Race Face Next SL Cranks
Weighing less than one pound (with a 34t direct mount ring) the latest version of Race Face's Next SL crankset is light enough that even XC racers should approve. This light weight is accomplished by constructing the hollow crank arms completely from carbon fiber, and then attaching them to a 30mm aluminum spindle made from a new aluminum alloy. Despite their lack of heft, Race Face claims the cranks are strong enough to handle nearly every type of riding except full-on downhilling.
| Details • Intended use: XC / AM / Enduro • Hollow carbon arms, aluminum 30mm spindle • Removable spider • Sizes: 170, 175mm • BB options: BB92, 68/73 BSA, PF30, compatible with 190mm and 165/170mm fatbike standards • Weight: 425g (175mm cranks with 34t direct mount ring) • MSRP: $560 USD (as tested, includes BB and chainring)
|
ConstructionRace Face manufactures the Next SL cranks at their own facility in Canada from carbon and aluminum imported from the United States, an increasingly uncommon practice in an industry dominated by products made in Asia. This tactic allows them to oversee the construction process from start to finish, making it easier to monitor the quality of the final product.
Part of the crank's light weight is achieved through the use of hollow carbon fiber arms. These hollow arms attach to an aluminum spindle that is 30mm in diameter, a change from the 24mm titanium spindle found on previous versions. According to Race Face, this change allowed them to achieve the same stiffness and strength of a steel spindle while still being lighter than the titanium version. Race Face also used a new aluminum alloy for the spindle that is claimed to be 20% stronger than the more common 7050 alloy. Compared to other cranksets that have the spindle permanently fixed to one of the crankarms, the Next SL's spindle can be completely removed, allowing users to swap it out for one with a different width (
Race Face has spindles available to fit fat bike BB spacing). Since the Next SL cranks have a 30mm spindle, in order to make them compatible with bikes that use BB92 bottom brackets a bearing with an outer lip is pressed directly into the frame. Eliminating the retaining cups allowed Race Face to use the same size bearings as are found in a 24mm spindled set up.
The Next SL cranks feature a 30mm diameter spindle that is completely removable, and Race Face has bottom brackets available that lets them work with every style currently on the market.
In addition to being able to swap out the spindle, the Next SL's Cinch interface means riders can run pretty much every imaginable chain ring combination, everything from a direct mount single ring all the way to a triple ring set up. An aluminum spider holds whichever gear combination is desired, and is then slid over the splines on the drive side arm (
no spider is required for direct mount rings). The ring or rings are then cinched down using a lockring with the same pattern as a bottom bracket cup (Park Tool BB-22). We ran our review cranks with Race Face's 34 tooth direct mount Narrow Wide chain ring.
InstallationInstallation was quick and easy – simply press in the bearings, the inner sleeve, and any necessary spacers using the correct tool, and then slide the spindle through the bearings. Next, tighten it all down with an 8mm hex wrench. The final step is to turn the preload ring found on the non-drive side to take up any play, and then secure it with a 2mm hex. Rubber boots are also included to protect the ends of the crankarms from rock damage.
Once the cranks are installed, the preload adjuster on the non-drive side arm is used to remove any play. Race Face's BB92 bottom bracket does away with the plastic retaining cups to allow the 30mm spindle to work.
Ride ImpressionsWe rode the Next SL crankset like we would any other crank, running them through the full gamut of trail styles and conditions. Crank stiffness can be difficult to quantify, especially when riding a full suspension rig, but there wasn't any noticeable flex to speak of, even off of larger drops into harsh g-outs, or when mashing down hard to power through a tricky uphill section. The best cranksets and bottom brackets are the ones that don't call attention to themselves, remaining quiet and creak free, and we were pleased to find that the Next SL cranks fell into this category – they remained silent for the duration of our test. The wet fall weather allowed us to subject the bearings to some properly nasty Pacific Northwest mud and grit, but they took it in stride, and by the end of the test they were still spinning smoothly. The muddy conditions did accelerate the wear marks on the crankarms caused by shoe rub since our test cranks did not have protective tape on them, but Race Face has said that the cranks are currently being shipped with tape already in place.
We've had good luck with Race Face's four-bolt Narrow Wide chainrings, and the direct mount version installed on these cranks proved to work just as well. Set up with SRAM's X01 drivetrain and no chainguide, we never dropped a chain, even when plowing through steep, rooty terrain at race pace.
Race Face's direct mount Narrow Wide chainring never let us down, keeping the chain on throughout the duration of our review period.
