Reynolds MTN AM Carbon
Reynolds MTN AM Carbon wheels features carbon fiber rims, straight pull spokes, sealed bearings, and interchangeable endcaps.

Reynolds MTN AM Carbon wheelset details:

- Full MR5 carbon fiber rim
- 21mm internal width, 29.5mm external width
- DT Swiss Revolution spokes
- Aluminum freehub body
- Front hub options: 9mm QR, 20mm thru-axle, 15mm thru-axle. Rear hub: QR, 135x10, or 12 x 142mm.
- 2 year warranty, "no questions asked" damage protection plan available for $250.
- Weight: 1600 (claimed), 1720 (actual)
- MSRP: $1800 USD

Details
Carbon wheels, once a rarity only seen at trade shows and beneath sponsored pros, continue to trickle down to the masses. While still expensive, each season the number of options expands and the prices slowly eke downwards. The Reynolds MTN AM Carbon wheelset is the company's all-mountain offering, designed to be light weight, yet strong enough to handle being ridden hard day in and day out.

Carbon Rim
The rims are constructed using what Reynolds has termed MR5 technology. The number 5 in this acronym refers to five different sections of the rim: the sidewall, rim hook bead, nipple bed, tire channel, and spoke face. The rims have a unique carbon fiber layup and resin formula designed specifically for the strength needs of each section. More or less material is used depending on what type of stress a section of the rim will see. For example, the spoke face needs to be strong enough to resist the pulling loads of the spoke, while the rim hook bead must be able to withstand the outward pushing pressure of an inflated tire. Once the rim layup process is complete, Reynolds uses their proprietary Inert Gas Compaction (IRG) process to mold and cure the rims. In this process, an inert gas is used to put over 300psi of pressure on the rim to compact the carbon fibers and resin, as well as remove any potential air pockets.

Reynolds' rim hook bead is deeper than most, which is why although the rim external diameter is 29.5mm, the internal channel width is 21mm. It's interesting to see such a pronounced rim hook bead, as there are carbon clincher rims on the market that do not even have a hook. The rim depth is deep enough that a longer valve stem is needed if traditional-length Presta valve tubes are used. A 32mm valve stem is a bit too short to engage with most pump heads. Using a Presta to Schrader valve adaptor (usually available for less than a dollar at most shops) is a quick way to rectify this in a pinch – it adds enough length to the valve stem to allow a pump head to fit.

Reynolds AM Carbon rim
Reynolds uses inert gas compaction to mold and cure their rims. Notice the unique rim bead hook design.

Hubs and Spokes
Both front and rear rims are laced with 28 straight-pull, double butted DT Swiss Revolution spokes. The spoke lacing pattern at the hub makes it so the spokes do not ever touch each other (as they would in a traditional two or three cross lacing pattern) before reaching the nipple. No special tools are needed to true the AM Carbon wheels; the alloy nipples can be turned using a spoke wrench designed for 3.32mm nipples (the black one in the Park Tool lineup).

Using different adaptors, the front wheel can be configured for a 15 or 20mm thru axle, or a standard quick release. Although the majority of thru-axle front wheels share similar design principles, the Reynolds front hub is slightly different. In many front thru-axle hubs the axle passes through an outer adaptor, then rests on the inner surface of the cartridge bearings. In this case, the adapter extends past the inner surface of the bearing and part way onto the internal aluminum sleeve. This slightly different design does mean the bearing number is 6805, instead of the 6804 more often found in thru-axle hubs. The rear wheel can also be adapted to work with nearly every frame standard out there (except for 150mm). Adaptors are included to set up the wheel with a quick release, a 135x10 thru axle, or a 142x12 thru axle.

Reynolds MTN AM Carbon freehub body
The six pawl freehub body houses three sealed cartridge bearings.

Setup
To match the AM Carbon's “all-mountain" moniker we set them up with a folding Maxxis Minion DHF 2.5" in the front and a 2.3" Specialized Butcher Control in the rear. We used the supplied tape and valve stems, along with the correct amount of Stan's sealant to set them up tubeless. The front tire popped into place without any issues, but on the rear tire we had trouble stopping the tire bead from diving below the rim hook. Even after using soapy water the bead still didn't want to seat evenly. We finally got it to an acceptable point, but it took longer than we would have liked. The extra thick bead hook of the rim is the likely culprit in this case. It does an excellent job locking the tire into place, which is great for preventing the tire from burping air when riding, but can cause headaches when seating a tire. We also found that the supplied valve stems didn't provide a very tight seal. Little bubbles of Stan's continued to find their way past the stem long after the rest of the tire was ready to go. We used tubes for part of our testing as well, and found that we ran into the same difficulties getting the tire to seat properly.

Reynolds AM Carbon engagement teeth
The red anodized rear hub shell has 24 engagement teeth.

