This week we review the Ranger, Wilderness Trail Bike's all-purpose Plus tire that can be had in either a 2.8-inch or 3.0-inch carcass, and in all three popular wheel diameters: 29, 27.5 and 26 inches. Its small tread blocks are pointy to help shed mud, and its flexible casing should make for a bump-smoothing, fast rolling tire. WTB says that, "the Ranger has taken the widest range of terrain and conditions into account, resulting in a tire that rolls fast, hooks up to all your local trails, willingly sheds mud and outdoes itself in both wet and dry."Details:• Purpose: all-condition trail and back-country touring
• Width: 2.8" or 3.0" (stated)
• Wheel size options: 26", 27.5" and 29"
• Suggested rim width: 30 to 45mm Plus widths
• Tubeless ready: Yes
• Configuration tested: TCS Light, High Grip, 27.5" x 2.8"
• Weight: 848 grams (actual)
• MSRP: $67.95 USD
• Contact:
WTB,
@wilderness-trail-bikes WTB has been cranking out new tire designs at a rate that suggests that the California design group is gunning for the likes of Maxxis and Schwalbe. It may take a while before WTB earns the title of, "the most blacked-out tire in World Cup DH and enduro competition," but they were founding members of the Plus bike movement and got a head start on a fresh trend that is presently the only growth market spurring sales of authentic mountain bikes. Innovative wheel and tire technology will be the keystones of Plus, and WTB's knowledge and experience could give them an advantage should Plus go mainstream, as some insiders predict it will.
Meet the Ranger 27.5 x 2.8 TCS Light, High GripWTB has a mind-numbing naming protocol, based upon casing stiffness and rubber compounds that would take a separate article to introduce, so all I'll say is: the Ranger tires tested here fit 27.5-inch rims, (preferably, 30- to 40-millimeters wide). The version we asked for was the smaller-option, 2.8-inch width, and the configuration sent to us was the TCS Light, High Grip, which means that it is tubeless-ready, it has the lighter of WTB's two casing options, and uses their grippiest rubber compound (Gravity DNA Rubber). Our Ranger tires weighed 854 grams and came with an MSRP of $67.95 USD.
The Ranger's voluminous, lightweight casing and minimal-looking tread pattern defies the current enduro-inspired trend, which embraces rigid, two-ply DH casings, topped with rows of large blocks of sticky, low-rebound rubber. Both, however, will get you stopped, accelerated, and around corners with remarkable speed and precision, but in entirely different ways. Enduro tires are like cat's claws, you force them deep into the soil, ripping and slashing your way around the trail using flashy power moves. The Ranger is like a soft Gecko's paw, lined with dozens of small grippers. The tire molds itself around the trail surface and grips tenaciously, with much less fanfare.
The larger, softer casing spreads the weight of the bike and rider over a larger area, and thus cannot concentrate pressure on a large, single tread block like a DH tire is designed to do. So, WTB reduced the size of the Ranger's tread blocks and gave them pointy tops and sharp edges to help push them into the surface. WTB says that the smaller, pointed blocks also shed mud quite well - a ray of hope for anyone who has slogged uphill pushing Plus-width tires that were fouled by mud.
Rather than relying on one row of stiff edging blocks for traction, the Ranger's side tread becomes more concentrated to build up grip as the tire is leaned over. The row of edging blocks that WTB designed is well reinforced, and they protrude beyond the tire carcass (a necessity, it turns out) to encourage the tire to jump out of ruts - and to prevent it from slipping down the sidewall on steep, off-camber rocks and roots.
The crown tread of the Ranger is slightly raised, presumably, to reduce the contact patch slightly so it will roll faster on smooth or hard-pack surfaces. I'm not a fan of any tire with raised center ridges, because they usually give the ride quality a dull and less responsive feel, but such was not the case with these tires. The initial sense, after airing them up and checking for optimum pressure, was that they were fast rolling and more energetic than expected.
