First Look: Felt 2016

Jul 16, 2015
by Richard Cunningham  
Lead photo


Felt stages its annual bike launch at its headquarters in Irvine, California, where the entire crew is on hand to answer questions. This time, journos were invited inside the secret halls to get a first-hand look at the process that the team uses to bring a bike from concept to creation. Like most every bike maker, Felt's products are manufactured in Asia. Felt, however, maintains a well-equipped rapid-prototyping facility that includes welding, fabrication, 3D printing and CNC-machining capabilities, as well as destruction and fatigue-testing apparatus.



The Secret Tour

Engineers there have up-to-date design tools: finite element analysis software to model how stress affects frames, fluid dynamic programs to model aerodynamics, and linkage programs to fine-tune suspension geometry. Felt's capability stops short of being able to construct carbon fiber prototypes there, but being able to build aluminum "test mules" gives its staff the ability to ride and evaluate suspension kinematics and frame geometry before they pull the trigger and send the bike off for production. Rapid prototyping facilities are the secret weapons of the sport's most successful brands, and it explains how a relatively small marquee like Felt can remain competitive at the highest levels.
Felt 2016 launch
Felt Senior Engineer Jeff Soucek dives deep into fluid dynamic modeling. Reportedly, it can take up to a week for the computers to crunch the data for one airstream simulation.

The Living Line

Another take-away from the Felt Launch was that it was disconnecting from traditional model years. Felt calls it the "Living Line," which means that they will release new models when they are ready, and not rush them out to correspond to artificial pressures dictated by selling seasons, trade shows or conspicuous industry events. The benefits, says Felt, are numerous: relevant models in their range can remain in production, Felt can upgrade components at any time in the production cycle, designers can take the time necessary to refine and test new bikes without pressure to rush them to market in the traditional fall cycle, and Felt can release new models to their dealers and the media in a more focused and relaxed manner, rather than lumping them all together in a dog-and-pony show. Felt isn't the first to abandon model years and the trend is gaining momentum as key bike and components makers realize that the race to bring in new technology is more often won by getting it right the first time - not simply getting there first.
Felt 2016 launch
Felt's 3D printer can make exact-scale thermoplastic replicas of its frame designs, as well as components from the likes of SRAM and Shimano that are not yet in production, to verify compatibility issues - like the brake caliper in the foreground.

Felt 2016 launch
Rapid prototyping also means that Felt can build custom bicycles, like this 27.5-plus hardtail to investigate geometry and handling in actual riding situations.


What's New

Felt has a new logo in celebration of its 25th year as a brand. The winged shield is retained, while the brand logo has been sharpened into a more simplified, technical graphic. For the most part, 2016 seems to be an in-breath for Felt that marks an effort to improve the specifications and fine tune the performance of its existing models while its engineering staff is working on its next-gen shockers.
New Felt logo 2016

To its credit, the range looks good. Trail bikes have increased suspension travel. Dropper posts appear everywhere. One-by drivetrains have finally penetrated the inner sanctum of Felt's mountain bike range, and its product managers have gone as far as to spec SunRace wide-range ten speed cassettes on lower-priced models to offer entry-level riders a simpler, more enjoyable trail experience. Felt also has eliminated some aluminum models and expanded its carbon offerings down to much more affordable price points. On the opposite end of the pricing spectrum, Felt's racing genetics have produced what may be MY 2016's most expensive trailbike: The $12,500 Shimano Di2-equipped, RockShox Pike-suspended, Virtue FRD.

Felt Virtue Nine FRD 2016
Virtue FRD
What has 130 millimeters of rear-wheel travel, 140 up front, electric shifting, a carbon chassis that requires eight hours just to lay up, and costs over twelve thousand US dollars? Felt's Virtue FRD features its Equilink rear suspension and its chassis is constructed using super strong Textreme flat-woven carbon. Carbon is the theme, with Race Face Next cockpit items, Easton Haven carbon wheels and a carbon-rail WTB saddle. The drivetrain is Shimano Di2, brakes are XTR, and its suspension is all RockShox - with a Monarch RT3 shock and a Pike RCT3 Solo Air fork. Sizes are small, medium, large and X-large, with a medium size model pegged at 26.7 pounds (12.14kg)


Felt 2016 launch
Felt 2016 launch
Textreme is a trademark process that weaves ultra-thin tapes of high-strength unidirectional carbon in a checkerboard pattern. The material is used where two layers of carbon would normally be required. This is what a carbon layup looks like before it is placed in a mold for final curing.


Felt makes extensive use of RockShox's Pike fork throughout its range, which is a welcome change from the firm's previous belief that 32-millimeter stanchions were good enough for most trail riders. In response to reports that its rear suspension lacked mid-stroke support, Felt went to work with the tuners at RockShox and developed custom valving and the initial response to the changes is reportedly very favorable. On the same note, all the 100-millimeter forks in its cross-country and XC /trail range have been upgraded to 120 millimeters in response to its customer feedback.


Felt 2016 launch
Edict FRD
Edict FRD represents Felt's take on the ultimate 29-inch-wheel dual-suspension race bike. Its FAST, 100-millimeter rear suspension eliminates traditional dropout pivots to save weight, and its carbon chassis uses Felt's top-range, UHC Ultimate construction, including Textreme reinforcements. Its RockShox RS1 fork has been upgraded to 120-millimeters of travel and both the RS1 and its Monarch XX shock are remote controlled with the Full Sprint system. The drivetrain is SRAM XX1, powered by a carbon Race Face Next crankset. Brakes are SRAM XX and wheels are DT Swiss XRC 1200. Claimed weight is 22.3 pounds (10.12kg). MSRP for the Edict FRD is $9999 USD. Four models are offered, with the entry-level Edict 5 sporting a less-sophisticated carbon chassis, Shimano Deore components, and an attainable, $2999 USD sticker price.


