What better place to debut two new bikes than Whistler, B.C.? Especially if those bikes happen to be Trek's new carbon framed Session 9.9 downhill race rig and the 160mm travel do-it-all Slash. The area's lift serviced terrain is second to none, offering up everything from high speed bermed runs to the most technical of technical singletrack, making it the premier zone to test a downhill bike. But that's not all, just outside the park you'll find all-mountain trails that are filled with sections where'd you'd like to be on a DH rig, only to be followed by steep climbs that will test even the fittest rider's legs. In other words, Trek wanted us to spend our two days in Whistler pushing the new bikes hard. To that end they brought Aaron Gwin, Ross Schenll, Rene Wildhaber and Andrew Shandro for us to try and keep up with, all of whom were on hand to also show us just what the new bikes are capable of.
Trek Session 9.9 and Slash Launch in Whistler, B.C.
Session 9.9 Downhill Race BikeTrek hasn't been shy about wanting to create the most capable off the shelf race bike available and to do that it needed to come stock with first-class suspension. As such, the production 9.9 sports Trek-developed proprietary Fox suspension, including a radical Fox Hybrid Air fork that uses an air-assist spring that you'll find only on the 9.9, and a custom shock tune that is currently used by the TWR team. Both get the full Kashima treatment as well. If you purchase the 9.9 as your race bike you now officially have no equipement excuses.
SESSION 9.9 FRAME DETAILS:
• Intended use: Downhill racing
• All new carbon frame
• Carbon EVO Link and seat stays
• 210mm of rear wheel travel (up 10mm from last year)
• Tapered E2 1-1/8'' - 1.5'' head tube
• Frame is approx. 800 grams lighter than the TWR team's aluminum version
• ISCG-05 chain guide tabs
• 12 x 157 ABP DH rear axle spacing (slotted 150mm rear end for easier wheel alignment, can also accept standard 150mm wheels)
• Internal or external cable routing for both brake and derailleur
• Custom Fox RC4 shock with TWR tune
• Adjustable geometry allows head angle range from 62.5 to 65.4 degrees
• Revised suspension rate for better square bump performance
• Frame weight: 7.2lbs (w/ Fox DHX RC4 shock with a steel spring)

The bike's low weight and suspension is only part of the story, with its adjustability also playing a big role in its performance. Between the Session's Mino Link system (rotatable chips used to attach the seat stays to the EVO Link, pictured to the right ), the Cane Creek AngleSet headset that comes stock, and 12mm of adjustability in the Fox fork’s axle-to-crown length, the new Session has over 28 geometry settings. This unique combination of adjustability provides 1/3 of a degree adjustments at the head tube, and bottom bracket adjustments down to the mm. Excessive? Certainly not, considering the bike's intentions as a top tier race machine. It should also be stressed that although using a combination of the Mino Link and AngleSet allows you to select a head angle between 62.5 to 65.4 degrees, the Mino Link's prime intention is to tune the suspension by varying the leverage ratio to either devour square edge impacts or to pop, enabling the rider to clear rough sections with ease. The AngleSet and axle-to-crown length compensate for the geometry changes made by altering the Mino Link.
Chairlift Gwinterview by Mike Levy

Sometimes it's the smallest of things that catch up with you, even when you are the best of the best. Gwin lost his front teeth thanks to a small wheelie drop gone wrong, but his new chompers are such an exact match that you'd never know unless he took them out. Anyone who has spent time with him would likely agree that he is probably one of the nicest guys on the circuit, but he looks the part of a bruiser with his teeth removed. Maybe he takes them out before each race run to intimidate the Euros? Whatever he is doing, it's working. He finished the season with five World Cup wins, the most by a male racer, and an incredible feat considering that he broke onto the World Cup scene a few seasons ago after riding downhill bikes for roughly eight months. Watch the video interview above to hear is opinion on tracks, the World Champs and what he thinks about racing.