Riding impressions
Claimed weight for the Reynolds AM Carbon wheelset is 1600 grams, although ours weighed in at 1720 grams. They are light, although not as light as some other carbon wheel offerings currently available. We didn't notice the lower weight of the wheels as much as how they seemed to take the edge off of rougher sections of trail. The feeling was akin to riding with a couple psi less air pressure in your tires; subtle, yet definitely noticeable. The carbon rims paired with higher tension straight pull spokes make for a stiff, responsive wheelset – there was no noticeable flex under hard cornering or during out of the saddle pedal mashing. We tested these wheels to the full extent of what we consider all-mountain riding – our test circuit included off-camber roots and rocks, high-speed berms, and the occasional drop or jump. We wouldn't recommend taking these wheels into the bike park (that's definitely not their intended purpose), but they do seem able to take a fair amount of beating before needing some love with a spoke wrench. We did manage to knock the wheels out of true a couple times – one particularly hard landing into a jumble of roots completely loosened a spoke on the rear wheel. In each case, we were able to true the wheels back into shape without any issue, and the rims themselves survived the testing without any damage.

Issues
The rear hub has 24 engagement teeth, which equates to a 15° engagement angle. We would have liked a lower engagement angle for those slow speed, technical trails where quick engagement makes maintaining forward momentum easier. When we took the freehub body off to examine the internals we noticed one of the small springs that secures the pawls to the freehub had broken. We're not sure when this occurred - because the other pawls were still engaging, we didn't notice that one had ceased working. After speaking with Reynolds, we learned that our test wheels were an early production run with only three pawls. The current, updated version now features six pawls, which should better disperse the forces applied during hard pedalling. Regarding warranty issues, all Reynolds wheels are backed by the company's two year warranty against manufacturing defects. However, riders looking for a little more protection for their investment can buy into the Reynolds Assurance Program (RAP) for $250. The RAP provides two years of no-questions-asked coverage should the wheels become damaged. "No questions asked" means just that - whether you come up short on a gap or you drive into the garage with your bike still on the roof rack, Reynolds has you covered.

Another issue, which we mentioned earlier, is that longer stemmed tubes are needed due to the deeper than normal rim profile. The valve stems supplied for running the wheels tubeless are long enough, but if you want to install a traditional Presta tube you will need one with a longer stem length (48mm as opposed to the more common 32mm).

photo
We fitted the Reynolds MTN AM Carbon wheelset to our Production Privee hardtail for testing, thereby ensuring that they saw some proper abuse.

Pinkbike's take:
bigquotesThe biggest question which surrounds carbon wheels is "Are they worth it?" With a price tag of $1800 we found ourselves asking the same thing. Granted, the AM Carbons are lower priced than many of the other carbon wheelsets currently available, but it's still a hefty bit of change. Plus, when you add in the price of the Reynolds Assurance Program the price difference shrinks substantially. For comparison, an Easton Haven wheelset weighs in at 1450 grams with a retail price of $2500, and a SRAM Rise 60 wheelset weighs 1330 grams (claimed) and sells for $2000. We could almost justify the cost if there was a significant weight savings, or an element of guaranteed durability that meant we wouldn't need a new wheelset for a few seasons. The RAP program is appealing, and looks like a good option for those who are historically hard on wheels, but we'd like to see it cover a time frame longer than two years. As it is, unfortunately there's not a characteristic that makes these wheels inherently better than much lower priced aluminum rimmed offerings. Don't get us wrong, the Reynolds AM Carbon is a fine wheelset, but it's lacking that spark, that extra bit of charm that would make us reach for our wallets. -Mike Kazimer

www.reynoldscycling.com

Author Info:
mikekazimer avatar

Member since Feb 1, 2009
1,737 articles

121 Comments
  • 49 2
 My AM wheelset with 25mm internal width AMride aluminum wheels on Novatec hubs wheels weighs 1680g is holding up fine so far and cost me around 450$ custom built. I'd rather have 5 sets of wide alu wheels if I have to spend 1800 on wheels.
  • 5 0
 what rims and spokes are you using to build that AM wheelset at 1680g?
  • 9 4
 big fan of carbon rim. owned enve xc, enve AM, easton haven carbons, and reynolds AM. this article seems to suggest that cheaper aluminum wheels have as much value because the weight is similar. Light is nice--no questions. Haven carbons are so snappy--super quick wheels (but the hubs are unworthy). But there is more to carbon than light: its also about ride quality and strength. This article mentions both, but doesn't give these qualities the weight they deserve. All other things being equal, these rims will definitely outlast their aluminum competitors. No question. Laterally stiff, vertically supple. The article says these qualities are a noticeable difference, but then says they're too much like normal wheels to make them reach for their wallets...

btw, like the article says, these are super hard to set up tubeless--hard to seat the bead.

lastly, fyi, you can buy a set of 2011 Reynolds on Ebay for about $700...reach for you wallet, I say.
  • 3 0
 I have some of the 2011 wheels which i bought for cheap and they've been nothing but flawless.
Hubs are still going ok, we'll see how they last after a year or two. They've gone through some decently rough stuff and walked out fine (though i do use Specialized 2.4 on front and 2.2 on rear which are quiet a big bag).

