From DH Bikes to Super Boots: Randoms - Interbike 2015

Sep 18, 2015 at 8:13
by Mike Kazimer  
Norco Interbike 2015
There's an aluminum version of Norco's Aurum 650B on the way. The 7.1 (shown) will retail for $3885 USD, and the base model 7.2 will go for $2985. Both bikes have 200mm of travel via Norco's A.R.T rear suspension, their take on a Horst Link design.


Norco Revolver
Looking for an XC speed machine? The Revolver is Norco's new 100mm carbon fiber race weapon. The 9XX model shown retails for $7145 USD.


Norco Range
The 160mm Range remains relatively unchanged for 2016, although it now get a 170mm fork up front to make it even more of an all-mountain menace.


100 Interbike 2015
The top four versions of the Ride 100% Aircraft helmet will be arriving this November, followed by the lower four colors in March 2016. The carbon/Kevlar shelled helmet will retail for $400 USD, with a $50 upcharge for the chrome color options


100 Interbike 2015
The Aircraft uses 25 vents to maximize the amount of airflow, and also has emergency release cheek pads to help medical personnel remove the helmet without moving the rider too much.
100 Interbike 2015
The helmet will be available in five sizes, from XS to XL, with a a weight of 1000 to 1080 grams depending on the shell size.



Norco Torrent
Add Norco to the growing list of manufacturers offering a 27.5+ option. The aluminum Torrent has a relatively slack head angle of 67 degrees and rolls on 3.0" tires. Riders interested in the Torrent 7.1 shown, which has a SRAM GX 1x11 drivetrain and a 130mm RockShox Yari fork will need to set aside $2425 USD.


Maxxis Aggressor
Maxxis' Aggressor is designed to be an all-rounder, usable for everything from trail to all-mountain riding. There are two versions, one with Maxxis' EXO sidewall protection, and the other with their new extra-reinforced Double Down casing. Both options measure 27.5 x 2.3".


Interbike 2015
I wish helmets looked this cool when I was a kid. Bell's Ramble helmet is multisport certified, available in three colors, and even comes with a sticker kit for $60 USD.


Interbike 2015
Jamis is making a push into the all-mountain / enduro segment with their 160mm Defcon.


Interbike 2015
7iDP's Transition knee pads now come in a wraparound version that can be taken on and off without removing your shoes.
Interbike 2015


Interbike 2015
7iDP are also expanding their glove collection, with a wide range of colors and styles.


Garmin Interbike 2015
Garmin's Edge 520 GPS computer can display live Strava segments, and can be paired up with other components to display Shimano's Di2 electronic shifting information, heart rate, power, and more.


Novatec Interbike 2015
Novatec's Demon wheelset is aimed at DH and enduro racers. The 26" or 27.5"rims have been redesigned, and now have rounder profile and an internal width of 25.8mm. $829 USD.


Novatec Interbike 2015
The hubs on the Demon wheelset have a quick 4.8 degrees of engagement, and are available for most axle standards, including Boost.


Interbike 2015
7Mesh's Northwoods jacket is a light and packable wind resistant layer for keeping the elements at bay on those brisk fall days. $149 USD.


Blackburn Interbike 2015
The Blackburn Wayside multi-tool has 19 functions, and includes removable hex keys to help get to those hard to reach spots. There's even a tool to help hold your chain together when fixing a broken link. $34.99 USD.


Light and Motion Interbike 2015
Night riding season is coming, and Light and Motion have a plenty of choices for chasing the dark away. They've teamed up with Bar Fly to integrate their light underneath a computer mound, decreasing the amount of handlebar clutter. They also have light mounting options that integrate with a GoPro mount.


Osprey Interbike 2015
Osprey's Viper and Verve packs are now available in a smaller version that has 3 liters of cargo capacity, just enough room to carry a few tools and a small jacket.


Yakima Interbike 2015
Yakima have a new aerodynamic steel crossbar that's is said to decrease wind noise and help preserve a car's fuel efficiency.


