Genuine Innovations Tubeless Ready Kit - Review

Mar 26, 2014
by Richard Cunningham  
Pinkbike Product Picks

Genuine Innovations Tubeless Ready Kit-reviewed-2014

Genuine Innovations put all the items you will need to get a tubeless-ready wheelset converted and sealed into one package.



Genuine Innovations, the folks who revolutionized racing with the first useful CO2 inflation devices for cyclists, have assembled all the necessary ingredients for converting a wheel to tubeless into one handy package. The Genuine Innovations Tubeless Ready Kit comes with two threaded 20-gram CO2 cartridges, a Microflate Nano inflation device, a pair of valve stems with removable cores, one Schrader-to-Presta adapter, an eight-ounce bottle of Slime Pro sealant, a pair of plastic tire levers, a tiny valve-core wrench, a measuring cup, and a roll of one-inch Gorilla Tape. The tape and sealant can prepare four wheels for tubeless conversion, while the included stems and cartridges will get two of them up and running if all goes well. The kit, which is trimmed out in Slime green, also offers instructions in a number of languages and costs around $59.99 at bike shops.
Genuine Innovations

Genuine Innovations Tubeless Ready Kit-reviewed-2014

Gorilla Tape is a proven winner for sealing rims. The one-inch tape in the kit can seal up to four rims, up to 24mm internal width. Slime's Pro tubeless sealant (right) could plug small pinholes, but did a poor job of plugging anything else.



Pinkbike's Take:
bigquotes Adding up all the bits that come with Genuine Innovations' Tubeless Ready Kit reveals that its initially shocking $60 MSRP is actually a decent value for first-timers who do not have anything in their toolboxes to mount and seal a tubeless ready wheel. The one-inch wide Gorilla tape will handily seal four 29-inch rims and PB's experience with the stuff says that it is both long-lasting and reliable. The Microflate Nano device, paired with a 20-gram CO2 cartridge is a wasteful method of inflating a tire, but often, a blast of gas will get a stubborn tire mounted when a floor pump has failed. The inflation device is Innovation's most reliable version and its twist-type valve can be throttled on or off as needed. We mounted some Kenda tires to Novatec Diablo wheels, happily discovering that the included valve stems sealed well and that the tires aired up by hand without the need for a burst of pressurized carbon dioxide - but that is where the fun ended. Two ounces of Slime's Pro sealant did little to keep the air inside the fully inflated and mounted tires. Dribbling out from normal sized pores in the tire's sidewalls and hissing from unknown places, the pretty green fluid required a number of re-inflations and enough shaking and rolling of the wheels to give the impression that we were auditioning for a primal dance troupe before it sealed the tires well enough to ride them. Even then, though, the tires never did not hold full pressure longer than two hours. Yes, we shook the fluid. Yes, the tires were well seated to the bead wells and yes, there were no holes larger than those that a sewing needle would make in the sidewalls. We were thinking that the Genuine Innovations' kit would be a perfect emergency pack to bring to the races or for road trips, but after imagining the headaches such a poor performance could cause, we'd have to recommend that readers purchase the necessary items in the kit separately in order to avoid the Slime Pro sealant altogether. - RC



Genuine Innovations Tubeless Ready Kit





Author Info:
RichardCunningham avatar

Member since Mar 23, 2011
974 articles

98 Comments
  • 41 5
 Just go with Stan's, it's been the industry standard since it came out, and will never fail you
  • 11 32
flag deeeight (Mar 26, 2014 at 22:48) (Below Threshold)
 stans is better for rim sealing, less useful for punctures. The "micro" fillers are just that, micro...they really don't plug worth a damn unless you leave the thing that made the puncture in place also.
  • 54 5
 @deeeight every time you post, I feel like a lot of people get a lot dumber for having read your "knowledge"
  • 30 14
 On this site I'm not sure that's possible.
  • 6 2
 @deeeight are you suggesting that we're all as dumb as you?
  • 5 1
 @seajay you just made my day!
  • 3 0
 Gorilla+Stans.
  • 6 1
 u need an air compressor cause some times the tire doesn't seal as expected and u end up using a lot of air. @ Deeeight, we use stans on all of our bikes at the shop, there is no question it provides the best rim sealing and puncture sealing. We've tried many others such as Orange Seal and Slime Pro there's no doubt stans is the best. First question is, do you even ride tubeless? second question is, do you even ride what so ever or are you just always on pinkbike nagging children.
  • 4 7
 @Bonedog... yes...I was doing tubeless mtb tires years before Stan stole the idea from myself and others. I even had instructions posted on the internet on how to do it, because I didn't see the point in charging for a conversion anyone could do themselves.
  • 15 1
 Have a bloody medal pal.
  • 6 1
 Charging people for things they could do themselves/don't need, that's the essence of capitalism!
  • 1 0
 I can say with a ton of confidence that Stans is not the best sealant out there... They use far less of the actual Sealing particles (which are also smaller in size) than brands like orange seal.
  • 3 0
 " I didn't see the point in charging for a conversion anyone could do themselves."
didn't follow through with the MBA I see...
  • 1 0
 Can you use Slime and Stan's? This is a stupid question isn't it.
  • 1 0
 @AJRockslife producers says that mixing sealants is bad thing because "you will contaminate our product"...
  • 1 0
 @Reformed... at the time, I didn't have the view of exploiting mountain bikers for such an obvious invention...silly me.

