PRESS RELEASE: Pole BicyclesPole Bushmaster specs and details are out. Here's Joe Nation riding the Stamina but just think about how the Bushmaster is going to go on a trail if Joe can make the 180mm travel Stamina go like this!
Bushmaster is the long waited new short travel trail bike from Pole, and as the name says, this bike does well in the bushes. Bushmaster is designed for people who want to ride technical but flat trails like a snake and have fun in the bush. We started designing Bushmaster by designing the Stamina first. We wanted to test the new frame construction first from the top and then go back to shorter travel. On Bushmaster, we took 2% off from the speed and made it more fun, so it’s still fast but yet more fun. Bushmaster still has a long wheelbase, steep seat tube, and slack head angle but it does manual easier, and it gives you more time on riding on the edge.
“Lachesis, also known as bushmasters, is a genus of venomous pit vipers found in forested areas of Central and South America.”Pole Bushmaster follows the new design style of Pole with dust sealed links with double axles. The frame is RAW machined 7075 T6 aircraft aluminum with black details on links and hardware to make the bike stand out.Key features
• New Pole geometry
• Dust sealed bearing seats
• Three water bottle mounts
• Stiffmeister compatible
Presale pricing
• TR 4,028.23€
• XC 5,370.97€
• LE 7,584.68€
• Frameset 2,580.65€
Prices excluding VAT (Europe +24%)
You can find out all the spec, geometry, and details about the Pole Bushmaster on www.polebicycles.comHow did Pole come up with Bushmaster?Stamina was an eyeopener for Pole even though all of our bikes have been very successful, we learned that even now starting from a clean desk is worth the effort. Bushmaster was named and on our roadmap before Stamina. The idea was to create a shorter travel trail bike after we launched the Machine. Our Founder and head engineer, Leo's insight, was to create a more playful, shorter travel trail bike with Pole DNA. Just before the project had started Leo got an idea that we should make a mule "Stamina" to test if we could push the limits of the bikes yet further. So instead of creating one bike, he wanted to create two! When we had done first laps with Stamina, we knew right away that we have made a breakthrough. We learned that a 180mm travel 29" still pedals like a trail bike and it is also fast. Then we decided to release Stamina as well.
Later we got challenged by Steve Matthews when he claimed that he had figured out a perfect front and rear center balance for cornering. We already knew that it is not like that, but we stood up and wanted to do science with Steve. We took his theory and tried to test it in practice. We got a bike that had exactly his portions and compared it to Stamina, which should not work. In the result, we found out that our portions are 3% faster than his.
You can read the full story about the test here.With Bushmaster we take a notch off from the speed and focus for a balanced playfulness and leave that 1% advantage to for the races. This bike is our answer to the playfulness and speed.
Pole Bushmaster has less than half the screws than the MachineEngineer's take | Stamina opened my eyes how much we can actually make a difference by just changing the frame construction. Stamina took us to a new era of the frame design how to go faster, and our goal on Bushmaster is to make a bike that is truly fun and fast. On Stamina, we started to remove the bolts from the frame as we became more confident on the new frame profile. We have applied for some patents on the new frame construction, and now we can start the production on both frames. Yes, it's lighter, stiffer and all that jargon, but Bushmaster might be an eyeopener for the people who have been doubting Pole's geometry and our innovative approach as it's going to hit the fun argument more than speed argument. Bushmaster is not going to be a statement that we go back to conventional frames. Bushmaster has just 15mm shorter wheelbase than our bikes normally would, but we can make a difference with that 15mm shorter Pole.—Leo Kokkonen |
Seem to know more about natural attractions...interesting to hear that ur attractive when u feel u wouldn't be...
I get your point but a Yeti frame costs 4000€ here (thats over 4.5k USF which is insanity)..and most Poles come with EXT shocks for not much more (add that to other carbon frames and youre way more expensive)
Also who said that Alu is cheaper to make? High quality Alu frames (Knolly/ Nicolai/ this Pole) are not easy to manufacture.
It's never welcome in an open forum, forums exist to lay down and discuss differing opinions, I hope they enjoy success with what they are wanting to achieve, you obviously know the people behind the success of Pole, passion is a wonderful thing, as are manners.