Felt 2016 launch
Carbon frame and a carbon fork. Felt upped the 29-inch-wheel Edict's fork travel from 100 to 120 millimeters, which is in keeping with its purpose as a rough-course XC racer.
Felt 2016 launch
FAST pivotless dropouts take advantage of Felt's carbon expertise. The rear triangle is sprung slightly so the fibers relax as they pass through the mid-point of the rear suspension travel.

Felt 2016 launch
GripShift has become a favorite among pro riders. The big Full Sprint button controls the fork and shock lockout simultaneously.


No surprise here: Felt has enjoyed sell-out years with its DD fat bike, so next season, three models will be offered that can handle up to five-inch tires. Felt, however, has held back on fielding a line of Plus-sized contenders, justifiably stating that the availability of decent wheels and tires is not sufficient to support the trend, and also that there is little consensus among consumers and bike brands on their purpose. For 2016, Felt will ante up with one model: the aluminum-framed, 27.5+ "Surplus" hardtail, which was only available as a computer rendering at the launch.


Felt 2016 launch
DD 10
Who would have guessed that a brand so steeped in carbon and technology would be serving up fat bikes? The DD 10 is the showcase for Felt's three-model fat bike range, and the only one with a suspension fork. The butted 6061 alloy aluminum frame is equipped with four-inch tires, but it can handle fives. The RockShox Bluto fork has a 100-millimeter stroke and the DD 10 rolls on Schwalbe Jumbo Jim tires. The Shimano XT 11-speed one-by drivetrain is powered by a Race Face Ride crankset. Felt's MSRP for the DD 10 is $2999 USD, with the entry-level DD 70's sticker price pegged at $1499.


Chief designer and engineer Jeff Soucek correctly states that wheel and tire technology is the driving force behind Plus. He says that presently, tire and rims are priced out of the range necessary to make viable production models, but more importantly, that the optimal combination of tire and rim has yet to evolve. Candidly, Soucek said that Schwalbe is the clear leader on the tire side of the equation with its 2.8-inch designs and, if the industry goes that direction, Plus will probably eliminate conventional hardtails. At the launch, Felt showed one of the 27.5-plus hardtail prototypes that the staff have been riding to evaluate components and geometry for a comprehensive range that is sure to emerge in the very near future.

Felt 2016 launch
Compulsion 10
With 160 millimeters of rear-wheel travel backed up by a matching RockShox Pike RCT3 fork, the Compulsion 10 is finally equipped to fulfill the role that it was intended for when it was first introduced. Its chassis and graphics are retained from last year, but the component spec finally checks all the boxes. The SRAM X01, one-by drivetrain is driven with a Race Face Turbine crankset, brakes are SRAM Guides, the dropper post is a mostly reliable KS LEV, and its 27.5-inch wheels are built with not-so-flashy, but proven reliable Novatec hubs, laced to equally tough WTB KOM i23 rims. Compulsions are sold in four sizes (small to XL) and reportedly weigh 29 pounds (13.1kg). MSRP for the 10 is $4999, Three models are offered, all sharing the same chassis, with the Compulsion 50 base model priced at $2999..


Felt 2016 launch
760-millimeter handlebar, paired with a 60-millimeter stem.
Felt 2016 launch
Equilink suspension, powered by a capable Monarch Plus shock.


What's Unchanged

Felt's Compulsion all-mountain bike is unchanged beyond a fresh graphic treatment and better spec, which is conspicuous, because the bike works quite well and deserves to be upgraded to carbon more than any other model in Felt's mountain bike lineup. It was a sensitive topic at the launch, which ultimately led Felt's Doug Martin to admit that they had been hard at work developing its successor. The V2, which is its working title, is slated to emerge in aluminum first, with a carbon version to follow shortly after.

Edict frames are unchanged, and their FAST (Fantastic Acronym for Simple Technology) pivotless rear suspension's travel remains at 100 millimeters. The aluminum versions have been eliminated and the Edict 5 has been added, which brings the cost of Felt's most popular XC/trailbike to $2999. Felt was quick to note that three out of the four Edict offerings feature one-by drivetrains - the Edict 5 has a Shimano Deore two by ten transmission.


Felt 2016 launch
Nine FRD
Felt's 29-inch-wheel Nine FRD weighs 19.3 pounds (8.76kg), has a SRAM XX1 transmission, Race Face Next cranks, and just about every component is carbon fiber, including the uppers of its RockShox RS1 fork. If you can't pop for its $8999 MSRP, there are three more carbon models and two aluminum replicas to choose from, with the entry level Nine 80 posting a remarkable, $649 sticker price. If you are racing, however, you have two real choices: the Nine FRD and Nine 1 are the only models that get the 900-gram UHC plus Textreme chassis.


Felt would be foolish to change its "Nine" hardtail - it outsells every bike in its mountain bike range added together. The top-line FRD was once the sole benefactor of Felt's ultimate "Textreme" carbon layup, but they will bring that same 900-gram frame down to the Nine-1 for 2016. Good news, as the Nine-1 costs a thousand dollars less than the FRD version. I am not into 29er XC hardtails so much, but I have to admit that it is a wicked looking machine.


Felt 2016 launch


What the future looks like


Felt has been quietly working on an all new model that reportedly will be placed above the Compulsion, presumably, as Felt's all-out enduro racer, but nobody there would confirm that statement. Its name is the "Decree" and it will be released in the fall of 2015 in Italy, October 16. Insiders say that the new bike is actually done and in first production models are in hand, but Felt was not quite ready to show their cards at the July launch date. There was considerable excitement there about the new bike, and for good reason - the public has been waiting forever for Felt to release a second-generation trail bike and a fresh design is long overdue. We'll be all over that one.
Felt 2016 launch




View more photos of 2016 Felt bicycles in the first look gallery.