 | At the end of the day it's just bike racing. So whether you're first or tenth, it really doesn't matter at all. It's just trying to keep a level head and have fun riding bikes. You know, we're super lucky to be able to do this for a living... - Aaron Gwin |

With decades of experience in the world of motocross, not to mention many years spent working on pushing the envelope of mountain bike suspension, Trek's Jose Gonzalez has been one of the major reasons for the success of their recent full suspension designs. Jose is part of a team of engineers known as the Advance Concept Group, or ACG, who's job it is to constantly raise the the performance status quo. Jose, along with Eli Krahenbuhl, primarily focus on suspension, often working on products that we won't see for a full year or two down the road. He and Eli were in Whistler to not only educate us on the 9.9's Fox 40 Hybrid Air fork and TWR tune equipped rear shock, but also to get some time in on his creations in the perfect testing environment.
 | Our goal was to create a bike that any rider could use on the World Cup circuit and not be held back. We feel that the stock Session 9.9 will actually outperform many factory race bikes, it's that dialed, off the shelf. - Jose Gonzalez, Trek suspension engineer |
Trek's new 160mm travel Slash
How do you best get a feel for a bike like the Slash? Easy, you have Whistler open up one of their highest chairlifts, the Peak Chair, for our select group of media friends and pro riders to get dropped off at the very tip top of the worlds most famous bike park. But we'd be avoiding the crowds in the park and heading down Khyber Pass, a burly trail that is named after the forbidding mountain pass linking Afghanistan and Pakistan. From there we'd drop into Babylon, followed by some lightening fast singletrack that would spit us out at the lake in the Whistler Valley roughly 7,000 feet below. It wouldn't be all downhill though, not even close, as there were plenty of steep pitches to power up and keep you breathing heavy. I've had a great Summer on the bike, having had the chance to ride a number of new-to-me trails that I'd happily trade a close family member to ride just one more time, but our route down Khyber Pass sits at the top of my ''to do again'' list.
Photography by Sterling Lorencewww.trekbikes.comStay tuned for a full review of the Session 9.9
Most guys (non pro) on a 28 lb bike vs Gwinn on a 48 lb bike - I'd still give it to Gwinn. Make sense?
Last of all, I weigh 190 pounds, so all my 150-170 pound buddies are already toting around 40 less pounds than me. I've never ridden a really light dh bike, so I'm wondering if anyone out there really has experience in this.
PS Rember trek bikes back in 2006? How ugly and how much they sucked? Now i think that the session is the hottest looking bike out there. What a turnaround.
But all in all I think alot of Pinkbike users take weight way too seriously. IMO anyone who isn't competing on a pro/world class level (where those weight differences can actually make a difference) and says that weight is a serious factor for them, just care about bragging rights and industry hype. Because when your enjoying the ride on your favorite trail I can bet the last thing on your mind is how that X9 derailleur or coil shock is weighing you down and that it would be soo much better with an XO and Vivid Air.
If you are, you're doing it wrong
There's a lot of cool stuff in this article, but the main thing I'm taking away is that a handlebar mustache looks great on the trails.
Licence/license is the same: My licence proves I am licensed to drive.
I am assuming where you said Scratch, you meant Slash? Just a tad confusing...
I've done that with 170mm 66rc2x, now I have Lyrik U turn. I don't feel problems on downhills with 160 fork, bike doesn't hold me back in any situation I throw it into. Low & slack trail bike is what I find to be the future of amateur gravity riding, much better than a bunch of ppl riding for fun on DH racing rigs. But lowbb high cockpit & slack ht with next to no compromise to uphilling is a marketing fairytale, just as if someone suddenly found this perfect geometry that was right there all the time and we were all blind not to see it.
It is a lot about own preference, but actual difference between 180mm up front and 160 talas dropped to 120 is huge. I can imagine though that 180 talas set to 140 is still at acceptable if someone really feels that 160 travel and this 1 deg of ha less is stopping him from shredding big time
There's more than a few of us...
Yeah, I could probably get by with a 160 fork and a steeper setup, but why? Why on earth would I want to compromise my DH performance so I could pedal a little better? I'd much rather have the DH gains from 20mm extra travel and a slacker setup than get the uphill gains from 20mm less travel and a steeper HT angle. To me, then thought seems ludicrous, but hey, to each their own
The seat tube angle is about 74deg with 180mm fork and 75 with 160mm. It's steeper than my old hardtail and i can feel the difference in pedaling.
