For episode 2 of How To Bike, Ben Cathro takes a deep dive on geometry, stem lengths, suspension settings, and everything in between. Sit back, crack a beverage, and enjoy.
Science Cathro is awesome
I wish this had been around when I started riding. It would have saved a lot of costly mistakes.
Finally in a place where I feel like I have a bike that works for me and how I like to ride, but it's taken a lot of working out
Thanks for a dose of reality Ben. So tired of 'experts' insisting lower tire pressure is always better. Folded knobs don't grip better. The real goal is to not fold or squirm your tire in hard corners, as you pointed out. (30 psi ain't dead
I was steadily moving to lower and lower psi and settled at 19 psi front and 22 psi rear and that works for me. But then I had set my tires at 30psi for a service road climb and forgot to lower the pressure. And then I got a Strava top 10 and now I don’t know what to do. It was super dry and I was slipping around a bunch so I’m pretty sure 30psi is still too high for me.
Side note: I haven’t had a chance to watch this video yet.
I find that lower front pressures tend to feel wonky on jumps, even when great everywhere else. Sometimes I think I've forgotten how to ride, but then realize my front had wandered down under 20 psi.
I am just north of 230lbs and have been riding for 25 years and am tired of people telling me that 30+ psi is too high. I have enough damaged rims, burped tires and other anecdotal evidence to say my big butt doesn’t care about that…33 rear, 31 front and I have all the traction I need with much less carnage….tho I did think closer to 40 was necessary until the last 8 yrs or so, so find your sweat spot and roll with it!
@teenwolf: it’s almost as people should figure out what works for themselves and realize it only works for them. I will, however, always recommend people try lower psi to see if it works for them.
"Up for sale is a *like new* yada yada, *custom build* you won't find anywhere except for everyone else buying the current most trendy parts in our area!"
This was so well done for the amount of ground covered Ben! Really appreciated the brief review of the key points without diving too deep. Also very cool how everything was described in terms of potential differences in experience and not just "good" or "bad." Really enjoying this series.
I'm dealing with some tennis elbow related to descending, and after some physio consultation, they are advising against flatter levers. From what I understood, forces exerted on a bent wrist, which seems unavoidable with flat levers, antagonize the tennis elbow. So, I'm moving to a setup where palms and forearms are aligned in the same plane.
if you haven't thought of it, when do you need your brakes the most? Descending. So set them for your DH riding position not your JRA seated position. But I'm no physio just a bloke on the internet so take my thoughts with a grain of salt.
@MattyBoyR6: Depends on your trails, when you spend 55 minutes out of every hour not descending, chances are you don't have trails steep enough to warrant flat levers anyway.
Buy several Flexbars now and watch the videos on the twist exercise. Other exercises work but none reduce pain like the Flexbar.
I am dealing with same condition and also had to switch to running my levers more downward.
I have had tennis elbow issues when riding for years. Had to stop riding but am back at it. I tried the Flexbar but it didn’t help - it actually hurt my other elbow. I recently came across the fiix elbow - a new machine. It is expensive but I have been pain free for 5 months now and I have ridden a lot this spring / summer. Worth it to me - I have crashed due to elbow pain b4. Tennis elbow sucks
Wow, I have watched a lot of videos on this topic and this was the best one in terms of giving straight facts, not opinions while also avoiding being to vague on any specific topics. Great job, I am going to consider cutting my bars down from 780 to maybe a 770 on my trail bike for some added clearance when trying to learn tabletops and bar turns.
How tall is she? I'm 5'3 with shoes on, generally happy with 27.5" wheels, small frames, slammed 35mm stems and flat bars. Found going to 165mm cranks and 700mm bars made a huge difference--its really hard to control a bike when you're in some sort of starfish yoga pose just to reach the contact points, as it turns out.
Flat bar, negative rise stem? All things I’ve done as a 163 cm tall rider. I tend to ride bikes labeled as small or medium. About a 420 reach with a normal 74 ish st angle. When I watch little kids on their bikes, the bikes look really long proportionally but those kids ride really well. Long bikes truck. Short bikes suck. Thing with mountainbikes is that set up is always a compromise between climbing ability and descending.
@ryetoast: 5’2”. Have done a lot of what you describe except the cranks. Good idea. The 275 bikes are harder and harder to find sadly. Perhaps a mullet setup might work.
