For every 32" or 36" bike we've covered on Pinkbike, there has always been one big drawback, tires.
Trek's Travis Brown politely put it as, "the quality compared to what enthusiasts are accustomed to of those tires is pretty low, so that kind of influences the impressions," while
36pollici described them as a limit of their carbon 36er project.
An increase of 7 inches in the diameter of the tire means an increase in the circumference of more than 21 inches. That's a lot more rubber and a lot more bead and that brings with it a lot of issues. The larger diameter tires are also a very specialist bit of kit. As a lot of vendors simply don't have the oven drums to go larger than 29", those wanting to build larger wheeled bikes have to go to more economy-based manufacturers who can't provide the same quality as the brands we may be more used to.
The most popular choice for larger diameter wheels at the moment is the Vee T-Monster 36x2.25 from Vee Rubber. While we
previously enjoyed riding Vee Tire Co's dedicated mtb options, Vee Rubber's 36er is from their mass-market focused parent company and is reported to leave a lot to desired, despite being the best option on the market.
Although this is a Vee branded tire, it was actually designed by
Walt Wehner of
Waltworks, a custom frame builder based out of Park City, Utah who claimed at one point to have built more 36ers than anyone else on the planet. He approached Vee to make the tire as a contract job and says, "Vee did not design the tire (or particularly want to make it), I designed the tire and then we argued about minimums and bead characteristics and such."
The tire is now around 15 years old and was, and still probably remains, the lightest and most mountain bike worthy option among larger wheeled tires. It has also been adopted by unicyclists who use it as an off-road option on large wheeled touring unicycles. We caught up with Walt to understand what the biggest issues are in designing larger tires and what that might mean for the future of mountain bikes with larger diameter tires (answers edited for clarity).
What are the key characteristics you want in a 36” tire? are they different to a 29” tire?
The key characteristics really aren't much different if designing purely for bikes (more on that in a minute). This is a 15-year-old tire at this point and 36ers were (and still are) basically XC bikes, so the design was XC oriented.
What considerations do you have to make to a tire to work with both unicycles and bicycles?
Unicycles suffer from something called camber steer - essentially this means that on uneven terrain, the tire tries to "climb" into/up the ramp, because the side of the tire is moving slower than the bottom of the tire as the wheel spins. This means that (on a unicycle) it's very hard to ride on off-camber surfaces, especially at low pressures with flimsy/flexible sidewalls. So unicycle-specific tires have a MUCH stiffer carcass in general. It's worth noting that bikes camber steer too (if you've ever had your front wheel try to climb up out of a rut you've experienced it) but having 2 wheels on the ground makes the problem much more manageable.
What are the difficulties in designing a tire larger than 36”?
The biggest difficulty is keeping the tire on the rim. As the bead gets longer and longer, a little bit of stretch matters more and more because the bead stretches more in absolute terms on a bigger tire even if it's the same as a percentage. Once there's enough absolute stretch, the tire can come off the rim. So the 36er tire bead has to be crazy burly.
What are the biggest limitations of tires larger than 29”?
The beefy bead and resulting weight is the biggest drawback/limitation, probably, setting aside the relatively tiny market for the tires which is obviously a bit limiting factor.
What are the biggest advantages of tires larger than 29"?
The advantages are the same as with any other wheel. Bigger is more efficient as the terrain gets rougher. Believe it or not, the US government studied this with tractors during WWII when trying to save fuel. They found that basically there was no size too big for tractor tires (confirming what farmers had already figured out, of course).
How much lighter could a 36” tire be made?
I can't be sure how much lighter a 36" tire could be made but I'd guess the lower limit would be around 1000g? Until someone puts a lot of effort into it and there's a market, I'd guess we'll be stuck with the Vee tires.
You mentioned you would rather the tires be wider than lighter, why is this?
The existing tire is a 2.25" which is pretty skinny by modern standards, and to be honest I don't give a rat's ass about bike weight anyway, so I'd rather see the tires get more capable than lighter. If you ever get a chance to ride that Vee tire, it's just fine in most situations (as intended) but it gets in over its head pretty quickly on anything rough/loose/etc. To take full advantage of the 36" rollover on rough stuff, it would be nice to have a more aggressive tire.
Do you think larger tires will be adopted by the industry in future?
There are a lot of problems fitting even average-sized riders onto 36" wheels (suspension is mostly impractical, for example) but the longer/slacker trend is a good thing - wheelbases on 36ers are now right in line with normal trail bikes, when back in the day they were crazy long. If I were a betting man I'd bet we'll see 32" wheels on mainstream bikes in the next decade, but 36" will probably remain a niche/unicycle item.
So, there we have it, as it stands there's a chicken and egg situation going on. Tire manufacturers aren't willing to invest in the technology to produce bigger tires until here's demand for them and currently demand is stifled by a lack of suitable tires. Travis Brown said, "People are definitely going to be messing with this for a while and depending on what happens with tires, I see that as kind of the biggest restriction on really feeling into what the potential is of larger diameters than 29. I would bet that when one of the quality tire manufacturers or someone commissions a prototype of a really high-quality tire, our understanding of what the potential is will experience another breakthrough. And that'll be fun." Until that time, it looks 29ers will be the biggest common wheel size we'll be seeing for a while.
To be clear, I made the tires because (at the time) a bunch of people wanted 36ers and there was a parallel unicycle market. I don't personally own a 36er or recommend them to anyone, but they can be really fun as an N+1 type bike for XC riding or goofing around with novice friends or on trails you're bored with at the end of the season.