And you can mix your own sealant for way cheaper. Liquid latex mold builder compound is an obvious base to use, but there's also liquid latex floor sealer sold by the gallons that's pretty much ready to go. Oh Notubes says there's has fillers added, but that's part of the lie of marketing.
  • 1 0
 If you made a solid product and didn't over charge, that would not be exploitation.

RE: fillers, a friend who does a home-brew sealant uses bits of nylon rope, run through a coffee grinder. I also heard that the little packs you get in products to absorb moisture (the ones that say "do not eat", duh) can be crushed and make an ideal filler.
  • 1 1
 Well Notubes started with selling "kits" of yellow packing tape and premixed latex mold builder sealant and a couple valve stems cut out of cheap tubes, for $25US, based around about $3 of material costs...
  • 1 0
 I've heard of people adding glitter to Stan's to help with larger punctures with positive results. Never tried it but the logic seems sound.
  • 23 1
 "Genuine Innovations"
using stuff made by other companies in your kit is not much of an innovation.
  • 10 23
flag deeeight (Mar 26, 2014 at 22:56) (Below Threshold)
 You do know that G.I. invented the use of co2 inflators for bicycle tires right? They got their start in 1989 the same time as Slime was invented for mountain bikes. They're both owned by the same company now.
  • 6 3
 Yes yes I know all about that, but I just think its ironic that a company called "Genuine Innovations" is packaging several products together that are already out on the market and selling it as a genuine innovation. It was more of a silly joke than serious criticism.
  • 6 25
flag deeeight (Mar 26, 2014 at 23:29) (Below Threshold)
 Why is it ironic to package their OWN products, together with some tape from another innovative company ?

Considering that "no tubes" as a brand name, was created out of thin air, on the basis of other people's ideas that existed long before Stan came along and claimed them as his own.
  • 16 1
 you're missing the point and taking this way too seriously. sorry i offended you by joking about your beloved innovators
  • 4 1
 I see your point scmalex, and I find it funny.
  • 4 1
 I think anyone with half a brain cell will see his point. Wink
  • 5 0
 dont know why we need a package. for anyone that thinks tubeless is bad, they should try it first. you never have to worry about pinch flats and it would take a serious slice of the tire to flat which would happen anyway with a tube
  • 2 12
flag sq225917 (Mar 27, 2014 at 1:52) (Below Threshold)
 I run latex tubes, they can't burp and have never pinch flatted for me in 22 years, what's the point of tubeless other than selling consumables?
  • 4 1
 Punctures seal automatically and the reinforced sidewals of tubeless tires allow for lower presure without the weight penalty of dual ply tires.
  • 2 5
 So what's the point of tubeless? I can run any tyre with a latex inner tube that you can run with sealant, I don't have to worry about burping, sealing or seating my tyres, I can change a tyre out in under a minute on the trail if I tear one up and i can run them at any pressure I please.

