How Much Do Pro XC Bikes Really Weigh? - Val Di Sole XC World Cup 2023

Jul 2, 2023 at 5:13
by Nick Bentley  


What's the first thing that comes to mind when you say cross-country race bike? It's going to be weight, right? With the change to more extreme XC tracks, does the shave-every-gram mindset start to change? More riders than ever before running tire inserts, wider tires, and bikes with 120mm of travel. Are the days of weight weenies dead, or are there still plenty to be found?

We headed out with a set of scales into the pits at Val di Sole to see who would first let us weigh the bikes and second, who would come out on top with the lightest bike that we could measure.

We found 12 teams who were happy to weigh their bikes. That's not to say that there weren't more who were keen, but with time short we couldn't get around to all the pits. Maybe we can revisit this later in the year.

There were certainly a few that were not keen for us to get the scales out on their bikes, which in itself was interesting. This is not super scientific. We borrowed a set of scales from the Giant Factory Off-Road Team (thank you, guys). We originally borrowed some luggage scales from the Val di Sole bike shop, but the Feedback scales were a lot easier to work with, so thanks to both for their help. And then we got to it.

But first, you have to understand the practicalities of what we did here. This won't be a photo epic; the pits are always a tight space, so we worked around teams who were busy prepping bikes for a very busy XC practice. We used a simple format: first, the teams guessed their bike weight and if they had inserts and power meters fitted or anything else that would be a big weight addition. Then we put the bike on the dream crusher and found out what it weighed. So let's see what we found.



Trek Supercaliber

photo

Okay, first up, the Trek pits were a bit tight, even though they look massive. There were a lot of bikes and mechanics, all of whom were flat out, so we couldn't get a shot of the bike on the scales in the stand. You'll have to trust me on this one.

Teams Weight Guess

The Trek team wasn't really sure about this one. Their guess was around 10kg.

What's On The Bike

This Supercaliber belongs to Anton Cooper, and it doesn't have any inserts or a power meter on it. It's also worth noting that the Supercaliber is a softtail, with only 60mm of rear travel.

Size

Medium

photo

Weight

9.75 kg / 21.5 lb



BiXS Pace

photo

Team's Weight Guess

11 kg

What's On The Bike

The BiXS Pace, being a 120mm travel bike, may not yield low weight numbers. The team was quick with their guess, suggesting they might have weighed it previously. There are no tire inserts or a visible power meter, but it does have a dropper seatpost.

Size

Medium

photo
photo
Weight

10.97 kg / 23.7 lb



Ridley Probe RS

photo

Team's Weight Guess

11 kg

What's On The Bike

The Ridley Probe RS, being a hardtail, is expected to have a low weight. Unfortunately, we didn't get information about the rider for this bike. However, it does have a power meter, dropper seatpost, and inserts in the tires.

Size

Large

photo
photo
Weight

9.39 kg / 20.7 lb



BMC Fourstroke

photo

Team's Weight Guess

10.5 kg

What's On The Bike

The BMC Fourstroke that we measured had a power meter and dropper seatpost fitted.

Size

Large

photo
photo

Weight

10.62 kg / 23.4 lb



Superior Team XF 29 Issue R

Another warning here: reading orange roofs in pits may result in photos with random colors. However, we have to work with what we get. To avoid this issue, team managers are advised to make the roof of their pit white, please.

photo

Team's Weight Guess

10.5 kg

What's On The Bike

We weighed two Superior Team XF 29 Issue R bikes, one in size large and the other in size small, to see how much variation there was between the two. Both bikes were equipped with dropper seatposts, front and rear tire inserts, and power meters.

Size

Large

photo

photo
photo

Weight

Small 10.45 kg / 23 lb

Large 10.48 kg / 23.1 lb



Liv Pique Advanced Pro 29

photo

Team's Weight Guess

10.3 kg

What's On The Bike

The Liv Pique Advanced Pro 29 that I weighed had XC CushCore installed in both the front and back wheels, along with a Stages power meter.

Size

Medium

photo
photo

Weight

10.3 kg / 22.7 lb



Mondraker F-Podium Carbon DC RR

photo

Team's Weight Guess

11.3 Kg

What's On The Bike

The Mondraker F-Podium Carbon DC RR, although initially intended as a spare bike for the team, is built to the same specifications as a team bike. It is a larger travel XC bike and features a power meter.

