Vitus Sommet Carbon - First Look

May 24, 2016 at 4:52
by Matt Wragg  


Vitus, Chain Reaction's in-house, direct sales brand have been around for a few years now. In the past we'd forgive you for not having paid much attention to them, with their range consisting mainly of well-priced road bikes and lower end XC hardtails. Yet in the last couple of years that has changed and they have started making bikes that are not only good value, but that look like a lot of fun too.

The Sommet is the flagship for their full-suspension bikes, sitting between the 130mm Escarpe and their downhill race weapon, the Domineer. After a couple of years of racing, riding and testing to be sure that it is the bike they want to make and ride, it is the first bike in their range to receive a full plastic makeover. When we visited Chain Reaction's headquarters in Ballyclare, Northern Ireland, we were some of the first journalists to see the bike up close and take it for a pedal.


Vitus Sommet Carbon
• Intended use: trail / enduro
• Travel: 155mm
• 27.5" wheels
• Horst link suspension with floating shock mount
• 65.5° head angle
• 435mm chainstays
• 12 x 142mm rear spacing
• Weight – 12.67kg /27.93lbs (for CRX model)
• Sizes S, M, L, XL
• Price: £2,849.99 - £4,199.99
Vitus Bikes


The obvious question for many when they see the name Chain Reaction behind the bike is: What is the difference between this and a Nukeproof? The short answer is that while both brands are based in the same building, Nukeproof has a more all-out focus on performance, where Vitus bikes are pitched at being slightly more accessible and, through the direct sales model, having a much greater focus on value for money. Although, if you compare the geometry of Nukeproof's current Mega and the Vitus Sommet, it's undeniable that there are similarities, and Vitus admit that much of what they learn through Nukeproof can be seen on the Vitus bikes, simply because they want to make the best bike possible. With the people behind both brands racing and riding a lot, they felt it was unthinkable to deliberately not make one brand or the other as good as it could be in the name of brand separation. With the pricing on the Sommet, it is clear that they are aiming straight for YT Industries' all-conquering Capra - offering very comparable specs at the same pricepoints.

Vitus are not shy with their stated intentions for the Sommet - it is an enduro bike, designed to excel both on the race course and on the kind of steep, technical trails that can be found up and down Ireland and Northern Ireland. If there were any question of that focus, Killian Callaghan (Greg's Callaghan's cousin), shut them all down at the recent Enduro World Series in Wicklow, Ireland, grabbing the under-21 win on the aluminum version of this bike. For a bike aimed at being slightly milder than its Nukeproof stablemate, it is still towards the progressive end of things if you cast an eye over the wider market for bikes at around this travel.

The Sommet ticks all the boxes on the "long, low, slack" list that forms the core of what is frequently referred to as modern geometry. Starting at the front of the bike, you find a relaxed 65.5 degree head angle, paired with a suitably steep 74.5 degree effective seat angle. Chainstays are a fairly conservative 435mm, with Vitus refusing to jump on the short chainstays bandwagon, as you need that extra stability racing at higher speeds. Bottom bracket drop is a relatively low 10mm. Looking onto the all-important reach numbers - the large sized frame sport a 451mm reach, with the seattube length low enough for a 5'9" rider with a 30" inseam to comfortably get on with the bike (Vitus' website recommends 5'11", with a 32" in-seam for the large frame, but this is overly conservative if you are looking for a roomier ride). In fact, these numbers form a more aggressive package than many US brands are offering right now - it lines up as a bigger, longer bike than a Santa Cruz Nomad.

Geometry

Vitus Sommet geometry

Vitus Sommet CRX First Look. Ballyclare Northern Ireland. Photo by Matt Wragg.
Internal cable routing for all your needs.
Vitus Sommet CRX First Look. Ballyclare Northern Ireland. Photo by Matt Wragg.
A Monarch Plus keeps the rear end in check.