Suggestion - create some realistic test conditions with multiple runs, multiple riders, multiple bikes on multiple courses. If Pole comes out on top all of the time then they are truly the fastest bikes.
Anybody who wants to have less of a environmental footprint can do so by simply replacing their bikes less often.
I have this kumbaya picture in my head of the industry in which we could spend less on buying new bikes and perhaps more on parts and maintenance at our LBS'
btw I realize I didn't completely address your argument, but i have to get ready to go for a ride. I'll be back :p
These guys have the capacity to shape our preferences, sometimes to offer something actually better for us, but also sometimes just for the sake of shaking money out of our pockets. So, huge amounts of potential progress, which then gets dragged out over the longest period of time possible, à la iPhone, so that it takes a decade to get to what they could have done in 2 years. Sorry for the ramble, some of this is probably accurate.
I agree with most of that, except for some matters of personal opinion. I should mention that i'm a garage builder who is getting ready to build my second design after riding the first for I think 5 seasons? something like that. I've spent a ridiculous amount of time over the last 6 months or so studying suspension and tinkering on linkage, a simple suspension computer program. Also reading a f*ck ton of online reviews and comments, here and elsewhere, and noting some trends. It has created a sensitivity, i'm afraid.. to mountain bike marketing bullshit.
I'VE DECIDED ITS TIME TO TAKE A STAND.
Anywho, on your points, I personally don't like the idea that bikes have become such a -for lack of a better word- consumerist.. um..y object. I know the what its like to form a deeper connection with a bicycle. And friends, i'm here to tell you it's beautiful.
Also, as far as progress goes i'm mostly referring to geometry and suspension designs, I do agree that refinements will always continue as they should. But in regards to geometry and suspension goes I think humourously, that some consensous has been reached, but no one wants to point it out. Most big players have somewhat settled around 65 degree head angles (this is "enduro" and aggressive trailish bikes I speak of), a pivot around the top of the chainring (even many popular short link designs have trended toward less manipulation of this pivot point, vpp type designs being a notable exception.. perhaps theres others I havn't checked them all). Its suprising how many create braking characteristics reminiscent of the good old fashioned single pivot. In most instances, they simply don't make a big deal about the braking, and interestingly people just don't notice, or its just not that big of a deal. Perhaps single pivots ride just fine afterall.
.. The other day, A LINE WAS CROSSED. A company lied. I tried to point it out. Nobody noticed.
So i'm here today, to tell the 4 people that are still reading these comments, and to say to the so called "bike industry"
THE. TIME. HAS. COME.
So you're putting together some single pivots?
Now if you look at a psychological profile of a person to invest in a new tech, it requires a certain level of stubbornness to leave the mould. Commitment. You just can’t commit, spend as much money as SWorks and say: Oh, this bike sucks... you will invest in getting used to it. You will get biased.
Mountain Biking tech became extremely complex. Confusion is tremendous and everyone: big and small, capitalize on it. Even if someone gets out of their limb and buys a HT they are likely to chose a long travel one. But the issue is that it is the simpliest of bikes BMXes, DJs, that open our eyes on how to ride a bike fast.
While I do agree that skill is #1 for performance, I think that newschool geo is quite good for those applications. It just happens those are popular MTB segments nowadays. Trust me, there is a reason “down country” isn’t replacing XC. A newcomer of course will probably struggle less and learn more on a more conservative bike, not on lets say a Pole or a Mondraker, but more skilled and fit riders can benefit hugley from these designs. I know a really good pro-rider whose favorite bikes have been banshee runes and whyte s-170.
I believe that what we are getting to as an industry is the realization that different skill levels and body types benefit differently from wheelsizes and geos. My 165cm friend who is just starting out will probably hate a Stumpy EVO but me, being 180cm, 91kg and years of riding will probably enjoy it.
Also, consider terrain. Would you need a pole stamina if you live in a flatland? Would you rather have a 2008 jekyll in La Parva?
If you’re going to bash Pole for saying the have the ideal GEO for everything bash every company as they say the same thing and every bike will be better for a different application. But to suggest everything is a fad and conspiracy is kinda crazy.