MENTIONS @feltbicycles, @SramMedia, @shimano, @schwalbe

Author Info:
RichardCunningham avatar

Member since Mar 23, 2011
974 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

204 Comments
  • 225 8
 Is anyone else of the opinion that a 130mm trailbike that costs over TWELVE f*ckING THOUSAND DOLLARS should weigh way WAY less than 27 pounds? Did I mention the f*cking thing costs MORE THAN TWELVE THOUSAND DOLLARS. Screw this, too expensive, next bike's gonna be a YT.
  • 25 87
flag Smitty2661 (Jul 16, 2015 at 9:26) (Below Threshold)
 YT is nice when youre buying, but I feel like reselling it would be pretty tough considering its already cheap from them directly
  • 64 2
 Better than having to shell out $12K.
  • 57 0
 Yeah 12k is extremely steep considering the sworks stumpy is 8900
  • 53 0
 honestly! YT top of the line bike for $5,500 USD...
  • 16 43
flag deeeight (Jul 16, 2015 at 9:39) (Below Threshold)
 Well it INCLUDES a dropper post, which on its own is about a pound more than a nice carbon post would be (that would cost half as much) in the weight, although it doesn't include pedals because at the high end, bikes don't include pedals anymore, rider choices being all over the place its become pointless to spec a particular brand/model of pedal. Then stores inevitably have to sell customers something else and end up blowing out OEM spec pedals in discount bins. I ended up with a dozen pairs of crank brothers pedals that way a couple years ago. But realistically the weight is right where it should be for that travel of bike. Think about it, 15 years ago a $5k bike with 130mm/140mm travel and no dropper post would have weighed a lot more, and wouldn't have been a 650B or 29er, and wouldn't have had a super responsive carbon frame and wheelset nor such good quality shocks, forks and brakes.
  • 35 0
 It's remarkable to me that in making a huge deal about this new light weight type of carbon that they would spec the bike with 2x, which would definitely hurt the weight of the bike. The $5,900 Stumpy Carbon weighs at 27lbs, has 20mm more travel, and costs half the price.
  • 29 0
 its still $12,000
  • 8 37
flag deeeight (Jul 16, 2015 at 9:54) (Below Threshold)
 Yes, and if you tried to get all those components individually...you'd pay even more than 12k.
  • 4 2
 @ethan991 which proves you can get a helluva bike for like 6000 less
  • 17 2
 I live near YT's factory, or the outlet center in Germany.
So far I have two YT Bikes (Enduro and Downhill).
Pretty much the best thing you can get for little money.

A disadvantage however:
They keep certain products merely 2 years on stock, so if something breaks and your warranty covers the damage, it's possible this element is out of stock.
  • 5 0
 I guess selling your new 'RIG' for 12K is one way of topping all the other companies bikes. 12K, that's just wrong!
  • 27 2
 YT needs to make a trail bike.
  • 13 1
 Ya exactly. It just seems so weird that Felt, a company that I don't think the majority of mountain bikers think if as a very competitive brand, would put a 12 grand bike in their line up. It just doesn't seem logical to me. I understand maybe $8,000 because there are people out there willing to spend that, but for 12 grand would I really want to buy a felt? Not really.
  • 22 7
 Except not one with XTR Di2 electric shifting, Haven carbons, Raceface Next bar/stem, WTB carbon rail saddle, etc. Bikes like this are want-need sorts... do you want it or need it. For those in that category, they're not even going to blink at the price, and its still less than Felt's flagship road bike.

XTR Di2 groupset alone is $3500 retail. That Pike is about a thousand, the Haven carbon 29er wheelset is about $2300, right there without a frame or anything else you're over six thousand.
  • 3 0
 Good point. I guess if someone had the money to blow that spec is pretty sweet. I guess it comes down to personal preference, as do many things in the MTB world. If I had 12 grand to spend on a bike that wouldn't be the spec I'd go with, hence my animosity towards the price.
  • 1 14
flag drfunsocks FL (Jul 16, 2015 at 10:13) (Below Threshold)
 Its called a capara google it
  • 12 0
 Would I buy a 12,000 dollar bike?

Nope; I'd spend 25% of that on a bike, then another 25% of it in the form of gas, highway fees, bike park fees and local trail association fees / trail maintenance tools and the other 50% on family trips and holidays.

For everyone like me, there's someone who wouldn't think twice about dropping that kind of cash.

If you must insist on XTR and Di2 then you have to pay the coin. As long as there is a bike there at a price point that suits you, don't insist people with more money can't spend whatever they want.
  • 14 3
 Deeeight has a point, Felt's top TT bike is only $16,000. The cool thing is that Felt's designers are given carte blanche to build their FRD bikes however they want. I'm sure that, after they have had their fun, even they cringe when Felt's bean counters calculate the MSRP for their latest masterpiece
  • 1 0
 I can imagine it's great fun to spec those bikes. I wonder how many of the Virtue FRD's in that spec they produce? They must expect a fair amount of buyers if they green lighted a build that expensive.
  • 12 1
 Cool Fred Sled. To be seen on the back of $60k SUVs at Starbucks.
  • 1 0
 @ethan991 I'm guessing that, if you want this spec, you're looking at a custom order, they probably don't keep inventory of something they will move so few units of.
  • 3 0
 Everyone needs to settle down a bit. I'm not a fanboy of this company (though their cruisers are freaking awesome) but they have bikes at all price points.
  • 2 0
 Ok that would make a whole lot more sense.
  • 5 0
 I don't want to be that guy who compares the pricing of mountain bikes to motorcycles, but...

www.ktm.com/us/enduro/500-exc
  • 11 3
 Who the hell buys Felt anyways?
  • 7 1
 @deeeight You have a point about the cost of components. However, I'd suggest that Felt don't pay retail price on those. Do they pass on any of that saving? I cant tell but at 12k it's easy to see how someone would think they don't.