As above, there is a decent difference between the feel, strength and ride of carbon rims to justify them over alloy. Just as per carbon frames vs alloy. No they won't replace alloy rims, but they are that next step up in performance i feel.

Weight wise, yes they do turn out similar to alloy wheel sets (e.g. Mavic Crossmax SX - which id say is the alloy benchmark in this category and a huge fan of) but just being the lightest i don't think is their main purpose. Ive no doubt the strength of these rims long term is a main feature, the feel and stiffness when riding is spot on, and something that does justify the extra price (as mentioned i bought mine for cheap anyway so the price wasn't an issue). As carbon gets more popular and more accessible in wheels im sure the price will come down. But its not like Mavic are reducing the price of their wheelsets now either is it?

I also found them to be the easiest tubeless setups i've ever used. A decent air compressor to pop them in always helps. But ive never had air leaks or one problem with this setup with a few different (AM type) tyres now.
  • 1 0
 @friijole:
Rims should be stiff and durable The wheel assembly made of properly dimensioned spokes fitted on a properly dimensioned hub.

Proper suspension action is: Tire, then suspension give. Soft plastic-rims are unsound engineering if they deflect.

Cathar rides a very sound rim package at 5x less the cost and will last for a long time. Novatec is rebuildable with proper bearing sizes. All for 450 a set. Reynolds keeps making great tubing. Backed my car into my 35 year old reynoldstubed race bike. Hated myself for a month.
  • 1 0
 Amride 25 rims with a mix of DT Comp and Revolution spokes
  • 3 0
 BTW I'm planning to build a carbon-rim wheelset as well, but no way am I gonna spend 1800 on them, that's more like full build money for me.
  • 16 3
 You guys must be loaded and/or have no wife and kids. £1500 for a pair of wheels, the mrs would chop my dick off
  • 4 1
 i'm with cathar, these wheels are totally pointless when i can buy a set of sub 1700g alloy wheels for £260
  • 2 1
 I always wonder, what happens to a carbon rim if you hit an exposed rock at high speed. The kind of freak occurance that destroys aluminium rims. I'm a light rider and at 32 I've been mountain biking for 22 years. Until two weeks ago I had never smashed a rim or broken any other parts that I cen remember. I hit a rock on a DH run at full speed which almost sent me over the bars, and my front Stan's Flow rim is rooted - massive flat sport 1/2 an inch out in the vertical. That's the first time it's happened to me and I know it wasn't the rim's fault, but what if that had been carbon? What would have happened? I find it hard to believe that a carbon rim would have just shrugged it off. A lot of money down the drain, no?
  • 1 0
 About the only flaw in these wheels are the hubs which makes the price harder to swallow. That said, I re-laced mine to DT 340 hubs with 15X100 & 12X142 hubs. I cannot rebuild my second bike this year so I am selling them. $750 Rims are nearly flawless, new hubs spokes and nips.
  • 18 1
 I respect Reynolds for being a great source of material for people who want to build bikes themselves, not every company will sell you tubing for just one frame if you want to test. Their customer service is awesome, they are very open and helpful. But... such a difference in claimed weight is not fair and very low, then for that price for such product it is an outrage - I'm not a weight weenie but I would be honestly pissed off if I bought that and put it on the scale...
  • 7 0
 I dont see how they could get such an inaccurate 'claimed weight' I could understand if it was 10 or 15 grams off product variatios and the marketing side of things. But 120g... What? they must have weighed it underwater or something.
  • 4 1
 I've just sent a mail of complaint to WTB on a similar issue, I wonder what they will say. The claimed weight of Laserdisc trail 29 I bought, is 570g while on scale they weigh 614g and 615g. 90g in total is quite a chunk on rotational weight on a 29er.
  • 3 0
 watcha buildin' WAKI?
  • 6 37
flag dubstepqt (Dec 5, 2012 at 5:31) (Below Threshold)
 Lol weight Nazis go build leg strength and stop crying about such little things my fr bikes 34. If it was under 30 I'd put heavyrr parts u all cry about such little thingd
  • 3 0
 @Jackclark- it's finished, a niner HT. latest pic in my profile. Changing rims to TN719 next spring though,,,