The bar height (from the ground), is exactly the same like my old Enduro SL 2008 model (150mm in front) and level with the saddle in full pedaling position. All these in static mode, in dynamic the more sag of 180mm fork, put me even more (a little bit), in lower position. So no problem at all in technical uphill terrain. Maybe with the fork in 160mm it's still easier, but the difference is very small.
The longer wheelbase and heavier fork almost equals the slacker angle, so the "wandering effect" in steep uphill situations, is about the same. I love my "cockpit"...
Also homeboy's tattoo is proof that if life's about decisions he made a wrong one.
I mean I'm not complaining, the 09 Remedy is my steed of choice.
09 Remedy's seem to attract a premium used price right now, and perhaps Trek are admitting that moving it to more 'xc trail' was a bit of a mistake?
Anyway, both of these bikes look damn near perfect. 2 new models that hit the 'best in catagory' award straight away. Trek are THE company to beat this year.
Thanks for proving my point so well.
Anyway, if that particular made-up marketing term doesn't fit with your last ride, then I'm sure you can coin a whole new one for us.
Slash seems to be a "Nu-school" version of Remedy, just like Stumpy vs Stumpy Evo. It's like Remedy is for those who are old enough that they want a Mercedes, but youngsters prefer Porsche for the same money. It is a more descent friendly bike comparing to Remedy, at the same time less ascent friendly for sure. I think it's just been made aside of Remedy, so that downhillers feel that they have their own trail bike.
I mean, if you put a fixed travel 160 fork on Remedy, that means you are a lot into descending as your cockpit height and headangle are definitely not uphill friendly, they make a hard job even harder. So you might as well get a bike that is slacker and has lower BB.
The slash (which I have yet to ride, will be riding it on the 15th and 16th), is meant to be "downhill/XC" thus the name slash. just by looking at the geo. I don't think that would be my weapon of choice for any AM riding, I'd stick with my Remedy 9.7. However, I'm still keeping an open mind and dieing to ride it in a week or so!
And @britt-100, I put the 36 on my bike because my 32 Talas (stock fork)was leaking oil and I got hooked up with that, it's heavier and more of a big hit fork but I really love it. as for climbing with the fork, it's not as easy as on my S-fly hardtail lol but I can get the job done. Not much of a speed machine up the hill. it's only about a half inch difference for the fork travel, so it isn't impossible to climb, just slower.
overall, my 2011 Remedy 9.7 is an AM machine, and I don't think my rig or the Slash would be suitable for XC riding. it's very nimble but still a big travel bike.
Sorry, Mike, but as a rider of all wheel sizes, including that of the 20" variety, I wonder why you feel like you have to take a shot at BMX. Sounds to me like you're like a large number of mountain bikers who have never ridden BMX for a variety of reasons, most of which boil down to not having the cajones. Don't you think it's interesting that many of the people who have and now do dominate the sport of mountain biking ALL have had BMX backgrounds? Gwin, Peat, Lopes, Berrecloth, Kintner, Carter, Chausson, Tomac to name a few. All of these "kids" love to ride bikes, regardless of how big their wheels are and each of them probably do get out on the 20 from time to time.
Kidding. You can find it on the trail maps. It's a bit of a pain to get to.
www.enve.com/handlebars/mtb.aspx
Edit - in the first vid
but does it blend?
*troll face
Also - noticed Gwin is wearing a Bell MX helmet. Not the "Drop" helmet.
BTW - some people were wondering about how much change Trek has made in last few years. Thats because when Lance was riding in the Tours they didn't pay attention too much to MTB. Now the big dogs realized they are missing out. Build a new factory out in Cali, hired a bunch of young smart engineers and tada... here we are today.
What we are given these days are ready solutions, things that few years back were fixed by switching some components. People get obsessed with low BB hype, I mean I can't even understand that people believe in a miracle of low BB geometry. Previously you put a big fork on a Am bike, the BB went up. Now they make bikes with BB height nearly the same for 5" bike as for 6" bike - hello! where do people think the travel goes? - Imagination land? - no it means that near bottom out your BB is lower than on "old school" bikes. It all dependson trails you ride, if it's deamn rocky New school bikes might not be the best choice. The only major positive difference in modern geo is actualy seat tube angle, as older bikes, when getting slacker due to the bigger fork, were getting stupid seat angles