Size

Small

photo
photo

Weight

11.04 kg / 24.3 lb



Scott Spark RC Team Issue

photo

Team's Weight Guess

10.3 kg

What's On The Bike

The Scott Spark RC Team Issue that we weighed belonged to Nino Schurter, and was equipped with a power meter, dropper seatpost, RockShox Flight Attendant, and has 120mm of travel. The team mentioned that these were not the lightest wheels they could run on the bike.

Size

Medium

photo
photo

Weight

10.25 kg / 22.6 lb



Giant Anthem Advanced Pro 29

photo

Team's Weight Guess

10.3 kg

What's On The Bike

The Giant Anthem Advanced Pro 29 that we weighed had a rear insert in the tires and a dropper seatpost fitted.

Size

Medium

photo
photo

Weight

10.32 kg / 22.8 lb



KTM Scarp

photo

Team's Weight Guess

10.3 kg

What's On The Bike and

The custom painted KTM Scarp that we weighed had tire inserts fitted and a dropper seatpost installed.

Size

Medium

photo
photo

Weight

10.42 kg / 23 lb



Simplon Cirex SL

photo

Team's Weight Guess

10.7 kg

What's On The Bike

The Simplon Cirex SL that we weighed had recently returned from training and was equipped with training wheels. Additionally, it had inserts in both the front and back tires, along with wider tires, which would add some weight.

Size

Medium

photo

Weight

10.8 kg / 23.8 lb



Santa Cruz Blur

photo

Teams Weight Guess

10.5 kg

What's On The Bike

Once again, we had the opportunity to weigh a large and a small bike at Santa Cruz. Both bikes had a rear tire insert and a power meter installed.

Size

Large and Small

photo

photo
photo

Weight

Small 10.10 kg / 22.3 lb

Large 10.48 kg / 23.1 lb



So, what did we learn from all of that? Actually, bikes are still pretty lightweight. The hardtails are not as common as before but they definitely offer the lightest options. However, speaking to the riders and mechanics, weight isn't necessarily the main concern anymore. The durability of the bike to survive a full XC race is high in their minds. If it comes down to a compromise between finishing the race and shaving off a few grams, the teams I spoke to seem to prioritize being able to finish the race.

A big thanks to all the teams and mechanics involved, as they really got behind it and enjoyed it. I even had a lot of the mechanics throughout the day chasing me to find out how they were holding up against the rest of the field. It's clear to see that weight still matters, but perhaps less than it ever has before. Also, the fact that the Scott bike is so light is just mind-boggling.

Author Info:
Mandownmedia avatar

Member since Nov 28, 2019
260 articles

182 Comments
  • 283 12
 XC bikes are cool again. 120mm bikes with reasonable geo that are still light and fast AF are awesome. More XC coverage please! Show us the key points of the tracks, where passes might happen, etc.
  • 123 4
 Probably one of my favorite articles I've seen on PB in a long time.
  • 66 1
 I bought an epic evo this winter, after years on bigger and bigger bikes. Best purchase ever, it's my most fun bike to ride
  • 22 74
flag s100 (Jul 2, 2023 at 11:55) (Below Threshold)
 Meh. All the trails I like to ride a more fun on an enduro. FS: 25lb Transition Spur.
  • 8 18
flag fentoncrackshell (Jul 2, 2023 at 14:17) (Below Threshold)
 @s100: I get this. I feel like there's more hidden magic in my 37lb enduro and lots of different ways to interpret chunky trails. I kind of ride everything the same way on my Spur and it's still fast and fun, but a little less dynamic.
  • 15 12
 @fentoncrackshell: yup. I have completed all the trails in Squamish on my spesh enduro or my WR1 Arrival. Taking the Spur out this am shows where it excels and where it doesn’t.