At the same time, I can't see what's the fuss about the 12k price tag. There is a market for everything in this world and someone will most certainly buy one of these bikes. That someone won't be me, but I also won't be screaming about how that price is ridiculous. One man's ridiculous is another man's normal. I'm also sure Felt don't think these will sell like hotcakes.
  • 3 6
 No manufacturer pays retail but if you want all those bits, you're always better to get them stock on a bike than to try and upgrade a lower spec model with them.
  • 1 0
 I'm sure the carbon is top notch, and that they're getting that OE discount. However, it's still $12K.
  • 6 0
 $12,000 . . . . How else would they fund the Robot!
  • 2 0
 This reminds me of a news item. A poor individual had a 20,000$ Bike stolen. They caught the thief. The bike was NOT recovered.
....
12,000$ + Bike = Biggest "STEAL ME" sign in history. Better have that thing insured, and permanently tethered to your person. Or when its gets stolen....You're not gonna have a good day.
  • 4 1
 Most Bike thieves have no idea of the value of a bike, they are stealing it to sell for drugs within the same hour. Steal a $12K bike for $100. Truth.
  • 11 8
 How is this so expensive? I know Di2 is a bit more but lets look at it using vaguely retail pricing:
Frame 3000
Fork 1000
Groupset 2300
Wheels 1000
Finish Kit 1000
Um, that's not even $9k... and this thing weighs 2-3lbs more than it should IMO. I haven't been into biking in over a decade but I am shocked at how much more costly and heavy bikes are even given improvements in suspension and elsewhere.
  • 4 0
 @IcehawkOS Some corrections
$4500 frame
$2600 wheels
  • 6 6
 I already provided the price for the wheels (its more than $2300 not $1000) and the drivetrain ($3500 not the 2300 you seem to think it is). A dropper post like the reverb stealth is $450 on its own. Raceface Next bar is about $150. That WTB Rocket V Carbon saddle is $250. A pair of evo series TLE 29er Nobby Nics is over $200. The Virtue FRD frame alone is $4500. An Easton EC90SL carbon stem is $250. Clearance prices for three year old parts and frames at CRC or Jenson aren't the prices you compare to or use to build a bike when trying to compare to a new for 2016 model.
  • 8 1
 That is one big bullcrap with pricing, everyone having a slight idea about buying "on the internet" would fix all that under 8k. Everyone knows that such bikes are bought either by super rich people who could not give a tiniest damn, or by worst kind of upper middle class wankers. Please... We are all friends here, no need to pretend
  • 5 7
 Yes, fix it for under $8k... 18 months from now when parts are marked down. Meanwhile the rest of us who have the money to buy it now would rather be owning and riding it for those 18 months. You cannot get wasted time BACK and you can't take money saved to the afterlife.
  • 4 2
 Would you buy that bike deeeight or anything above 8k? Seriously dude...
  • 4 0
 Look for one of these on the Buy/sell in a year struggling to sell at $6,000....
  • 3 0
 I may have missed it, but can you tell me how much it the trail bike costs again? Thanks.
  • 6 1
 Well if you don't fixate on the 12k of the flagship version, the Virtue 3 model is $3500 and still with a carbon frame. I wonder how many realize they're arguing over the price of a 29er though.
  • 1 0
 I'm with you on that point
  • 1 0
 And here in Thailand, Feltlike bikes are sold in Tesco, which is akin to Wal-Mart
  • 2 0
 welcome to the new 100$ is the NEW 10$
  • 4 1
 You can buy an aluminum bike, that weighs 2-3lbs more, with a better suspension design, with the same fork and shock, for 7-8 grand less. Fact. If you pay 12 grand for a MTB, even if you can afford it, then you probably also drive a purple Lamborghini with a floral pattern shirt blasting bad techno and paying to get laid . Or your a factory sponsored rider (no one here).
  • 10 2
 people who drive purple lambo's aren't paying to get laid
  • 6 2
 Everyone pays to get laid, whether you know it or not, your paying one way or the other. Those guys are paying way more. Fundamental fact of life. Another fundamental fact is they are charging way too much for carbon, especially since there is little benefit over aluminum. Another fact, who buys Felt MTB's? Not even the bad taste Lambo guys.
  • 1 0
 If I would have $12,000 to spend on one bike i would build a custom one for sure. Then again this bike is mainly built so felt can show off their skills and so people connect felt more with high quality (basically to gey rid of that "for that money i wouldn't bu a Felt" image). And for rich business men who don't know much about cycling but want to buy a decent bike, so they buy the most expensive one, because it is probably the best and money isnt an issue anyways.
  • 1 2
 Oh sooory its a 29er - must be worth at least 12k - bit of a bargain actually:-)
  • 1 0
 That's a lot of cash. I'm also looking at YT.
  • 2 1
 Funny how many of you are slamming Felt yet most likely never ridden one. Keep up the Pinkbike rep, makes for entertaining read.

Love the paying for sex comment, middle school right?
  • 2 1
 @theoriginaltwotone, tell us your experience of riding Felt bikes
  • 1 0
 C'mon guys, its so dudes with their uber expensive XC race bike now have an uber expensive trail bike to go with their uber expensive road bike, and their uber expensive triathlon bike, etc.....
  • 1 0
 @WAKIdesigns I had a 2009 Complusion 1 for several years. I was very impressed at how well it pedaled for a 150mm travel bike and that was coming from a 2000 SWorks FSR. It pedaled better than the 2012 Stumpjumer FSR Comp 29 that replaced it.
  • 1 0
 My remedy is 31.5 lbs and I am about 3 grand into it. If I bought carbon wheels, light tires and switched to a carbon post i bet I could get within 1lb of that 12 grand bike. I had 2 different spesh epics in the shop the other day, on weighing in just over 22lbs and the other at 27. The only difference between the 2 was a 1x drivetrain and carbon wheels. Otherwise both were brain shock, carbon post and crank, super light brakes and everything else. Makes me think there is no way this 12000 bike can justify its weight.
  • 4 0
 It's a misprint on the weight, not the first or last time it will happen. The Current NON FRD Virtue is 25lb with AL wheels. I doubt DI2 add 3 or more pounds
  • 4 0
 The info I received may have contained a misprint, but Felt claims 26.76 pounds on the FRD Virtue, I believe that they quote medium sized bikes. I was expecting it to weigh somewhere around 24.5. I have a call out to Felt.

