We last touched on the Canyon Lux Trail in last year's Downcountry Field Test, where it didn't fare as well as the competition. Held back by compromised geometry and a more XC-focused spec than others in the category, it irked some testers in the group. Canyon seems to have taken that feedback to heart, with the new Lux Trail sporting a host of changes that seem to address some of those problems. With revised sizing, kinematic, and categorization, the Lux feels a bit more at home in its skin. How'd that shake out on trail? Read on to find out.
Lux Trail Details• Carbon frame
• 29" wheels
• 115mm travel, 120mm fork
• 67° head angle
• 76° seat angle
• 412-500mm reach, 480mm size L
• 435mm chainstay length
• Measured weight: 28.5 lb / 12.9 kg
• Price: €3,299 - €8,499
•
canyon.com GeometryIn the name of keeping things quick (a theme with this bike), here are the beats: the seat tube angle is 1.5° steeper, landing at 76° across all sizes. The head tube angle of 67° is half a degree slacker than the prior generation, while the reach, stack, bottom bracket drop, and chainstay length remain essentially unchanged. This addresses a primary complaint about the prior gen bike, which was just how stretched out the seated position was, given the relatively long reach and slack seat tube angle.
The new Lux Trail's numbers are more in line with typical trail bike sizing, giving it both a more comfortable climbing position and confidant descending geometry. I've been riding a size Large, and found the seated position quite comfortable. The stock handlebar is a bit flat for my taste, but a little rise improved the ride quite a lot.
Frame FeaturesCanyon took the opportunity presented by reworking the Lux Trail's front triangle and really ran with it. The level of integration here is impressive, with in-frame storage, a hard-mounted multitool, and two water bottles to boot. The bike feels like it's been accessorized with long days in mind, and the quick-access tools and stashes make for a speedy fix should something go awry.
There are two frame trims to choose from, with the differences essentially coming down to weight. For an average size Medium frame, the CF models are claimed to weigh 2101 grams, with the more expensive CFR frames clocking in at 1936 grams. With equivalently light parts kits fit to each, there will definitely be some weight-weenie friendly builds in there.
The Lux now features a UDH rear end, making all your hard-shifting Transmission dreams come true. Front and rear lockout mean you can turn your mountain bike into a road bike at a moment's notice, and might make some post-ride pumptrack sessions more fun.
While the improvements are many and welcomed, there are still some vestiges of the compromised designs of prior generations still at play here. The main two that come to mind are the flat-mount rear brake (this is for road bikes, please keep it out of the MTB world), and our favorite enemy, the through-headset cable routing. Both details make for a bike that requires specialized components that usually don't perform at the level of equivalently light or convenient designs.
Suspension DesignThe Lux Trail retains the linkage-driven single pivot layout of the prior model, but implements a hanging rocker meant to improve the small-bump performance. The 115mm of rear suspension is much more progressive than the Lux World Cup, with a left-hand lockout setup that allows for quick changes in suspension characteristic. The Open mode is full fat, letting things move as much as your setup allows for; Pedal mode firms things up, and holds the suspension higher in travel; Locked means locked, expect no movement.
Build KitsThere's some difference between the United States market and the rest of the world when it comes to the Lux Trail, but overall expect a wide product range with many build kit options to choose from. The CFR models are not available in the US market, and the CF6 will be available sometime next spring. Spec and pricing is as follows:
Lux Trail CF6 // €3,299. Fox Performance suspension, Shimano Deore brakes and drivetrain, DT LN AM wheels, 13.1 kg.
Lux Trail CF7 // €3,699, $3,799 USD. Fox Performance suspension, Shimano SLX brakes and drivetrain, DT XRC1900 wheels, 12.9 kg.
Lux Trail CF8 // €4,699, $4,799 USD. Fox Performance Elite suspension, Shimano XT brakes and drivetrain, DT XRC1700 wheels, 12.48 kg.
Lux Trail CF9 // €5,699, $5,799 USD. RockShox Select+ suspension, SRAM GX Transmission, Level Silver brakes, DT XRC1501 wheels, 12.45 kg.
Lux Trail CFR // €6,999. Fox Factory suspension, Shimano XTR brakes and drivetrain, DT XRC1200 wheels, 11.25 kg.
Lux Trail CFR LTD // €8,499. RockShox Ultimate suspension, SRAM XX AXS Transmission, Level Ultimate brakes, DT XRC1200 wheels, 11.66 kg.
Ride ImpressionsSo far, my time on the Lux Trail has been all about hard climbs, long rides, and mellow descents. Based on the nature of the bike, I think things are going to stay that way. The Lux Trail feels like a cross-country bike for the people, and won't easily be confused for a more capable trail bike. I was able to ride plenty of my go-to test tracks for more capable bikes, but not nearly at the pace or confidence I'm used to.
That said, don't take that less-capable claim as a demerit, as that's really not what this little Canyon is about. It feels like a bike made for very long days in the saddle, covering as much ground as possible at a quick clip. While you might have to skirt around some of the gnarlier features and trails, you'll probably make up for it when you're pinned on the road transfers, with the suspension fully locked out. The novelty of the grip-shift twin lockout quickly became a convenience, and something I was happy to rely on for punchy climbs and longer pedaling traverses.