Riding the RangersWTB's Ranger 2.8-inch Ranger Light, High Grips replaced a set of 2.8-inch Maxxis Ikon tires, which mirror the Ranger's key design points, with smaller, widely-spaced tread blocks and a lightweight, flexible carcass. The Maxxis Ikons were a disappointment from the outset - falling short on durability, rolling efficiency and cornering grip. The uncanny resemblance gave me good reason to expect that the Ranger would suffer the same fate.
The review got off to a promising start as the Rangers mounted up easily to Sun Ringle Duroc 40 rims. Plus tires are not very stiff, so getting tubeless tire beads to side up to 40-millimeter-width rims can become an inflationeer's headache. I used a Topeak Joe Blow Booster pump to air them up and Stan's Race Sealant to keep them that way. The WTB tires look much more aggressive when mounted up (if I dare use that term for Munchkin-size tread blocks), which also boosted my hopes for a good first ride. I began the review sessions with my default pressures for 2.8-inch tires: 14 psi up front and 18 in the rear. Later, I discovered that the Rangers rolled faster and were more stable in rough corners at 18 and 20 psi respectively.
One 50-minute lap on my home test course was enough to squelch any doubts that the Ranger might be a repeat performance of the previous tires. I was often pedaling a gear higher on the smoother hardpack segments, and the Intense ACV they were mounted to felt more energetic everywhere. On pavement, the raised center section made a dramatic improvement in reducing its rolling resistance. It pedaled like a good mountain bike should.
Plus bikes tend to have massive braking traction up front when descending steeply, while rear-wheel traction is often below norms - especially on bare rock. Here the WTB Ranger was better than most - probably assisted by its stickier DH rubber compound. It was no Schwalbe Magic Mary, but I never found reason to question its grip in the rear. Traction up front however, was foolishly abundant under braking, to the extent that I had to re-acquaint myself with my standard-tire trail bike to keep from washing the front tire on steeps and corner entries.
It actually did rain while testing, and to WTB's credit, the Rangers did not pack any more mud than your typical Maxxis Minion or High Roller II - less, if you factor in the reduced knob height, and they self cleaned quite well. The side blocks found grip on slippery rocks and off-camber trail segments that stymied previous plus tires, and the rain also created plenty of deep ruts with which to test the Ranger's edging abilities. later, after the ruts hardened up, I learned that I could trust the rangers to give me an out option when I needed to plant my wheels into the maw of a big one.
Saving the best for last, I was dutifully impressed by the Ranger's cornering grip, How those tiny teeth find grip is beyond reason, but they do - on shifty gravel, slick rock, silty stream beds, and everything in between , I can't speak for how well the Rangers could grip on drippy Northwestern tree roots, but they are well suited for Southwestern trails. I rarely hit a corner without thinking afterwards that I could have gone in a little harder, because when they broke traction, the bike would still be gripping hard enough to burn off speed - and then it would crank around the turn like nothing happened. They douse the persistent notion that all plus tires wobble under hard cornering and bounce all over the trail at speed. Evidently, those things don't occur when the pressures are right and the tire is matched to the correct rim width.
Summing it All UpAs glowing a review as this was, WTB's 2.8-inch Rangers are not for everyone. I didn't slash a sidewall, but I would be remiss not to warn aggressive types that a sub-900 gram Plus tire is not going to hold up to Mach-2 descents through rock gardens with 20 psi or less standing between you and disaster. That said, they held up well, with only a few near misses evident on the sidewalls and not a single flat over two months of riding. On that note, as long as you don't skid them up, WTB's Rangers are quite durable. Mine still look good, but riders who haven't figured out the front brake thing could burn through a back tire in one day of hard riding. For all-out performance, I'd place them close to the top of the Plus pile. As an all 'rounder, it can't top Schwalbe's Nobby Nic 2.8-inch, but it certainly fulfills WTB's promise of an excellent all-condition trail and touring tire.