Ohlins Interbike 2015
Ohlins haven't officially announced their new air shock yet, but it will be appearing on select models of Specialized's Enduro 29 and 650B. It uses a single tube design, and like the coil sprung TTX22 has adjustable rebound and low speed compression, as well as a lever that allows riders to select between three high speed compression settings. The second Schrader valve is proprietary to Specialized, part of their AutoSag system that simplifies setting up the shock's sag.


SKF Interbike 2015
In addition to manufacturing seals for Ohlin's suspension and RockShox's new Lyrik, SKF provides the oil seals for the FOX 36. The seal on the right is the most current version for the 36, which has a layer of metal around the bottom to ensure that it stays firmly in place even under higher pressures.


Bionic Boots Interbike 2015
I'm not sure how this guy got past security, but he was bounding around on his Bionic Boots like a lost superhero.


Author Info:
mikekazimer avatar

Member since Feb 1, 2009
1,736 articles

113 Comments
  • 102 6
 Those 100% helmets are rad, the competition should be worried.
  • 12 90
flag Circe (Sep 18, 2015 at 8:52) (Below Threshold)
 Too bad the only thing it has going for it is good looks. It has literally no safety technology, which is why brands like Bell, POC, and Kali will get me money instead.
  • 38 1
 "The Aircraft meets ASTM Downhill and BMX standards while complying with ASTM, CPSC, CE, and AS / NZ bicycle standards." www.ride100percent.com/mountainbike
  • 13 0
 Actually it does if you read about it.
  • 6 48
flag mxben13 (Sep 18, 2015 at 9:28) (Below Threshold)
 They should exceed ratings. They are trying to much to look like a fox helmet.
  • 15 2
 Holy crap, Circe... Some people are so utterly clueless about helmet safety that it boggles my mind.
  • 7 0
 The only thing I wonder is which are the top 4 helmets and which are the bottom 4 the caption was mentioning Cool
  • 2 1
 Will it not protect your brain bucket?
  • 7 19
flag onemanarmy FL (Sep 18, 2015 at 13:28) (Below Threshold)
 Competition should be worried? They're not doing anything groundbreaking...
  • 2 8
flag Ceasy FL (Sep 18, 2015 at 13:52) (Below Threshold)
 but 50$ for the chromecolors?!? For fu45n 50 bucks I cover that whole thing with beatGOLD!
  • 15 0
 People these days think that a helmet without MIPS or other fancy techno for some reason isn't safe anymore... 0.o
  • 12 5
 Hole crap is right @Ka-brap. Some people really are dense about helmet technologies.

The 100% uses technology that is over 70 years old. It's literally a carbon fiber beer cooler for your head with some rad colors.

When I spend $400 on a helmet, I want multiple density foams, anti rotational systems, and materials to address low g impact.

Go look at what Leatt is doing with their new helmet than tell me the 100% helmet is doing anything more innovative than a chrome finish.
  • 2 1
 airoh is the best!
  • 3 0
 @Circe - nonetheless, all of those wonder inventions are truly good for the same, single impact. Multiple-impact claims are super scary because there is no way to truly know how many multiple impacts your helmet can sustain before it is unsafe (regardless of Poc's blinking light) and it could be unsafe after one big impact. How do you really know? All multiple impact claims do is build up a false sense of security because you could be riding with a toasted helmet while thinking it will still protect you. MIPS technology has yet to be proven by an independent 3rd party- all test results come directly from the company selling the feature, so believe that all you want for now.

Concerning low-g impacts, this is something that I do agree is a cool feature but as far as I am aware there is no test that specifically measures this. So any claims are just claims for now.
  • 4 0
 @ka-brap "multiple impact" occur during a single crash.
Every time you crash on your head, you have to change the helmet, nothing is different.
  • 3 0
 @faul you're right, "multiple impact" CAN occur during a single crash, but not necessarily during every single crash and not necessarily in the same repeated area of the helmet. Companies that promote "multiple impact" helmets (in both winter and summer sports) say that their helmets can withstand multiple impacts in the same area and this is what is potentially dangerous for riders. The foam in multiple impact helmets generally relies on some sort of re-expansion of compressed foam that can again absorb a future impact. But how much the foam can rebound and fully absorb another impact is what is unknown in every crash. That's why the best and safest approach (with any helmet) is that you have a crash where you say to yourself "wow, I'm glad I had my helmet on for that one" is to replace the helmet and start fresh with an uncompromised helmet.
  • 3 1
 You misunderstand the concept of multi-impact. Think dropping a watermelon in a helmet off your roof, straight down, perhaps into a bucket. That's single impact.