New: Felt put it on the scale (medium sized) and said that the FRD version weighs what they stated. They said that the SRAM XX1 version is lighter. Nice to get an honest response.
  • 1 0
 Gee-Zeus, Even if it was a 20lbs V10.6ccti, 12 thousands of dollars would still be an idiotic sum of money for a bike. Anything above 6k is
  • 3 0
 these super expensive bikes are simply known in the bike biz as "Halo Bikes"

not for everyone, and the bike co will not sell any real quantity, but it has the purpose of generating marketing kudos for the brand; hell we are talking about this on Pinkbike so Felt's marketing team have done their job?

and most importantly, the 'trickle down' effect that consumers that cannot afford the Halo Bike will purchase a more affordable model because it shows that the brand is credible, and can produce the goods.

the "value" is always in the middle-market model, not the 'low end' (too many compromises to hit a pricepoint) nor the 'high end' where minimal gains are felt for massive price inflations

its nice to graze a visual feast on the bling, but a mid-market model under the control of a skilled and powerful bike rider gets the job done with no fuss; often overtaking the rider on the low end model who is pogo-sticking and mis-shifting his/her way down the trail, and dominating the bling rider on the halo end model who has the gear and no idea... Smile
  • 1 0
 I'd rather buy three or four better looking bikes and feel like I've won the lottery. I do own a Felt hard tail that rips though. 900.
  • 2 0
 If anyone here has ever bothered pricing out textreme- that frame is a bargain. Toray T800 is something like 80 USD a yard for 48 inch wide bolt. Textreme is generally sold in 1 meter wide bolts starting around 275 USD per meter. Some of the higher modulus grades are 500 USD per meter, and they provide a version for F1 that runs an equivalent of 1500 USD per meter but is sold in like 2 or 3 meter wide bolts
  • 1 0
 I wonder how much better rider can someone be riding this 12k bike than something half the price...
  • 2 0
 If we are to complain about the price, at least complain about companies that don't even tell you what materials they use. Most frames are t700/800, and some are even lower, yet they all sell for roughly the same. Better rider? No. Arbitrarily raise expenses on every other bike? Also no. Felt's entry level 29er is 640. A specialized rockhopper in a shop down the street from me starts at 750.
  • 2 0
 @R-trailking-S

Specialized probably the worst for obscuring what carbon fibre materials they use? They just tell you "FACT 8" or "FACT 10" to obscure the information...no one in the bike industry seems to know either?

I know from my experience owning their bikes / frames and previously working in 2 Specialized Concept Store, dealing with crash replacement and warranty as a workshop manager....

...its not the best quality carbon pre-impreg cloth or resin; they use a relatively high ratio of resin to cloth (which is cheaper) and lower quality cloth which is weaker, meaning they use more material both cloth and resin - means its a heavy frame compared to much of the competition?

my Specialized Tarmac Elite SL4 road bike frame in medium (54cm) was a surprisingly porky 1.2kg with its thick walled tubes, high resin content and metal co-moulded parts

my Giant Defy Advanced Pro frame (road disc brake) in medium is 0.96kg, its fully toray T700 with Giant's own custom resin

even the halo "S-Works" frame are not particularly light (I've seen 0.97kg for medium Tarmac), especially considering the huge price premium (in the UK the Tarmac SW road frame is £2,800) from their "production" bike frames.
  • 23 3
 Why would I buy felt
  • 8 6
 because it feels good?
  • 14 0
 I had a felt, and it felt good. Didn't quite feel as good as other bikes I've had, but for a felt it felt pretty good...
  • 6 0
 ^^^ I've felt a felt also and I felt it felt OK, but overall I felt that the felt had too many pivots to maintain which felt like a headache felt quickly when periodic service commenced.
  • 2 0
 Reading these comments felt weird
  • 22 3
 UGLY !
  • 2 1
 I decree that the Decree looks like decrap
  • 2 1
 thats funny since the decree is not being shown in any of these pics.
  • 1 1
 my apologies. i thought the decree was the one with the negative bar setup (last bike in pics). again, i'm sorry to have upset you. please accept my apology oh great one.
  • 2 1
 not great at all nor do you need to apologize. you spoke of a bike being crap, yet that bike you speak of does not exist in these pics. if you want to call the compulsion crap, see pics, then feel free.
  • 1 1
 Ok thanks!
  • 16 0
 Why all the rage? I am going to buy that 12 grand bike. It will be perfect at smoothing out the speed bumps riding though the car park to my job at Google.
  • 16 0
 "we abandonmodel years" "now look at our 2016 bikes"
  • 4 0
 Pretty sure its says "traditional model years".
  • 1 0
 2016 range is the last to be sold within a 'model year'. The 'living line' will start once the 2016 bikes have been released.
  • 14 1
 "Gripshifts have become a favorite among pro riders".

Have I missed something?
  • 5 0
 XC pros lol. DH grip shift would be pretty funny though.
  • 1 0
 Oh, hah! I was thinking that DH pros didn't really need the lockout on the fork since they were always sending it, but that makes much more sense.
  • 1 0
 Had a problem with my shifter pod hitting and grinding my top tube pretty bad when crashing on my trail bike. I also have small hands so I can't really push the paddles far enough to get the fast half-cassette shifts. X0 gripshifts were on sale on xmas 2 years ago and I was like "meh, why not?". A week and 60$ bucks later... it shifts so good and it works really well, f*ck pod shifters forever... if I didn't switch to shimano on my DH bike I probably would have ordered one at some point and they're probably why I haven't went to shimano on the trail bike too.
  • 1 0
 Really @PLC07 ? I could certainly see the applications if one has a dropper post, a fork/shock remote, and the grips are wide enough so you don't accidentally shift.
  • 1 0
 My cockpit is ultra clean as I only have 2 brakes, a dropper remote mounted via matchmaker and the gripshift on my handle bar and the gripshift make things look even cleaner as there is no pod. Don't worry about accidental shifts, I cut my grip so I always have the thumb and middle finger wrapped around the gripshift and even in rowdy DH double black diamond trails, I never had one happen. It also actually shifts faster since you can go through an entire cassette with a single wrist motion.