@Dubstepqt - down from the horse... come down, that's it, come on, won't hurt you... take your time... now: why you assume we don't see, what you see? Why do you think we weren't there where you were? hmmmm? Why do you see what I don't have within? Why don't you see what I have within?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZKog8Oww-I
  • 5 0
 He cant hear you , the dub step it to loud..
  • 4 0
 34? Id love my bike to weigh that.....at 43lbs theres no point me buying lighter rims lol
  • 2 1
 @43lbs it would be an ideal reason to buy lighter rims, no? if your wheelset now is say 2400g,haven carbons would get you down 2 lbs of the most important weight. this set would get 1.5-1.75lbs
  • 3 4
 But 2 grand for 2 pounds is not worth t unless your rich and you have no life
  • 5 0
 what does having no life have to do with anything in any context? i know nothing i will say is going to register but some people work every day to buy stuff. sometimes they buy stuff that other people can't or think they have no need for. it has nothing to do with being rich or being stupid or being a loser. $1500 for a ns soda frame vs $3500 for a s-works enduro carbon frame is likely the same difference in weight and yet more than worth it to a vast majority of folks. if you can't afford them then they're not for you. not to mention that weight is merely 1 advantage of many. the rims will probably outlast several other entire wheelsets.

by the way, only suckers pay msrp.
  • 3 0
 Why are carbon bikes only a bit more than aluminium ones, but carbon rims are about eight times the price?
  • 2 1
 Saturnine: your last sentence is true and I would agree to a great extent if it wasn't a bit simplistic. Thanks to those suckers there are bike shops and bike workshops... I rather admire those people, even though I rarely do it. I'd say only perfectly selfish see online shopping as the only and the best way... though, if you buy used stuff - God bless you.

Jaame - Good question! I got the list of tubing and sheet pricing from Reynolds I, then learned briefly about how do you form and weld elements from different metals, then I learned how do you make a different sorts of carbon fiber objects. the quite obvious comes out: aluminium is waaaay cheaper than CF as a material, and a quite a bit cheaper in forming and processing. so I'd rather ask:

Why the hell are aluminium frames so bloody expensive?! At least those from Far East
  • 1 0
 I am pretty sure tht once the moulds and research is done making things out of CF is cheaper than have it welded heat treated and tested for allignment. Or so I have heard.
  • 2 0
 Depends what kind of carbon Tyran T21. The proper shit like Santa Cruz or Trek requires lots of work and very expensive equipment, quality fabrics, big forms, vacuum rooms, sheet cutters. Such CF products are not only light, stiff but also very compliant. Poor carbon is done with (as my father says) vacuum cleaner. One of the ways is to put weaving on positive foam form, then put a thick plastic bag and vacuum the air out... Then you sandpaper away the surplus and poor solution in to dissolve the foam. There are other such methods, resulting in a product that is light, strong but feels like shit by being either too stiff or wobbly. Simply because those simple methods don't give you same level of control. Ride a CF hardtail from Trek or Cannondale, then try some cheap shit like Canyon or On One. even bigger difference is noticable on road bikes. Metals on the other hand are very similar in properties, no matter the methods, that's why it makes me question what for instance Santa Cruz charges for their alu frames made on TW
  • 2 1
 i bought my carbon haven wheelset used. i saved upwards of $1400 from canadian msrp.
  • 1 0
 I've heard the same as you TyranT21, but Waki raises interesting points I've never considered before. Could it be that carbon frames are actually good value? I was cynical about why some new carbon DH frames are virtually the same price for carbon or aluminium - such as the v10 and wilson. I originally thought they were a lot cheaper to produce and the companies were making even more money than usual. It could be that they believe $3500 American is the price that best allows them to maximise profit.

Who knows?

I still believe carbon rims would smash just like aluminium if you hit a massive rock. That's why I would never consider them until the price comes down to more like $100 American per rim.
  • 1 0
 smash carbon rims into rocks and you won't have doubts. your price expectation is unreasonable. 819s are close to $100 and they're a moderately heavy aluminum rim
  • 2 0
 I cut over 20 lbs off my bike this year, and it cost me NOTHING. Just had to ride more and eat better. Could still stand to cut another 20 to get back to where I was before my daughters were born and life changed. I do like my Enve rims too, don't get me wrong. It's just that there are cheaper ways to reduce the weight one is pushing up the mountain. Atomic Dog! Nice to see a Bellingham trail pictured. Woot!
  • 3 0
 Saturnine, I'd be happy to smash carbon rims into rocks if I hadn't just spent a month's salary on them. I'll smash yours into rocks if you want to put your money where your mouth is.
  • 1 0
 reverend, the changes you mention are moot. you can drop 20lbs and have a 40lb bike or you can drop 20lbs and have a 30lb bike. you still come out ahead with the lighter bike. it's not necessarily relevant, but still true.
  • 1 0
 It's not about how much money you invest into stuff but how much trust you put into it, how much you think it's gonna do for you, instead of: what is it that I can achieve with the stuff I have. Life is about quality questions Smile
  • 2 0
 I would love to try some ENVE carbon rims. I absolutely believe that they would be noticeably better than my Flows. The problem is, I don't believe they are ten times better, or ten times stronger, or ten times more immune to me getting bored of them and just wanting to change. Until the price comes down to something reasonable, I couldn't consider buying them. Actually I'm more likely to get some big white ENVE stickers made up for an hour's salary and put them on my other rims. That would at least give me the ENVE look, which is half the appeal...
  • 1 0
 Id love someone to explain me why ZTR rims are so bloody expensive...
  • 1 0
 Me too, considering they're not that good. No shit, I've got some WTB Dual Duty rims that came on my STP, and they can take a right beating compared to the Flows.
  • 1 0
 I mean, I get it that they are good, all that BST seems reasonable. I also love that they are wide for the weight, which is a bit of a bummer on all my Mavic rims. But... they are 30% more expensive than premium Mavics and DTs (same stuff) which are made in France, meaning much higher production costs. Then ZTRs are also 30% more expensive than nearly identical WTB Frequencies made in Asia. ZTRs are made in Asia