Details

Looking at the specs of the top CRX and the slightly more affordable CR model, it is clear that Vitus have done their homework. It is a SRAM-heavy affair, with both bikes sporting a Pike up front, Monarch Plus shock, a SRAM 1x11 drivetrain with Raceface cranks and Guide brakes. The main difference is that the CRX's components have a few more letters in their names, carbon in the cranks and the lower spec version gets a Brand X 125mm dropper post rather than a Reverb. The finishing kit is a similar story, with short stems and 780mm wide bars from Nukeproof - but with the carbon version on the higher spec model. Getting down to the wheels, the higher spec version comes with Mavic's Crossmax XLs, while the lower spec version gets a very serviceable set of WTB i23s mounted on Novatec hubs. In truth, both bikes are pretty much ready to show up to your local enduro races straight from the box - the only question is whether the 1kg weight saving of the CRX is worth the additional £1,300 or so for you.

Vitus Sommet CRX First Look. Ballyclare Northern Ireland. Photo by Matt Wragg.
There is plenty of rain in Northern Ireland, so there is plenty of mud clearance ready for it.
Vitus Sommet CRX First Look. Ballyclare Northern Ireland. Photo by Matt Wragg.
The mainframe has room for a full-sized water bottle.

Riding the Sommet

We only had time for a short, 20km lap on the Sommet, taking in some of the incredible off-piste trails at Rostrevor, an hour south of Vitus HQ. Yet in that time a few things became apparent - it is a pretty easy bike to live with. Initial setup for the shock is a little bit fussy - the suspension design incorporates 66mm of rearward travel in the axle path, so you need to get your sag setting at 30% or less for the bike to use its travel properly.

After that, it is a very easy bike to just go and ride. On the brutal fire road drag climb out of the carpark it pedalled well enough, even with the shock wide open, although when you get onto trail climbs you do remember you are on a longer travel bike, not a nimble tail whippet. As soon as the trail pointed downwards, the bike was just composed. The finishing kit puts you in a very comfortable place to ride hard and very quickly there was no need to think about the bike any more, you could focus completely on the trail ahead. Off the back of Rostrevor things can get steep and wild fairly quickly, yet no matter how wild it got, the Sommet remained a cool customer. Of course, a 20km loop does not a review make, but on first impressions, the Sommet is a well-thought-out package that would suit riders of all abilities.



Author Info:
mattwragg avatar

Member since Oct 29, 2006
753 articles

94 Comments
  • 104 9
 Chances are I'm missing something, but to me this bike doesn't seem like that great of a value. The entry level Carbon Sommet with guide R brakes, a pike RC, and a GX drivetrain has a pretty standard price at upwards of $4,000. Their top-level bike is still over $6,000- I would say thats a pretty normal price. If I had that much money to blow, I personally would probably rather get "mid-speced" yeti or something as opposed to this more obscure brand. I'm probably going to get hated for saying that but whatever.
  • 44 2
 Especially when you can get a meta with the same building spec for 3000, or a Capra for cheap as well, even non direct bikes like a reign for 3400
  • 26 2
 I agree. Would much rather buy something like an SB6c or the Evil 160mm bike for $6000
  • 14 21
flag jaame (May 24, 2016 at 21:58) (Below Threshold)
 I like that Santa Cruz nomad.
  • 23 8
 Vitus prices are pretty much bang on what YT are asking if you compare CRC and YT's websites. To put the pricing into perspective, in the UK at least, the basic spec Nomad C is £4,599 with a GX/SLX level build or a Yeti SB5 is £4,299 with a GX build.
  • 27 1
 @mattwragg: I disagree on the pricing comparison. The Capra CF Pro sells for EUR 3,999.00, whereas the Sommet CRX's asking price is EUR 5,549.99. The specs are comparable, if not better in the YT.
  • 62 19
 I've come the realization that Pinkbikers will never be happy with the price of bike unless it's free, and even then someone will find something to whine about...
  • 28 1
 @Spark24: What do you mean my free bike comes with boost hubs?!?!?! And a metric shock!?!
  • 21 0
 The lowest spec carbon Vitus is £2564.99 on CRC with free postage for Uk customers.

The lowest spec carbon Capra is £2741.94 posted.

