Words: Olivier Cuvet
You know this feeling of riding a trail for the first time, telling yourself that you can ride it brakeless ? Well, I had this feeling, and I went for it !
After a couple of runs on McNearlyGnarly, I was convinced that its rideable brakeless. There are a few fast sections, a couple of steeper, scarier berms, and some gravel road crossing that got me nervous. But overall, it felt like the speed was manageable.
I went for a death grip run with brakes on, straight away followed by removing my Hayes brakes and going for the full run.
Manualing with no room for error was something I didn’t thought about before dropping in. I immediately knew I’d have to be focused for that.
It was by far the scariest lap of my lap. I knew I wasn’t done til the last right berm, so i couldn’t lost focus, nor slow down, for more than 5 minutes. Not sure I would do it again, but all my respect goes to the dig team who sculpted this piece of art. Im not sure there are a lot of proper MTB tracks that could actually be ridden top to bottom brakeless. This showcase how accessible, yet fun and good for everybody this track is.
Actually riding the line, clearing all the jumps and having fun on it was a must for me. The goal was not to cruise down the line.
Man I dont want to see this cockpit without brakes again
Now we use 170mm travel full suspension bikes on trails with better surfaces than most roads in Scotland. Where are all the rocks and roots???
Anyway...this was just a wee rant. Nice video, sick skills, yadda yadda....
f*cking anybody can build a "raw, rooty rocky tech trail. A skilled builder can make a sick natural trail but the consequences of shitty building are not the same.
Hate on flow trails all you want but the 4% of flow trails like this one that are actually good are the apex of trailbuilding skill. All the old grumpy f*cks out there could never build a trail that runs brakeless for this long, let alone one single jump.
this flow trail existing isn't preventing raw natural trails from existing
flow trail doesn't have to mean easy blue like this one, plenty of double black flow trails exist. When you see a fest jump lines, it's really just a very large flow trail.
The knowledge of momentum, gravity and trajectory, elevation management required to build a half decent flow trail is only going to help you build better natural raw trails.
No trail is "sustainable" if it's clapped TF out after a season of existing, that's why I highly value flow trails that are brakeless and aren't full of bumps.
I do get why flow gets so much hate, the vast majority of them are just some kook making a giant mess with a machine, they end up f*cking clapped after a week of being open because the builder has zero skill or knowledge.
Dunno why it has to be one vs. other - all kinds of trails are built skillfully & poorly all the time, even by well-meaning experienced builders. This ''grumpy old f*ck'' has a quiver of trails & skills going to blacks / rowdy / raw stuff going on 4 decades - and getting better. The duality you're presenting doesn't make flow look better by punching up on the skinnier rowdy stuff or people who build them - it just seem to put you in a corner about it. Lighten up - its just bikes and we all have prefences. I welcome all the trail types, I just prefer they're made well and not put in fragile places they have no business being installed...
I agree though, I love building raw, steep, gnarly stuff as well. I just found your able to get away with a lot more mistakes because they blend in with the natural feel a lot more than flow trails.
at the end of the day the majority of mountain bikers don't recognize dogshit, they are just happy to get out on a bike and when the trail is full of bombholes, overshoot jumps, berms that don't work ect, they just blame it on lack of maintenance and keep clapping and cheering for the kooks who keep getting paid to build their abominations.
Even if this was the case (which I don't think it is; connecting slabs, ladders and other features is a craft), the consequences of poor trail building are usually more dire on a gnar trail than a flow trail that gets rutted.
Honestly it's ridiculous. It seems as if every trail was on a knife's edge down the steepest mountain today. I know the old gopros would make things look much easier, but this is a massive overshoot much further from reality.
AnYwey I-ve hAd my murning cofee now, the trials aRe calinG.so I/m out, Haf a gr8 day.
@mi-bike: I never said you need apostrophes to write correctly. You said there was an error in my username, and the only error is the missing apostrophe from the contraction of "everything is" to "everything's" so I assumed that's what you meant. Sorry if I misunderstood but I'm not sure what else you could be referring to? It's a direct quote from dialogue in The Simpsons so any errors in grammar can be directed to Matt Groening, I'm sure he'd love to hear it.
@vinay: jeez you've taken this personally haven't you! I suggest going for a ride and getting off the internet for a bit, it'll do wonders for you.
Just as a general response and then I'm going to leave PB alone for a few days to get away from this weird toxicity - I think it's pretty clear I'm not attacking the rider, I clearly said that they've done their job with the sick riding and the video. Excellent work. That doesn't change the fact that the text in the article is embarrassing, it's just not their responsibility to catch and fix it. Someone should have proof read it and caught the errors, and unless I'm mistaken that is literally the job of an editor isn't it? Pinkbike/Outside has editors doesn't it? So for what it's worth, yes I do think it's ok to expect "linguistic perfection" on a professional digital media platform, that's one of the things that makes them a professional digital media platform! We should call out lapses in standards from professionals and we should ask for better. Are you seriously advocating for a world where we have no professional standards? As a professional digital media company it should be standard practice for an editor to check any article before it is published for errors, either that hasn't happened here or the editor missed a lot, and that is what I'm calling out. I'm not sure why you're finding this so controversial, and it's nothing to do with the rider.
Also, for what's it worth, I'm from Brest, I just live in the UK. Language has nothing to do with it.
Now go ride your bikes and chill out.