So... where is the price coming from... manufacturers tend to fart all over the place with info on technologies and materials, if they remain silent on it (and No Tubes does) it usualy means they have nothing important to say (but that's assumption). Also looking at the sections, they simply use less material on extrusion, + no eyelets, this is where the weight comes from, so no hiper diper alloys includign M5, Maxtal, manipulated AL-7063 forged ultimate purge technology.

I wish Mavic did as wide or wider rims as ZTR, or used such thing like BST, as their rims are not the best with sealing non proprietary UST tyres. Still I go with the "local production"
  • 1 0
 I love Taiwanese production because it helps the economy in the country where I live. I think BST is overrated. I bought mine instead of EX500s on the strength of magazine reviews and tubeless compatibility. Ten minutes into my first ride, the back tyre came off. I admit this may be my fault for using non UST single ply Maxxis tyres, and I concede the pressure may have gone down below 25 in the week since I installed them, but whatever, it still came off. Since then I've dinged them, flat spotted the front, folded the bead over in three places. I only weight 72kg and I don't go in for big jumps. Before this I have never damaged a single rim in my life, including a load of thin Mavics back in the day like 231s, 217s and 517s. You know, the narrow ones.

I wouldn;t touch another pair of Stan's rims. In my opinion, they're light because they're weak.

I'm going to get Spank race28s next. I'm told by people who actually use them that they are very, very strong and still only 500g each.

In five years, I'll go for some ENVEs when they can be had for $500 American a pair.
  • 1 0
 "I love Taiwanese production because it helps the economy in the country where I live" - exactly. I live in Sweden but well closest manufacturers of quality stuff are elsewhere in EU. So I choose Mavic, DT, Hope, Renthal I'd love to choose BOS one day Smile . Same goes to food production, anything I buy, I just try to support the very local economy.

What is you impression on how are enviornmental issues on Taiwan, do factories care a lot? How is garbage/sewage/dangerous goods handled? I am asking because we have all this hipocrisy here, banning of chemials in agriculture in EU while EU based companies use worst shit in Asia polluting their land, farmers and sell food back to Europe poisoning "their own people". Some f*ckers are so deep in their own shit that they even accuse China of using DDT and India of disposing chemicals, used in clothing production, straight into the ground water and rivers... ehhh
  • 2 0
 I hope this doesn't get banned for being off topic. This country is pretty dirty but cleaning up fast. The emissions regs are California regs, which I'm told are the tightest in the world. The problem is, they are not retrospectively applied, and there are millions of stinky old two strokes and trucks driving around that are 20 years old. The level of recycling is amazing to me, they recycle everything. Even waste food is not thrown out, but given to pig farmers. Literally all out food slops get put in the freezer and then handed over to the pig farmers once a week. I had asthma in the UK for ten years, and here I don't get it at all. Could be because of the humidity, could be because the air is clean, I don't know. I wouldn't swim in any rivers on the west said of the island though because they're visibly polluted (people still fish them though). The sea on the west (Chinese) side is brown like Kuta beach. I don't know if that's Taiwan's fault or China's - probably both.
Taiwanese people see Chinese people as animals. It wouldn't surprise me if everything you hear about China is true. They have no fish in the rivers, they throw babies away if they die, etc etc etc. I'll say two things for the Chinese though. 1. They're not America's bitch. 2. They work harder than any other race on earth for less money. When you put those two together, the rest of the world had better watch out! Actually I'll add 3. Even the ugly girls are thin, which in y opinion is better than ugly and fat ha ha!
  • 21 0
 My mortgage must be carbon fIber pages with ti staples
  • 11 0
 Why do I read these things... They only make me sadder that I'm broke!
  • 2 0
 I hear you!

