Update: We have learned that Hannah Finchamp racing in Nove Mesto for her trade team Orange Seal Off-Road Team and Pieter Wheymeyer, a soigneur working for the Bear National Team at the event, are two of the five people who have tested positive.
PRESS RELEASE: USA Cycling: USA Cycling has been notified by the UCI that two people planning to travel from the UCI Mountain Bike World Cup event in Nove Mesto, Czech Republic to join the USA Cycling delegation at the UCI World Championships in Leogang, Austria tested positive for COVID-19 during testing at the UCI World Cup event over the weekend. The rider and staff member have both started quarantine at this time.
Hannah Finchamp (Altadena, Calif., Orange Seal Off-Road Team), racing in Nove Mesto for her trade team, tested positive on site and missed Sunday’s race. She traveled to Prague for a second COVID-19 rapid test. The second test was also positive. Finchamp began her quarantine in the Czech Republic immediately following the positive test. USA Cycling is coordinating with her team to have her stay in Prague and quarantine until she is clear to fly following USA Cycling’s COVID policy. Despite the positive test, Hannah is feeling well and has only experienced minimal symptoms.
Pieter Wheymeyer, a soigneur working for the Bear National Team at the event, tested positive. He immediately returned to his home in Kitzbuhel, Austria on Sunday and reported to the Austrian Health officials that he tested positive.
USA Cycling has been in contact with the Austrian Health Organization to provide names, dates of birth, and contact information for the athletes and staff that were in the same group at the World Cup where the positive tests resulted.
Before leaving Nove Mesto, members of Team USA were tested. All test results came back negative. USA Cycling has spoken with UCI officials and will have that delegation re-tested once they arrive in Austria.
Statement: Hannah Finchamp
"I am devastated to find myself here, in this position. On Saturday, I tested Positive for the Covid-19 virus. It still feels shocking and heartbreaking to say those words. Since the Pandemic started in March, I have exercised an abundance of caution. I have self-quarantined at home, worn masks at all times in public, minimized trips to the grocery store to every 2 weeks to limit exposure, and in fact, Clayton and I recently postponed our wedding an entire year out of an abundance of caution. Prior to flying to Europe, I completed 3 negative PCR COVID-19 tests in staggered intervals to ensure that I would not be bringing anything with me. Once I arrived in Europe I also tested negative for the virus."
Hannah will be quarantining in the Czech Republic until further notice under the care of the Team USA Doctor and will not be traveling to Austria to compete in the 2020 World Championships.
The UCI has stepped up its testing protocol in Leogang after 5 positive COVID-19 tests were registered at the Nove Mesto World Cup.
Testing was carried out on Saturday morning in Nove Mesto and it currently isn't known who has tested positive or whether they were riders or other staff. The UCI is apparently satisfied that appropriate measures were taken following the positive tests but will still test everyone that has come from Nove Mesto today at the request of the Austrian authorities. The mandatory tests are in addition to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test that is required to enter the Leogang bubble and failure to take one will result in loss of accreditation and subsequent removal from the event.
The UCI's full statement is below:
Press Release: UCI
Following the COVID-19 tests that were taken in Nove Mesto at the UCI XCO World Cup on Saturday morning, 2nd October, we have been notified that 5 tests have been returned positive.
The individuals concerned were informed by the Austrian testing agency and subsequently we have contacted the relevant teams/national federations concerned to understand their current situation and the measures taken since notification of the test result.
Whilst we are satisfied that appropriate measures have been taken, due to the fact that positive cases have been identified at the event, the Austrian authorities in conjunction with the organizing committee in Leogang have requested an additional test be taken on-site in Leogang for all persons who were present in Nove Mesto.
The test will be a “quick test” with an immediate result and will be entirely funded by the Leogang organisers. There will not be a charge to the individual being tested. This “quick test” does not replace the required negative PCR test. These tests are mandatory if you have been on the list from Nove Mesto, and failure to take one will result in loss of accreditation and subsequent removal from the event.