Seems like you might be fixated on the benefits you've been told you are getting rather than looking for better solutions. Just saying...
  • 13 0
 Lapsus just told you the point. Just go ahead and try to run as low of pressure in your tubes as we can with a tubeless setup. I'll be a mile ahead while you have fun changing you flat. And if you've never had a pinch flat with tubes, you either don't ride hard or your pressure is way too high. BTW, post a video of your "under a minute" tube change.....really want to see a Formula 1 (or Nascar for the rednecks) pit style change. Though I don't know how you are so fast since you've never had to change a tube in 22 years.
  • 5 0
 sq: it gives you arguably improved traction. quite a different feel to the ride. seems to roll and accelerate better. you'd have to try it, of course, but I'd never go back to tubes again
  • 1 1
 @mtaero, I swap tyres to suit conditions, and seeing as I travel a lot to ride and it pisses it down here regularly, that's at least one tyre change a week. I'm not entirely sure why i never get pinch flats, it could be because I'm super smooth and light on my feet, it could be because I don't ride at 12psi, it could be because its nigh on impossible to pinch flat a decent latex tube as they are so stretchy they just don't split like butyl. I'm guessing you've gnaar enough to have done it though...

@Gnarbar, that seems reasonable I can figure it giving a more fluid feel to the tyre.
  • 1 0
 All razzing aside...., I used to pinch flat a lot even with latex tubes and that sucks because they are 5 times the cost of regular tubes. Some of that has to do with how the machining is done on different types of rims. You'll never pinch flat more than on a Sun Ringle rim for instance and we see this a lot at the shop... just the way they machine a nice sharp edge on the lip. I'm sure our terrain is much different from each other too... they don't call 'em the Rocky Mountains to be ironic. Not that I love to do this,but I dent the crap out of my rims and have never once lost pressure on a tubeless setup. I like to run lower pressure (about 28 psi) and the feel I get with a tubeless setup is worlds above what I used to get with tubes.

But hey..... different strokes for different folks. If your setup works awesome for you, rock on!
  • 1 0
 Yup, i've never really dented a rim, spread the sidewall a touch but not super localized.
  • 1 0
 @sq225917: If you swap tires every week and you're not having punctures often then I guess tubes make a lot of sense. It all depends on the terain and the riding conditions.

The trails I ride are quite rocky and litered with all kind of thorns during the warmer months. On my last ride a friend suffered one puncture and a pinch flat and having to change tubes mid-ride was a bit of a hassle. I've riden both tubes and tubeless and I prefer the feeling of a tubeless tyre. Also I've had better luck with tubeless setups compared to ading sealant to a tube when it comes to dealing with punctures. I still believe that tubeless is the best solution if you don't have to change tyres very often.
  • 1 0
 ya with regard to changing tires every week, honestly if you change them that much i would just get a cheap pair of wheels and just switch wheels out. much easier. tubeless is also really easy to switch, honestly its probably easier if you have a compressor and a solid tire. but if tubes are working then there's no need to change but if you ever decide ride other gnarly places or go on long trips i would for sure switch to tubeless. just my advice
  • 7 1
 I'd rather use the free compressor at the gas station than blow through a ridiculous number of mini CO2 cartridges to get a difficult tire to seat.
  • 2 1
 Is that before or after you have sealant leaking out allover the back of your car seat heading to/from the gas station?