I have to replace my dually as I cracked the frame, my bike budget is around what these carbon wheels cost :-/
  • 9 0
 I would spend money on other parts of my bike than a set of carbon wheels. Especially when their not that light either.
  • 5 1
 Some of you like carbon frames & components but you are a bit of suspicious when it comes to carbon wheels...I don't get it.
Plus, you think that they are quite expensive for your taste. Yet, you would love to have a carbon frame, whοse value is equivalent to two bikes. Nice.
  • 3 3
 The forces that a wheel encounters are quite a bit different than what a frame encounters. Your statement isn't comparing apples to apples.
  • 1 0
 I feel that, for me anyway, once you go carbon, there's no going back. I'm all in. And loving it!
  • 4 0
 I have four sets of carbon wheels, all handbuilt by me. I find they stay true way longer without any adjusting. They shrug off hits that dented my older aluminum rims. Spoke tension is more even. My last set was built with these rims: www.light-bicycle.com/carbon-mountain-bike/carbon-mountain-bike-rim

They are worth triple what I paid for them.
  • 5 1
 I just built my 29er am wheels set 25mm internal width carbon rims on tune king/kong hubs 15/12x142, dt Swiss super comps, dt Swiss 14mm hex head pro lock nips. 1475g $900 soo happy with them
  • 6 0
 As you can buy wheels for a lot less the weigh just the same not really worth the money.
  • 7 0
 I spy with my little eye the rock wall at the bottom of Atomic Dog!!!
  • 2 0
 Exactly what I thought
  • 3 0
 Turns out the riding is better south of the boarder Wink
  • 4 0
 No doubt. A-dog rules! (Far more fun than U Line, IMO)
  • 1 0
 I ride a remedy so I can have more high speed sketchy fun on A-dog, especially when its pissing rain and slick as all hell..... dont get me wrong though.... there is nothing better than a top to bottom run on U-line 100% off the brakes getting sideways
  • 6 2
 Dont forget that carbon has completely different properties than aluminum or steel. Those properties are what set them apart from other rims, not just the weight.
  • 5 3
 well...on rims ?? They are round and should roll the bike as easiest as possible...what does carbon better on that??
  • 2 1
 Carbon has different vibration damping properties than aluminum, which should theoretically provide a smoother (better) ride than aluminum.
  • 1 0
 also much stiffer and tighter spoke tension. spokes don't loosen from vibration or impacts, either.
  • 1 0
 @saturnnine

not sure about Reynolds build quality on their wheels? although they do 'look' nice....

my first experience of Reynolds was their 700c "Attack" road wheelset, fitted brand new out the box to my shop managers road bike

this guy hardly rides his expensive CF road bike and he is a small guy with light body weight, he rode his brand new wheels home and back to the store, about 15km in total on smooth city roads, wheels started rubbing on his brakes

the front wheel required truing, and the rear wheel required re-tensioning and truing

I then checked another set of Attack wheels brand new in the store with a Park spoke tension meter and found a 20% difference in spoke tension on both driveside and non-driveside on both front and rear wheel spokes, both wheels were relatively straight on the wheel truing stand

this suggests to me that the wheels have not been built well, or the rim is not particularly straight, which is why a first ride will throw the wheels out of true and tension

not acceptable for a £1200 wheelset
  • 1 0
 my sentiments are based on what SHOULD be the advantages. whether they are or not will not be up to me to figure out. they are accurate for my carbon havens - and that is the bar.
  • 1 0
 To be fair, the Attack wheelset is the entry level product. It really isn't great. I have their higher end 45mm carbon rims on I9 hubs. For a 1100 gram tubular wheelset with 16/24 spokes and a 210lb rider, these wheels are holding up GREAT!
  • 6 0
 yep won't be my next wheelset ...
  • 3 1
 Agreed. I'd rather spend my money on suspension, drivetrain, brakes, frame, etc....This is just too much money for a set of wheels.
  • 1 0
 My Friend works at Superstar Components and they are bringing some wheels out that are same weight and less than half the price. Its a really good company all the workers are sound . Just the guys in the front of house are douches
  • 1 0
 Hope EVO's, Syncros DS28, DT butted. 1890 grams $500. 2 years of heavy use (150+ rides). 2 minor touch ups. They are heavier, but I could buy 3 sets and enough beer to cause problems while building them for $1800. Add the warranty and I could replace almost every part on my bike with something lighter to makeup the 170 gram difference, including new wheels with lighter hub and rim options. I know the reasoning behind the lighter wheels, I have a set of lighter wheels that come in under 1700 grams, but aren't as strong. Will carbon last 3 times longer than what I'm running now, which would be a minimum 6 years?
  • 1 0
 Lots of other rim options that you can build up like this with a similar weight, as well. and with hand built wheels, you can tune the parts to the rider: there are women DH racers (I think it was SJ, but don't quote me) who ride stan's flows, because when you weigh 100lbs, you can get away with lighter components. factory wheels often have straight gauge spokes, too, no bueno.
  • 1 0
 I've got a brand new carbon wheelset for sale for £450:
www.pinkbike.com/buysell/1194594

Wider carbon rims, and lighter overall too!
Already running a set myself and would keep these if I could.
Once you've ridden a carbon wheelset (built well) you really will realise how much the stiffness and power transfer improves the ride of your bike.
They only wheelset I've ever had that can even compare to the stiffness was 24in Sun Doublewides, but they weighed a ton!
  • 1 0
 I have a set of Reynolds Topo C's and they are extremely stiff and the wheelset that have required the least amount of truing over the years. Too bad I have to unload them as I no longer run 26" on my XC bikes.