The Capra has a few better parts, but the same cranks, suspension, brakes, so the Vitus is definitely competitive with that.
  • 5 0
 @Spark24: I'll take it the next level: Every time I saddle up for a ride with my buds methinks "Now If I could just get paid to do this..."
  • 5 1
 How come Vitus is an "obscure" brand and, say, Canyon or Nukeproof aren't? I do not find any huge differences between this and a Strive for example. I suppose until we see someone rides it for a race to "convince" us - see TRP brakes for examples. All bikes are coming out good with all this competition and it's a matter of taste what we like (of course) and what the marketing like us to like (or not). Other than that I agree that this bike it's not "that great of a value" rather than and expensive one!
  • 5 1
 @starpak: Well, I for one have seen metric boatloads of Canyons, YTs and Nukeproofs (the latter a little less, as I'm residing in Germany - still a considerable amount of them on the trails here). Never seen a Vitus to date. I suspect my personal experience is in line with the experience of many others, which makes Vitus obscure in comparison to the brands you named. It doesn't mean "bad", just not very common, and maybe harder to get (well, they sell only over CRC, but in my mind that does not reeeally qualify).
  • 5 0
 @jts-nemo: And that is exactly my point. You're coming from Germany so it makes sense that Canyon is everywhere (there's also The Canyon Team of course with Barel playing a huge part in the promotion). In the UK you get say Cotic, Bird, Nukeproof, Ragley, Stanton, Kingdom and so on - and of course you get to see the Vitus more often in comparison to other parts of the world. Obscure means uncertain (in a way that there's no trust) - we trust other brands because our eye got used to see them around more often (in the part of the world that we're living in individually). What I said, I hope in a polite way, is that I could trust a Vitus as a Canyon and that I didn't get the "obscure" thing. That's also why I placed a comment on marketing. I own an NS bike and according to a couple of reviews is a "satisfying" bike; I find it extraordinary!
  • 7 0
 Just wait until the end of the season, and they'll be 50% off. Then it's a hell of a deal.
  • 6 0
 From CRC, with free shipping and no taxes, you can get the Summet CR for $3374.99. In my opinion, it's a better build than a Norco Range C 7.4 at $3995. The Summet CR is the cheapest carbon bike you can get with more than 150mm travel.
  • 3 13
flag dirtchurner (May 25, 2016 at 9:07) (Below Threshold)
 @Spark24: I agree with my smart friend across the pond. Many a pink bikers should move to the U.S. (California) and vote Bernie Sanders for Prez. then get everything free and not have to work for it.
  • 1 0
 @mattwragg: But it is not Nomad and Vitus don't have the long term development history and proven reliability that Santacruz Bicycles have. In addition, any one looking at the US$/£ exchange rate and having a kindergarten level maths ability, can work out that UK SCB buyers are getting screwed some where and it is certainly not all by the government on import duty. CRC also get preferential pricing on SRAM hence a complete build and it does not seem that they are passing on that saving with their direct to consumer sales model. Less margin leading to more sales might help them whilst they are getting established as a brand.
  • 1 0
 @Spark24: would pinkbikers be happy with free bike if it had 29" wheels?
  • 5 1
 Comprehensive review here, if anyone's interested: http://enduro-mtb.com/en/vitus-sommet-crx-review-exclusive-first-test/ Seems like a very decent, smart looking bike.

The CRX and CR are already discounted 10% on CRC before release for sale, to £3800 (CR is £2565), add in a 10% British Cycling code (10 mins and ~£20 to join) brings the CRX down to £3420 (CR to £2309).

Some things are cheaper in the US, and that must be true of Yeti, because I could save more than £1500 on the CRX which is spec and weight comparable to Yeti. That would pay for two weeks in Whistler I imagine.