We appreciate the inconvenience to you to take this extra test but to satisfy the Austrian authorities that everything is being done to maximize the health of all those present and travelling between countries, and to safeguard the event, we hope you understand the importance and we thank you very much for your cooperation.
These tests will be carried out on Monday 5th and Tuesday 6th October between 15:00 – 19:00, please follow signage.
Each National Federation/nationality has a time slot on both days, please respect it where possible to try to reduce waiting time:
15:00 – 16:00. AND, ARG, AUS, AUT, BEL, BRA, BIH, BUL, CAN, CHI, COL, CRO.
16:00 – 17:00. CRC, CZE, DEN, ESP, EST, FIN, FRA, GBR, GER, GRE, HUN, IRE.
17:00 – 18:00. ISL, ISR, ITA, JPN, LAT, LES, LTU, LUX, MEX, NAM, NED, NZL.
18:00 – 19:00. POL, POR, ROU, RUS, RSA, SLO, SRB, SUI, SVK, SWE, UKR, USA.
We commend the UCI and organisers in Leogang on their robust response to the potential infection. We wish a quick recovery to the individuals affected.
A note on the comments
COVID-19 is a serious global health risk, and while we don't want to limit the conversation we're going to actively remove disinformation and suspend people who continue to post it.
As you said, it is more than a political thing, markets really like US presidents being alive
But I am not a Dem.
Who is the conspiracy theorist here again lol?
Like George Carlin said - the Average Person is pretty stupid and 50% of the population are more stupid than that.
Scary.
Instead of insulting the opposition why don't you try listening to them? Or better yet weigh up what your told by talking heads and the Dems with the same skepticism you would a republican. Bring that vocabulary and superior intelligence to bear on your team, and see if their ideas pass muster.
You should really go out and talk to people, because you haven't a f¥€king clue what you're talking about.
Just like with Brexit here in the UK, though I absolutely disagree with it being a good idea, assuming all that voted for it are dumb, racist, bigoted or out for corrupt financial gain is plain wrong, the numbers that voted prove that - I lost that one, I hope you guys don’t lose again.
Some will vote a certain way in direct opposition to those constantly telling them they are something - such as racist, stupid etc for having views that may not align with theirs and may align with some of trumps policies. It isn’t so much spite (though in some cases it will be) - it’s the whole ‘deplorable life effect.
‘the left’ if you want to put it that way (inc myself, though I think I’m more centrist realistically) have lost bigly lately - the tactic of telling those on the other side how stupid they are isn’t working - remember a lot of people voted trump last time, though some will be racists, dumb etc etc it won’t even be close to all of them.
Let’s hope the left of the USA isn’t ‘sleepwalking’ into another trump victory on a cloud of their own superiority complex.
@davec113: What makes you think I know nothing? Point out what you find so off with what I said that made you cry and we can discuss it.
@preach: Do I have to know a public personality personally before I can form an opinion of them? Because I'd hate to have to tell the internet they can't say mean things about Donald Trump anymore...
My main issue with the Dems and the left is that they seem so hell-bent on winning and achieving power. They attack the 'core values' of republicans (for lack of a better term) from any angle they think will work, which in turn means they themselves don't really have any core values. Nothing grounds them, not even basic human decency (and I mean that; I have plenty of examples of actual disgusting behavior that turned me off the Dems for life) so they have no point of reference to assess whether a new position is good or bad, or what the risks and consequences are; Any and all subjects are on the table so long as their end goal is satisfied. This is why they so often have inconsistent ideological positions, invariably end up contradicting their own earlier claims and plans and probably most dangerous of all, means they will skirt violent fringe groups (or outright align with and empower them) as they search out new ways to get one over on the opposition. I'm not intentionally invoking Godwin's Law, but it's alarming how similar the current rhetoric of the Dems is to that of 'certain politicians' from 1930's Germany, and how little they're doing to prevent the violence and destruction that is afflicting the very communities they claim they stand in solidarity with and are helping the most.
To put it another way, the Dems are not the party of the political left (which does have some valuable and interesting ideas). They're a party that works for themselves who happen to align with the left because the party of the right stand in the way of their ambition for power.