The descending nature of the Lux Trail is sharp and a bit squirrelly, but with a higher-rise bar fitted things feel confidant enough to handle a wide variety of terrain. The suspension was predictable and supportive, with decent grip for a bike meant to maximize efficiency. The conveniences of the tool and spares storage baked into the frame are hard to overlook, and quite well integrated.
Build NotesI had a couple weird build anomalies on my test bike, which Canyon says should be isolated to this pre-production batch, but things to look out for regardless. The suspension lockouts were routed through brake housing, as opposed to the correct shift housing, making the action feel spongy and imprecise at first. Once fixed, things felt much crisper. The lockout shifter was also using a cable guide that sent the cables out 90° from the bars, which works with the Shimano brakes on some spec levels, but looked a bit silly on the otherwise clean SRAM build. Nothing critical overall, but some small mistakes to keep an eye out for.
Stay tuned for the long term review on the Canyon Lux Trail in the near future.
For more pictures of Lux, head on over to the album
here.
It's one of the main things that would stop me buying a bike even if it ticked all the other boxes I'm looking for
Brian: How do you parse the various feedback that you get? When you read that all headset cable routing is just the marketing department's fault, is that hurtful? How do you take that on board? Does that affect decision making or is it a good thing?
Reto: I think you always have to be open-minded for feedback. And I think, you know, feedback comes from all different levels. Of course, consumers, at the end of the day really decide what they like and what they feel it is they're looking for. I mean, we get also a lot of really, really good feedback and they like to see that. For example, your suspension doesn't get dirty. It's really clean. It's covered. We also get a lot of feedback from retailers. We get feedback from the market, and from athletes. So, it's really kind of a big panel of people who give us feedback and we have a big team of engineers and designers. They're definitely looking at what is the best solution and what to do on products
And like tube in tube cable routing then expensively solved a simple problem, I’m sure the bike industry will “solve” the problems with cable tourism-wasting R&D money on an unnecessary problem. And driving up bike costs in the process.
Do you even wrench bro???
Now I'm spending my valuable work time trying find the original link, it's a good read!
@Upduro is the hero we all deserve!
m.pinkbike.com/news/first-ride-propain-tyee-2023.html
"...it looks good..."
IMO, it looks like an afterthought.
Who thinks those are the same thing?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_garbage_patch
I imagine though it is about cost - a less complex layup for the frame as the cable ports are gone and some cheap plastic shite for a headset.
The chances of maintaining this bike using that headset, bearings and plastic parts after 3-4 years of ownership are rather slim.
www.bikeyoke.de/en/camber-2016-2018.html
The cable route is so hassle to route and need to cut the brake hose in order to remove the top bearing and replaced brand new brake hose then replace brand new bearings etc(routing the cable is a bitch)...not forgetting the non common top bearing which is hard to find any local bike shop but need to order from Canyon(it took almost 2 months to arrive just for the top bearing). Crazy!
I don't think their bearings is top quality...worse than aliexpress shit.
The big deal for me is how ugly the headset routing is. It's very inelegant.
Tangentially, I had to install a new fork on a Specialized road bike since the original owner cut off the steerer too short and the new owner wanted to add 15mm of spacers. The customer brought the new fork to us. In order to add 15mm of bar height, I had to completely re-hose the bike (it had wireless shifting). A job, which typically would cost $75 labor at our shop (install new fork, which would have included the brake bleed, but no hoses) and be a $100-125 total with materials, cost the customer $325 for the materials and labor, since it took almost three hours to install the new fork. And because of the dumb integrated headset, spacers and stem cap, you are forced to cut the steerer to exactly the length you want it to be, and if you ever want to change stem height or length, you'd have to replace the fork, again, and re hose the bike again. Just a stem length change would require a re hose, which would require you pull the fork out of the bike again anyway. Another $200-250 to to make a stem change.
Take a look at these though:
zenocycleparts.com/collections/q-connector-bicycle-hydraulic-quick-coupler
Wow that road bike...that's a lot of work.
Then change it out and let us know. Bars and stems are usually easy to change and if it makes the bike better, then we’d like to know.
Hump
Silver lining-feedback in places like PB comments can make a difference. Press fit bottom brackets were largely adopted to reduce costs, and they’re going away based on consumer feedback. It’ll take several years, but hopefully cable tourism goes the way of chainstay mounted U-Brakes.
I quite like the fat for small rides around home, no big mountains or whatever but as a full rigid bike you get enough trail "feedback" to make the ride enjoyable, I'm even thinking about ordering a bespoke one now, with a single color :p
The sweet spot seems to be the CF8 with the performance elite Fox and XT drivetrain for $1000 less than the GX AXS Transmission and Select+ RS.
Unless I can't find it I believe it was tested in 2021 vice last year?
Bike looks fast though - I'd like to try it out, but for that cable routing.
Sure, they only have made it this far by reading PB articles!