At the peak of the "craze" I was making 4 or 5 a year. Now it's one or two maybe. Over all the years that has added up to a decent number of these things out there. DirtySixer probably has more in the wild but they don't actually build their stuff in house AFAIK.
I mean, they're slow. There's no getting around that. But in the right situation they can be really fun, just like a unicycle or a gravel bike or a swing bike or whatever other goofy thing.
-Walt
I've got to say I have no personal experience with tires this long (and I'm not one for the N+1 scene either) and I'll stick with 24x3" on my unicycle. So good luck with your project but I hope it doesn't make any of the standards we have currently obsolete.
For what it's worth, the KH36 is intended for basically gravel riding. I don't think anyone uses 36" for MUNI unless you had really flat trails available. The cranks needed would just be too long.
-Walt
~JSV
I could see though in the article that there MAY BE a practical option someday soon for a 32".
~JAV
Indeed, tight/quick turns are not a 36er's forte, to say the least. Then again, modern long/slack geometry isn't great for that sort of riding either.
Hey, I'd at least like to TRY one!
~JSV
reading the article I hope our statement did not sound like a criticism.
In reality, the term "limit" is only linked to a question of weights.
The quality of the tires design is out of the question, it works well even on the most demanding trails.
I hope you didn't take our impression as an offense, on the contrary we just have to thank those who thought and created these tires.
It was precisely the fact that we found them already made that allowed us to imagine making a carbon frame. Thank you.
Greetings. Luca
TRENTASEI//36
Be safe be well,
Incognito Robin
youtu.be/xbhV2_nbEnU?t=64
Sure, TrentaSei means 36 in Italian, but TRENTASEI is an anagram for REINSTATE. Clearly a hidden BIG LIE signal.
Doppelclown, WYA fool?
And they didn't earn a Nobel prize with this? Surprising
So bigger wheels work, but present designs adds limitations when supersized
So tyres & wheel designs will get better if have a better way of fixing tyres too the wheels, simple in theory
Not so easy in practice?
www.britannica.com/technology/penny-farthing
In German, it translates as "nice man" and should sound more like "shown hair".
In practice, everyone locally says it as "shay ner".
But ride any bike with front flat will give you an idea what it is/ feels like?
*Chugs beer*
I'll send it
-Walt
-W
-Walt
There is now a rim and tire for 32 from Unicycle.com. If people got really excited I could perhaps be convinced to spearhead a tire project with Travis but the timing kinda sucks given that we can't even get regular tires right now.
32 would actually make sense for many riders in at least some situations. 36 basically doesn't unless you're just looking for novelty.
-Walt
To be fair, too, a 29+ wheel is over 30.5" already, so your proposed wheel size (kinda) already exists.
-Walt
Here's my 32 trail bike. Rides like a blast...on dry&hard. Would be glad to test some new tire!
m.pinkbike.com/u/jansportsi/album/32er-XXL-TRAIL-BIKE
29x3.25, 27.5x4.5, and 26x5.05 all have options that are pretty close to 31.8", with lots of 29x3.0 options that are close to 30.5" in diameter like you're asking for.
Recently heard that also applies to their 29x3.25" Bulldozers as well.
Running at full capacity for "normal" stuff is a good sign that more people are taking part in the sport, but it stinks that it has to come at the expense of experimentation around the edges.
-Walt
-Walt
My thought is that if you scale everything up (vs just taking a standard alloy rim extrusion and making it 36 inches in diameter (which is, I assume, how the rims are currently made?) it should be possible to get something closer to what we have today on 29ers. I know this stuff is always harder than it seems from the outside so would love to hear any more of your thoughts on if this seems feasible with the right resources. I personally would like to see 32 inch wheels on bikes at some point so I’m curious
I'd love to see 32 take off, but someone would have to simultaneously invest in a rim, tire, and probably suspension fork, at a minimum. It's unlikely to happen anytime soon.
Was doing 36 back when in UK - I also met a guy when I worked in Dubai who was on a 36 although there it’s because no one else had one. - his words - I don’t have the web links to hand but 10 years back when fat bikes were a thing and you could still get a decent 24 tyre ……..
Anyway the guy from PIM stayed on my radar but i recall tyres were the limitation - UNICYCLE won’t really work on a fast mtb? - With the £€$ behind it and for those who are 1.8m plus and you upscale the components why not but maybe 32” first?
www.unicycle.com/nimbus-nightrider-36-lite-tire
Pumped up hard, they steer well... Just takes a bit of effort to gather momentum off the mark! )
unless the cabal wants us to complain about 36ers and then settle with 32"
See also Plus tyres.
Just cut to the chase and release a full 29x5" and we can skip the whole "bigger diameter vs. bigger width" arguments of 27.5x4.5 vs. 26x5.
A real monster truck would be 29 fat version of something like a Foes Mutz:
www.ridefatbikes.ca/foes-mutz
Or a Lenz Sport Fattilac:
lenzsport.com/product/fatillac
Yeah, it's a gimmick.
-Walt
For everyone else, it's the same reason why people ride on mini bmx bikes with fat 10" wheels, tall bikes, or swing bikes -- because trying something different every now and then is FUN.
-W
Kinda joking, will still read the article - its just a bike, but I guess it just makes me wonder why bother to do this.