His numbers might be wrong technically, but if you had something like cancer, and the doctor told you your chance of recovery was 97.95 percent, I think you would be pretty confident and feeling good about recovery.
Then factor in that more than 50 percent of those 2.05 percent of those who have died are over the age of 80, and that people in their 20s have accounted for less than a percent of those deaths despite reporting the highest incidence of infection, then you have to feel pretty good about the chances of an elite athlete in their 20s. It sucks that they got sick, and I don’t wish it on anyone, but they shall be fine.
But consider this, the death rate has declined even as infection rate has gone up. In May, the death rate among positives in the US was 6 percent. It is now below 3 percent. Why is that? One possible explanation is that we are getting better at treating it, another is that as we get better at finding and identifying more people who have the disease — many of whom were asymptomatic, or had milder cases in the past. The more positive cases we are finding, the more we are finding that it’s not nearly as deadly as we thought in May. Despite spikes in cases, the death rate has remained flat since June.
@ricochetrabbit: and I shall be downvoted to infinity by people who very often like to recite the mantra, “believe in science,” who in this case will ignore the cold, hard data.
While agreeing with the foundation of your argument, I find the tone of the argument quite dismissive of what can be a significantly debilitating disease. The UK today has confirmed that people under 50 are unlikely to get "the" vaccine any time soon, due to the reduced risk to them, however that of course doesn't distract from the serious nature of the virus and how vigilant we must remain to protect as many peoples health & lives as possible.
I’m not trying to be flippant, but people’s’ understanding of stats and estimating the actual danger and putting it in perspective is horrendous.
I agree with the lack of guarantee for a vaccine, hence my quoation marks around "the". I would be surprised if one is not found though. Typically with these things it's resource that's the issue, if something is impacting economies then it's going to (and is) get the resources required.
As for them not being the ones who suffer with long / medium term effects, I'm not as sure as you are, at the moment I see the theories that the quantity of the initial infection appears to be a contributor to how badly the person will suffer. And with the different post effects not understood I wouldn't be able to draw a reasonable conclusion that a certain group wouldn't be affected - I've not seen the data, or don't believe there is data on this yet with which to draw such a conclusion.
As an example of 'after effects'
www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/15/fears-covid-may-leave-thousands-in-uk-with-severe-kidney-disease-long-term-effects-coronavirus
Your comment "I learned the hard way that 80% of pinkbike are liberals" added zero to the discussion. Unless of course you were simply hoping to get a reaction out of people, then you will perhaps believe you have been mildly successful.
If you can’t take that threat seriously then I don’t know what to tell you.
I agree with one of your points, it is exactly as I said, the data to draw conclusions of after effects of Covid aren't available, or at least i'm not aware of them.
How on earth have you arrived at the conclusion that it's more likely people had diagnosed conditions rather than complications from a pretty damn serious disease!?
So far in this thread there's only been yourself that's brought political divides into things, I've no idea why you felt the need to, other than to start arguments.
How do you think the institutional narrative would spin the results from autopsies on those people?
BTW I don’t think the UK has had a worse or better response than most other countries. The difference is you have an elderly population (and corresponding higher mortality rate) and an insane media/government propaganda machine that constantly leads you to believe the sky is falling.
I've not read enough on it at this point to state anything more than that.
You may not think the UK response has been better or worse, but it has been worse. We were repeatedly told we were 2 weeks ahead of Italy, yet 'we' did nothing but waited. Oh to be NZ.
Your other statement is false, you've insinuated the UK pop is older than most, it isn't.
I don't believe the sky is falling either, nor, seemingly do most people here; as folks are going around mostly as normal. Curious you arrived a this conclusion; assuming you're in Canada.
But yes, with so many uncertainties it's hard to voice an opinion without several caveats. Other than, folks should social distance, wash hands and wear masks as much as possible - simply because it's not a big deal to and it has been shown to be beneficial and to protect other peoples health
For one, a severe case of C19 - which, for example, results in double pneumonia - is no different than a severe case of influenza that results in pneumonia. Pneumonia is serious and can damage lungs and other things, causing long term problems for people. That's true now. It was true pre C19. It's true no matter how you get pneumonia (C19 or otherwise). In other words, C19 is not unique in this respect.