When I was a worse rider I needed more bike to cover my poor technique on a feature or trail. Now that I have a 130/120 bike, 170/153, 180/170, it helps me figure out what is the most fun! I prefer the Arrival for Squamish and the Enduro for Whistler bike park. And the spur for dark blue and under.
I suppose if I lived in VT or NC it would be a different story.
  • 6 1
 That said, the spur is a very impressive frame and I would definitely consider more Transitions after owning it.
  • 4 1
 @tgr9: I got one too! Its great but my Stumpjumper Evo is still more fun
  • 4 17
flag slowerthanmydentist (Jul 2, 2023 at 21:51) (Below Threshold)
 @s100: anybody who downvoted you has never rode here.
  • 13 2
 XC bikes have always been cool.Wink
  • 8 1
 @s100: XC bikes are rad, but I get your thinking. Every time I got an XC bike, I always ended up downcountry-ing it by putting meaty tires and over-forking it because it never performed like I wanted it to on the downhills. Lol.
  • 19 1
 This article is useless without a huck to flat video asessing them
  • 3 5
 @s100: meh, I have way more grip on a plus bike inside mounted to a trainer on zwift.

To each their own I guess
  • 12 16
flag matyk (Jul 3, 2023 at 9:47) (Below Threshold)
 Xc bikes are the most fun. Long travel and meaty tires are just a handicap for piss poor bike handling.
  • 10 14
flag fentoncrackshell (Jul 3, 2023 at 10:33) (Below Threshold)
 @matyk: Nothing will hold you back more than clutching your XC bike and telling yourself that long travel bikes are a crutch. I raced XC for a decade, and short travel and high posting held back my development of cornering, jumping, and a lot of other stuff. I consider it wasted time.
  • 3 1
 @tgr9: I did the same thing but settled on a Santa Cruz Blur and have almost ridden it exclusively since I built it up. Made all the local trails much more interesting.
  • 4 0
 @motdrawde: Same here. I think it's all about your local terrain, and mine favors the SJ evo.
  • 1 6
flag mtb-jon (Jul 4, 2023 at 1:40) (Below Threshold)
 @Compositepro: You mean “rolled down a ramp”. This is XC after all!
  • 1 0
 @sspiff: this. My StEvo is great for 5% of my local terrain, while my Epic Evo is great for 95%. Don't need to travel very far before this changes a fair bit.
  • 6 0
 @s100: @fentoncrackshell : all of you who says "meh, XC bikes suck", are not gonna be able to ride and not to crash on your superenduro in XC world cup trek Big Grin So it is a question of a skill. All XC bros I know, are much better bikers then all enduro bros I know ( including myself)
  • 4 0
 @valrock: My dude, I raced Cat 1 XC on a hardtail (4th in my state) and I can still clean most West Coast double blacks with no suspension. But I also know what it's like to limp 3 hours down a mountain to an ambulance, spend a night in the hospital, and not be able to pick up my toddler for 6 weeks. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I still ride the same trails but I enjoy them more on my enduro and I can make it to work on Monday. Different strokes.
  • 2 1
 @fentoncrackshell: all these ‘dudes’ forgot that I said fun. They don’t know or maybe forgot what that word means? I’m having fun at the BCBikeRace this week. Riding the appropriate Spur. Not the enduro. But these trails are torn up, dry, xc and not the fun trails I like but much more fun than the trails i had to ride when I lived in the USA.
  • 2 2
 @valrock: it isn’t a question of skill. Nobody rides 140/160mm rotors at the bike park. Sure you can. But those with the most skill and those having the most fun do not. Same with frames. And suspension. You can get away with it, I can ride a hardtail at the park. Or on Airplane mode. But it doesn’t make it fun. It just makes you look like an xc bro in a sausage suit.
  • 2 3
 @s100: wrong, you can easily ride a modern XC bike on 140/160mm rotors in a bike park Big Grin XC rider will be able to do that because in general ( IMHO) XC rider is much more skillfull biker. You take a way extra suspension travel from enduro pro - and they will kill themselves on a mellow black trail Big Grin
  • 2 2
 @valrock: I can see it now, valrok driving a semi and because he is skilled he has brakes from a ford pinto on it! Some people…
  • 2 3
 @s100: f*ck dude you are stubborn, pinto brakes on semi is more of V-brakes on Trek session - not what I am talking about here
  • 95 2
 Should've weighed the Arc8. Leaving the BB and crankset at the start line probably gets it below the 20lb mark.
  • 6 0
 What have I missed?
  • 43 3
 I wasn’t taught about the metric system. KG are definitely a foreign language for me. I understand the metric system in distance way better. I also know there’s a touch more than 25mm in one inch. But these articles are giving me an idea on weight. To the rest of world, I am learning!
  • 13 3
 Me either but ya kinda were in the sense of US money: base 10z 1/10/1000/1000/10000 etc.... same process. Just apply to weight, distance, measures.