The first ride on carbon rims was a bit daunting until after a while I forgot that I was on carbon rims. The rims were very very strong.

The only downside was that Reynolds would not reply to emails requesting information on maximum tire pressure, maximum recommended tire size (I didn't want to split the hook of the rim), and if it was okay to set them up tubeless. If a company doesn't answer my questions, I never buy their product again.

Good product; non-existent customer service.
  • 1 0
 About the only flaw in these wheels are the hubs which makes the price harder to swallow. That said, I re-laced mine to DT 340 hubs with 15X100 & 12X142 hubs. I cannot rebuild my second bike this year so I am selling them. $750 Rims are nearly flawless, new hubs spokes and nips.
  • 3 2
 That weight is not going to help sell the wheels for sure. A pair of Sun Ringle SRD wheels weigh 1555g and can be bought for about $1600 if riders want something light and more affordable.
  • 9 1
 Careful how you use the word "affordable" on this site. I have a very capable wheelset hope/mavic 521 that cost me less than $500 and I've used them for every type of riding. Rebuilt the rear hub once in ten minutes. I would commend them to anyone.
  • 1 0
 *recommend them to anyone
  • 9 2
 To me, the word "affordable" means good value for your money for what you get. $1600 is affordable for a 1555g AM wheelset. $500 is affordable for an aluminum wheelset. $0.99 is affordable for an avocado. They're all different.
  • 1 3
 compare them to a REAL wheelset like crossmax sx no brainer
  • 2 0
 Exactly what I meant, smike. 1555g is quite a nice weight for a carbon wheelset. If an aluminum wheelset weighed 1555g I'm not sure it would be able to hold up to any abuse. Therefore the $1600 price tag is somewhat justified.
  • 1 0
 Good points. To me value means performance per cost. Either you increase the performance or reduce the cost to get better value. Looking at your comment again, if you had said less expensive rather than more affordable I would have glossed right over. Not criticizing I just know how PB users react to money spending. To each his own.
  • 2 1
 i have tried to kill my 2 sets of crossmax sx. I can't even wear them out and they are 4 years old and 3 years. They weigh in at about the same as a carbon set. Tell me about carbon wheels in 4 years. Right now they are a RICH MAN'S TOY
  • 1 0
 The older Crossmax SX wheels were close to 1800g. The newer sets are a bit lighter but they are certainly geared towards more freeride use than any carbon wheel offerings out there. Most carbon wheelsets can afford to be quite light due to their construction and yet strong for their intended use.
  • 3 0
 My I9 AM wheels with ZTR Flow rims weigh about the same but were $700 cheaper an sound way cooler!
  • 2 2
 isnt carbon wheels really just another way for people to spend a bunch of money and say look at me my bike has carbon wheels, i just dont think its worth it, I rather buy new rims each season than spend this kind of dough, i would like a carbon frame as well but I look at it now as its just more training when I pedal my bike and i have some money for food and drinks with the friends after the ride
  • 7 0
 As with any sport, there will always be folks buy the most expensive gear in a silly attempt to promote self importance and I'm sure some folks on carbon wheels fit that description. That is not the majority, however. The advantages of carbon for wheels:
1. Stiffness - you never feel/experience flex
2. Dampening - they definitely handle trail vibration better
3. Durability - they can handle conditions that cause ALU rims fail
4. Weight - key is not to compare directly to the lightest ALU rim in a category. You need to think more in terms ratio of weight to stiffness and durability. I.e. compare the carbon rim weight to weight of the stiffest, most durable ALU rim in a category or even the next category in some cases.
5. Maintaing true - I ran Enve AM's all season (Mar-Nov) which included Super D and Enduro racing. I had to true my wheels just once, and even then, that was to to optimize.

As the author indicated, more manufactures are offering up carbon options, which means more choices for us and with every purchase by early adopters, the advantages of economies of scale begin to kick in. Prices will go down over time.
  • 1 0
 Hit the nail on the head Bliss503!
  • 1 0
 It also doesn't take too many Alu rims/spokes/nipples before the cost begins to rival a carbon rim that lasts... especially if you don't build your own wheels. I'm an average Joe who loves to ride, and I truly appreciate the feel of the carbon Enve rims on my rig.
  • 1 0
 I've heard from two industry wags that the bearings in Reynolds wheels are shit. I'll keep with my Crossmaxs, thank you very much. Two seasons on wheels that are 40-50% cheaper, and no issues so far.
  • 1 0
 ouch.. $1800.. thats almost the price of my whole bike..