Now go find another imaginary watermelon, put a new helmet on it and hurl it down your stairs or a nearby hill. That's what multi impact protects for; multiple impacts during the same crash. Think headfirst into a tree: single impact, tomahawking down the steepest pat of your local DH track bashing your head repeatedly on many things: multi impact.

Either way your helmet is hosed after one crash. It just might not be totally useless after the first impact within that crash. Additionally, just because you've only hit your head once in a given crash doesn't mean a multi impact lid is good for another. The term multi impact would actually be better understood if the sticker said "probably won't disintegrate instantly".
  • 3 0
 @tinfoil while your two examples aren't incorrect, your second example more aptly describes multiple single-impacts that affect the helmet in different areas. The example which I described needs to also be included (the one where you specifically sustain repetitive impacts in the same area of the helmet) and this is also how brands, including POC, refer to multiple impact.

Click on the "technology guide" section: www.pocsports.com/en/14/wheels-helmets
  • 3 0
 100% only cares about something being cool....highly doubt they give a rats ass about the actual safety aspect of new technology like most brands are doing. Their approach is to make stuff flashy and "stoke" people out. They give 100% effort to marketing and probably 10% to actual innovation in helmet tech. Also, why do we need another helmet brand....really, there aren't enough helmet brands already?!?!
  • 1 0
 @ka-brap That is a rather vaguely worded description isn't it? You're right, your example does fit under it. I can tell you though that when I used to ski race for POC there was no way they would have ever signed off on us reusing a helmet that had been crashed in, no matter what the marketing says. Take from that what you will.
  • 49 4
 My God, to have a bike expensive enough to have an Ohlins shock and still need an auto-sag valve to get in the neighborhood of the right amount of sag.
  • 42 6
 norco rocks there shit is sick
  • 29 2
 Norco rocks, THEIR shit is sick. FTFY
  • 30 0
 Punctuation is pretty fucking cool too.
  • 16 4
 Norco rox, They're shit is sic (sorry couldn't resist!!)
  • 4 1
 I´ve ridden Norco since the Aurum got his release. My Girlfriend rides a Range and an Oldschool 4X(XXXX) Fully. This Bike is awesome. And now i´ve ordered my Aurum carbon. The frame and the feeling of the bike is perfect. You can ride hard DH Tracks and u can have some fun on the freeride track.
Btw when u buy a Norco, you´ll buy some Piece of Canada...... and thats the best Part of it!
  • 1 0
 @b45her: a*shole
  • 20 3
 Keen to try the new maxxis. Been begging for rear with a decent rolling tread and a strong carcass for ages. Ardents are to flimsy and high rollers and minions to draggy. Hopefully this is the sweat spot for me
  • 7 0
 Seen the Maxxis Tomahawk? ardent-like center with burly sides and comes in their new DD casing. Works pretty well in socal...
  • 22 10
 Just dont be a Maxxis Adict. So many other tire brands with so much diferent tread desing.. Open your mind
  • 5 0
 Clearly he is looking for another Maxxis tread. I'm just pointing out that they have other new treads.
  • 7 28
flag hardyk FL (Sep 18, 2015 at 8:53) (Below Threshold)
 buy continental tires, problem fixed.
  • 9 5
 @hardyk it should be the other way around
  • 3 1
 @markg1150 - try the DHR2. I can't tell the difference in rolling speed between them and an Ardent but they grip a lot better. I tried an HR2 in the back as well and that thing DRAGS. The DHR2 rolls very quick though.
  • 2 1
 Yeah dude Im on board that tire looks sick, semi slicks are too sketchy in the wet
  • 4 2
 Thing is, Maxxis makes the best rubbers. @mudmandhbrazil I keep trying other stuff, Schwalbe, Conti, ect .... always come back. I have some new DHRII's that are killing it.
  • 4 2
 Mainly comes down to that around were i am maxxis are the easiest to get hold off, the longest lasting, and best suited. And I know they work. Tried conti few years ago hated them and they were to weak. Swalble are hard to get hold off don't last 5 mins and are heavy overall for anthing tough enough and are very expensive in comparison to maxxis. I'm looking at specialised butcher and control as possible future options to try .
  • 2 1
 Are you running them front and rear Darkstsr?
  • 3 2
 Yes trueeast front and rear in 3C DH case on my downhill bike. I love them. I run a TR version on the front of my trail bike. Excellent tread, like an improved version of the DHF, as if that was even possible.
  • 6 5
 correction, super tacky for DH 3C on my trail bike.
  • 7 1
 Sorry to whomever I offended sharing my tire experience with trueeast haha
  • 4 2
 I love Maxxis tires and also the DH tube. but I also love other brands. used more than 20 Maxxis tires in my DH bikes. tire choice is personal, look at some privetier racers using 2 diferent brands of tire on the bike. Maxxis is like iPhone people are adict to this brand that is a top product...was using Michelin DH tires back in 2000s and loved them now trying Schwalbe and I am completely in love with that tire knowing that wear fast. look at Magic Mary tires been blacked out by others racers that are sponsored from other brands. know I ride in my Demo a Minnion DHF in the back and a big 2.5 Mudy Mary in the front and love this cause it is big and works so great on DH trails I ride. know I bought a pair of Magic Mary and cant wait to try them. the important is ride the Mountain Bike and be hapy
  • 7 3
 There are other tires than Maxxis Minions...?
  • 6 5
 I don't care about your opinions
  • 2 1
 Man some people get so crazy in these comment sections...lol. Thanks Darkstar I just ordered some super tacky High Roller II's as I am making the jump to 650b on my DH bike. Been riding spesh Butchers for the last couple seasons and Magic Mary's before that, but the Shcwalbes didn't last long enough for $100 a tire. Went back to were I started and was a hard choice between the HR's and the DHR II's. Got a killer deal on them but next time I need tires gonna try the new DHR. Thanks for the reply.
  • 2 0
 im plannig to buy the Maxxis Shorty looks very good my friend is using on his 951 Evo 2.75 and said it is amazing on wet
  • 4 3
 @trueeast - bro, for the 3rd f*ckin time they're not a $100 tire. They're a $30-40 tire, you're just buying them in the wrong spot.