Conversion is the tricky part & if ya don't use a lot it goes away, but you can literally google "62.6kmh to mph" and the answer will pop up if ya don't wanna covert... point being, just think powers of 10. Aside from inches for wheels & tires nearly eveything is mm for bikes so just think about 1" to 25.4mm (or just 25 for rough)

Quickies:
*100mm (10cm) = 4 inches
1 kg = 2.2 lbs

Those alone will take ya places
  • 9 6
 @Mtn-Goat-13:

My Quickies:

Ft to m: divide by 3
Lbs to kg: divide by 2
Yard = m
Mile to km: little bit more than half
  • 25 0
 That must be annoying indeed, but great that you're putting in the effort. Just keep at it, and teach your kids.
  • 43 4
 @wcjrush: If you understand the metric system in distance, you understand it in weight. Problem solved. And, thank you for learning. It makes the world a better (more metric) place Wink

Quickies:
80kg average weight of adult male
100kg average weight of American male
  • 13 0
 At least, you have one system. Here in Canada we use both, it's fucking ridiculous.
  • 16 0
 @CaSentLeTabarnakMonHomme: don’t worry, we like to mix and match in the UK.

Driving a long distance? Miles.
Doing some DIY? Metres.
Running race? Miles OR kilometres.
Buying a beer? Pints.
Buying milk? Pints.
Buying spirits? Millilitres (shorts) or Litre(s) (bottles).

It’s a literal minefield.
  • 7 0
 @Mtn-Goat-13: and 1Kg = 100mm cubed of water = 1litre of water. 1m cubed of water is a metric ton. All handy stuff!
  • 3 1
 @gemas09: Nope: 1lb is 0.454kg... 10lb is 4.54kg, not 5kg... In 10 lb you have 0.9 lb of difference...
Kilos for ever!
  • 1 0
 @kev-jones: to make it more confusing your pints & fl.oz's are different than the US. Sitting here in Canada it gets confusing! Though I do know that legally a pint here is supposed to be 568ml
  • 1 1
 @mi-bike: uh I’m confused. I did the conversion, lbs to kg, I’m 77.11kg. Maybe I’m the exception and not the rule? Or maybe my American conversion is wicked off.
  • 11 1
 I’m surprised everyone on the metric system has been so resistant to adopting the metric time system. The 8-hour workday flies by when there are 100 hours in a day.
  • 2 0
 @kev-jones: weighing people: Stone
  • 6 0
 @kev-jones: The real killer is we buy our petrol in litres but record our fuel consumption in miles per gallon (our gallon is also bigger than an American one)
  • 2 0
 @timmytuned: The good old imperial gallon. Grateful I was taught both systems in school. Expected to use both in my engineering career, but the reality is the most I use metric units & tools is when I work on my cars/bikes.
  • 5 0
 @kev-jones: don't forget that a pint in the us is different from a pint in the uk! UK pint: 568ml, US pint=471 ml
  • 5 0
 I love my country, even though it is a mess at the moment, but I sure wish we would switch to the metric system. It is far easier than trying to convert fractions.
  • 3 0
 @neoides: Thats weird. I had no idea that there are two different measurements of pints. Who says you learn nothing from the Pinkbike comments?
  • 3 0
 @Hayek: I certainly wouldn't mind 100 seconds per minute and 100 minutes per hour. 100 hours per day could be annoying, but something like 20 would be fine (even if it kinda breaks the clean incrementation).
  • 1 1
 @wcjrush: it's ok. You may have missed the class explaining the meaning of average.
  • 3 1
 What computer are you using? If you're using MS Windows, the built-in calculator can also do conversions. If you're in OSX, linux or Android, you can open a terminal (terminal, XTerm, Konsole, Termux etc) and run "units -v". Obviously there is internet too but if you want to cut back on your carbon emissions, one thing to avoid would be to ask some far, far, faraway server to do the calculations for you (then send them back, analyze your data etc).