The inflators are so anyone can instantly seat the bead and go out for a ride and work the sealant into the tire.
  • 13 0
 @jamm I feel like an intelligent person would just wait until they got to the gas station to put the sealant in the tire
  • 2 0
 Stans' website is a great resource for learning tubeless. Great demonstrative videos. Key suggestion they provide for pumping the tire is wet around the tires/rims with soapy water before blowing them up. The tire catches at much lower pressures and relatively painless with a floor pump.
  • 1 0
 Also just depends on the rim that you are trying to make tubeless, the Spank rims seem to be really easy to inflate with a normal floor pump.
  • 2 0
 Why would you buy an expensive kit when a ghetto tubeless works perfectly fine and costs some sealant and a cheap 20" tube ? Seriously, I once made the mistake to buy a tubeless kit from Stan's, just to found that it is EXACTLY the same thing as a ghetto tubeless ... a THICK (Too thick to ensure the tire is properly seated in the rim hooks) rimstrip with a schrader valve on it that you stuck between your tire and your rim... All for around 40€ (~60$) while a ghetto tubeless costs me less than 10€.
  • 3 1
 Why are there no schrader tubeless kits? Could somebody tell me what the advantage of presta valves are? Why not just use the schrader? I'd rather not have to protect my schrader adapters better than the family jewels. Up with schrader!
  • 3 0
 I agree. I can't stand presta valves. I installed tubeless motorcycle schrader valves in my rims. They have been working great for a few years now.
  • 2 0
 @fohom1 endurorider.pl/2009/01/samodzielny-zawor-schrader I bought it in tire service shop.
  • 1 0
 Stans sealant has been changed ovr the years, i feel its less effective than it use to..its more "liquid" than before.
Salime has a version of their stuff sold in canadian tire store for cheap. Its stickier than stans and seem to seal better from my tests.
  • 1 0
 I haven't gone tubless because I'm lazy. One of the guys at the LBS went tubeless on his 29r but said the Stan's slime turned to water after 3 months. Can anyone comment on how long the Sealant should last? I'm probably going to keep the tubes for now; )
  • 1 0
 Stan's should last 2-7 months I believe
  • 1 0
 All depends on how dry or humid it is where you live and how much you ride. When I used Stans, I was putting new stuff in every month, but not because it dried out, because it separated. I know Stan is very proud of his sealant, but its a major flaw and one they don't seem intent on addressing. (assuming its because you'll have to buy more of a product that goes bad after a short time) You get what we at the shop like to call a "Stan's Monster" where all the little rubber bits and adhesive start bonding together and make this super weird rubber ball that separates from the watery liquid.
  • 1 0
 Ill stick with stans.couldn't keep air in ny tires with the amount of thorns. First ride with stans they had just cleared locusts trees from the trail. Caught 5 thorns bigger than nails. Sealed up with enouoh air to get back to the car no problem.still holding air. Heavy duty tube on the back? Not so much. They won me over for life with that.
  • 12 8
 I think I'll just keep my tubes...
  • 11 3
 Your loss.
  • 1 0
 I'm riding Ghetto Tubeless from early 2011 and for me best version is rim strip from 20" tube. Gorilla tape is a mistake. BTW: CO2 cartridges shortens life of sealants by drying them.
  • 1 0
 What's wrong with Gorilla tape? All my rims are setup with it and it has been flawless.
  • 1 0
 @ SoDiezl350 I find rim strip much more easier to apply and seal. Also it is way faster than messing with tape. It's quite possible that I'm not good enough to deal with tape Smile
  • 1 1
 That's true for all sealants but Slime Pro. It has antifreeze components and low temperature doesn't affect it.
  • 1 0
 silvavitae Stan's got antifreeze too but it doesn't change the fact that sealants don't like CO2 cartridges.
  • 3 0
 Proper UST rims for me with some Stans for my non UST Minions. Winning combo, never had issues.
  • 2 3
 I've been using slime pro for years in Tubeless ready tyres. Its no different to the other brand of sealants in my experience. Leaky sidewalls and poor bead lock should be directed at the choice of tyre and rim - not the sealant.... 2 hours and the tyre deflates? Mine holds the same pressure for 2 months! And no there not UST tyres!!! Way to slate a product after one application. Well done.
  • 4 0
 Many people dont share the same views as you unfortunately, in mine and my mates experience, any Slime stuff is awful, it takes forever to seal and even then, I once got a puncture in a slime filed inner tube, piece of glass left a 4mm long slit, didn't seal what so ever and left me with a major clean up job
  • 1 0
 Well the slime pro tubeless sealant has plugged many a slits in my wafer thin Nobby nics allowing me to continue the ride as planned. Filled tubes generally don't work from any brand really, do they? Especially not when you have a sizable slit or pinch.. In the three years my trail bikes been tubeless, Slime has definitely shown itself as the best sealant. Ill definitely be sticking with it.
  • 1 0
 Not really, I went back to halfords (I was 15, I didn't know any better) and complained it didnt work, they checked it and said it should have sealed, offered me a direct replacement, but I asked for a halfords own version instead, worked 50x better, even when I got a roofing nail in my tyre that left 3 2mm diameter holes in it, then a week later another piece of glass, still sealed a bigger slit than the slime. You might have had good luck/just happened to get a good tyre for it, but 95% of people I know who have used slime hated it.
  • 1 2
 so much about this post is lame. first, i don't want to read all the comments because the shit is old. second, anyone who says any part of this combo doesn't work is wrong. third, this isn't even ghetto tubeless. shit gets a lot more ghetto than that when you start using bmx tubes. and lastly, i feel like i did my peers a disservice by not telling them that gorilla tape basically makes every rim a tubeless dream. this kit is only getting reviewed because it's enduro approved. I just wish it worked for all-mountain stuff.
  • 1 0
 My first attempt at setting tubeless recently, Sun/ringle' rims, Maxxis TR tyres an stans kit
All went together first time, without any problems
  • 3 0
 It says slime read no further
  • 3 1
 The kit actually has gorilla tape instead of rim strips!! I feel so validated. It's officially no longer the ghetto method.
  • 2 3
 Don't do Ghetto Tubeless!! It is so dumb. Just spring for the legit UST system. It will save you time(shit ton of it) and money in the long run(because it isn't going to work and you are going to get a legit UST setup anyways). And if you come into my shop wanting me to do a ghetto tubeless system, I will politely say Hell no! That shit's a liability!
  • 1 0
 UST or tubeless compatible is definitely worth the money if you are dead set on going tubeless. Some tires/rims simply won't convert at all. I couldn't get my kenda sb8 to seat on anything. Ever. No matter how much tape/tube I put in there.