What is unique, is that we are obsessively monitoring C19 and our overall sense of fear is dramatically escalated re C19. The same was not true pre C19. So, we didn't obsessively follow every tragic tale of say a 30 year old who died of the flu in 2017. Incidentally, go look up the stats in the US for number of fatalities in age range 30-40 during the 2017/18 flu season. Had we had wall to wall coverage of each one of those deaths, we'd think it was the Spanish flu all over again.
That's probably what's taking place here, combined with the "need" for C19 to be as bad as we're invested in it being. Every post C19 health issue, real or imagined, is being branded as possible "long haul" covid precisely because we're all in. We're invested in this. Covid, in many ways, has to be the plague. If it's not, then all the sacrifice, fear, and anxiety caused will be for naught. This is not dissimilar to, for example, what goes on with Lyme disease.
Obviously, Lyme has nowhere near as much fear surrounding it (not much does at this point), but pre C19, and relative to other diseases, there's certainly escalated fear surrounding it. This has created tension between the medical community and Lyme patients. Many Lyme patients swear, up and down, that there is such a thing as "Chronic Lyme Disease". But, most in the medical community reject this - claiming that the elevated fear of Lyme, leads to exaggerated associations of post recovery medical, mental, and other issues with Lyme.
I suspect the world's hypochondriacs are going to annoying the hell out of their doctors for the next decade or so over C19.
And to add: it certainly is a big deal, the disease properly batters people, I'd right rather not get it and go through it if I can. Expect that if I were to get it then I'd likely live through it and hopefully not have any lasting effects. Young or old it's a right shite thing to get through, but just like many others, carrying on as the new normal is and hoping I don't get it
Why do you think Sweden has a lower per capita fatality rate than many other countries. Isolations/lockdowns are junk science.
What actually needs to happen is 20% of people need to get the virus. Hopefully they are young and healthy and easily able to fight it. By prolonging the virus with lockdowns, distancing etc, it just allows the virus to be spread to vulnerable people.
“On the basis of these data, it is plausible to hypothesize that preexisting cross-reactive HCoV CD4+ T cell memory in some donors could be a contributing factor to variations in COVID-19 patient disease outcomes”
science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6512/89
Let me ask you this for my amusement. Do you think the virus is going to be around next year? How long are you going to socially distance/wear a mask etc? Do you think there is only one CDC/WHO scientific opinion on a response? How do you explain the numbers from Sweden and the Diamond Princess?
Looking forward to your contradictory nonsense.
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.15.20188896v1
Seems like the issue is still up in the air and we should refrain from conclusions about cross immunity. Especially because T cell response is not the same as immunity.
I live in Germany, we have resumed regular medical procedures, the opera is performing again, schools are open, I go to the office every day, life is relatively normal. That is because we have the virus kinda under control and it would not be possible otherwise.
You are citing Swedens approach, without reflecting on what allows Sweden to actually do what they do. That country is very different from Northern Italy, the UK or the US in terms of social dynamics.
/əˈpriːʃɪeɪt,əˈpriːsɪeɪt/
verb
...
2. Understand (a situation) fully; grasp the full implications of.
Updated press release states 1 US rider and 1 staff member, 1Ukrainian rider and 1 Staff member. #5 still a question???
COVID-19 is a serious global health risk, and while we don't want to limit the conversation we're going to actively remove disinformation and suspend people who continue to post it."
Might want to start with the comments on this article.
It's not just a virus playing... Who doesn't realize this so far might be lobotumized by TV without noticing it...
the people that died from covid, died from covid. those with underlying conditions would still be alive, with their conditions. so saying only 6% (or whatever it is) were "directly" dead from covid is either stupid, or disingenuous.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082143
Also, the fact that you equate/define being asymptomatic as also being non-contagious shows that you have *zero* knowledge of how the virus works, even after 8 months of constant information stating otherwise. It does, however, explain perfectly your (probably purposeful) misrepresentation of its actual impact.