Pinkbike does a lot of IS units already but I'm surprised they typically stick with pressures in psi (where 29psi is about 2bar or easier, 30psi = approx 2bar). I always find bar much easier to relate to as 1 bar is about 1 atmosphere which makes it much easier to relate pressures (when mentioned in bar, Pascal or atmosphere) to the ambient pressure.
  • 1 1
 @endoguru: There was a big push for the Move to Metric back in '75-'76. Unfortunately it failed miserably.
A large percentage of U.S. Consumers, Industries and Government just didn't want to make the switch.
The result is the maddening mixture of Standard & Metric we have today. I hate it and wish we'd just finish the job and get it over with. Especially when it comes to Tools. There's only one thing I don't care for with the metric system and that is there's no really good equivalent for the "Foot". Inches to cm, Yards to Meters, Miles to Km all work out pretty well; but there's nothing to replace the Foot. It needs a new Unit of Measure right around 30cm.
  • 1 0
 @edfw: me being me, I like to be a bit different and weigh myself in kg’s, but yes, generally speaking stone/pounds
  • 1 1
 @777MTBRider: The imperial system won't go away overnight and you probably won't want that anyway. If some bolt and tool sizes in your products are already imperial, they are there to stay for the lifetime of the product (plus the amount of time it takes for the manufacturer to retire the product, to not produce it anymore). The safest is probably the Torx sizes as afaik they aren't in imperial (but correct me if I'm wrong). For allen bolts, it is easy to mess up and use a 3mm tool in a 1/8" bolt... There is a good lot more if you want to get rid of the imperial system. Obviously there is this psi pressure measurement which even "metric proponents" seem to be holding on to. But your shoe sizes work in quarter inches too, don't they? There is a shoe size metric that is actually metric (in mm) but I've only seen it being used in soldier boots. Even the "Euro" shoe sizing isn't metric.

I understand your disappointment with the lack of in-between names but that's probably because it typically works in powers of ten whereas the imperial system also works with multiples of four (four shoe sizes in an inch), twelve (twelve inches in a foot) and three (three feet in a yard). Yet at the same time, that same approach is still commonly being used to measure time and angles. Twelve hours in half a day, sixty minutes in an hour, sixty seconds in a minute, why? A straight angle is considered 90 degrees even though 100 grad sounds more "metric". Watch the world go mental if bike geometry would be measured in grad instead of degrees.

So long story short, be careful with what you wish for. Lots of people would be very, very unhappy if we'd really go fully metric.
  • 1 0
 @timmytuned: Most people buy their fuel by £ spent and then run out of fuel when the price goes up
  • 1 0
 @777MTBRider: why you saying there should be a metric foot? Whats the use for it, what would you measure in multiples of feet?
  • 1 0
 @GZMS: I think what he says is that he wants a size somewhere between cm and m like there is the foot between inch and yard. Obviously there is dm but that's probably too close to the cm.
  • 1 0
 @vinay: yes but why?
  • 1 0
 The one that gets me is Fahrenheit, it seems crazy.
  • 2 0
 @motdrawde: It is pretty simple, isn't it? 0 degF is the lowest temperature he could reach in his lab, 100degF is the rectal temperature of a cow. And then he divided it into 100 (not 12, not 144) equally spaced degrees. Which makes it metric, doesn't it?
  • 1 0
 @vinay: dm is equal distance to cm as it is to m, namely a factor 10.
  • 4 0
 @CaSentLeTabarnakMonHomme: just going to get a 4'x8' sheet of 19mm plywood!
  • 1 0
 @mi-bike: Yeah, kind of how you interpret "equal distance". I wouldn't necessarily agree with someone who says 100dB is twice as loud as 50dB.
  • 2 0
 3.8 Liters per Gallon, 1 Gallon per flush. Thank you public restroom toilets for helping me remember that.
  • 3 0
 @neoides: make America Great Britain Again! Bigger Pints!!!
  • 1 0
 @kipvr: Now ya've gone and nuked me... Ive not head to deal much w/ volume but I'm gonna add this one to the quiver - thx!
  • 1 0
 @KingPooPing: and gallons
  • 1 0
 @777MTBRider: you get used to not having it. In the building trade for example you’d just say ‘put a screw in every 300 or 400 mil, as opposed to every foot / 16”
  • 37 2
 edbullmediahouse showing all them influencers how it's done
  • 29 0
 What’s interesting is that a nice XC race bike has always weighed about 23.5 pounds, but has gone from rigid steel bikes with rim brakes and little wheels to 120/120 29ers with discs, and every iteration in between.
  • 6 0
 I think there was a period when they were a bit lighter. That was roughly fiveteen years ago, when 26" carbon hardtails were the standard in XC.
  • 5 0
 @Ttimer: Definitely some sub-20lb bikes back then.
  • 1 0
 @Ttimer:

You’re correct, but just after that, discs started to become the norm, and those added at least a pound/~half kilo, then came big wheels, and now full suspension
  • 23 0
 This is what every XC rider visiting PB wanted to see, so thanks for persuading the teams to take part and putting the effort in @mandownmedia .