The only problem I can see is that the grip you shift with has a big diameter so only the biggest grips out there will fit nicely with it (flush, in terms of diameter). Even though I have small hands, I love big grips so it's not a problem for me (I ride ourys but odi rogues would most likely do). If you're a fan of ruffians and the such, I wouldn't recommend the gripshift as the gap between the GS diameter and the smaller grip would probably be uncomfortable.
  • 4 0
 You could run a not connected to anything gripshift on a DH bike to help time your Braaaap brap noises.
  • 1 0
 More like click click lol
  • 1 2
 I run Gripshift on my DH bike and LOVE IT!
  • 10 1
 12k on a pedal bike?!! Unfortunately that's the way it's heading. I was at a bike park in the UK and where a few years ago the car park was full of vans and crappy estate cars, now it's full of brand new Audi's, BMW'S, Merc's (all with expensive roof racks, gets the leather dirty!), and even the vans are fully specced VW Transporters. Either we've been priced out by the manufacturers and it's now a rich man's game or we're too happy to pay these prices. I'm sticking to the grass roots and driving my 250km Volvo.
  • 5 0
 Suck it up and just be better on a bike half the price I say! Well, it's one solution. For the average rider, spending 200% more money won't them anywhere near that much better, fact. But we knew this was gonna happen. Years ago, as soon as soft drinks and car firms starting using mountain bikes to sell their products, we knew it was the end of the 'wholesome' fledgling sport it had been. For better and for worse, mtb is big business now, and that's reflected in the available price hierarchy. It's all bollox though really isn't it, we all know we almost all ride bikes too good for us. We all know we could go virtually as fast and have just as much fun on a bike half the price of whatever we ride. To me, for the most part, 12k bikes are bought by people who either a) seriously love bikes b) are seriously good on one, or c) they buy expensive everything because that's their spending bracket/capacity. I reckon it's mainly c.
  • 2 0
 You don't need to spend that much money to get a decent bike. Spending extra for more bling is optional.
  • 5 0
 In this sport, as soon as you get a 3-4k full suspension bike, there are three ways of getting noticeably faster and spending additional 4-8k on classic components is not going to do the job by a tiniest margin, even if you drop 8lbs. Those ways are: getting fit and skilled, getting an e-bike, taking performance enhancing drugs. everything else is just fooling yourself.
  • 3 1
 I'd rather see reviews of performance enhancing drugs than e-bikes.
  • 15 6
 ugliest rear triangle available on the market
  • 8 1
 process 134dl anyone? 134 in the rear and 140 up front. mine weighs 29 pounds. cost me 3600, added aluminum roval fatties 600 bucks and carbon bars of course.
  • 5 0
 Let's get one thing straight...Felt is a company that REALLY doesn't target the average user of pinkbike. They don't make super-slack endurotastic bikes, they don't make 40 pound throw away wet park bikes, they started as a road company, and they sell most of their bikes to middle aged and older guys out to ride road, or who collect beach cruisers. As a teen to twenty-something or a budding 30-year old, their offerings aren't cool, the bikes they make don't shout "RAD BRUH", they don't have a DH presence or "Cool" sponsors, and quite frankly...yeah. Felt is not a cool company in the mtb realm.

While the equilink system suffers from "too many moving parts" syndrome, and as a consequence weighs a bit more and requires more maintenance (less of an issue if you live in dry climates, like the climate they were designed and tested in), it's hands down one of the best riding designs out there, and if they could figure out a way to simplify the linkage and preserve the performance, they'd have an absolute winner. But as it stands, it's just too complex to really be usable in a wider range of conditions beyond dry, dusty, and rocky. It may have a nice rearward axle path that takes square edged bumps super super well (unlike DW bikes, such as pivot mach 5's), pedals very nicely (like DW or VPP), stays active under braking, and blah blah blah marketing terminology etc, but again, there's just too much going on with it to be a viable system in really sloppy, wet climates. ...Which makes me glad I live in so-cal.