IssuesWe haven't run into any performance issues with the Next SL cranks – they've taken everything we've dished out without complaint. The crank boots are a welcome addition to help protect the arms from rock damage, and the addition of protective tape should help prevent the shoe rub marks we experienced. There is one potential issue that is worth mentioning about the BB92 version regarding the pressing of steel cups into a frame every time the bearings need to be replaced. It's essentially the same way a headset functions, except that with headsets it is possible to replace the bearings without removing the cups. With careful installation this process should be trouble free, but careful is the key word – getting creative with a block of wood and a hammer is not the correct way to go about installing press fit items, no matter how tempting it is. Care needs to be taken during removal as well – if the bearing is punched out crooked, it could affect the frame. To help with this, Race Face will have a bearing removal tool available next spring.
Pinkbike's Take: | These babies are expensive, comparable in price to Shimano's aluminum XTR crankset, but bear in mind that the Next SL cranks are likely the lightest production crankset on the market. Plus, the large number of possible chainring and spindle options should help prevent them from becoming obsolete whenever the next chainring / bottom bracket "standard" arrives. We'd say the Next SL makes the grade, coming in at an incredibly light weight while still being able to handle the full gamut of riding styles, and the fact that they're made in Canada earns them bonus points as well. - Mike Kazimer |
www.raceface.com
Light, strong, cheap. Pick any two.
Except zee. Or maybe spank...
anyone who's seen any engineering mathematics class will get that.
@bjorntsc: 7068 has a high strength not a high stiffness, stiffness indicator is the tensile modulus.
" Race Face also used a new aluminum alloy for the spindle that is claimed to be 20% stiffer than the more common 7050 alloy."
That's a comparison of alloys... and has nothing to do with the diameter increase which they already mentioned was done to compare to the stiffness of a steel spindle while being lighter than the titanium axle they previously used.
As I said, to get 20% stiffness increase you need to leave the Aluminium alloys as most consider them (where its a majority of Al - 85% or more - and then usually a dozen other elements in small percentages) and move into the realm of metal matrix composites which have previously been used for bicycle (more than 20 years ago by Specialized for example). I have a couple Specialized M2 series threadless stems for example, which are made from the same weldable MMC that they made the M2 stumpjumper frames from and those came from Duralcan which is a division of alcan aluminum.
I do agree that it would have been weird to have an alloy mostly consisting of the same base element to have a young's modulus that is 20% different; this doesn't happen unless you change a large percentage of the alloy.
Add to all of that, I've never weighed less than 200lbs!! There is a lot to be said about those metal matrix composites.
Certainly come out as the lightest compared to others on ww.
weightweenies.starbike.com/listings/components.php?type=cranksets&sortby=real
30T w/ BB92 BB
That's $1429 for the XO and $1525 for the XX. If I'm spending that kind of money. I'm not going to worry about $100 bucks extra, to get the XX. Minus 15% = $1300
With a 28 tooth chain-ring and 42 tooth cog and a 26" wheel,,,,,, you get a 17.2 gear inches per revolution.
A 22 tooth chain-ring and a 34 tooth cog and a twenty-six inch wheel,,,,, you get 16.8 gear inches per crank revolution. Nearly the same.
I'd like to try it. As soon as I get some money.
28t is the lowest they are doing, but this is simply not enough for going fast on a downhill (not meaning a DH downhill, just at a higher speed).
Do any other RaceFace cranks use this Direct Mount system? Could you buy a spider that direct mounts so that then you could have the versatility of having a single crank that could run single 26t or swap out for a 24/38 mounted on double spider. An Alum Turbine which can mount these DM chainrings would be on my short list of cranks i would actually consider/could afford.
www.bikerumor.com/2013/08/27/next-gen-race-face-next-sl-crankset-unveiled-495-grams-all-in-plus-pedals-wheels
So apparently, Yes you can direct mount spiders. No this isn't available on any system other than the NEXT cranks. I'll be waiting for the trickle down to Turbine. Love the versatility of this system though. +1 for RF
Picking up a third set today
they are really stiff and light
running one 1x10 with xtr rd986
running the other two with xo1
Also have S-Works Fact with XX1 28t
RF Next Sl are nicer(more options, less proprietary)
These certainly are sweet cranks but pricey. Reminds me of 1990s high end pricing when a friggin hub could cost $350! Parts now seem much more reasonable...except this. Besides, why would I want this when I have FSA Afterburner bitches?! That's right, Afterburner, it makes me go fast!
My understanding is its a bearing with a lip on the outside edge to correctly locate and stop it going all the way in. That's just for pf92 I believe.
If they called it crap on a stick the trolls here would rename their man parts after it.
This crank looks totally awesome. I hope carbon manufacture gets cheap so we can all have this good of stuff someday.
But I still don't like the name and you can feel to neg prop me with one hand and play with your "next" with the other.
Not that will stop the rich folks from dropping a few coins to pick one up.