Concerning durability, what do you expect with soft rubber? It's a race tire. Race tires in ALL other sports (cars, motorcycles, etc) race tires don't last for shit. It's the price you pay for grip.
  • 2 1
 @Alias530

Shit man, I wish everyone understood that.
  • 3 3
 Relax bro I understand what your saying I just don't think you understand what I was originally asking Darkstar. When Magic Marry's first came out they where 99.99 I get a discount and knew they would wear quick. Sorry I'm not a pro Motorsport driver and get them for free. How about minding your own business, never asked you a question or your opinion. Damn man untuck your little buddy and go ride for Pete's sake.
  • 1 5
flag Alias530 (Sep 19, 2015 at 6:32) (Below Threshold)
 I made a comment about DHR2's then you responded to someone else who said basically the same thing as me AFTER my post, so you were essentially replying to me. Every time one of your little retard comments pops up I get a notification so I'm just sick of seeing that, checking the notification, and seeing more ignorant shit.
  • 2 2
 alias you need to lighten up a tad, if you don't want to be bothered by the internet don't play there. For what it's worth I think Maxis tacky compound holds up better than Schwalbe's and grips similarly. I think the Magic Mary is a great tire btw, but for me personally I like the predictabilty of the Maxxis and that likely has most to do with the fact I've been running Minions for like fifteen years so I'm used to them. Bottom line- all preference. I will agree that It is tiresome to hear people complain about expensive soft race tires not lasting more than a couple weekends of riding.
  • 2 1
 Wasn't replying to you. Chill bro it's all good...Wink
  • 10 1
 Those Norco Ranges look awesome, but I find the pricing on them a little insane.