And if you have ever built up a few too many layers, try pulling the bead off after it ripped through the tire. Almost cut my finger off once the whole damn bead ripped out. Took an hour and a half to get it off the rim.

that said tubes work fine most of the time.
  • 1 0
 Can anyone recommend a brand that seals punctures better than stan's? Have used a few that seal beads well but not punctures
  • 5 6
 I'll stick with tubes thanks I've only had a hand full of flats since I started riding when I was 14 I'm 27 now too a few years off but in hard pressed to go tubeless when tubes are so reliable
  • 4 0
 Depends where you ride. Riding in the desert will have you going through tubes pretty fast. I haven't got a flat since going tubeless so i consider tire+sealant reliable.
  • 7 0
 Man I literally pulled 15 goat head thorns out of my tires after my last ride and I checked, they didn't even lose 2psi. I get the feeling tubes would have deflated by then.
  • 3 1
 Ghetto tubeless FTW. Cheap and easy.
  • 2 0
 LIKE MY MOM! oh i mean't to say your m.... nevermind.
  • 4 2
 TUBELESS FLUID DISSOLVES THE GLUE ON THE BACK OF GORILLA TAPE!!!
  • 9 0
 eerrr...... mate.... i think your capslock button is stuck?
  • 2 0
 Does anyone got a pump I can borrow?
  • 2 0
 Gorilla tape is all we use in the shop to seal tubeless tires
  • 1 0
 Stan's is like a GoPro... There's knock offs that are close, but never as good as the real thing.
  • 1 0
 Gorilla tape? when did they enter the tubeless world?
  • 1 0
 where have you been?
I think it is $2.99 for a 1" roll from Home Depot.

Next stop - Dick's Sporting goods for a box of CO2 cartridges...I think it was $15 for a box of 15 (non-treaded, 12g...even if you need 2 for a large tire, your still ahead)
  • 1 0
 I guess I been in the local bike shop. Haven't been doing much bike shopping in DICKS&HOME DEPOT?
  • 1 0
 Hey, if you want to pay $10+ for a roll of Stans's tape, and $4.50 for a CO2 cartridge, by all means…
I'd rather save the coin and use it at the bike shop on real bike parts and tires.
  • 1 0
 Never dented a rim? How the f.... has he managed that?
  • 4 0
 they're called "dirt roadies" it's some kind of cult i think
  • 2 5
 Enough tape for 4 wheels? What size wheels, 29 or 27.5 or 26? Maybe PB can do a wheel-size specific test of this tape - to include the new wider rims - and let us readers know is this kit better for 29/27.5/26.........
  • 9 0
 "The one-inch wide Gorilla tape will handily seal four 29-inch rims"
come on man.
  • 3 7
flag deeeight (Mar 26, 2014 at 23:00) (Below Threshold)
 Well its about 1 layer of tape with some overlap near the valve hole for a 29er but that might not be a thick enough layer to build up many rims to fit tubeless ready tires that weren't designed to be specifically converted. The stuff is about 0.3mm thick whereas Notubes yellow tape is about 0.1mm thick. One thing with gorilla tape to consider is it adds weight. Its about an 28 grams to wrap a layer of 1" wide tape around a 29er vs 5 grams for the 25mm width yellow notubes tape. If you need to run 2 layers to build up a thick enough seat for the tires to seal quickly, you're at about 60 grams.
  • 1 0
 Sorry man, it was a weak - on my part - dig at the wheel size debate. I'll quit the comments section of PB from now on...
  • 1 1
 How does it get on the back of the tape in the first place?
  • 1 0
 ..
  • 1 2
 Its ghetto tubeless or bust !!
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.062051
Mobile Version of Website