Felt's greatest strength is their road offerings, where unlike their full-sus mountain bikes, they offer really damn good value for money, and apart from meh rear brakes on the AR series (it IS a tt bike after all), I got no complaints about what I've seen come through my shop's doors. (Yes, the shop I work at sells Felt, and I own a compulsion LT3. It's a rad bike. I likes it.) Their road-oriented strength is reflected with their MTB offerings, where their XC stuff (the edict) is definitely the best mountain bike they have, with their longer-travel offerings having historically had a "long-travel XC bike" feel, but it sounds like they've got some new engineers and who knows, maybe their new thing will be awesome!
  • 5 2
 Some how all the bike manufactures got together and jacked up the price to set a corporate standard in pricing in order to get more coin from the consumer. Top end bikes where in the 6.5 grand range a few years back wtf happened? are the frames made out of rare metals or is the Queen of England building them on her spare time? Felt you and other companies are nuts!
  • 3 0
 I would not blame the bike brands, they are just R&D, marketing, and sales. I'd blame the factories that make all the bikes for these guys. If it costs Felt more to purchase that bike from the contract manufacture than last year, guess what, the MSRP is going up because their business model relies on a specific margin goal for each product to keep the lights on, employees paid, etc. If A-Pro, Giant, Merida, etc raise prices you'll see Trek, Specialized, Felt, etc all have to react.
  • 3 0
 @Elspecialized. You couldn't find carbon rims on a production mountain bike 5 years ago. Nor droppers (not that there is one on this bike). Even carbon bars were relatively rare. Plus there were fewer full carbon frames. Account for that, then adjust for inflation, and bikes aren't actually much different in price. Don't believe me? Pick a model further down the price spectrum that doesn't have these options and enter the price into a website that does inflation conversions.
  • 3 0
 i think it all happened with the introduction of the larger wheel sizes....whilst people (myself included) were moaning about the pro's and cons they were upping prices like 650b made you ride like a god. Surely everyone else noticed this? plus there are too many people on here telling us "no ones making you buy this bike if its too expensive" but as long as your ok with it you may as well get lubed up and grab your ankles as the manufacturers f@#k you good for another few grand extra on the next model......
  • 1 0
 A very big factor in the price is how the value of the USD is changing compared to the value of the Taiwanese and Chinese currency. I heard last years it changed negatively for us. This also counts for Europe, as those Asian companies usually sell their stuff in USD
  • 1 0
 Mattin: Yeah. The dollar has been strong in Europe, but it isn't doing so well in Asia. Bike prices will be ratcheting upwards for the US market.
  • 7 0
 Nobody buys Felt, not even Team Robot
  • 5 1
 can someone explain the idea behind less rear travel than the front? More and more I'm seeing this, Transition might have the biggest discrepancy between front and rear.
  • 7 0
 Over-forking a bike helps out with more aggressive riding.
  • 4 0
 Progressive linkages using air shocks, slack ht angles, raked out forks, long front centres. There are many good reasons for it
  • 5 0
 Maintain pedal efficiency where it matters most, at the rear of the bike. Upping the fork travel, something that adds little weight if at all, makes the bikes geometry a little more descending friendly, slowing the steering at high speed, and also giving a little room for error with a bit extra travel that allows you to charge harder through rough sections of trail. It's negative effects of climbing steering is marginal for a larger improvement when pointed down.
  • 6 1
 140mm fork with a 69°head angle give 130mm of vertical travel. so it's not that "over-forked"

And hardtail had more travel in the front for decades.
  • 1 0
 Over-forked compared to the amount of rear travel.
  • 1 2
 I thought it's what people did to slacken out older bikes, and maybe raise BB heights, to make a bike less racy and more trail-friendly. Not sure why the mfgs are doing it, but they are taking away that level of customization.
  • 1 0
 Should give a little more pop for boosting jumps while letting the front eat up trail obstacles, too.
  • 1 0
 Do remember its also a 29er... much easier to make a fork longer than it is to make a frame longer.
  • 2 0
 Its because rear suspension is mechanically increased where as a fork is 1:1. With linkages and various different positioning you can make 100mm of travel feel like 120, where a 100mm fork will always feel like a 100mm fork. Plus your rear end is being pulled over things, rather than being driven straight into them, so for a lot of riders they can get away with the increased pedalling efficiency and extra pop on jumps.
  • 1 1
 Think about the old days, we weren't riding rigid forks and rear suspension because the business end is the front. To see the 'sense' in a front bias on a full suss, you just have to stop and ponder the validity of front suspension hardtails. And why there are no bikes with the opposite bias.
  • 1 0
 You want extreme examples in full suspension, look at softtails. My Salsa Dos Niner has ONE whole inch of rear travel vs 3.9 inches in front. Its still perfectly capable of launching off a drop 3 1/2 feet high to flat at speed without pitching me off.
  • 2 0
 As long as the bikes geometry is designed around that particular front/rear travel, no biggie. And Seriously? A 3 1/2 foot drop can be done on a rigid hard tail, that's nothing. That's what we did on our BMX's when we were kids.
  • 1 0
 Well if you have the skill for it, and if you don't...six inches will endo a lot of folks. Most wouldn't attempt a nearly blind corner 3 1/2 footer with low hanging branches jumping INTO a cedar grove where you literally have 3 bike lengths to touch down and steer to avoid trees.
  • 2 0
 Why WHYYY didn't they bother to put some actual bearings on the equilink axles...?? I'm riding a 2015 Compulsion and the Equilink is rattling and creaking like f#&%... after a rear triangle rebuild and new bushings that's good for maybe 50 km and then it starts over... It rides great, though. But I'm spending more time in the workshop than on the trails due to your supsenion layout!
  • 6 0
 sweet road bikes felt....
  • 6 0
 "Plus will probably eliminate conventional hardtails."

lol.
  • 6 0
 Yeah im gonna buy a felt for 10k. Said no one ever
  • 1 0
 That's a pretty sweet 2k discount! Smile
  • 1 0
 I could buy a second decent bike from that
  • 4 2
 f*cking hell that carbon frame looks absolutely bloody shit. I can't believe how much of the cloth and glue shit is in this artical. Mix that in with 27.5+ ridiculous wheel size and you shave the worst "1st look review ever!". Big props to Kona for not following the same pattern at least someone sees sense. I have to say thanks to people like Felt I'm dreading 2016!!!
  • 6 0
 Kona went boost on some of their bikes this year YOUR WHOLE WORLD IS A LIE
  • 4 1
 @Matt76 why is that every time carbon is mentioned on pinkbike you pop up in the comments raging about it. Just shut up and don't buy it
  • 2 0
 The cost of the bike does not make you a better rider.

Certainly a $500 bike does not compare to $4000 bike. But $4000 bike versus a $12500 bike, there probably isn't a ton of difference for a fit proficient bike handler. Anyway, no bike is worth that in my opinion, even if I won the lottery.
  • 5 0
 Only if riding an Ellsworth was the other option...
  • 2 1
 Felt can go jump. I destroyed a Felt frame on my first ride out- a brand new bike. Yes I stacked it but it should not have folded the way it did- not when the forks were absolutely perfect (Lyriks). Their QC was terrible, oval headtube from the factory and a downtube as thin as foil in the middle. Super poor customer service too.