Moreover it's the CR at £2309 that's the real bargain: around £400/£500 cheaper than the entry CF Capra/Strive/Spectral, that's a week in Morzine (on a tight budget, maybe just). Plus it would be delivered in days, and I know how good CRC are with returns/warranty etc. Can't allow for all currency fluctuations, but in the UK at least this is a bargain if you're after a carbon bike.
  • 1 1
 @Spark24: They're giving away free bikes just to make the bike I paid for obsolete!
  • 1 0
 @zzRider: Are you saying that as a member of British Cycling, you get a flat ten percent discount off everything at CRC? Or is it just bikes?
  • 2 0
 @jaame: Any order over £99.
  • 1 0
 That's good to know. I haven't had a BCF membership since 97 but I buy stuff from CRC all the time
  • 2 0
 @starpak: Of course, you're totally right when you take the literal meaning of obscure from the oxford dictionnary (which only brings a very shortened definition of it). But then it is a strange application of the word, I think. And most people that throw around the word obscure mean something along the line of "hard to find" instead of simply uncertain, or "very uncommon" or "from unknown/hardly known origins", which all are in line with the etymology of the word in its figurative use. Wink Then it makes sense to use it for a lesser known brand (even in UK you don't see many of them) and does not judge the quality of feeling of the bike at all, just its more "uncommon" roots from a smaller brand. Either way, I just wanted to explain why I think the use of the word is ok here, didn't want to attack your comment, the rest you said I totally agree on.
  • 2 2
 @jts-nemo: I was going to write that too, but I couldn't be bothered. Thanks for explaining it to him.
  • 2 0
 @jaame: I have the tendency to write long paragraphs about miniscule points I try to make. Idk, sometimes it's fun Big Grin
  • 14 1
 66mm of rearward travel? That seems like way too much for a bike with no idler. Surely there is a considerable amount of pedal feedback in the design no? @andrextr
  • 9 1
 We need Andre!
  • 6 3
 Making the CS 501mm in effect. 1982 called. They want their chainstay back
  • 3 0
 It probably should read 6,6. Not 66
  • 14 1
 66mm of the vertical travel has a rearward component to it. The wheel doesn't move that far horizontally.
  • 3 0
 I'm still confused how this bike has any rearward axle path in the first place...

Anyone able to explain or show with some cool visuals? Haha
  • 7 0
 Draw a line through the pivots on the chainstay and another line through the pivots on the link. Where they intersect is the instant center, basically the point the rear wheel pivots around in that point of travel. If that point is higher than the rear wheel then the travel is rearward. On this bike the instant center starts high and forward and is brought down and back as it goes through it's travel.
  • 1 0
 @Arnoodles: will do so at work. Thank you
  • 5 0
 Yah It should be 6.6mm for sure, the main pivot is near the BB, there's no way that it can have 66mm (that's the case of the Zerode !).
  • 10 0
 I did a quick draft model, and as expected it's around 4-5mm of rearward horizontal travel (and this rearward path occours during the first 60-65mm of vertical travel, then it becames forward travel...so it migth be this what they meant in the article...it's not literelly 66mm of horizontal travel). That bike also have a very independent suspension during braking. The IC is very low and faraway at SAG, so the brake squat is around 30-40%. In other words, the seatstay does not move much during suspension compression, thus, the amount of brake calipter rotation around the disc is very low when the suspension is compressed. Bye
  • 6 0
 @brockfisher05: I don't know if this picture could help, but basically the axle path is an arc, so you have the vertical component of travel, and you have the horizontal component.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/13291669
  • 1 0
 @andrextr: Is Vitus's Horst link suspension with floating shock mount better than Nukeproof's horst link only suspension? Sounded better but the article says Nukeproof is more performance driven...
  • 13 3
 It's interesting seeing so many bikes looking more and more similar. Sometimes it's hard to really believe one is that much better the next. There's gonna be a certain point where reviews are just gonna say " it's a Horst link rocker driven rear traingle so we know how those feel" haha. God I feel bad for people just getting into this sport more and more every day.


On another note.... great looking bike I am very confident in saying that I bet it's a great bike to go rip trail on!!
  • 40 0
 " God I feel bad for people just getting into this sport more and more every day."

Hell no. Most bikes these days are pretty good! A beginner can buy with confidence, knowing they'll get a sweet ride that's obsolete in 2 years time.
  • 6 0
 antonio had some words to that effect on his entry about this- the systems are surprisingly different if you compared a Strive or Patrol to this bike. though Strive, Patrol, Snabb are quite similar. linkagedesign.blogspot.com/2014/10/vitus-sommet-650b-2015.html
  • 1 0
 @scottzg: you are right in saying that it's pretty hard to buy a crappy bike now adays... But for someone just entering this world of bikes imagine looking at so many bikes that in their eyes will look very similar and then hearing that one is better than the next... it gets a little confusing...

