PRESS RELEASE: Canyon For 2021, Canyon is rolling out updated versions of both its Torque and Sender AL models, complete with all-new component packages and colors.
The Torque, which Canyon considers a gravity bike is designed to be versatile. The slack geometry and long reach are intended to give confidence on steep terrain while the short rear end allows the bike to be poppy and nimble, even as a long-travel bike. Canyon claims the bike is perfect for tackling the most technical trail rides or riding lap on lap at the bike park. It's built to the same "Category 5" standards as their DH bikes and takes suspension cues from the Sender, making it a true gravity machine.
For 2021, there will be five Torque models. The Torque 5, 6, and 7 are aluminum, while the CF 8 and 9 are carbon-fiber. In addition to new colors, all Torque models now feature Fox 38 or RockShox Zeb forks and a wide-range Shimano or SRAM Eagle drivetrain. Both the CF 8 and 9 now also feature OneUp's V2 dropper post. Prices range from 2,799€ for the Torque 5 (not available in North America), $2,599 for the Torque 6, and up to $5,399 for the Torque CF 9.
The Torque 5, not available in North America
Torque 6
Torque CF 7
Torque CF 8
Torque CF 9
The aluminum Sender is made to also be versatile, for a 200mm dual-crown forked bike. The alloy bike is made to be a great choice for riders seeking an affordable DH race bike, thanks to chassis design with pedigree, having carried riders such as Troy Brosnan to the podium. The Sender AL is also an ideal ride for those looking for more than just raw speed. The bike's adjustable geometry and chainstay length allow riders to shorten the wheelbase, creating a more playful bike for the park.
The $3,399 Sender 6 is available in Rampant Purple and sports Marzocchi suspension front and back with a 58 fork and the coil-spring Bomber CR rear shock. The Sender 5, also available in two different paint schemes, uses RockShox suspension and is available in select markets for 2,799 €.
The Sender 5, available in select markets.
The Sender 6
2021 Torque and Sender models are now available on
canyon.com
"Bearing Concept
To hold up over seasons of riding whatever the conditions, the frame is equipped with fully-sealed industrial bearings."
Bearings being the deciding factor whether a bike is good or not is pretty trivial considering it's a direct to consumer brand that you've already saved a lot of dosh on (when comparing purchasing at RRP).
The 3mm allen head becomes a problem when you start over-torquing it and is a $1 replacement from any bolt shop.
I can think of many more things I'd consider more important when deciding on a bike.
Never had a bike that is riding this good with so many designs and quality flaws.
Half the time they have no idea what they're talking about, let alone know how to maintain their own bike so what credibility do they have when commenting on the frame design of a bike?
Canyon FB page has many positive reviews on the customer support. It all comes down to the office you're dealing with and if the person you're talking to is competent at their job.
Australian customer support for myself and 3 close friends has been faultless.
Just because one office is crap, doesn't mean you can say Canyon in general is crap. The same applies to the inverse too. Giving specifics of what office has been giving poor quality service does help.
Like the above, you only hear from people when they have something to complain about so it will saturate the FB groups.
Believe me, I have been in more than a few bike factories to know when a company is cheap on a QC.
The formula is simple and it goes something like this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiB8GVMNJkE
And also, from what you can find on FB groups, it seems that only Australian cs are doing their job like it supposes to do (or they don't employ incompetent people)
Ofc, but when any group is saturated with only one problem, you need to ask "is this thing ok to be like that? Maybe something is wrong here"?
The only raw statistic I can see is the poll done on the FB group which the results show not even remotely close to what you're stating.
You can't really call it a bad design when at most your description is a vague 'some kind of play'. I'm not discounting there is a problem but the whole outrage approach with non quantifiable information claiming there is a problem just doesn't cut it.
Where are you getting this 'overwhelmed with warranty requests' fact from? You seem to be either cherry picking a post or two or assuming your experience you've had is what is happening all around the world.
If you think any company in this world has all staff who are completely competent at their job then you have no idea of the real world.
If you've "been in more than a few bike factories to know when a company is cheap on a QC" which means you apparently were completely aware of the quality but still purchased one? I think you're putting a bit of pepper on your statements.
From what I've seen, they do fulfill a replacement yoke at times depending on the office. (even to the point of calling every Torque owner in Australia proactively offering them a new yoke). Yes, all consumers should be issued a replacement yoke.
Not only Australia has good service, but also UK and US seem to have good service too. Poland on the other hand is terrible, plus another European country which I can't recall.
100% those countries should do better, but if everyone who has a bad experience with them takes your outrage approach of going 'Canyon cs is bad! Never again. (more emotionally driven vague comments) ' .. then you just sound less credible than providing clear and meaningful information like 'My dealings with Canyon Poland was well below acceptable. Here is what happened: .... '
You're correct, the page is only saturated with one problem because:
A. Its the only problem people have to post about (and by the looks of it, when they're asked more detailed info about it like what effect does it have when riding? They don't reply).
B. People only post when they have a problem. So what else are they going to post about if they don't post good experiences?
Look at the YT owners and there is a sea of either e13 problems or Capra cracked chainstays. At least in those pages, they have determined a quantifiable problem. Even look at the Pole owners group for bikes that cost 2x more with catastrophic failure. Imagine how pissed those guys are, and here at worst you have to replace 2 plastic bushings every season.
It seems like you expect Santa Cruz level of frame manufacturing process and quality for half the price.
However, it's hard not to notice that today we already have similar bikes with upgraded geometry (like new Propain) that are much easier to live with compared to the Torque
For guys at around 5'7" this isn´t a big issue in comparison...
I often do 1000m d+ enduro sessions with mine, no problems and the riding position is just perfect for downhill.
I pedal with my legs, I’ve riden all sorts of STAs not one made any difference, apart from steep 78deg making me feel like I’m about to be ejected OTB when smashing along flat rough trails
13 cm longer than my mtb! And at least 10 cm lower (compared with the drop on my mtb).
Do you still wants to compare apples and oranges?
Don't forget it is a low cost bike: 4k torque is carbon frame with 36 grip2 and XT, just compare it with a 4k santacruz...
I'm trying to get the new yoke (on the warranty which is now expired due to your lack of customer care) for about 11 months now!
anyway, it doesn't matter the what size wheels each of us rides, it's just funny