I've got a current generation Spark with Pikes, a Faserwerk bar and stem and full 11 speed XTR including the wheels. It's 24lb and I had assumed Nino would be riding one in the region of 20lb based on what pro XC bikes used to weight. It's actually comforting to see that these pro bikes are so heavy.
  • 18 0
 Maybe if you had only one Pike on your bike it would come close to Nino's bike weight.
  • 23 3
 When are the comments about the weight of your 2003 hardtail gonna start? Popcorn is getting cold.
  • 11 0
 No need to go there..
btw; I remember when I bought a carbon levers for my Formula brakes. Just 50 bucks and I saved more than 6 grams
  • 5 0
 “All you need is a good steel or titanium haRdtail or rigid bike, the bike industry just forces us to ride carbon full suspension bikes that are fast and fun, it’s unacceptable.
  • 22 1
 Weight weenie articles are a welcome sight
  • 13 1
 dead impressed, my carbon road bike with disc brakes and average wheels weighs 9.8kg, look at what these bikes are capable of riding, if you've seen the technical nature of a wc course up close they are tough and god only knows how they manage with stems slammed like that................
  • 13 1
 This is awesome. Very impressed you got the teams on board, they must really like you! Smile
  • 10 0
 It's almost like most the teams knew the weight of their bikes before they were weighted.
  • 11 3
 So basically amateur hour in regards to message forum dwelling light bike enjoyers
  • 1 0
 I was surprised some of those weights were so low considering some of the spec choices.
  • 9 1
 The subtle difference being these bikes get ridden.
  • 2 0
 Not surprising, considering that the spec choices on all these bikes are severly limited by sponsors. No chance of mixing and matching the lightest parts.
  • 6 1
 Really liked this. I’m not obsessed with weight of a bike but do like a good balance of weight vs durability. My bike is around 12.5kg after swapping out lighter carbon wheels for alloy because I prefer the ride feel and also swapped carbon cranks to alloy XTR due to durability issues with the RF ones. I don’t like a bike that is too heavy but also not so light it gets thrown off line. XC bikes now are crazy how light they are able to make them.
  • 8 0
 Thanks! Such good insight and fun format. And...you guys got your hands on Ninos bike. Damn good work.
  • 8 1
 That BMC Fourstroke looks awesome.
  • 5 0
 That was interesting. it would be cool to see this done on the WC dh bikes. Obviously weight is a lower priority there and I bet there would be more variation.
  • 16 0
 I might be already thinking of doing it Smile
  • 1 1
 Can we agree range for XC is 9-11kg and DH is 16-18kg ?
  • 3 0
 @AndrejM: Watch Ed Masters' video where he weighed EDR bikes and they were all around 16-17.5kg. DH bikes would be around 17-19kg
  • 5 0
 @JamesR2026: honestly wondering if a DH might be lighter. No dropper and a smaller 7speed cassette. Also lots of bikes in EWS run one up multi tools or frame storage.
  • 8 1
 Some seriously long and flaccid stems on those bikes.
  • 5 0
 Haha droopy wieners lol
  • 4 0
 Give us XC riders our due - longer, stiff enough but admittedly not as girthy.
  • 4 1
 Would have been nice to give a shout out to Ed Bull Media who started this ‘weigh bikes in the pits’ trend - which is excellent btw! Perhaps it’s because he managed to VLog his ‘weigh-in’ of the elite DH bikes? And some were only 6kg more….
  • 2 0
 I missed the DH bikes but the Enduro bikes were more like 17kg/37lb the lightest was 34.4lb for Pagey's Nukeproof Mega.
Got a link to the DH bikes?
  • 3 0
 How the times have changed. My old Trek Rumblefish 120/110mm 29er (31-ish lbs in aluminum) was considered a "bruiser" and a "long travel 29er" back in its day, and now XC riders are commonly on 120/120mm bikes and crushing it.
  • 5 1
 PB: "Who cares about bike weight? It's overrated and I'm cool with my 40lbs iron steed!"
Also LB on an article about bike weights: "This is the coolest article ever!"
  • 2 0