Pinkbike's Take: | WTB's Ranger Plus tire is designed to showcase the best aspects of the genre. It is lightweight enough to float effortlessly above trail chatter and grippier than a Velcro skin suit on a terrycloth water-slide. The Ranger offers an extra measure of control and confidence in nearly every trail situation that one would encounter between the borders of cross country racing and enduro competition. WTB gets it. While some tire makers are erroneously scaling up heavy enduro tires to Plus proportions, WTB's more comprehensive approach to mid-size tire design suggests that Plus bikes might be the beginning of a something new, rather than an evolutionary branch of the weather-beaten all-mountain tree. - RC |
For example, when you are driving on the motorway, and a Prius is driving slow in the fast lane and slowing everyone down. It's really annoying when they don't understand that they should move over. When the slow Prius driver gets stuck behind even a slower Prius driver in the fast lane, that puts a smile on my face. The frustration that they must feel. Clinton just got slapped back into reality. The democratic party just got slapped back to reality. They do have stars on their side, but if they want to sweep them under the rug to push a flawed candidate, sometimes a slower prius driver will get in your way.
Just like Obama didn't take people's guns away, and he didn't bring Islamic Sharia Law, we will be okay under Trump, maybe even better under him than Hillary.
It's going to be frighteningly interesting. It will be worlds biggest reality show
Btw since this is a tire review - props to WTB for doing a 26" version.
holy shit that was funny. And true!
Awesome off-topic battin!
My earlier batin comment was from the movie idiocracy, they refer to whack off as 'batin lol
Weapon of choice:12"taser strapon."bend over and let me relieve you of your wanton desire for Taiwan bilge.
Let me inject you with polish 3k weave loveliness"
Script title? WAKIBRATOR.."I'll be back..in your crack.
Great to see 26" rims not dead even if frames are dying
Does not give hope for human survival and blame bad weather on acts of god rather than god like humans
Roll on American civil war
So yea I'm sick of this stupid Trump debate. Each president in modern world is a clown at the service of big business and gets entangled in the web of interconnected interests. They talk sht because they have to show as if they were doing something.
daisyluther.com/an-open-letter-to-snowflakes-who-are-melting-in-the-streets-because-trump-won
You can not claim Trump being anti science - as all the climate models are indeed flawed, and keep blocking nuclear power development.
All those carbon credit scheme is a scam to make money and impose more taxes. If you care about long term energy needs - fund nuclear research.
So no, I don't think that the coal lobby is the source of evil ruining the planet. That is a fkng retarded thing to say. Not sure if you meant that
If you do not understand that, you are another brainwashed snowflake.
You basically talk like a preacher outlining the sources of sin... sounds like a regular FB activist drivel. Sounds like sht people say explaining why a particular football team is the best and why did they win/lose. Recreational pseudo-expertism.
And well, it is rather quick to check what are the causes of global warming and coal although being the big player is nowhere close to be the biggest. Off course unless you believe that coal lobby is corrupting sources like wikipedia.
BTW I am very positive towards nuclear fusion... I even like nuclear weapons. Not sure about the future generation of atomic weapons though... large yield, low radiation. Makes pulling a trigger much easier. On the edge of getting into the age of fusion and AGI
we cannot be sure of anything. One thing I can bet though. Politics is a game, a necessary show, so that every now and then, we move a bit forward while big and powerful eat their cake. You have no fkng clue what you talk about because you cannot, since you are at the bottom of the food chain. If you sat in the board of Exxon you could school people. But you are just a peace of dust trying to connect the constantly changing multi-dimensional puzzle - like all of us here.
There is nothing political about those facts. Those are facts.
Stop the climate whining and fund nuclear physics research instead.
