I'd been itching to take
Trek's new Slash 29 out for a ride ever since the veil of secrecy surrounding it was lifted at the beginning of June. The Slash is one of those bikes that looks fast standing still, a carbon fiber beast poised and ready to pounce and devour its unsuspecting prey. On paper, the numbers are positively drool-inducing: 29” wheels, 150mm of rear travel matched with a 160mm fork, 434mm chainstays, and a slack 65-degree head angle.
As luck would have it, Trek had a few Slash 29s on hand at Crankworx Whistler, and I was able to take one out for some quality time on some of the best trails in the world. 'Best in the world' isn't a phrase I toss around lightly, but when it comes to the gems that are hidden in the woods surrounding Whistler, it's entirely true.
ClimbingThe ride started with a steep climb up the side of Blackcomb Mountain, a fire road grind that's full of loose gravel, perfectly placed to cause rear tires to spin out and riders to curse, especially under the merciless heat of the summer sun. With the Float X2 in the full open position, out of the saddle climbing is met with a fair bit of bobbing, but that's where the shock's little blue lever comes in handy. It's easy to reach, and once it's turned to the firmest position any unwanted movement is drastically reduced. There's still enough shock movement to allow the rear wheel to absorb bumps and stay planted to the ground, but the increased compression damping makes the bike feel much more efficient on the climbs.
Even though the Fox 36 TALAS can be switched dropped down to 130mm of travel from 160mm, I never felt the need to reduce the amount of travel – I was perfectly comfortable spinning away with it in the fully-extended setting. There are some riders that swear by dual-position forks, but I'm not one of them – I find that the weight shift caused by the lowered front end makes climbing feel more, not less, difficult. Because the climb was mainly on a chewed up dirt road, I can't comment on the Slash's handling on tighter, more technical climbs, but once we get our hands on one for a long-term test there will be plenty of tricky ascents in its future.
DescendingOnce the climb was over it was time to reap the reward – a descent down the same terrain used for the recent Enduro World Series, full of steep straightlines, loose turns, and enough roots and rocks to keep it interesting – exactly the stuff the Slash 29 was designed for. As aggressive as its geometry numbers are, the Slash was surprisingly nimble in the tighter sections of trail. It's certainly happiest plowing through anything and everything at warp speed, but it'll also whip around sharper corners without putting up a fuss. Compared to the Nukeproof Mega 290, the Slash is less demanding to ride - it doesn't require as much muscle to get through slower speed sections of trail. There's a very satisfying amount of grip in the corners, and even in the looser, dustier portions of trail I was able to push hard with minimal loss of traction.
The Slash proved itself on that particular trail, but I was still curious about how it would do in a bike park setting, so I headed over to the lift to find out. It turns out the Slash is no slouch hitting jumps either, and in fact, I preferred its handling to that of the 2017 Trek Remedy I'd been riding the previous day. The slacker head angle and slightly longer wheelbase (not to mention the bigger wheels) made the Slash feel more stable, with trail manners that were more reminiscent of a downhill bike than a trail bike.
More to ComeNow, half a day on a bike is just starting to scratch the surface, and there are plenty of questions that will require more ride time to figure out, including how the Slash 29 handles on techy climbs and slower, less steep descents. Is this a one trick pony, suited only to the gnarliest terrain around, or is there enough depth to its handling to make it a feasible option for less aggressive riders, or those who don't have the wild trails of British Columbia in their backyards? Keep an eye out for a long term review later this year.
Visit the gallery for high resolution and additional images.
carbon vs ally = lighter
Properly tuned Fox vs not really tuned Rockshox
Looks may be subjective but this looks (like a session) awesome.
The geometry between the two is remarkably similar but the Nuke has nice big chainstays, though I dare say that most will prefer the Treks 430 over the Nukes 450 (not me personally). I get your comment on the jewellery but from what I can tell this bike is just a cut above my own although they are based at different price points and while I'd chose the Mega again I admire the Trek for what looks to be broad all round capability - not just at the gnar end of the spectrum.
That Slash looks like a great bike but just as some hardocre 26" ripper, if setup badly, with wrong tyre choice, it can be just another bike out there.
Nukeproof Mega 290
Trek Slash 29
Specialized McDuro 2017
Intense Carbine 29 replacement (to be announced soon)
All badass....
Also, with current tyres like Maxxis Minion in maxxgrip you can literally endo at speed in the midst of a tight corner without the front slipping. It is insane how good bikes are today compared to 5 years ago, and how good and accessible are learning tools for anyone wanting to excel at riding. Not to mention how many strength training programs for MTBers are now out there, sht non contaminated with some roadie science. You can take a monster like that Slash and climb anything on it, then smash the downhill almost like a DH bike. You no longer need to compromise and get a short travel bike with whimpy light tyres because you feel you need to be able to tackle those climbs somehow, and then hold back on descents.
Santa Cruz doesn't give into bullshit trends. They set the trend the nomad is a great example. Every enduro bike that has come out recently, the pivot firebird even this week has basically copy pasted the nomads geometry. How can you say they are not innovators? They made the market what it is now.
Just saying that all the new bikes of the last few years are iterations of the old.
Eg 2011 Tallboy - gamechanger.
2012 and the TBLTC comes out and is a gamechanger.
Erm, since then, no game changers.
Evil are far more innovative.... I wouldn't day SC set trends 'anymore'. They did, but not anymore. Until recently they had the longest chainstays in the business for example.
Don't get me wrong, the combination of vpp (possibly the most efficient rear sus design for climbing and not bad at all for descending) and slick brand management is a winner for SC. i just feel like they are in cash cow mode now.
Intense, Evil and dare I say it, even trek are thinking outside the SWAT-hole!
I think the X-country people will now need a bigger wheel size. Could this be the beggining of the end for 650b?
Someone send me a poster of it for my wall, it's the only way I will be able to have it in my bike room. ????
found a picture of another slash where it's correct: www.pinkbike.com/photo/13725168
but, who says 29 dh bikes are not coming? if its good enough for enduro...
Enjoy your superior heat.
(being a troll seems like really hard work)
I don't know sh*t about hot weather. When I think I've got it bad riding in 105F and humid weather I'll remember those poor souls pedaling their bikes surrounded by snow capped mountains and ice cold mountain streams, because those sons of bitches KNOW what heat is.
Also I'm a Trump supporter?..
And I wasn't resorting to insults, I was simply mocking someone's uninformed conclusion that Canada has merciless heat.
It's Canadia and not Canada.
Kilimanjaro's got snow on it, so Kenya couldn't possibly be hot, right? amiright?
You ride a bike: IMO, you're already 100 IQ points higher than any Trump 'tard.
Don't mistake Canada's higher latitude for automatically meaning there are 10 months of ice and snow. The widely varying topography and sheer size of the North American continent bordered by three oceans makes massive differences in localized weather patterns. Sometimes shit further south is cooler and sometimes it's hotter than places further north.
But hey, what do I know, I'm just a Canadia-ian.
(I was just being sarcastic about the whole house on the sun thing. Many people are saying it's not habitable for humans.)
I cannot wait to hear more