 The effect of fine tuning the center of mass using lead weights around the bb is much clearer if you have a lower weight bike to start with. They don't ride the bikes as pictured but the placement of the weights is classified as it could otherwise give others a competitive advantage.
  • 5 0
 Loved this article really fun, great stuff PB
  • 2 0
 I was pretty surprised that tire inserts seem to have become the default. What sort of tire pressures are they able to run when using the inserts? I already default to 20f-22r on my hardtail.
  • 1 0
 Most of them rides well below 20psi. Like Nino around 17f - 19r ...
  • 1 1
 @mi-bike: Yes, why don't they start with burlier tires first with more grip to boot?
  • 3 0
 Please stop referring to Trek Supercaliber as a "softtail". It is 100% full suspension bike. It has a shock and pivot with bearings.
  • 1 0
 How is the supercaliber a softail?....it has a pivot and a shock so it's a short travel full suspension bike surely?
My gx 9.8 weighs 10.5kg with pedals, invisiframe and very light bottle cage. I can imagine the very top specs ones getting well below 10kg easily.
  • 5 1
 Liv and Giant 100% weighed thier bikes beforehand
  • 4 0
 Nobody said that was against the rules
  • 1 0
 They did lend me the scale so yeah I guess they do a lot
  • 3 0
 This is true. We also weigh all of our tires and wheels.
Having the lightest bike won't win you the race (sometimes, it can lose you the race), but scales are inexpensive and weighing isn't time-intensive compared to some other things we do, so why not! That said, none of our athletes are extreme weigh weenies. We could make these things lighter but none of them are asking for it.
Cheers.
(Thanks for dropping by, Pinkbike!)
  • 3 0
 Maybe I missed it, but would be great to see this for XC, DH and Enduro bikes all on the same weekend
  • 1 0
 Sucks to be told what to ride! My '17 Spark RC SL is lighter than all these with 100mm travel at both ends, a 125mm dropper, and parts that haven't let me down going on 7 seasons.
  • 1 0
 Listing wheels and tires would help show how much "weight" they put into the weight of the rotating parts. Is everyone on carbon, are they all on sub 1400g wheelsets and sub 700g tires for example.
  • 3 0
 3 X XC = 1 X e (hang on, weight)
  • 2 0
 I alone appreciate your math nerdery
  • 1 0
 @hllclmbr: Maths?! I thought he was coming up with the name of Elon Musk's next child!
  • 2 0
 Maybe I missed it, but would be great to see this for XC, DH & Enduro bikes all on the same weekend/location.
  • 3 0
 Very interesting, thanks.
  • 3 0
 More tire inserts than in enduro.
  • 4 0
 That's because XC racers run much lighter tires with thinner casings and run at lower pressures.
  • 2 0
 Weights here seem to be more accurate than edbullmediahouse's enduro bike weigh in. Like to see this!
  • 3 0
 Would have been nice to see the Epic and Scalpel rides
  • 1 0
 And Canyon. People occasionally do well on these bikes.
  • 3 0
 Sina Frei's Epic is probably the lightest full suspension bike in the lead group of women.
  • 1 0
 @imjeffinghungry: She's probably also one of the shortest riders on the circuit, isn't she? Not sure about weight and I doubt they'd make lighter versions of certain parts, though I can imagine a lighter rider can get away with using lighter tires, no inserts where others would need them, maybe wheels with fewer spokes when available, smaller brake rotors... Luckily this is no sport where being light gives you too many advantages (so that keeps people from chasing being lightweight only) but I might allow for some weight saving on the bike here and there.
  • 1 0
 @vinay: I might be wrong, but Sina seems to choose tires one step up from the others. When Laura is on Renegade front, Sina is Fast Trak front - and so on. Weight vs grip?
  • 1 0
 Haha Ridley team guessing their bike is 11kg when it's actually just over 9kg. I guess they don't worry much about weight : )
  • 1 0
 Amazing, 25 years after Volvo Cannondale and a pro XC hardtail race bike isn't any lighter. Oh well, bigger wheels and dropper post are nice updates.
  • 1 0
 I am really Enjoying the increased emphasis on XC and trail bikes. In some ways, they’ve benefited more from the long low slack design than the enduro and dh bikes have.