I mean, it's not like $9000 for a full carbon bike is unheard of these days... but you'd think that if you're dropping almost 10G's on something, it'd at least come with a top of the line fork.

www.norco.com/bikes/mountain/enduro/range-carbon/range-c71

$9000 and you don't even get a kashima fork with full (HS and LS) compression adjustments? Seems like an odd choice.
  • 8 0
 Welcome to 2016 MSRPs with the current Canadian dollar
  • 11 2
 Man, if you're Garmin or some of those other companies making a $300+ special-purpose "bike computer", competing with perfectly adequate free apps, you've gotta be counting the days to the end.
  • 6 0
 Strava was a free app for me... until I crashed hard and taco'd my phone. I just bought the Garmin Edge 25... I'll report back after my first crash with it to see how it fares.
  • 14 3
 That Norco looks familiar...
  • 4 1
 ..
  • 5 0
 Can't quite put my finger on it but...
  • 12 1
 Call me crazy but that was one boring Interbike.
  • 3 2
 Agree, Eurobike was much better. Maybe all the good stuff was already shown there and they are coming up a little short looking for something different.
  • 3 1
 Eurobike was better if only for some of the ridiculous, over-the-top products. Gotta love all the PB outrage and hate!
  • 7 1
 13 years ago I had a Norco Torrent with 3.0 tires. Loved it. Obviously the geometry/technology was vastly different then (as was our desire to jump it off staircases into flat parkades) but it was a rad bike then and the new one looks great too. Glad to see Norco still relevent and making nice looking bikes (the Range included and on a short list for my next steed).
  • 1 0
 This bike seems pretty interesting. 67 head angle its a nice hard tail that you could run large or smaller tires on right?
  • 9 0
 Currently looking up prices on bionic bouncing boots
  • 7 0
 Dat range.......mmmmm. Shame that the ohlins stuffs is specialized only. Can't think of many brands I'd rather rather not own.
  • 9 1
 Thanks Novatec for the 26 respect.
  • 4 0
 Hope that new maxxis is available in the best wheel size too Wink
  • 6 2
 $800+ dollars for alloy Novatecs? I'm cool with dropping that coin (or more) for wheels but not for middle of the road Novatecs. I can think of a plethora of other wheels in that range or less that make more sense. Starting with Hope hubbed Stan's flow customs.
  • 10 4
 Somebody needs to tell Jamis bikes to stop what they are doing and just go home...that rocker is fugly
  • 2 0
 I wonder if they ever fixed their issue with chain stays snapping
  • 6 1
 We need the safety ratings for the 100% helmet!! We all know it looks sick, now how safe is it?
  • 70 2
 It's 100% safe
  • 7 4
 ^ stop right there, I'm filled to the brim with joy at your punnyness.
  • 5 0
 So why would I want mount my bar light under the bar, where all of the cables/hoses cross?
  • 6 0
 Maybe to make it more difficult to turn on/off?
  • 1 1
 You mount your bar light low and pointed to shine far. That way there will be less glare from dust kicked up by the rider in front of you.
  • 1 0
 I can never work out why nearly every wheel manufacturer out there insists on lacing their front wheels with the leading spokes both outside the flange, and their rear wheels leading one side, trailing the other. It is definitely the norm, but why?
  • 2 0
 totally guessing, but maybe because the rear wheel sees large forces in the pedaling direction, but the front wheel sees forces in the braking direction? Maybe a little better stability by having the stressed spokes just a couple millimeters further outboard. But like I said, total guess.
  • 4 2
 ummmm torque... drive torque for the rear freehub side, disc brake torque otherwise. The outside spokes have the widest effective cross section base to the triangle.
  • 2 1
 Yeah I totally agree you should have the stressed spokes on the outside, but in my brain, braking forces ALWAYS overpower drive forces. Think how easy it is to skid the rear wheel, compared to how hard it is to wheelspin. This is why I always build all my wheels with the leading (braking) spokes on the outside. All front wheels are built this way, but rear wheels are always built left flange one way, right flange the other way. The only argument I can see is that they imagine the hub shell is twisting under drive loads. However, it isn't twisting, and there is no reason it would. Even the flimsiest hub would shrug off any twisting loads a human could apply, and thats WITHOUT the support of 30+ spokes under huge tension. yet ALL companies build their complete wheels this way.