Just got some Hadley hubs.. excited for a nicer wheelset as I have never ridden anything but a stock wheelset..

$1800 for wheels.. wow, not on a teacher's salary..
  • 1 0
 Got rear-ended in Colorado last year with my bikes on the rack, and the other driver's insurance bought my wheels. That's how to get carbon on a teacher's salary.
  • 2 1
 Ive got an American Classic MTB Race 29 wheelset. Price $700, actual weight 1421 grams. Sorry but good luck getting a piece of the market share, Reynolds.
  • 2 0
 You're comparing an 29er xc wheelset to a set of 26" carbon AM wheels. Ride them on the same terrain and you'll soon realize the difference.
  • 1 0
 Very true! Just trying to make the point that for that price it would make sense to have considerable weight savings. My Mavic Crossmax SX wheelset weights 1730 grams, nearly the same as the carbon Reynolds, and they cost $500. I just think if they want to create an incentive to spend $1300 more on a wheelset, they should offer something...i.e. weight savings, or maybe offer a lifetime subscription to Playboy. Just an idea.
  • 1 0
 I agree. The sx is a better comparison.
  • 1 0
 Something that will really trip you guys out. The Specialized Butcher tires we tested had almost a 145 GRAM variance between 4 tires! WEIGH IT ALL
  • 2 0
 Weight variances in tires is a lot more acceptable in my books. The process of manufacturing is a lot less precise, and manufacturers usually lost weight variances. However, I think it's a lot less acceptable for a set of $1800 wheels.
  • 1 0
 PB didn't say how they weighed the wheels, 120g is approximately the weight of rim strips and valves, maybe Reynolds weighed them nekid and PB weighed them ready for tubeless? Hard to say.
  • 1 0
 I would give pb a little more credit than that...
  • 1 0
 Yeah, that's why I said "hard to say". Otherwise Reynolds got some 'splainin' to do.
  • 1 0
 True but next time you are trying to win the weigh class weigh in something to ponder. I would just go the Stans and Hope route to build light wheels at that cost I think....and buy 3 sets.
  • 3 1
 ztr flow on hope hubs, thats all i need
  • 1 0
 how much would they weigh?
  • 2 0
 crappy engagement, not tubeless, expensive, no thanks
  • 2 1
 hard to believe they are not UST
  • 1 0
 The Easton's offer a 2 year no questions asked warranty, which includes if you brake them due to crashing.
  • 1 0
 FTFY: "Break"
  • 2 0
 you have to be mad to spend $1800 on a set of wheels
  • 1 0
 how did you get that folding minion dhf on there, mine blows off of 823's all the time
  • 1 0
 send them to me. ill be happy to test them
  • 2 2
 Made by Crank Brothers, or do Reynolds make CB wheels/hubs... the similarities are astounding.
  • 1 0
 What's the advantage of not having any spokes touch each other?
  • 2 0
 Mentioning that the spokes don't touch each other was a way of illustrating the wide bracing angle of the spokes. The intent of this design is to add stiffness to the wheels. Plus, the lack of any bend in the spokes on their path from hub to rim means there are fewer potential fatigue points.
  • 1 0
 That's exactly what I had assumed but I wanted somebody to confirm it. Thanks for the reply! I like straight pull spokes but it's unfortunate that they are challenging to build wheels with.
  • 1 0
 Reynolds assurance program???.....red flag!!
  • 1 0
 Easton offers "no questions asked" coverage on the carbon havens at no extra cost. That's the way to stand behind your products.
  • 1 0
 And with the Eastons, you are going to need it. 3 freehub failures in 40 days. Then blown bearings. They never did ask any questions. Perhaps that is the problem.
  • 2 1
 for 1800 bux I can get 2 sets of crossmax sx's
  • 1 0
 I'm with you on this. I have STs and I ride the living hell out of them.
  • 2 0
 i have a crossmax sx 2012 white/silver front 15 for my Ibis's new fork. It weighs 760 grams. I don't want a 450 gram front wheel. I only need real world parts that do not break. If I am spending $2,000.00 It MUST be UST and the spokes need to be beefy and light/strong like Zicral Mavic spokes. I have snapped 5 spokes from my 2 year old Havens and they are proprietary and just dissapear when they go awol. That is my benchmark
  • 1 0
 Second that, @madmon. I used to hate on Crossmax when the first arrived for the XC set because they seemed spindly, and so much more expensive than the XT/DT/Rhyno Lite wheelsets that I could build myself. Now, years on the STs, two hard years on SLRs, a full week at Whistler on SXs and I am a believer for life.
  • 1 0
 The hub looks like the Sun Charger hub....
  • 1 0
 What mod keeps bumping this to the top of the news frontpage? Seriously.
  • 1 0
 Reynolds Assurance Program Explained.... Smile
  • 1 0
 1800 bucks?
lolno.







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.060489
Mobile Version of Website