@MikeyMT: I feel like a mullet would make the usually-too-high stack height of a small frame trail bike worse. But maybe if you reduced the fork travel (and put the geo in slack position if it has a flip chip to compensate for steepening the HTA)? I don't think I have ever bottomed out my 150mm pike except maybe at the bike park...
@MikeyMT: ah I've got the opposite problem, comically short torso. Short cranks are probably worth a shot in that case. I think Canfield makes them down to 150mm, Hope and Race Face make 165s. Shorter cranks = less torque though, might want to go down a tooth on the chainring if you go much over a cm shorter.
@ryetoast: I would look at a super short headset upper like the cane creek slam set. It isn't much, but 5 mm can make a difference in stack height. There are also some lower profile stems that help get the bars down. I think he wildest one is the syntace flatforce 44, though it isn't super cheap.
This was outstanding, great work. Perfect blend of correct information presented without bias, and humor.
Already forwarded the video around to some of my "in the market for a bike whenever they become available at normalish prices" buddies who so far have been riding on random craigslist finds.
Great video Ben. Needing clarity on the organic vs sintered pad situation:
I find that when I ride metallic / sintered pads in the dry in a heavy braking zone they heat up and glaze over easier much than organics.....I used to have to switch my sintered pads all of the time because they were ruined by glazing, but I've never suffered a similar situation with organics.
Please advise.....will need to adjust my over-confident spraffing about organic pads if i'm wrong here.
Thanks so much for this vid. It is honestly one the best mtb-related videos I've seen. He covers so much critical topics without coming across as preachy. Have definitely saved for later as it's a resource I will use again and again - even something for stubborn customers who need an explainer on bike trends and bike fit.
Cheers mate, definitely owe you a lot of beers for this one
I'd really like to know how Cathro made a Marzocchi Bomber CR fit his Tallboy. The Tallboy takes a 190x45mm shock, but the shortest lengh the Bomber CR is available in, is 210x55mm. Anybody got an idea how he did it?
Total guess but the bomber cr is just a van rc with new stickers and a black shaft- the van rc can be bought/has parts for 190x50 so the bomber cr can definitely be run in that size too. The 5mm extra stroke would fit in the frame and would up the travel a bit. Again just a guess!
Ben - great overall synopsis! What about saddle angle! There is a lot of weird stuff going on out there! We must nip the downward-pointed saddle trend in the bud. Climbing isn't that cool.
One thing not mentioned - Using crazy super wide handlebars means you need less frame reach. If you keep the same reach, your shoulders need to be angled further forward. Skinner handlebars may mean you require a frame with slightly longer reach.
@ben-cathro: Late to the game question here. Vacation got in the way of following your excellent material! You allude to the bar angle when talking about reach and stem height. Do you recommend mounting bars with the sweep vertical, or aligned with the head angle, or somewhere in between? I like the "hack" of using higher rise bars to maintain the reach instead of raising the stem. Thanks for sharing such great tips!
@ben-cathro - I set up my bars as Paul Aston does (nsmb.com/articles/paul-astons-210mm-do-everything-nicolai-g1) with the centreline of the grips through the centreline of the steering axis. This means rolling the bars back to get the centrelines to align. It reduces my reach (as I use 50mm and 70mm rise bars on FS and HT respectively) but keeps the steering feeling sharp.
It would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this set up. Also i'm running 12 degree backsweep bars as they feel more natural for my wrists. I had carpel tunnel and 16 degree bars helped a lot to sort this. 12 degree feel better for agressive riding.
every new rider should be MADE to watch this......Ben is the best. Cutting through all the marketing BS and clearly explaining it like it is. Like Cam Zink i think bikes are getting too long and having been riding since the inception of the sport grew up on steeper shorter bikes and therefore as detailed in this video i would opt for the shorter livelier feeling bike but that doesn't mean i ride the flattest trails ever and dont like dh i just prefer a livelier feeling bike as thats what i had to learn on and i honestly feel its made me a better rider.
The biggest and best thing in this video for witch Ben should be praised for is the fact that unlike manufacturers sales pitch babble he clearly explains both the positives AND negatives of each change. Ben your content is the best not only on pinkbike but anywhere else in the industry as far as i am concerned.