Second will be a horst link. Somewhat traditional looking walking bar, low verticalish shock. More "active" braking. I really never noticed "brake squat" (I think that's the easiest term to visualize), Except for In 1 spot near me. Its a somewhat sustained chundery, straitish pitch, where one can certainly pick up some speed, most, maybe even all riders are required to brake in this section to control speed, it quickly becomes tight and rutted subsequently. I notice how even during light braking in this section the compliance to the chunder becomes slightly compromised. I almost never notice it otherwise. I suspect the truth of the matter is that its at worst an annoyance. But is something that can be noticed, so there is value to the idea that it can be improved upon. I also observe that a few big players (Specialized, Trek off the top of my head) have consistently stuck with designs that produce actual more active braking characteristics, especially in downhill and "enduro" applications where it could be argued that active braking characteristics are of greater value. Say what you want about the bigger brands, but it is possible that their size allows them to take a more scientific approach. Perhaps even, a more "correct" approach.
I also wanted to fit a water bottle.
I think pointing out the Stumpy EVO is an interesting point. Ties into my observation that bigger companies could be taking a more scientific approach. What do scientists do? Experiments. Most of their models (the ones they have committed more financially to) take an approach that is essentially the industry consensus that I have spoken of.
Not to be confused with "bigly" which would be a word Donald Trump frequently uses and made up
To achieve more "active" braking, what you need to achieve is de-coupling the braking forces from the suspensings movement about its pivot point (actual or theoretical), As far as Anti-rise goes, this means going BELOW 100%
But to oversimplify things even more, and perhaps in a way agree with you, Anti-rise as a percentage can be thought of as a sliding scale, in which 100% can be more accurately and honestly I think described as "middle of the road" braking characteristics. Perhaps that's the hidden meaning of "neutral" afterall.
Whoa.
Yes, it is true amazing bike handlers have expressed little interest in these new geometries, Ratboy’s a giant and rides a medium Habit. But then again Graves has said that for races he rathers the Large over the medium because it’s longer and he uses a medium back home for shits amd giggles (aka riding with friends or for pleasure). This goes back to the important point I was making. There is no one better geometry. There is no fad. Different geos’ benefit different riders in different situations. I imagine if Josh were to race again, he might upsize to something more stable, but of course he’ll rather the M for jibbing and having fun. And you’re quite brave for going against pole in an engineering discussion, kudos for being ballsy haha
What I disagree with is the idea that ALL riders CAN benefit from the more radical approaches to geometry. I agree that some can. But others perhaps cannot. It simply might not suit certain riders riding style and preferences. My issue is thus when designers with radical approaches make sweeping claims of superiority, although this is in most cases carefully implied, rather than boldly announced, perhaps unintentionally.. i'm actually not a big fan of conspiratorial thinking. I don't doubt that these guys absolutely love the bikes their making, its just that, as you alluded to, its a bit of a matter of opinion. Something I've (and others I suspect) noticed in reviews of bikes with these more radical long slack designs is you'll almost always find a statement to the effect of "requires a more aggressive approach, to keep weight over the front end". I've read things even to the effect that these bikes require a different approach to cornering, requiring the rider to set up earlier. Clearly we are no longer talking about "neutral" handling characteristics. I think that "neutral" handling characteristics can be thought of as a riders perception of when a bike just feels right. The size fits, the weight distribution, angles and everything just feels right. Minimal adjustments to riding style and technique required. The rider doesn't have to think, because god dammit nobody wants think about anything while shredding downhill. The beauty of those perfect "flow" moments is noting how for those moments of time we are simply living and feeling in that moment. Anything that interrupts that (thoughts) should be minimized. this is why I believe in the idea of "neutral" bike handling (which for this discussion is separated from braking characteristics). That said, what feels "neutral" can indeed be a matter of personal opinion.
hmm...
