If you've been on any music, film, art or games website in the past 6 months, you'll no doubt have heard about NFTs. Well, now it's the bike industry's turn to get in on the action and, as you might expect from an intersection of cryptocurrency and cycling, a silly amount of money has changed hands for something that you can't even ride.
The NFT in question is a 3D rendering of a special edition frame from Italian road bike brand Colnago. The rendering is a 1-of-1 C64 frame that celebrates the great victories the brand has taken in the past from Tony Rominger's Hour Record to Tadej Pogačar's Tour de France-winning V3Rs.
The rendering has now sold to User MTD-01, who has coughed up 3.2 wETH tokens (a cryptocurrency) for an NFT of a Colnago C64. This converts to US$8,592USD - or, about $2,300USD more than an actual Colnago C64 frameset that exists in the real world
But what is going on here and why is it worth so much? Well, it's probably not.
First we probably need to understand what an NFT actually is. NFT stands for non-fungible token and it is a way to authenticate a digital asset. It works a bit like an artist's signature where a painting itself could be printed and copied identically but the painting with the artist's signature on it has a much higher value due to its authenticity and rareness. Similarly, when an NFT is purchased, the transaction is stored on a digital ledger called a blockchain that records the purchaser of the NFT as the sole, rightful owner of an authentic artifact. Some recent examples include Jack Dorsey, founder of Twitter selling his first tweet for over $2.5 million, the meme animation Nyan Cat selling in an Internet marketplace for just under $600,000 and Tony Hawk selling footage of his last ever 540.
Anyway, back to Colnago. Much like the NFTs listed above,
we can all see the rendering of the bike but none of us own it, unlike MTD-01. They purchased it two days ago after a bidding war with another interested party and Colnago has said that the design will never be replicated, meaning they own the only version of the picture in existence.
The whole affair might bring to mind the saying about the fool and their money but maybe one day NFTs will take over the world and the prestige of cycling's first will make MTD-01 a multi-multi-millionaire... if they aren't already. Will that happen? If I knew, I certainly wouldn't be writing about it that's for sure. Anyway, time for a spin on a real bike that actually exists in the real world to try and forget about all this...
For more info or to make MTD-01 an offer to take the NFT off their hands,
click here.
I mean look at the selling of that first tweet. What is the difference between that and say someone having gotten their hands on the first iphone prototype, or something like that.
Can we get NFT and Crypto filters to go along with the E-bike filter, please?
NFTs are the promise of ownership of "something else" that relies on a constant stream of spending to maintain that claim. It has an indefinite negative intrinsic value.
There's no scarcity to it. A Gretzky rookie card or the first ever iPhone sold is collectible because it's rare.
Besides all that, it seems the current purpose of NFT is to launder money not necessarily support artists or collect art.
"According to The University of Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index, Bitcoin has an electricity consumption of 129.24 TWh per year – that’s more than entire countries such as Argentina and Ukraine, which consume 125.03 and 128.81 TWh each year, respectively. In comparison to Canada, Bitcoin uses approximately a quarter of the electricity that Canada would consume in a year."
energyrates.ca/crypto-mining-why-does-bitcoin-use-so-much-energy
With regards to the Dorsey tweet, the NFT gives you the original digital copy, not a copy of something you viewed on the internet. Like the article pointed out, this is not really any different than art, where there may be thousands of copies or prints of a piece that are almost indistinguishable from the original, but there is only once signed copy by the artist. Or think of game used memorabilia. At the end of the day its just a nike basketball shoe or football, etc. But people will pay thousands of dollars because that shoe belonged to Lebron or Kobe. Even though the first tweet has been viewed millions of times, there is only one original.
Now don't get me wrong, some of this shit is absolutely stupid and insane. Nor do I buy any of it myself. But these NFTs aren't any dumber than some of the other "collectable" shit people pay alot of money for.
Most kids today wont ever own or pay off their homes..
Most kids are happy to pay 15$ a month for spotify/apple and none of them own a single song or album
Most kids don;t see a huge difference between a text or speaking with the person directly
But I digress....
Buy gold and see what happens....the kids ain't buying gold, the kids aren't buying our houses when we get old or die, the kids don't go to the bank and other then birthday money from grandparents don't us cash. The world has changed us boomers and Xer need to get over it and buy the dam ebike.
Electronic cash is the future if you pick the winner it will be like amazon/apple/google, pick the loser and it will be like the corner store,/blackberry/the newspaper....NFTs: don't get them but don't get tangible collectables either.
Are any of them legal?
it seems from this thread that a lot of people need to get over there dated understanding of things digital as not being "real".
Because legislation requires them to.
You "it's about the tech!" guys are so precious. It was never about the tech. It's always been about "number go up!"
Of course we can't prevent each and every form of irrationality, but if we all were a bit more down to earth, bit more human, we'd think about it more often and control ourselves. When the average family makes about 30000€/year and some painting get sold for 100.000.000€
As someone who tried to get some work in the bike industry as a CG artist but didn't make a dime, this article is particularly "ironic".
I got contacted by one of those NFT thing to copyright my pictures. I wouldn't even understand the point. I was like "what ? It's just a render, it's the work that has value, the years of practice, the software knowledge, the design skills, not the render ?!". And then the crypto art started going crazy :p
My good friend just sold a house and built another after buying land, so 3 transactions involved, and three lawyers offices, and three banks. It took 10 days from the initial payment until he had the proceeds sent to his account.
I actually am very skeptical of crypto as a currency. Not too fond of the Winklevoss' controlling global currency. But I do hope it disrupts the financial system to a degree that makes it more consumer friendly and efficient.
Now there's other ways that are better as well, I just thought that it was a real painful way of doing things compared to via LTC etc.
Point is it takes a long time to move around money and the key benefit of crypto currency is expedited financial transactions.
There will need to be a balance between frictionless and the current system. Example I gave about the mortgage actually took 3 more weeks that I excluded... because the bank sent the residual proceeds to the wrong customers' account 3x. $385k sent to the wrong person. 3 times. While unimaginably stupid, in a crypto world those transactions are untraceable and it would have been a bigger cluster to sort out.
earth.org/nfts-environmental-impact
Tesla has always said it's not a car company, but a software company.
That's not even it. You're buying a piece of (imaginary) paper that says you own it, but which no legal authority recognises.
I could (attempt to) sell an NFT for the Mona Lisa but that doesn't make it mine or the buyer's.
Again, I think all this collectable stuff for the most part is stupid. But you can't shit on NFTs and but say stuff like autographs, or game used memorabilia, etc aren't just as dumb.
weth.io
WETH (WETH) is a cryptocurrency and operates on the Ethereum platform. WETH has a current supply of 1,153,916.966737 with 0 in circulation.
I guess anyone can make a cryptocurrency? Is that the power to the people?
It’s all bullshit compared to cash.
I think 3.2 wETH is about $9.000
-oops I went straight to the comments. it's in the article.
Ok... I'm listening!
Wat to go, Rich Interwebers
Us: Sure look at this f*cking digital bike owned by a Saudi king who didn't ride all his life.
“..THIS PICTURE ON MY PHONE..!”
Pick a colour (or two?)!!
@suspended-flesh: Catch this stray.
Point being that they never miss an oppo to alert you to their status as such. I fux wit them - but you know it's true.
"@suspended-flesh: Catch this stray."
Don't net bang or I'll sock-check you in public.