I wish there was. It's probably somewhat depending on riding style and terrain. I find I can adapt to to different setups, but without back to back testing i'll never know what I truly prefer. So I think i've answered my question. I need to go to more demo days and do back to back tests on different bikes.
That was really good to hear about FUN bikes! More manouverability can actually be a good thing. I love Ben cathros videos and this one made so much sense to me.
@spicysparkes: You are right, well you see what i meant is the tipe of linkage used, ZantaCruz on the enduro models has had the same tipe of suspension linkage design for a while and othe companies have adopted it aswell, like the Specialized enduro. Treck has stayed with the same type of linkage for a while adding now the high pivot, but generally speaking the same design, like Giant, Kona and othe brands. Then there is the Commencal Meta type that goes directly to the top tube, and finally the YT Capra, Yeti SB and Commencal Clash type of linkage. Ive been wondering what is the best type of suspension design generally speaking. Which one keeps your center of gravity centered the most.
@alex-morales: all depends on how well the brands optimise their versions of the linkages. Generally a linkage system like Horst link or four bar which have the rear axle on the seatstay and the rear pivot on the chainstay should perform better than a single pivot linkage actuated like the commecal clash which has the rear axle on the chainstay. This is due to the Axel path following a perfect arc on the single pivot rather than a tuneable arc on the Horst link bikes. There's plenty of other designs with their benefits but again it's all down to how well the bike is designed and how it works with the shock. You can get a demo versions of this software called "linkage" which allows you to check out the suspension of almost every bike and see the anti-squat, anti-rise, leverage ratio, Axel path etc.
I might be alone in this, but crank flips always seem goofy to me. Seems like something we will look back on in 10 years and make fun of ourselves for doing. Anyways, awesome video nonetheless!
I would certainly NOT recommend short cranks for everyone as in this video. Shorter cranks mean more force through your joints (especially knees). And you can easily overstress them and overwork them resulting in knee pain and damage. If you do a lot of uphill riding especially steeper slopes you should go for the recommended length for your height. Some people might get away with shorter cranks but that really depends on pedaling style or your joint health predisposition. For instance I would recommend 175mm for anybody 6" (180cm)+.
I am 6ft1. Had 1 knee operation already (bucket tare from football), have shot my knees 3 times now (football and jumping off a bridge into water too shallow). I also have a wrecked ankle (cross country running when younger). 165mm works fine for me. 175 on a more modern bike can lead to too many pedal strikes.
One day though... They will figure out that feet further apart leads to better stability.
165mm cranks with a 34t ring to a 155 with a 32t oval is one of the best changes I've ever made in my 25 years of cycling. I've moved from 175 to 170 to 165 now to 155's over the last year because of my knees. Leverage between the 165/34t and 155/32oval is similar but the 155's are way easier on my knees as I have a shallower knee angle during the power stroke. 170's caused constant knee pain. 165s a little better. 155's = no knee pain and I have gobs of pedal clearance so I can power through some chunky sections I used to have to ratchet over.
@brianpark: Will love to have Levy doing a whole note about hiding in the woods for a poo, best care products, best spots on BC trails, poo handling, and stuff like that...
Side note: I haven’t had a chance to watch this video yet.
So she gets a small frame which is great for going down but sucks for up or an XS and the opposite is true.
Thoughts on setup for short people…XS frames also end up having a rear center longer than the front which must make the bike perform strange.
Already forwarded the video around to some of my "in the market for a bike whenever they become available at normalish prices" buddies who so far have been riding on random craigslist finds.
I find that when I ride metallic / sintered pads in the dry in a heavy braking zone they heat up and glaze over easier much than organics.....I used to have to switch my sintered pads all of the time because they were ruined by glazing, but I've never suffered a similar situation with organics.
Please advise.....will need to adjust my over-confident spraffing about organic pads if i'm wrong here.
It would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this set up. Also i'm running 12 degree backsweep bars as they feel more natural for my wrists. I had carpel tunnel and 16 degree bars helped a lot to sort this. 12 degree feel better for agressive riding.
Great stuff!
Did you breathe at any point?
ZantaCruz, Treck, Commencal Meta, YT or Yeti?
Ive been wondering what is the best type of suspension design generally speaking.
Which one keeps your center of gravity centered the most.
165mm works fine for me.
175 on a more modern bike can lead to too many pedal strikes.
One day though... They will figure out that feet further apart leads to better stability.