It's not about feeling good you got a good bike when spending more than 2000.00 they probably already know it's a good bike...it's about not being sure you got the best bike in that category. For a lot of people if they aren't convinced it's the best thing since sliced bread they dont want it.... or sometimes they just want the bike if it comes in a certain colour... Frick... haha
  • 5 0
 I think that a lot of buyers feel like for $6000 they don't want to feel like ANYTHING on the bike is missing, including the paint job.
  • 4 2
 @b26-4-Life: linkage design. ..... PB take some well composed photos and write some random stuf. In this article, contradiction beteen the review and the summary. Linkage design shown real numbers and engineering thought with a nice page to explain what the numbers mean... I think more and more people know what they like or want these days and LD is getting more use.
  • 3 1
 @scottzg: Another way to look at it - a beginner can buy with confidence, knowing that they'll get a sweet ride that will still be a sweet ride in 2 years. Because unlike in the distant past, these things can actually hold up for a while. And what's fun today, will be fun tomorrow, unless you're sampling a bunch of newer bikes and getting a bad case of new bike lust.

Seriously - the stand out designs from two or three years ago are still great, competitive bikes today. Think Process (current lineup has the same geometry as in 2014), Transition bikes (2015), Nomad, Enduro, etc. Yees, there's change, yes, there's improvement - but the bikes don't get worse over time. That's the thing people always get confused about. Computers and smartphones get worse over time, because the software they all run keeps getting more and more demanding. A three year old iphone is a dob, doing the same things (opening web pages, running apps) more slowly than when it was new - and you can't upgrade the damn thing. That's obsolescence. A three year old bike, as long as you maintain all the moving bits, still performs just a well as it did when it was new. Yes, newer bikes are better - but that doesn't make the old bike worse than it was. That doesn't mean it's obsolete, it just means it's been superseded. And quite a bit of the performance advantage of new bikes comes from newer components - which you can upgrade if you like.

Now when it comes to new standards, that's a bit of a different story. It's one thing to keep your older bike performing up to its old level by replacing components over time as they fail - you'll probably find stuff for a while yet (you can still buy rather nice 135mm QR hubs for example, and you can still get all the old standby tires in 26"). It's the new stuff that's then not made to those standards anymore - meaning if there's a new version of a fork coming out you really want, you many not be able to get that in 26".
  • 6 1
 @g-42: a new standard of a fork....
I rode last saturday with some very competent riders. On my old mk2 Nomad, with a push link, a -2 degree headset and a set of older totems... I even had those very old design tyres on... the 60a minion.
Somehow this antiquated machine cleaned more of the climbs, rode the descents the quickest! On Sunday it cleaned more of the climbs, rode considerably more of the flat technical stuff in the mountains and managed an "impossible" descent... whilst the brand new, high end 160mm bike with custom valved fork on it was pushed... that new bike was just too long, too slack, bars too wide, wrong leverage curve etc for the mountains. Oh... and the new tyres just didn't have the correct tread pattern.
Now.... the mountains have not changed in the last few years, and that nomad could ride them a few years ago with its old kit. (Not minions back then, just happened to have them on, would rather have had high rollers on), I was glad that because someone had changed the must have wheel size, tyres, geometry etc that the nomad didn't notice, as it was playing on my mind for ages leading up to these rides. So please.... nobody tell my nomad that she is obsolete and no longer capable of what she used to do regularly, coz once she finds out I fear that she won't be able to ride these mountain trails anymore, and I will have to replace her with a slacker, longer, bigger wheeled bike which will be upsetting as she has been fine so far.....