Confuses me muchly.
  • 3 1
 The spokes on the inside of the flange are slightly less prone to breaking, as they're not being bent so much to clear the outer edge of the flange then get to the rim. On the rear wheel, the torsional force from the drive side of the hub is going clockwise (looking at the wheel from the drive-side), so it makes sense for the trailing spokes (the ones more under tension with a clockwise torsional force) to be stronger.
On the disc side, the force from the brake is acting counter-clockwise (looking from the drive side), the leading spokes are the ones taking more tension under braking, so the disc side leading spokes are laced inside the flange.
On the front wheel only counter-clockwise torsional braking force is taking place, so all the leading spokes are laced to go inside the flange, where they're slightly stronger.

Edit - damn, so many replies making my comment irrelevant in the time it took me to type it
  • 3 1
 The you read up on this, the more you will realize that it doesn't matter as long as the wheel is tensioned correctly. Even large companies (Shimano / King / DT etc) don't agree. I think Shop people try and make a big deal about it is so they sound like they are some sort of Wheel God. Same goes for arguments about spoke prep / Spoke Freeze / linseed oil / Triflow etc......
  • 2 0
 Oh god yeah, it doesn't really matter as far as I can tell, but it seems to me the optimum way (if we're splitting hairs) is braking spokes on the outside at all times. It seems as tho every big wheel manufacturer disagrees, just wandered what their logic was.

Have narrowed it down to imagined hubshell twist, or the fact that outside spokes trailing on the drive side will help push an overshifted chain out from behind the cassette.

So one is a solution to a prob that doesn't exist (twisting shells) and one is a solution to a prob that shouldn't exist unless your rear mech is set up by a numpty.

Think I'll stick with my leading spokes on the outside technique. (tbh I was never planning on changing anyway)
  • 1 0
 Vee rubber is coming out with a re-inforced sidewall for some of their tires called "synthesis". Looks to be able to handle the low pressures people love to run with out risking those pesky snakebites. Also they have a more aggressive 27.5 + tread about to launch.
  • 3 1
 man screw the arum I want those boots
  • 2 1
 big up norco for keepings things cheap while still making a sweet looking bike
  • 2 0
 Looks like ahhh fuck it its too easy
  • 3 2
 Looking at the piggy back placement on that ohlins an thinking there's a lot of bikes that's not gonna fit
  • 1 0
 What is the dropper post on the Torrent? Looks like a KS Dropzone but with stealth routing… 2016 model?
  • 1 0
 Can't wait to have kids now, just so I can put one of those bell helmets on them
  • 2 0
 real talk tho that aurum is priced awesome for the spec
  • 1 0
 That Yakima crossbar is bullshit!
You would save 1/10000 gallon/mile
With the "improved" crossbar
  • 1 0
 Would love to see a long term RC review on those boots
  • 1 0
 release date for the norco aurum aluminium?
  • 1 0
 The D3 has a rival! Nicely done 100%
  • 2 1
 Why do I feel like watching SUPER MARIO BROS. THE MOVIE now?
  • 3 3
 Nice Aurum but hopefully the shafts on the rear shocks aren't still breaking.
  • 5 2
 that was demos.
  • 2 3
 No, not demo aurums, production aurums, down vote all you want...but that doesn't stop the fact that this is happening on production models.
  • 1 0
 edit
  • 2 1
 is bell trying to Rogatin a sponsorship with that no visor!?
  • 2 0
 I liked the multi tool.
  • 1 0
 That alloy Aurum looks amazing.
  • 1 0
 Are there $829 USD hubs now? What?
  • 2 1
 I thought Oscar Pistorius was in jail
  • 1 0
 Keep showing pictures of the 100% helmets until I own one. Thank you.
  • 1 0
 That norco aurum is sexy
  • 1 1
 Well hello, Jamis...welcome back to making a good looking mountain bike!
  • 1 1
 That aurum, WANT!!!
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.050898
Mobile Version of Website