I guage my own knowledge by attempting to explain things
Maybe a bike that majes you adjust your riding to it could make you faster and more comfy once you adjust. Although said bike also might make it slower and more fatigue. It is difficult to predict hoy a different bike will respond to a different input. And thats why there must be testing and there must be open mindedness to the fact that maybe some riders will improve. I think there’s no one right call on this topic
A lot of us ride for fun though.What may be best for reaching the limits of speed might not actually make for the most fun bike to ride, to a particular rider. I've heard it observed that long wheelbases can make shorter, lippier jumps feel a little strange because the difference of timing between when the individual wheels hit the lip becomes quite obvious. Certainly makes sense, seems slopestylers and bmxes prefer shorter bikes as they feel more as if the entire bike is hitting the lip at one time, which simplifies technique to a degree, I think, i'm a pretty mediocre jumper myself. But I do know that a lot of us enjoy hitting jump trails on our "enduro" bikes. Some of us also enjoy tighter, twistier trails too, which can bring out some adverse effects of a longer wheelbase.
I could go on, but I probably shouldn't. I really wish there was a place on pinkbike designated to respectfully discuss theory, that the industy would be willing to contribute to openly and thoroughly. Probably a pipe dream though.
So confusing - now you tell me it is NASA. I hear Space-X is about to advertise for Seven Astronauts soon, NASA gave up on that number.
Well I think it's really good for pedalling, but I was on a bike with a shock for a 70kg rider and I'm closer to 90 so it did bob a little.
Can't really comment on dh performance with my skills other than that everything felt really easy.
VPP is another great example of this. Great pedalling bikes but not known for liveliness until you get shorter in travel etc.
180mm on flatter/ less demanding trails is little Bit exhausting and annyoing to ride.
I tried this excuse, but she wasn't buying it.
There will always be those that pretend like the reason for why they suck at climbing or turning is the bike, and those are the people that are all into the shit like "playfullness" or the new version of that called "downcountry". Good for Pole for appealing to them and making more money to continue developing the actual good bikes like the Stamina.
It's just that middle spec (XC) that gets the Maxxis Ikon 2.2's. The lower build (TR) gets the Maxxis Aggressor 2.3 and a Minion SS 2.3. The top spec (LE) with the Trickstuff brakes gets the typical DHF/DHR II 3C in 2.3.
I do agree though it's a strange mix of tires until you get to the top build. I'd be switching out tires on any of these builds anyway... which is also pretty typical since almost no maker actually specs their bikes meant for hard charging with tire casings also meant for hard charging.
Did they allow you to modify the spec at all? For instance a Lyrik RC2 instead of the RCT3 they have it spec'd with?
One criticism I have, is support. I mean, I'm not looking for hand holding, but the bike doesn't even come with a manual. I couldn't find any torque specs for anything anywhere, and it seems that most questions are answered with "Have you tried the Pole facebook group?" I suspect that will improve as the company grows however. If you can live with kind fending for yourself in terms of tech support, you'll be fine though.
polebicycles.com/pole-service-portal
You need to get Leo to give you a discount as your word of mouth advertising is what got me on to Pole!
Why not EXT and intended, like on G1 from “Nic” and in same price range
Anyway nice frame.
Lightly used made in china vvp bike for sale.
For your "Your opinion that front wheel has more grip than rear wheel regardless of chainstay lenght", I don't know where that came from, it's not what I said and I have no idea what you mean with it. You seem to be clueless about bike handling. Have you ever seen someone doing a nose wheelie? Do you know what that is? Is that not putting all the weight on the front of the bike? Is the rider sitting on the stem?
Thank you for stating that. Now I see where you are coming from. You suffer from under-riding, if you have never even ridden a bike to the point where the rear drifts away. I just don't understand why you bother to comment if your opinion is automatically invalidated by you not knowing what you are talking about. Try removing the training wheels!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrTMDEU05jc
Also, see how I commented nice without paternalizing you?
I’ve yet to meet these people.
I remember when 140mm was a freeride bike.
The new Edit v3 from Airdrop has exactly 435 chainstay with steeep 78.7 seat angle and 64.5 HA, but it's not as long as Pole. I wonder why Pinkbike haven't said anything about it...
Hot sauce . Can be too hot must be a balance of heat and flavour.
Kind of like trails they need a balance of flow and gnar .
All gnar only one percent will ride it . All flow you never learn teck.
Cheers.
Thank you for that, will do!!