Dear Nomad...
I still love you in the mountains. You are still pants compared to a trail bike in the local woods though. Xxx
Lots of Love
Mountain biker who can see the wood for the trees.
  • 2 0
 @betsie: Exactly - that bike still works just like it did. My comment on obsolescence through new standards was more aimed at bikes that cannot be ridden anymore at all (because they have some asinine proprietary bits, like Cannondale's pull shocks and such) that you can't buy anymore when yours break, or that can't be kept in their as-new levels of performance. With most reasonably run-of-the-mill parts, that's not an issue - in fact, you can get rather awesome prices on 26" pikes and such, and there are still lots of 135mm QR hubs around, and while they may not make the new tread patterns in 26", all the old tread patterns are still available and they are keeping the molds going, so tires aren't a problem.

Your point to geometry is interesting, though. Yes, it's all about long/low/slack these days. But the shorter wheelbase of the older bikes opens some doors. So you're talking about technical climbing - yep, that's one of those areas. I'm not a terribly skilled rider - the longer front center on what's considered modern geometry is great for me, as I don't need to work so damn hard to get my fore/aft balance right, the bike just makes that so much easier. Instant confidence booster, and instant fun enhancement. That doesn't make my new bike a better bike than my old bike (which was a bit steeper and shorter) - but it does make it a better bike for my specific needs.
  • 5 0
 Got the VRX version (non carbon) at the beginning of the season for $3k after taxes. Was by far the best deal I could find for the build (YT and Commencal were close seconds but still 3 or 4 hundo more for similar builds).

Also, their customer service was amazing. Has some shifting issues that eventually were tracked down to the drop out being machined out of tolerance. At first i thought i had made a big mistake buying a consumer direct bike because i thought i wouldn't get the same customer service as i would at an LBS but i was totally wrong. Experience was even better. They helped me diagnose the issue and had a new set of seat stays to me within a week.

Vitus for the win!
  • 4 0
 Yup, got my wife's hardtail from Vitus/CRC and felt like I was stealing it. Easily one of the best value brands around; the frame is totally worth upgrading, and the spec/dollar is unbeatable. They generally choose really smart places to cheap out, unlike a lot of the bigger brands. And the experience with CRC was great.
  • 5 0
 I recently bought the non carbon VR (wanted the VRX but it wasnt in stock in my size). For £1800 inc delivery within 2 days it just couldnt be beaten!
Also, if you've ever dealt with CRC customer service you'd have every confidence in it if something did go wrong.

I'm going to steer away from the "amazing bike for the money" comment. Its just an amazing bike, regardless of price.
  • 9 1
 I'm taking it to the sommet for a plummet !
  • 5 2
 Another bike with a fugly bend in the toptube near the headtube. I wish this trend would go away, but companies like Mondraker and Intense keep pumping out this shit. Why? This, and the bend in the downtube, makes it look like the bike hit a tree dead-on very hard.
  • 2 0
 Love that they indicate the standover according to inseam, first time I've seen that. Makes so much sense. So long as they don't start making frames from denim and not carbon.
  • 5 0
 Not in Canada, with exchange right meow...
  • 2 0
 Dear Vitus, please make a carbon 27.5+/29er with short chainstays (435?) at this price point. 120mm travel is fine. Think of it as the Vitus answer the Tallboy/Hightower. Will buy. Promise.
  • 2 0
 I ride an Escarpe 29er and it have looong cs. Yes, it could be shorter (also reach could be longer), but to be honest, this is a trail not an enduro bike and it rides flawlessly. If I wanted something more lively or more aggressive there is smaller wheels Escarpe and Sommet to choose from.
  • 1 0
 I haven't seen any comments on the direct sales method and how it will eventually kill the local bike store. One of the cool things about biking is the experience of hanging out at the LBS, seeing the latest models, talking shit with the mechanic and just geeking out on bikes. The direct sales method misses all of this and reduces local employment. It is too bad that the bike industry is so poorly payed, they deserve more money. Do you really want to send your bike to Ireland for warranty?
  • 2 0
 Would be really interested in seeing a review on the new Dominer. That bike looks like a great value.
  • 1 1
 I'm 5'9" with a 30" inseam and I definitely wouldn't be able to run a dropper on a large, not if i wanted to touch both pedals anyway. Looking at the 134 yesterday, Kona seem to have the right idea about seat tube length.
  • 1 1
 I have the 167 and with a 150mm dropper on my large at 6'3" with a 34" inseam I have no issues at all getting the saddle too high to reach the pedals, but can get low enough to forget the seat is there. My 2010 Medium Specialized Pitch has a 450mm reach like the large here.
Kona have got it right. Longer and lower please.
A 170mm reverb can have 400mm showing out the top of the seat tube + the 483mm for size large + 165mm for crank length giving the average inseam of a 233cm tall man (7 foot 8" bloke) which I would imagine would be moving up to an extra large frame maybe? Even a 150mm dropper can go up to a 7'4" persons inseam on a large frame.
  • 1 2
 cool looking ride ---