  • 1 1
 Dumb question here but why are they running inserts? I would have thought the tire psi would be quite high (maybe 30-40psi) to reduce rolling resistance. Do you still get benefits from inserts at high tire pressures?
  • 3 0
 XCers run around 20psi.
  • 3 0
 it seems counter intuitive, but lower pressures reduce rolling resistance. The lower pressure allows the tire to conform to the shape of the dirt and rocks. The lower tire pressure also increases the contact the tire has with the ground and offers better grip. This is equally important in XC where handling and the downhill aspect has changed so much in recent years to create more demanding courses.
  • 2 1
 Mondraker is going to have to scrap their whole program now! How can they race a boat anchor like that?!
  • 2 0
 Terrible guess by the KMC Team. Lol
  • 2 0
 Could somebody make a distribuiton plot/histogram of the weights please?
  • 2 0
 Sempione or Simplon, not Simpion
  • 1 0
 @edspratt some photos of the KTM are used twice (in the bike underneath the KTM)
  • 1 0
 Scott must’ve recruited dangerholm do do some illegal things to get that battery ridden bike that light.
  • 1 0
 I'm really liking that Ridley Probe. Nice touch painting the calipers to match the frame.
  • 4 3
 Great article "XC" I don't do enduro / down hill, Only XC
never read enduro articles
  • 3 0
 Credit Eddie masters
  • 1 0
 Now what is the real name of a scale in the bike industry...DREAMCRUSHER!!!
  • 1 0
 Huh, Giant (Liv) can guess the weight of their bikes exactly, but can't figure out how to put a weight in their website!
  • 1 0
 Which of these light weight rigs is the sexiest? I like the Mondraker and the Trek.
  • 1 2
 XC bikes going TrailBikes and getting lighter... Enduro Bikes going Mini DH bikes and getting heavier... Something doesn´t makes sense here...
  • 1 0
 @pinkbike pretty sure you meant Simplon...
  • 1 0
 @Mandownmedia some photos of the KTM are used twice.
  • 1 0
 Bm with a paintjob Ronald McDonald could love.
  • 1 0
 Why so many mediums? They sizing down?
  • 1 0
 The dudes always do. Bigger bikes that actually fit properly aren't maneuverable enough. So they employ long droopy stems and freakishly slammed seats just to give the needed space. Seems a little ridiculous but whatever, I'm not a pro. Women's bikes always look better because their bikes fit the way they're intended to.
  • 4 0
 I'm 5'9", very, very average height. And just about every single bike chart says I should be on a Medium frame. There was one that said I could possibly be a L...most M frame specs end around 5'9", and L starts at 5'9", so I always go the Medium frame. So I'm not that surprised. A lot of the men look tall, but since they weight about 145 pounds, maybe they are all pretty average and go for the Mediums? Just a theory
  • 2 0
 "Why are most people average height?"
  • 1 0
 @KingPooPing: there’s the weight thing as well. But it’s more so that being in that position is more advantageous for aero purposes.

A pro athlete will have no problems fitting into a bike with a slammed stem.
  • 2 3
 that supercaliber frame is a ringer. there's NO WAY that things production and a full pound lighter than other comparable builds. thats a 2400gram frame.
  • 3 1
 err okay 2100g..but still
  • 2 0
 It says here, that it's a Softtail. In my learnings soft tails didn't have bearings - the standard Supercaliber has bearings (single pivot with flex stays), too. Is this a prototype? Or what is a Soft Tail, then?
  • 1 0
 @mm732: Maybe we're viewing the long speculated prototype of the longer travel, more aggressive Supercaliber. I guess thats the Spesh version.
  • 1 1
 I'm surprised they're that heavy. 3 years ago you could build an Intense Sniper for $3500 that weighed 21lbs.
  • 1 0
 How many of these bikes had down tube storage?
  • 1 0
 Really cool, thanks!
  • 1 1
 Fascinating!
  • 3 4
 Would rather watch Edbull weigh the DH rigs.
  • 1 2
 Check out my hot pics➤ u.to/mWPGHw
  • 1 4
 Only hot girls, as well as me write to me ➤ u.to/mWPGHw
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.055918
Mobile Version of Website