Those who know about those issues, they understand.
ok lets talk about facts: I made a 5 minute sweep of google: According to various sources: Electricity and heat production emits between 21% and 25% of total greenhouse gases. When looking at energy production, according to various sources I found that coal stands for between 37 and 41% of Earths tot al energy production. That gives a total contribution of coal burning emissions to around 10%. That is less than transportation (12-14%) or agriculture (10-14%). So no, coal isn't the main factor and nuclear is not goign to save us. I could post you the sources of my info, but I thought that in order to become a better human being you could learn to do the simpliest of research (I have no fkng clue who gave you your facts on the reach of evils of coal) and check for yourself if these were biased by coal lobby. Coal is fkd up but you are demonizing it.
What interests me though is that Republicans have coal money in their pockets, while Obama was having his war on coal... Aren't you supporting the wrong cause? You see it doesn't hurt to google, instead of listening to some politician jerk who has not fkng clue what he is talking about. His only worry is to keep the polls numbers in check.
One thing is sure: please take my advice: everyone who tells you that he knows who destroys the world and he knows a solution to make world better is full of crap and please don't listen to him.
IE - All the bad pollution he kept showing in that movie was just harmless water vapor. Don't believe the Sierra Club statistics/spin.
And most of the pollution is from China.
Never forget
Its comon knowledge that in an Enduro racing format, the narrow tires perform better and roll faster.
THE PODIUM DOESN'T LIE.
When 2.8 tires start winning world cups we will revisit the issue.
Richie Rude, last year's and the current EWS champion rides on 2.5 minions .
On the no so technical tracks , 2.3 and 2.5
For real @RichardCunningham? Their naming convention seems pretty straight forward to me: light/tough casings; fast rolling/high grip rubber.
Now, compare that to double down, 3c, maxxterra, trailstar, vertstar, snakeskin, etc. that don't tell you anything at all unless you learn what the nomenclature is for that company...
I only ran the Ranger for a month. It was relatively light and definitely fast with low rolling resistance. I weigh about 190 and had to run the Ranger with 15f/18r psi to keep it from feeling squirrely for general rowdy trail riding. But even at those pressures I'd get an occasional rim strike. In general I did not experience the cornering traction that was referenced in this review. I also did not have any favorable experiences in wet or muddy terrain with the Ranger. They did climb very well and had amazingly low rolling resistance which was super fun on the downs. They were a good tire most of the time, light and fast but there were several situations that they left me wanting more traction. Just so its noted, mine were a different compound and were mounted on a more narrow rim (i30 vs i40) than the ones reviewed here. I wonder if my experiences would have been a lot different with the DNA rubber and/or a wider rim? That all said I did enjoy the tire enough that it solidified my decision to keep my bike converted from a 29 to the B+ format, just with more aggressive tires. Its because its a 29 to B+ conversion that I cant run anything wider than a 2.8 on a i30 rim in the frame though.
So I changed out the Ranger for the Rekon and I am much happier now. I can run the Rekon at 11.5f/16.5r psi on rooty trails with small jumps and drops with no issues. 10f/15r if the ride is more casual. I think I ran them at 17-18f/22r psi at Highland and Killington. I find the Rekon to be much better in the corners both with their sidewall support strength and useful cornering knobs. The Rekon rolls well but they do feel to me like they roll a bit slower than the Ranger, but its very minor. The Rekons are also some of the best tires I've ever rode in wet and muddy conditions.
I can also say that after a month and about 100 miles the Rangers were looking very beat up and the rear had significant wear for such a short period of time. Maybe because I wasn't using the front brake enough as RC suggested in his review. I have spent over twice the time and miles on the Rekon and they look way less worn. I think in the future I will run a 3C Rekon front just for that little added tack on hard wet surfaces like rock faces, roots and bridges.
Once you go (mid) fat, you don't go back!
This tire is 70g lighter than the new e*thirteen 2.35s, in similar compound.
Well I guess I'll still buy the new DHR II in 26x2.8 seeing as it is 400g lighter than a Magic Mary 2.5 with DH casing!
"Just grab them by the pusssy and you can do anything!!"