ha --- Vitus. ya don't say --

that's a French road bike I used to sell about 15 years ago. they had a badass carbon road frame (with a very gay looking paint splash that killed the look of the bike).
  • 2 0
 Funny thing is that this is a new bike from this year and is already obsolete.
  • 1 0
 Guaranteed that within 3 weeks ChainReaction will have the price discounted by 10%, a few months later it will be - 20% all the way down to -40% by Christmas
  • 1 2
 Bike looks nice but like others have said what is going to make me spend money on an unknown brand? If its to directly compete with the likes of YT etc then it will have to be cheaper. Why go against a bike like the Capra that has won god knows how many awards, bike of the year etc etc. Gotta start somewhere i know but respect is earned not just given cause on paper its similar!
Personally im well and truely over the whole carbon 160mm travel enduro crap. Has anyone taken a hardtail with some good geo and good forks/brakes for a spin? Almost just as capable! Do we really need all this flash rubbish..........oh wait of course we do cause the industry says we do!!!!!
  • 1 0
 Really sharp, sleek design. Somehow also made a floating shock on a carbon frame? Not too bad for a new kid on the block.
  • 3 0
 lovely bike!
  • 2 0
 @vitusbikes please put the carbon on the Escarpe!
  • 2 0
 It is a pretty good looking bike. I would buy it.

Beer
  • 1 0
 blimey that's quite light...I quite like it even if the frame looks the same as many others out there.
  • 3 5
 nuke proof shown everywhere .. Advertisement pays...... That's why I'm building a 15' Mega am 27.5 I've got 3k into it so far including the 2016 170mm lyric's my new bike would smash on these.
  • 1 0
 Looks great or would do without the mavic yellow wheels
  • 1 1
 HA! Yeah, um no, sorry. You are not Journalists pinkbike. At the very most, you are Reporters.
  • 1 0
 Vitus Sommet?

In me dyslexia perhaps, but thought said it Situs Vommet.
  • 1 1
 I think it is not that great of a deal as pinkbike wants us to think it is
  • 1 0
 Still looking good!
  • 1 0
 BB Threaded?
  • 1 0
 Push fit
  • 1 0
 @olrenison: ok,frame-only option is irrelevant then, I'll never buy a press-fit BB frame ...
  • 1 0
 Frame-only option?
  • 2 0
 ah, here it is, 1200 pounds and s nit to bad

vitusbikes.com/products/sommet-pro-frame-2016
  • 1 0
 @TheUnknownMTBR: That's the aluminum version, not the carbon.
  • 1 0
 @olrenison: yes, I recognized that and thought I had deleted the reply rather than posting it (note the typos etc.), my bad ...
  • 5 8
 Any enduro bike specced with a Pike instead of a Lyrik will need an expensive fork upgrade soon. YT knows that, and that's why the Capra is still the best option.
  • 1 1
 Sorry, wasn't my intention to negprop you - smartphone is too small.
Pike di 160mm per tre anni e no problema. Smile
  • 1 0
 @Gamsjaga: No problem bro. Pike is a very good fork , but Lyrik is best suited for hard enduro riding, in my opinion (I own both).

See you, cheers!
  • 1 1
 the new titus?
  • 3 6
 Looking like a Marin/ Norco sight hybrid
  • 2 5
 @jmcleod66 thats the first thing I thought when I saw this bike
  • 2 5
 looks like a canyon
  • 1 0
 I was just about to say that look at that linkage ripped it straight of a canyon and resprayed it still nice bike though
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.043141
Mobile Version of Website