I hope these bikes bomb.
  • 1 0
 Can anyone speak from experience on how the equilink actually feels on the trail? Still not sure what the hell that thing is for after all these years..... something about pedalling efficiency I suppose. Felt refuses to abandon it, so it must do something (more than marketing mumbo jumbo).
  • 4 0
 Rock Shox need to sort it out and start work on a 4x/jump version of that upside down shizzle.
  • 1 0
 love to see them try that.....its flexy as is for xc so a dirt jump version would be hilarous.i am not saying its a rubbish fork but people have too be a bit honest and agree that its more flexy than they would like for the money.....and a sid is sooo much easier on the wallet. But hey if aesthetics is ya thing its certainly a nice looking fork.
  • 1 0
 Yeah I had a short travel shiver for a while, the flex was very apparent but somewhat predictable in a way. It was a bit like driving a wishy washy french car and eventually knowing you just have to turn the wheel more for the same effect. I just feel like if they can make a successful one legged upside down fork why can't they work this one out. Being a peasant lay-engineer.. Wouldn't a proprietary huge front axle help? I'm talking 30-35mm.
  • 1 0
 Yeh i guess like you say the lefty works fine from what i hear and i think it doesnt weigh too much either so yep i agree does seem a bit odd.
I also saw someone riding on a lauf fork near mine.....looked pretty trick but why would anyone buy one as its basically £650 of wobbly mess....650 gets you a decent conventional fork. And if weight is that much of an issue you should not be sacrificing steering accuracy so badly for such small bump absorbtion.

www.bikeradar.com/mtb/gear/category/components/forks-suspension/product/review-lauf-trail-racer-29-fork-14-48818
  • 1 0
 Not trying to insult the company but 95% of the cycling community wouldnt even think about a Felt bike in the first place. They are t advertised and not well known. The fact they are charging 12 k for a trail bike? The think still weighs 27 pounds. For that money it should be 20 lbs. Are they ridiculous? Just go by a YT. Maybe 4 em.
  • 1 0
 I think the whole point of introducing this bike is trying ot change that image. To get people talking about how exclusive and luxurious bikes felt makes.
  • 3 0
 I am not a huge xc bike fan, but that edict frd is the sexiest bike I have ever seen.
  • 1 0
 I got do demo the Edict last year and it is a very good XC bike. I liked it more than both the Superfly FS and Scalpel, and overall on par (if not better than) the Epic and Jet9.
  • 7 3
 No on price, no on colour and design.
  • 4 0
 Not even spy photos of the 2016 Felt Up?
  • 1 0
 Still working out legal issues with the TSA.
  • 4 0
 still no DH bike huh? team robot must be happy to stay on his xxl V10
  • 2 0
 they have a TT bike, maybe you can just buy that instead.
  • 3 0
 Last year felt kinda the same... Not necessarily the prettiest bikes (to be gentle).
  • 5 1
 "GripShift has become a favorite among pro riders" What year are we in???
  • 8 0
 2055 judging by the price?
  • 1 0
 Sorry Felt but you are ripping us on frame cost and passing MSRP prices of components which we all know is bullshit pricing to begin with.
  • 3 0
 Any plans for selling the Little Bastard?
  • 2 0
 Any Felt dealer can get them! Their cruisers are actually pretty damn sweet! They've got a 29er cruiser with knobbly tires and a 2-speed kickback hub, I think it's called the rail, that's especially rad! Less than Klunker too!
  • 4 1
 12 grand only gets you 130mm travel?? No thanks
  • 4 1
 Tough crowd to please....
  • 5 2
 Felt = Fuji = diamond back = Giant = meh
  • 2 0
 70% of the bikes are Giant.
  • 2 0
 *of all bikes
  • 1 0
 Exactly my point. Giant = meh too
  • 1 0
 I demo'd last years virtue. non-carbon. was very surprised on how well it climbed as well as ripped on desents! bike was a lot of fun and changed my mind on bigger wheels
  • 3 0
 SeinFELT - because they're so ugly and overpriced it's hilarious!
  • 3 0
 I once touched one and it Felt s%!t
  • 1 0
 Markerter: "Hey, what do you think some douche bag would pay for this?"

Engineer: "........................... Twelve. Twelve Thousand Dollars."

Marketer: "Done."
  • 1 0
 12k!? f*@ck that, id rather spend the cash on a clean example BMW1000RR and the rest on a Halfords special....

..tru story bro!
  • 2 0
 FAST: "Fantastic Acronym for Simple Technology"

I laughed.
  • 3 1
 Those FRD frames looks amazing! I can live with just 1 kidney, right?
  • 2 1
 Felt mountain bikes do less than nothing for me but I like their road/cross bikes
  • 2 0
 wasp with da dawg bone ?!? Abandoned ages ago..
  • 3 0
 yeah,I felt nothing.
  • 1 0
 Equilink font is similar to DW link font. Vide: DR White vs White Dots skis! old trick!?
  • 1 0
 After reading these comments, I felt compulsive need to leave a comment that didn't mention YT, whoops I just did.
  • 10 9
 I felt so bad reading this
  • 1 0
 I'd pass one the RS1 and just go with the lighter new Fox 32 or RS SID.
  • 1 0
 Only 12g's that's a deal. ...do they offer 30 year financing
  • 1 0
 must must some good gear!!!!
  • 1 0
 felt like ive just been bent over!! lol
  • 1 0
 12000 USD is as steep as the head angle...
  • 1 0
 i like it!! if it was framed on a wall
  • 1 0
 Looks like a bunch more overpriced dog shit to me.
  • 3 3
 Looks like a session! j/k hahaha
  • 2 0
 Surely it only felt like one?!
  • 1 0
 must be spell check lol
  • 1 1
 "Plus will probably eliminate conventional hardtails"
And pigs will fly...
  • 1 1
 nothing to see here
  • 1 1
 Oh my poor eyes.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.074472
Mobile Version of Website